Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

protected-advice-at-life’s-end:-seventh-circuit-holds-indiana’s-funeral-licensing-ban-on-death-doula-counseling-fails-even-under-intermediate-scrutiny—and-consent-orders-don’t-waive-federal-rights Case Commentaries

No Per Se Prejudice from Lost Appeal; Electronic Service Starts Reopening Clock — Azamov v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

No Per Se Prejudice from Lost Appeal; Electronic Service Starts Reopening Clock — Azamov v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 8, 2025
No Per Se Prejudice from Lost Appeal; Electronic Service Starts Reopening Clock — Azamov v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025) Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Summary Order —...
Speculation Is Not Prejudice: The Second Circuit’s Doubly Deferential Strickland–AEDPA Framework Illustrated in Cortez v. Kopp

Speculation Is Not Prejudice: The Second Circuit’s Doubly Deferential Strickland–AEDPA Framework Illustrated in Cortez v. Kopp

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Speculation Is Not Prejudice: The Second Circuit’s Doubly Deferential Strickland–AEDPA Framework Illustrated in Cortez v. Kopp Note: This decision is a Summary Order of the U.S. Court of Appeals for...
Precision Required in Big Apple Map Prior Written Notice and Bar on Post‑Discovery Expansion of § 50‑e Claim Locations

Precision Required in Big Apple Map Prior Written Notice and Bar on Post‑Discovery Expansion of § 50‑e Claim Locations

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Precision Required in Big Apple Map Prior Written Notice and Bar on Post‑Discovery Expansion of § 50‑e Claim Locations Case: Lieder v. City of New York, No. 24-3071-cv (2d Cir. Nov. 6, 2025) (summary...
Preservation Is Paramount: Second Circuit Affirms Verdict in Tatas v. Ali Baba’s Terrace Inc. on Waiver, Plain Error, and Rule 403 Discretion

Preservation Is Paramount: Second Circuit Affirms Verdict in Tatas v. Ali Baba’s Terrace Inc. on Waiver, Plain Error, and Rule 403 Discretion

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Preservation Is Paramount: Second Circuit Affirms Verdict in Tatas v. Ali Baba’s Terrace Inc. on Waiver, Plain Error, and Rule 403 Discretion Introduction In a non-precedential summary order, the...
“Good Cause” Means New, Uncontrollable Grounds Plus Diligence: Second Circuit Clarifies § 1455(b)(1) and Reopens the Door to Post‑Trial Federal Officer Removal in New York v. Trump

“Good Cause” Means New, Uncontrollable Grounds Plus Diligence: Second Circuit Clarifies § 1455(b)(1) and Reopens the Door to Post‑Trial Federal Officer Removal in New York v. Trump

Date: Nov 8, 2025
“Good Cause” Means New, Uncontrollable Grounds Plus Diligence: Second Circuit Clarifies § 1455(b)(1) and Reopens the Door to Post‑Trial Federal Officer Removal in New York v. Trump Introduction This...
Attaching QWRs Saves a RESPA Claim from Summary Judgment; Borrower Default Bars Contract Claims and Supports Foreclosure — Eleventh Circuit’s Partial Remand in Embry v. Carrington

Attaching QWRs Saves a RESPA Claim from Summary Judgment; Borrower Default Bars Contract Claims and Supports Foreclosure — Eleventh Circuit’s Partial Remand in Embry v. Carrington

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Attaching QWRs Saves a RESPA Claim from Summary Judgment; Borrower Default Bars Contract Claims and Supports Foreclosure — Eleventh Circuit’s Partial Remand in Embry v. Carrington Note: This is an...
Residence Alone Is Not Enough: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Plaintiff’s Burden to Allege and Prove Florida Contacts for Personal Jurisdiction Over Nonresident Defendants

Residence Alone Is Not Enough: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Plaintiff’s Burden to Allege and Prove Florida Contacts for Personal Jurisdiction Over Nonresident Defendants

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Residence Alone Is Not Enough: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Plaintiff’s Burden to Allege and Prove Florida Contacts for Personal Jurisdiction Over Nonresident Defendants Court: U.S. Court of Appeals...
Ordinary Criminality Is Not Nexus: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Pecuniary-Motive Rule and Rejects Imputed Anti‑Gang Political Opinion in Osorio‑Villalobos

Ordinary Criminality Is Not Nexus: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Pecuniary-Motive Rule and Rejects Imputed Anti‑Gang Political Opinion in Osorio‑Villalobos

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Ordinary Criminality Is Not Nexus: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Pecuniary-Motive Rule and Rejects Imputed Anti‑Gang Political Opinion in Osorio‑Villalobos Introduction In this unpublished, per curiam...
Reaffirming Deference to Adverse Credibility Findings and the Chenery/Bagamasbad Limits on Appellate Review When the BIA Denies on Credibility Alone

Reaffirming Deference to Adverse Credibility Findings and the Chenery/Bagamasbad Limits on Appellate Review When the BIA Denies on Credibility Alone

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Reaffirming Deference to Adverse Credibility Findings and the Chenery/Bagamasbad Limits on Appellate Review When the BIA Denies on Credibility Alone Introduction In Sakib Ahmod v. U.S. Attorney...
Eleventh Circuit: Receiving a Non‑EEOC Subpoena Is Not Protected “Participation” Under Title VII; Two Isolated Advances Insufficiently Severe or Pervasive; Stray Age Remarks Don’t Prove Pretext

Eleventh Circuit: Receiving a Non‑EEOC Subpoena Is Not Protected “Participation” Under Title VII; Two Isolated Advances Insufficiently Severe or Pervasive; Stray Age Remarks Don’t Prove Pretext

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Eleventh Circuit: Receiving a Non‑EEOC Subpoena Is Not Protected “Participation” Under Title VII; Two Isolated Advances Insufficiently Severe or Pervasive; Stray Age Remarks Don’t Prove Pretext Case:...
Deterrence Without Empirical Proof: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms District Courts’ Discretion to Rely on Experience When Weighing § 3553(a) Factors

Deterrence Without Empirical Proof: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms District Courts’ Discretion to Rely on Experience When Weighing § 3553(a) Factors

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Deterrence Without Empirical Proof: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms District Courts’ Discretion to Rely on Experience When Weighing § 3553(a) Factors Case: United States v. Frank D. Cavanaugh, No....
Good Cause to Defer 404(b) Rulings: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Post‑Opening Admission of Prior Fraud Conviction to Prove Intent

Good Cause to Defer 404(b) Rulings: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Post‑Opening Admission of Prior Fraud Conviction to Prove Intent

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Good Cause to Defer 404(b) Rulings: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Post‑Opening Admission of Prior Fraud Conviction to Prove Intent Introduction In United States v. Jarnel Sael (11th Cir. No. 25‑10750,...
United States v. Diggs: Distinct Overbreadth Theories Must Be Specifically Preserved; No Plain Error in Treating Florida “Stereoisomer” Cocaine Convictions as ACCA Predicates

United States v. Diggs: Distinct Overbreadth Theories Must Be Specifically Preserved; No Plain Error in Treating Florida “Stereoisomer” Cocaine Convictions as ACCA Predicates

Date: Nov 8, 2025
United States v. Diggs: Distinct Overbreadth Theories Must Be Specifically Preserved; No Plain Error in Treating Florida “Stereoisomer” Cocaine Convictions as ACCA Predicates Introduction In this...
Preservation Matters in ACCA: ioflupane overbreadth does not preserve isomer arguments; no plain error in treating Florida “stereoisomer” cocaine convictions as ACCA predicates

Preservation Matters in ACCA: ioflupane overbreadth does not preserve isomer arguments; no plain error in treating Florida “stereoisomer” cocaine convictions as ACCA predicates

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Preservation Matters in ACCA: ioflupane overbreadth does not preserve isomer arguments; no plain error in treating Florida “stereoisomer” cocaine convictions as ACCA predicates Commentary on United...
Major Upward Variances at De Novo Resentencing Post‑Taylor: Eleventh Circuit Upholds 240-Month Term Based on Aged-Out Criminal History and Public Protection

Major Upward Variances at De Novo Resentencing Post‑Taylor: Eleventh Circuit Upholds 240-Month Term Based on Aged-Out Criminal History and Public Protection

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Major Upward Variances at De Novo Resentencing Post‑Taylor: Eleventh Circuit Upholds 240-Month Term Based on Aged-Out Criminal History and Public Protection Introduction In United States v. John...
Returned Funds Do Not Moot a Standalone Claim to Seizure‑Warrant Affidavits; Lack of a Cause of Action Is Merits, Not Jurisdiction — California Palms v. United States (6th Cir. 2025)

Returned Funds Do Not Moot a Standalone Claim to Seizure‑Warrant Affidavits; Lack of a Cause of Action Is Merits, Not Jurisdiction — California Palms v. United States (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Returned Funds Do Not Moot a Standalone Claim to Seizure‑Warrant Affidavits; Lack of a Cause of Action Is Merits, Not Jurisdiction — California Palms v. United States (6th Cir. 2025) Introduction...
Pronouns, Politics, and Tinker: Sixth Circuit Bars Punishment of “Biological Pronouns” Absent Evidence of Disruption or Rights Violations

Pronouns, Politics, and Tinker: Sixth Circuit Bars Punishment of “Biological Pronouns” Absent Evidence of Disruption or Rights Violations

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Pronouns, Politics, and Tinker: Sixth Circuit Bars Punishment of “Biological Pronouns” Absent Evidence of Disruption or Rights Violations Introduction In a high-profile en banc decision, the U.S....
Age-Related Recidivism Must Be Raised at Sentencing; Within-Guidelines Life Sentences for Sex Crimes Survive Eighth Amendment Challenge

Age-Related Recidivism Must Be Raised at Sentencing; Within-Guidelines Life Sentences for Sex Crimes Survive Eighth Amendment Challenge

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Age-Related Recidivism Must Be Raised at Sentencing; Within-Guidelines Life Sentences for Sex Crimes Survive Eighth Amendment Challenge Case: United States v. Arisknight Arkin-Everett Winfree (No....
Mootness by Statutory Amendment and Rooker–Feldman Limits in Post‑Conviction DNA‑Testing Litigation: Commentary on DeLoge v. Hill (10th Cir. 2025)

Mootness by Statutory Amendment and Rooker–Feldman Limits in Post‑Conviction DNA‑Testing Litigation: Commentary on DeLoge v. Hill (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Mootness by Statutory Amendment and Rooker–Feldman Limits in Post‑Conviction DNA‑Testing Litigation: DeLoge v. Hill (10th Cir. 2025) Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Date:...
When State Drug Law Changes Mid-Prosecution, ACCA Looks to the Offense-Date Law Preserved by State Saving Provisions: Eleventh Circuit Vacates Enhancement in United States v. Miller

When State Drug Law Changes Mid-Prosecution, ACCA Looks to the Offense-Date Law Preserved by State Saving Provisions: Eleventh Circuit Vacates Enhancement in United States v. Miller

Date: Nov 8, 2025
When State Drug Law Changes Mid-Prosecution, ACCA Looks to the Offense-Date Law Preserved by State Saving Provisions: Eleventh Circuit Vacates Enhancement in United States v. Miller Introduction This...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert