Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

juvenile-sentencing-guidelines:-iowa-supreme-court Case Commentaries

AstraZeneca v. HHS: Defining Standing and Due-Process Limits in the IRA’s Drug Price Negotiation Program

AstraZeneca v. HHS: Defining Standing and Due-Process Limits in the IRA’s Drug Price Negotiation Program

Date: May 9, 2025
AstraZeneca v. HHS: Defining Standing and Due-Process Limits in the IRA’s Drug Price Negotiation Program Introduction In AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP v. Secretary, United States Department of...
Intervening Amendment to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 Redefines Generic Robbery and Permits Reassessment of Circuit Precedent

Intervening Amendment to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 Redefines Generic Robbery and Permits Reassessment of Circuit Precedent

Date: May 8, 2025
Intervening Amendment to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 Redefines Generic Robbery and Permits Reassessment of Circuit Precedent Introduction United States v. Wickware (5th Cir. 2025) addresses whether a 2023...
Kelsey v. Kessel – Second Circuit Clarifies that Eleventh-Amendment Dismissals Must Be Without Prejudice and Re-emphasises the “Ongoing-Violation” Prerequisite to Ex parte Young

Kelsey v. Kessel – Second Circuit Clarifies that Eleventh-Amendment Dismissals Must Be Without Prejudice and Re-emphasises the “Ongoing-Violation” Prerequisite to Ex parte Young

Date: May 8, 2025
Kelsey v. Kessel – Second Circuit Clarifies that Eleventh-Amendment Dismissals Must Be Without Prejudice and Re-emphasises the “Ongoing-Violation” Prerequisite to Ex parte Young 1. Introduction In...
Requirement of Reasoned Explanation for Denial of Asylum Based on Private‐Actor Persecution

Requirement of Reasoned Explanation for Denial of Asylum Based on Private‐Actor Persecution

Date: May 8, 2025
Requirement of Reasoned Explanation for Denial of Asylum Based on Private‐Actor Persecution Introduction In the unpublished per curiam decision Yamilet Del Carmen Garcia Chavez v. Pamela Bondi, No....
Recalibrating Home Rule: The Appellate Division Upholds New York’s Even-Year Election Law

Recalibrating Home Rule: The Appellate Division Upholds New York’s Even-Year Election Law

Date: May 8, 2025
Recalibrating Home Rule: The Appellate Division Upholds New York’s Even-Year Election Law Introduction County governments from eight regions (Onondaga, Nassau, Oneida, Rensselaer, Rockland, Dutchess,...
Limits on Standing and Waiver under the Specialty Doctrine in Extradition Treaties

Limits on Standing and Waiver under the Specialty Doctrine in Extradition Treaties

Date: May 8, 2025
Limits on Standing and Waiver under the Specialty Doctrine in Extradition Treaties Introduction Ricardo Alberto Martinelli Berrocal, a former President of the Republic of Panama, challenged his...
“Notice-and-Knowledge” as the Linchpin of Retaliation: Collymore v. City of New York (2d Cir. 2025)

“Notice-and-Knowledge” as the Linchpin of Retaliation: Collymore v. City of New York (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: May 8, 2025
“Notice-and-Knowledge” as the Linchpin of Retaliation: Collymore v. City of New York (2d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction In Collymore v. City of New York, No. 23-1304 (2d Cir. May 7 2025), the United...
Ensuring Material Consistency in Supervised Release Conditions under Rogers: United States v. Aughenbaugh

Ensuring Material Consistency in Supervised Release Conditions under Rogers: United States v. Aughenbaugh

Date: May 8, 2025
Ensuring Material Consistency in Supervised Release Conditions under Rogers: United States v. Aughenbaugh Introduction In United States v. Ryan Aughenbaugh, decided May 7, 2025, the Fourth Circuit...
Clarification of Larceny by Conversion in Construction Deposits: Title and Possession Principles

Clarification of Larceny by Conversion in Construction Deposits: Title and Possession Principles

Date: May 8, 2025
Clarification of Larceny by Conversion in Construction Deposits: Title and Possession Principles Introduction This commentary examines the Michigan Supreme Court’s decision in People of the State of...
Clarifying Custodial Responsibility Under Ohio’s Public Records Act

Clarifying Custodial Responsibility Under Ohio’s Public Records Act

Date: May 8, 2025
Clarifying Custodial Responsibility Under Ohio’s Public Records Act Introduction State ex rel. Clark v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, 2025-Ohio-1611, arose from a pro se mandamus...
Municipalities Liable for Frivolous Litigation Under New Jersey Frivolous Litigation Statute

Municipalities Liable for Frivolous Litigation Under New Jersey Frivolous Litigation Statute

Date: May 8, 2025
Municipalities Liable for Frivolous Litigation Under New Jersey Frivolous Litigation Statute Introduction Borough of Englewood Cliffs v. Thomas J. Trautner (Supreme Court of New Jersey, decided May...
“Retention-of-Use” as a Badge of Fraud: The New Standard for Summary Judgment under Former DCL §§ 273 & 276

“Retention-of-Use” as a Badge of Fraud: The New Standard for Summary Judgment under Former DCL §§ 273 & 276

Date: May 8, 2025
“Retention-of-Use” as a Badge of Fraud: Appellate Division Reinforces Summary Judgment Standards in Schiffman v. Affordable Shoes, Ltd. (2025) 1. Introduction Matter of Schiffman v. Affordable Shoes,...
Clarifying the Distinction Between Motions to Reopen and Reconsider and the Prima-Facie Hardship Standard After Wilkinson: A Comment on Wong v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Clarifying the Distinction Between Motions to Reopen and Reconsider and the Prima-Facie Hardship Standard After Wilkinson: A Comment on Wong v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: May 8, 2025
Clarifying the Distinction Between Motions to Reopen and Reconsider and the Prima-Facie Hardship Standard After Wilkinson: A Comment on Wong v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025) Introduction On 7 May 2025 the...
Portal Delivery Triggers Limitations Period; No Equitable Tolling for Portal Access Delays in Title VII Claims

Portal Delivery Triggers Limitations Period; No Equitable Tolling for Portal Access Delays in Title VII Claims

Date: May 8, 2025
Portal Delivery Triggers Limitations Period; No Equitable Tolling for Portal Access Delays in Title VII Claims Introduction The case of Melissa A. Berry Smith v. Texas Children's Hospital, Inc....
Actual Loss Over Intended Loss and Victim Definition in USSG §2B1.1 – United States v. Barkers-Woode

Actual Loss Over Intended Loss and Victim Definition in USSG §2B1.1 – United States v. Barkers-Woode

Date: May 8, 2025
Actual Loss Over Intended Loss and Victim Definition in USSG §2B1.1 Introduction United States v. Patrick Barkers-Woode and United States v. Nana Mensah, decided May 7, 2025 by the Third Circuit,...
Requiring Actual Loss for Sentencing Enhancements under U.S.S.G. §2B1.1

Requiring Actual Loss for Sentencing Enhancements under U.S.S.G. §2B1.1

Date: May 8, 2025
Requiring Actual Loss for Sentencing Enhancements under U.S.S.G. §2B1.1 Introduction The consolidated appeals in United States v. Patrick Barkers-Woode and United States v. Nana Mensah arose from a...
Affirming Upward Variance for Straw Firearm Purchases to Deter Gang-Related Gun Violence

Affirming Upward Variance for Straw Firearm Purchases to Deter Gang-Related Gun Violence

Date: May 8, 2025
Affirming Upward Variance for Straw Firearm Purchases to Deter Gang-Related Gun Violence Introduction In United States v. Jordan Harmon, No. 24-1797 (3d Cir. May 7, 2025), the Third Circuit addressed...
Consent-Based Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction in Bankruptcy Appeals: §636(c) Empowerment

Consent-Based Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction in Bankruptcy Appeals: §636(c) Empowerment

Date: May 8, 2025
Consent-Based Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction in Bankruptcy Appeals: §636(c) Empowerment 1. Introduction This case, In re: MTE Holdings LLC, arose from a dispute over oil-and-gas royalties between...
Gentile v. Dudek: Post-Onset Diagnoses Alone Cannot Establish Childhood Disability—Second Circuit’s Reaffirmation of the “Substantial Evidence” Deference

Gentile v. Dudek: Post-Onset Diagnoses Alone Cannot Establish Childhood Disability—Second Circuit’s Reaffirmation of the “Substantial Evidence” Deference

Date: May 8, 2025
Gentile v. Dudek: Post-Onset Diagnoses Alone Cannot Establish Childhood Disability—Second Circuit’s Reaffirmation of the “Substantial Evidence” Deference 1. Introduction Andrea Marie Gentile sought...
Second Circuit Fortifies the “Reliability-First” Rule for Border Interviews in Credibility Determinations

Second Circuit Fortifies the “Reliability-First” Rule for Border Interviews in Credibility Determinations

Date: May 8, 2025
Second Circuit Fortifies the “Reliability-First” Rule for Border Interviews in Credibility Determinations Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Chacon-Marin v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert