Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

new-precedent-on... Case Commentaries

Rational-Basis Review and Proof of Primary Residence in Mitchell‑Lama Succession:
Commentary on Matter of Mantilla v. New York City Dept. of Housing Preservation & Development

Rational-Basis Review and Proof of Primary Residence in Mitchell‑Lama Succession: Commentary on Matter of Mantilla v. New York City Dept. of Housing Preservation & Development

Date: Dec 19, 2025
Rational-Basis Review and Proof of Primary Residence in Mitchell‑Lama Succession: Commentary on Matter of Mantilla v. New York City Dept. of Hous. Preserv. & Dev. I. Introduction The New York Court...
Limiting Contractual Indemnification to Injuries Arising from “Performance of the Work”: Commentary on Dibrino v. Rockefeller Center North, Inc.

Limiting Contractual Indemnification to Injuries Arising from “Performance of the Work”: Commentary on Dibrino v. Rockefeller Center North, Inc.

Date: Dec 19, 2025
Limiting Contractual Indemnification to Injuries Arising from “Performance of the Work”: A Commentary on Dibrino v. Rockefeller Center North, Inc., 2025 NY Slip Op 07077 I. Introduction In Dibrino v....
Finality Before Flexibility: Indiana Supreme Court Holds Trial Rule 15(A) Inapplicable After Final Judgment in Brooks v. USA Track & Field

Finality Before Flexibility: Indiana Supreme Court Holds Trial Rule 15(A) Inapplicable After Final Judgment in Brooks v. USA Track & Field

Date: Dec 19, 2025
Finality Before Flexibility: Indiana Supreme Court Holds Trial Rule 15(A) Inapplicable After Final Judgment in Brooks v. USA Track & Field I. Introduction The Indiana Supreme Court’s decision in...
When the Only Direct Evidence Is Untested Testimonial Hearsay: Indiana Tightens Harmless-Error Review for Confrontation Violations in Taylor v. State

When the Only Direct Evidence Is Untested Testimonial Hearsay: Indiana Tightens Harmless-Error Review for Confrontation Violations in Taylor v. State

Date: Dec 19, 2025
When the Only Direct Evidence Is Untested Testimonial Hearsay: Indiana Tightens Harmless-Error Review for Confrontation Violations in Taylor v. State 1. Introduction This commentary examines the...
Accrual of Protection-Order Claims Under Pennsylvania’s Sexual Violence and Intimidation Act: Commentary on Weatherholtz v. McKelvey

Accrual of Protection-Order Claims Under Pennsylvania’s Sexual Violence and Intimidation Act: Commentary on Weatherholtz v. McKelvey

Date: Dec 19, 2025
Accrual of Protection-Order Claims Under Pennsylvania’s Sexual Violence and Intimidation Act: Commentary on Weatherholtz v. McKelvey Commentary on Justice Dougherty’s Concurring and Dissenting...
Affirmative Public Benefit and Judicial Deference in Section 1329 Utility Acquisitions: Commentary on Consumer Advocate v. PUC (Aqua Pennsylvania Wastewater)

Affirmative Public Benefit and Judicial Deference in Section 1329 Utility Acquisitions: Commentary on Consumer Advocate v. PUC (Aqua Pennsylvania Wastewater)

Date: Dec 19, 2025
Affirmative Public Benefit and Judicial Deference in Section 1329 Utility Acquisitions: Commentary on Consumer Advocate v. PUC; Appeal of Aqua Pennsylvania Wastewater, Inc. I. Introduction This...
Consumer Advocate v. PUC (East Whiteland): Reaffirming PUC Discretion and the “Affirmative Public Benefits” Test for Fair Market Value Utility Acquisitions

Consumer Advocate v. PUC (East Whiteland): Reaffirming PUC Discretion and the “Affirmative Public Benefits” Test for Fair Market Value Utility Acquisitions

Date: Dec 19, 2025
Consumer Advocate v. PUC (East Whiteland): Reaffirming PUC Discretion and the “Affirmative Public Benefits” Test for Fair Market Value Utility Acquisitions I. Introduction This consolidated decision...
Affirmative Public Benefits and Deference in Section 1329 Utility Acquisitions: Consumer Advocate v. PUC (Aqua / East Whiteland)

Affirmative Public Benefits and Deference in Section 1329 Utility Acquisitions: Consumer Advocate v. PUC (Aqua / East Whiteland)

Date: Dec 19, 2025
Affirmative Public Benefits and Deference in Section 1329 Utility Acquisitions: Consumer Advocate v. Pennsylvania PUC (Aqua / East Whiteland) I. Introduction This commentary analyzes the Supreme...
Commonwealth v. Kurtz: Probable Cause and the Validity of Reverse Google Keyword Warrants in Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Kurtz: Probable Cause and the Validity of Reverse Google Keyword Warrants in Pennsylvania

Date: Dec 19, 2025
Commonwealth v. Kurtz: Probable Cause and the Validity of Reverse Google Keyword Warrants in Pennsylvania I. Introduction The concurring opinion by Chief Justice Todd in Commonwealth v. Kurtz...
Probable Cause and Reverse Keyword Warrants: Chief Justice Todd’s Concurrence in Commonwealth v. Kurtz

Probable Cause and Reverse Keyword Warrants: Chief Justice Todd’s Concurrence in Commonwealth v. Kurtz

Date: Dec 19, 2025
Probable Cause and Reverse Keyword Warrants: Chief Justice Todd’s Concurrence in Commonwealth v. Kurtz I. Introduction This commentary examines the concurring opinion of Chief Justice Debra Todd in...
Probable Cause for Reverse Keyword Warrants Under a Totality-of-the-Circumstances Test: Commentary on Chief Justice Todd’s Concurrence in Commonwealth v. Kurtz

Probable Cause for Reverse Keyword Warrants Under a Totality-of-the-Circumstances Test: Commentary on Chief Justice Todd’s Concurrence in Commonwealth v. Kurtz

Date: Dec 19, 2025
Probable Cause for Reverse Keyword Warrants Under a Totality-of-the-Circumstances Test: Commentary on Chief Justice Todd’s Concurrence in Commonwealth v. Kurtz I. Introduction The concurring opinion...
Possession as Dominion, Not Exclusivity: Duncan v. Chartiers Nature Conservancy and the Threshold for Quiet Title Actions in Pennsylvania

Possession as Dominion, Not Exclusivity: Duncan v. Chartiers Nature Conservancy and the Threshold for Quiet Title Actions in Pennsylvania

Date: Dec 19, 2025
Possession as Dominion, Not Exclusivity: Duncan v. Chartiers Nature Conservancy and the Threshold for Quiet Title Actions in Pennsylvania I. Introduction The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania’s decision...
Perjury and Sophisticated-Means Enhancements in COVID-19 EIDL Fraud Sentencing: Commentary on United States v. Kelly Harris (6th Cir. 2025)

Perjury and Sophisticated-Means Enhancements in COVID-19 EIDL Fraud Sentencing: Commentary on United States v. Kelly Harris (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 19, 2025
Perjury and Sophisticated-Means Enhancements in COVID-19 EIDL Fraud Sentencing: Commentary on United States v. Kelly Harris (6th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction This commentary analyzes the Sixth...
United States v. Neal Harris: Materiality, Perjury-Based Obstruction, and Sophisticated Means in COVID‑19 EIDL Fraud

United States v. Neal Harris: Materiality, Perjury-Based Obstruction, and Sophisticated Means in COVID‑19 EIDL Fraud

Date: Dec 19, 2025
United States v. Neal Harris: Materiality, Perjury-Based Obstruction, and Sophisticated Means in COVID‑19 EIDL Fraud I. Introduction This unpublished Sixth Circuit opinion, United States v. Kelly...
Circumstantial Evidence and Comparator Proof in Title VII Cases: Commentary on Brown v. FCA US LLC (6th Cir. 2025)

Circumstantial Evidence and Comparator Proof in Title VII Cases: Commentary on Brown v. FCA US LLC (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 19, 2025
Circumstantial Evidence and Comparator Proof in Title VII Cases: Commentary on Brown v. FCA US LLC (6th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction This commentary examines the Sixth Circuit’s unpublished decision in...
“Immaterial” Inconsistencies Are Immaterial: Adverse Credibility in Asylum Cases After Shaibu Salu v. Bondi

“Immaterial” Inconsistencies Are Immaterial: Adverse Credibility in Asylum Cases After Shaibu Salu v. Bondi

Date: Dec 19, 2025
“Immaterial” Inconsistencies Are Immaterial: Adverse Credibility in Asylum Cases After Shaibu Salu v. Bondi I. Introduction The Sixth Circuit’s unpublished decision in Shaibu Salu v. Bondi, No....
No Offset Without Tracing: Restitution, Collateral, and Victim Subpoenas in United States v. Cross (6th Cir. 2025)

No Offset Without Tracing: Restitution, Collateral, and Victim Subpoenas in United States v. Cross (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 19, 2025
No Offset Without Tracing: Restitution, Collateral, and Victim Subpoenas in United States v. Cross (6th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction In United States v. Cross, No. 25-5276 (6th Cir. Dec. 16, 2025)...
Considering Anti‑Government and Sovereign‑Citizen Beliefs at Sentencing: Commentary on United States v. Bentley III (6th Cir.)

Considering Anti‑Government and Sovereign‑Citizen Beliefs at Sentencing: Commentary on United States v. Bentley III (6th Cir.)

Date: Dec 19, 2025
Considering Anti‑Government and Sovereign‑Citizen Beliefs at Sentencing: Commentary on United States v. Bentley III (6th Cir.) I. Introduction This commentary analyzes the Sixth Circuit’s decision in...
United States v. Porter: High Bar for New Trials Based on Inadvertent False Evidence and Deferential Review of Loss, Restitution, and Forfeiture

United States v. Porter: High Bar for New Trials Based on Inadvertent False Evidence and Deferential Review of Loss, Restitution, and Forfeiture

Date: Dec 19, 2025
United States v. Porter: High Bar for New Trials Based on Inadvertent False Evidence and Deferential Review of Loss, Restitution, and Forfeiture I. Introduction Case: United States v. Romane Porter,...
Bare Denials Are Not Enough: PSR Objections, Cash-to-Drug Conversions, and Sentencing Reasonableness in United States v. Taylor (6th Cir. 2025)

Bare Denials Are Not Enough: PSR Objections, Cash-to-Drug Conversions, and Sentencing Reasonableness in United States v. Taylor (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Dec 19, 2025
Bare Denials Are Not Enough: PSR Objections, Cash-to-Drug Conversions, and Sentencing Reasonableness in United States v. Taylor (6th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction The Sixth Circuit’s decision in United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert