Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

juvenile-sentencing-guidelines:-iowa-supreme-court Case Commentaries

Scope of Record-Based Sexual Contact Findings Under Nebraska’s SORA: State v. Strawn

Scope of Record-Based Sexual Contact Findings Under Nebraska’s SORA: State v. Strawn

Date: May 3, 2025
Scope of Record-Based Sexual Contact Findings Under Nebraska’s SORA: State v. Strawn Introduction In State v. Strawn, 318 Neb. 859 (2025), the Nebraska Supreme Court addressed whether a defendant may...
Requirement of Diligence for Equitable Tolling and Strict Application of the INA One-Motion Rule: Portillo-Bautista v. U.S. A.G.

Requirement of Diligence for Equitable Tolling and Strict Application of the INA One-Motion Rule: Portillo-Bautista v. U.S. A.G.

Date: May 3, 2025
Requirement of Diligence for Equitable Tolling and Strict Application of the INA One-Motion Rule: Portillo-Bautista v. U.S. Attorney General Introduction Juana María Portillo‐Bautista, a native and...
Non-Speculative Causation Required in Louisiana Slip-and-Fall Claims: Adger v. TA Operating

Non-Speculative Causation Required in Louisiana Slip-and-Fall Claims: Adger v. TA Operating

Date: May 3, 2025
Non-Speculative Causation Required in Louisiana Slip-and-Fall Claims: Adger v. TA Operating Introduction In Adger v. TA Operating, L.L.C. (5th Cir. May 2, 2025), the Fifth Circuit clarified the...
“Reasonable Forecast” of Disruption Standard in Elementary School First Amendment Cases

“Reasonable Forecast” of Disruption Standard in Elementary School First Amendment Cases

Date: May 3, 2025
“Reasonable Forecast” of Disruption Standard in Elementary School First Amendment Cases Introduction This commentary examines the Sixth Circuit’s decision in C.S. v. Craig McCrumb, 25-a0112p.06 (6th...
Enforcement of Appellate Mandamus Orders Prior to Expiration of Trial Court Jurisdiction

Enforcement of Appellate Mandamus Orders Prior to Expiration of Trial Court Jurisdiction

Date: May 3, 2025
Enforcement of Appellate Mandamus Orders Prior to Expiration of Trial Court Jurisdiction Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Alabama’s decision in Ex parte Tramaine Bonner,...
People v. Dozier (2025): Competency ≠ Criminal Responsibility – The Appellate Division Distinguishes CPL Article 730 Exams from Psychiatric Defenses

People v. Dozier (2025): Competency ≠ Criminal Responsibility – The Appellate Division Distinguishes CPL Article 730 Exams from Psychiatric Defenses

Date: May 3, 2025
People v. Dozier (2025): Competency ≠ Criminal Responsibility – The Appellate Division Distinguishes CPL Article 730 Exams from Psychiatric Defenses Introduction In People v. Dozier, 238 A.D.3d 1523...
Defining the Contours of Sidebar Presence and Rule 404(b) Admissibility in United States v. Civitello

Defining the Contours of Sidebar Presence and Rule 404(b) Admissibility in United States v. Civitello

Date: May 2, 2025
Defining the Contours of Sidebar Presence and Rule 404(b) Admissibility in United States v. Civitello Introduction United States v. Civitello is a Second Circuit summary order affirming the...
Plain-Error Review of Prosecutorial Jury Argument: Clarifying the Chitwood Framework in State v. Perez

Plain-Error Review of Prosecutorial Jury Argument: Clarifying the Chitwood Framework in State v. Perez

Date: May 2, 2025
Plain-Error Review of Prosecutorial Jury Argument: Clarifying the Chitwood Framework in State v. Perez Introduction State v. Perez, 373 Or 591 (2025), is the Oregon Supreme Court’s latest guidance on...
Parker v. State: Eyewitness Identification Standards and the Skip Rule for Lesser-Included Offenses

Parker v. State: Eyewitness Identification Standards and the Skip Rule for Lesser-Included Offenses

Date: May 2, 2025
Parker v. State: Eyewitness Identification Standards and the Skip Rule for Lesser-Included Offenses Introduction In Keundre Parker v. State of Arkansas (2025 Ark. 55), the Supreme Court of Arkansas...
Affirmation of Upward Variance Reasonableness in Multi-Victim Cyber-Stalking & Identity Theft under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

Affirmation of Upward Variance Reasonableness in Multi-Victim Cyber-Stalking & Identity Theft under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

Date: May 2, 2025
Affirmation of Upward Variance Reasonableness in Multi-Victim Cyber-Stalking & Identity Theft under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) Introduction In United States v. Joseph A. Valdez, No. 24-10656 (11th Cir. May...
Oral Adjudicatory Findings Vest Jurisdiction in Child Abuse and Neglect Cases: In re J.W., D.W.-1, and W.W.

Oral Adjudicatory Findings Vest Jurisdiction in Child Abuse and Neglect Cases: In re J.W., D.W.-1, and W.W.

Date: May 2, 2025
Oral Adjudicatory Findings Vest Jurisdiction in Child Abuse and Neglect Cases: In re J.W., D.W.-1, and W.W. Introduction In In re J.W., D.W.-1, and W.W., the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia...
Trademark Licensors and Strict Products Liability: No Liability Absent Substantial Involvement

Trademark Licensors and Strict Products Liability: No Liability Absent Substantial Involvement

Date: May 2, 2025
Trademark Licensors and Strict Products Liability: No Liability Absent Substantial Involvement Introduction The Supreme Court of Nevada was asked to resolve a novel question of Nevada tort law in the...
Part I, Article 2-b Enshrines Privacy: Limiting In Camera Review of Privileged Records Held by Private Entities

Part I, Article 2-b Enshrines Privacy: Limiting In Camera Review of Privileged Records Held by Private Entities

Date: May 2, 2025
Part I, Article 2-b Enshrines Privacy: Limiting In Camera Review of Privileged Records Held by Private Entities Introduction The Supreme Court of New Hampshire’s decision in State v. Zarella, 2025...
Separateness of Third-Party Freight Transactions Exempts Them from Mississippi Use Tax

Separateness of Third-Party Freight Transactions Exempts Them from Mississippi Use Tax

Date: May 2, 2025
Separateness of Third-Party Freight Transactions Exempts Them from Mississippi Use Tax Introduction Mississippi Department of Revenue v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC (No. 2023-SA-01079-SCT) is...
The Immutable-Conviction-Date Rule: Matter of Trubitsky (2025)

The Immutable-Conviction-Date Rule: Matter of Trubitsky (2025)

Date: May 2, 2025
The Immutable-Conviction-Date Rule for Automatic Disbarment Commentary on Matter of Trubitsky, 2025 NY Slip Op 02649 (1st Dept.) Introduction Matter of Trubitsky presents a straightforward but...
“Nunc Pro Tunc Reciprocity” – Matter of Stafford Establishes Equitable Timing in Cross-Jurisdictional Attorney Discipline

“Nunc Pro Tunc Reciprocity” – Matter of Stafford Establishes Equitable Timing in Cross-Jurisdictional Attorney Discipline

Date: May 2, 2025
“Nunc Pro Tunc Reciprocity” – Matter of Stafford Establishes Equitable Timing in Cross-Jurisdictional Attorney Discipline Introduction Matter of Stafford (2025 NY Slip Op 02648) is a First Department...
Proper Service Determines Applicability of the Forum Defendant Rule in Removal Jurisdiction

Proper Service Determines Applicability of the Forum Defendant Rule in Removal Jurisdiction

Date: May 2, 2025
Proper Service Determines Applicability of the Forum Defendant Rule in Removal Jurisdiction Introduction Uzoigwe v. Charter Communications, LLC (2d Cir. May 1, 2025) presents two key issues: Whether...
Permissibility of Specialized Lay Opinion under Arkansas Rule of Evidence 701

Permissibility of Specialized Lay Opinion under Arkansas Rule of Evidence 701

Date: May 2, 2025
Permissibility of Specialized Lay Opinion under Arkansas Rule of Evidence 701 Introduction Devon Romick v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 57, is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Arkansas...
District Courts’ Broad Discretion to Apply Uniform Percentage Reductions in Section 1988 Fee Awards

District Courts’ Broad Discretion to Apply Uniform Percentage Reductions in Section 1988 Fee Awards

Date: May 2, 2025
District Courts’ Broad Discretion to Apply Uniform Percentage Reductions in Section 1988 Fee Awards Introduction In Franco v. Gunsalus, 24-2061 (2d Cir. May 1, 2025), the United States Court of...
Due Process Limits on Prosecutorial Refiling: Clarifying the Brickey Standard

Due Process Limits on Prosecutorial Refiling: Clarifying the Brickey Standard

Date: May 2, 2025
Due Process Limits on Prosecutorial Refiling: Clarifying the Brickey Standard Introduction State of Utah v. Kyli Jenae Labrum (2025 UT 12) presented the Supreme Court of Utah with the question...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert