Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

juvenile-sentencing-guidelines:-iowa-supreme-court Case Commentaries

Statute of Limitations and Tolling in Accounting Malpractice: NRS 11.2075 Interpreted

Statute of Limitations and Tolling in Accounting Malpractice: NRS 11.2075 Interpreted

Date: May 30, 2025
Statute of Limitations and Tolling in Accounting Malpractice: NRS 11.2075 Interpreted Introduction In Tricarichi v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP (Nos. 86317/87375/87835, May 29, 2025), the Supreme...
Principles Governing Dismissal for Want of Prosecution and Rule 60(b) Relief: Griffiths v. Eggemeyer

Principles Governing Dismissal for Want of Prosecution and Rule 60(b) Relief: Griffiths v. Eggemeyer

Date: May 30, 2025
Principles Governing Dismissal for Want of Prosecution and Rule 60(b) Relief Introduction In Terri Griffiths v. Lorin Eggemeyer, 23-3253 & 24-1098 (7th Cir. May 29, 2025), the Seventh Circuit...
United States v. Ruston: Permissibility of Supervised-Release Search Conditions under §3583(d)

United States v. Ruston: Permissibility of Supervised-Release Search Conditions under §3583(d)

Date: May 30, 2025
United States v. Ruston: Permissibility of Supervised-Release Search Conditions under §3583(d) Introduction United States v. Ruston is a 2025 decision of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals that...
Reasonable Jurists Standard: Constructive Possession and Firearm Operability in §2254 Habeas Review

Reasonable Jurists Standard: Constructive Possession and Firearm Operability in §2254 Habeas Review

Date: May 30, 2025
Reasonable Jurists Standard: Constructive Possession and Firearm Operability in §2254 Habeas Review Introduction Jenkins v. Bridges is a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Jurisdiction Unaffected by Name Errors and Sentence Ambiguities: Limits on Habeas Corpus Relief

Jurisdiction Unaffected by Name Errors and Sentence Ambiguities: Limits on Habeas Corpus Relief

Date: May 30, 2025
Jurisdiction Unaffected by Name Errors and Sentence Ambiguities: Limits on Habeas Corpus Relief Introduction In State ex rel. Dodson v. Smith, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-1878, the Supreme Court of...
Permissibility of Lay Vehicle Identification and Prior Bad Acts Evidence: State v. Chandanoeuth Hay

Permissibility of Lay Vehicle Identification and Prior Bad Acts Evidence: State v. Chandanoeuth Hay

Date: May 30, 2025
Permissibility of Lay Vehicle Identification and Prior Bad Acts Evidence: State v. Chandanoeuth Hay Introduction State v. Chandanoeuth Hay was decided by the Supreme Court of Rhode Island on May 29,...
Clarification of Interim Suspension Due Process and Disbarment Sanction Protocols in Attorney Discipline

Clarification of Interim Suspension Due Process and Disbarment Sanction Protocols in Attorney Discipline

Date: May 30, 2025
Clarification of Interim Suspension Due Process and Disbarment Sanction Protocols in Attorney Discipline Introduction This commentary examines the landmark decision in Robert Brech, as Executive...
Federal Credit-Card Statutes Do Not Preempt State Bans on Cash-Discount Pricing

Federal Credit-Card Statutes Do Not Preempt State Bans on Cash-Discount Pricing

Date: May 30, 2025
Federal Credit-Card Statutes Do Not Preempt State Bans on Cash-Discount Pricing Introduction In Asociación de Detallistas de Gasolina de Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (1st Cir. May...
FINRA Arbitration Authority: Awarding Damages under Notice 10-39 and Attorneys’ Fees in Defamation Cases

FINRA Arbitration Authority: Awarding Damages under Notice 10-39 and Attorneys’ Fees in Defamation Cases

Date: May 30, 2025
FINRA Arbitration Authority: Awarding Damages under Notice 10-39 and Attorneys’ Fees in Defamation Cases Introduction In Key Investment Services LLC v. Oliver, 23-7326 (2d Cir. 2025), the Second...
Analyst Testimony Requirement for Forensic Evidence: Enforcing the Confrontation Clause in State v. Hall-Haught

Analyst Testimony Requirement for Forensic Evidence: Enforcing the Confrontation Clause in State v. Hall-Haught

Date: May 30, 2025
Analyst Testimony Requirement for Forensic Evidence: Enforcing the Confrontation Clause in State v. Hall-Haught Introduction State v. Hall-Haught is a landmark decision of the Washington Supreme...
Virtual Certainty Standard for Latent Disease Under Washington's Industrial Insurance Act

Virtual Certainty Standard for Latent Disease Under Washington's Industrial Insurance Act

Date: May 30, 2025
Virtual Certainty Standard for Latent Disease Under Washington's Industrial Insurance Act Introduction Cockrum v. C.H. Murphy/Clark-Ullman, Inc. (Howmet Aerospace, Inc.) marks a pivotal shift in...
Jurisdictional Limits on State Interlocutory Appeals Under Ark. R. App. P.-Crim. 3(a)

Jurisdictional Limits on State Interlocutory Appeals Under Ark. R. App. P.-Crim. 3(a)

Date: May 30, 2025
Jurisdictional Limits on State Interlocutory Appeals Under Ark. R. App. P.-Crim. 3(a) Introduction The case of State of Arkansas v. Ronald Russell (2025 Ark. 89) arises from a pretrial order in a...
Statute of Limitations in Accounting Malpractice: Accrual at Service Completion or Inquiry Notice; Standards for NRCP 60(b) and 68 Awards

Statute of Limitations in Accounting Malpractice: Accrual at Service Completion or Inquiry Notice; Standards for NRCP 60(b) and 68 Awards

Date: May 30, 2025
Statute of Limitations in Accounting Malpractice: Accrual at Service Completion or Inquiry Notice; Standards for NRCP 60(b) and 68 Awards Introduction In Tricarichi v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP...
“Directory, Not Mandatory” – The 20-Day Hearing Rule under 12 NYCRR 300.23(b)(2) Re-Defined

“Directory, Not Mandatory” – The 20-Day Hearing Rule under 12 NYCRR 300.23(b)(2) Re-Defined

Date: May 30, 2025
“Directory, Not Mandatory” – The 20-Day Hearing Rule under 12 NYCRR 300.23(b)(2) Re-Defined Introduction In Matter of Juncal v. Maspeth Remodeling Co., 238 A.D.3d 1441 (3d Dep’t 2025), the Appellate...
Affirming Disarmament of Domestic Violence Misdemeanants: Constitutional Validity of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9)

Affirming Disarmament of Domestic Violence Misdemeanants: Constitutional Validity of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9)

Date: May 29, 2025
Affirming Disarmament of Domestic Violence Misdemeanants: Constitutional Validity of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9) Introduction The Tenth Circuit’s decision in United States v. Jackson (No. 23-6047, 2025)...
Refining Confession Admissibility: Interpreting “Slightest Hope of Benefit” and “Remotest Fear of Injury” under OCGA § 24-8-824

Refining Confession Admissibility: Interpreting “Slightest Hope of Benefit” and “Remotest Fear of Injury” under OCGA § 24-8-824

Date: May 29, 2025
Refining Confession Admissibility: Interpreting “Slightest Hope of Benefit” and “Remotest Fear of Injury” under OCGA § 24-8-824 Introduction In Short v. State, decided May 28, 2025, the Supreme Court...
Qualified Immunity for Lethal Force on Reasonably Perceived Armed Threat

Qualified Immunity for Lethal Force on Reasonably Perceived Armed Threat

Date: May 29, 2025
Qualified Immunity for Lethal Force on Reasonably Perceived Armed Threat Introduction Cruz v. City of Deming is a 2025 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit addressing...
Pro Se Representation Limits and Pleading Standards in §1983 and Federal Anti-Discrimination Actions: Wells v. East Baton Rouge Sch Sys

Pro Se Representation Limits and Pleading Standards in §1983 and Federal Anti-Discrimination Actions: Wells v. East Baton Rouge Sch Sys

Date: May 29, 2025
Pro Se Representation Limits and Pleading Standards in §1983 and Federal Anti-Discrimination Actions Introduction Wells v. East Baton Rouge School System, decided May 28, 2025 by the United States...
Unreviewable Discretion of the NLRB General Counsel to Withdraw Complaints Pre-Hearing

Unreviewable Discretion of the NLRB General Counsel to Withdraw Complaints Pre-Hearing

Date: May 29, 2025
Unreviewable Discretion of the NLRB General Counsel to Withdraw Complaints Pre-Hearing Introduction United Natural Foods, Inc. (“UNFI”) brought charges under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA)...
Exclusivity Requirement of Paragraph V: Suits for Declaratory Relief Must Be Brought Against the County Alone

Exclusivity Requirement of Paragraph V: Suits for Declaratory Relief Must Be Brought Against the County Alone

Date: May 29, 2025
Exclusivity Requirement of Georgia Constitution Article I, Section II, Paragraph V: Declaratory Relief Actions Must Be Brought Exclusively Against the County Introduction In Tussahaw Reserves, LLC et...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert