Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

juvenile-sentencing-guidelines:-iowa-supreme-court Case Commentaries

“A Supervisor Switch May Be Reasonable” –  The New Hawaiʻi Precedent from Gima v. City & County of Honolulu (2025)

“A Supervisor Switch May Be Reasonable” – The New Hawaiʻi Precedent from Gima v. City & County of Honolulu (2025)

Date: Jun 11, 2025
“A Supervisor Switch May Be Reasonable” – The New Hawaiʻi Precedent from Gima v. City & County of Honolulu (Haw. 2025) 1. Introduction In June 2025 the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court issued a landmark opinion...
“Speculation Is Not Jurisdiction” – The Second Circuit’s Dual Clarifications on Personal-Jurisdiction Pleading and Harmless Error Review in El Omari v. Dechert LLP

“Speculation Is Not Jurisdiction” – The Second Circuit’s Dual Clarifications on Personal-Jurisdiction Pleading and Harmless Error Review in El Omari v. Dechert LLP

Date: Jun 11, 2025
“Speculation Is Not Jurisdiction” – The Second Circuit’s Dual Clarifications on Personal-Jurisdiction Pleading and Harmless Error Review in El Omari v. Dechert LLP 1. Introduction On 9 June 2025 the...
“Drawing the Line Between Fact and Law in Qualified-Immunity Appeals” – A Commentary on Horn v. Adger (2d Cir. 2025)

“Drawing the Line Between Fact and Law in Qualified-Immunity Appeals” – A Commentary on Horn v. Adger (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 11, 2025
“Drawing the Line Between Fact and Law in Qualified-Immunity Appeals” A Comprehensive Commentary on Horn v. Adger, 24-1034(L) (2d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Parties and posture. In Horn v. Adger, two...
Clarifying the Weight of Direct Contradictions: Paguay-Acosta v. Bondi and the Second Circuit’s Refinement of Credibility Analysis in Asylum Proceedings

Clarifying the Weight of Direct Contradictions: Paguay-Acosta v. Bondi and the Second Circuit’s Refinement of Credibility Analysis in Asylum Proceedings

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Clarifying the Weight of Direct Contradictions: Paguay-Acosta v. Bondi and the Second Circuit’s Refinement of Credibility Analysis in Asylum Proceedings 1. Introduction In Paguay-Acosta v. Bondi, the...
Commentary: Strict Application of Lozada & Prejudice Standards in Ineffective-Assistance Motions – A Review of Salazar-Asencio v. Bondi

Commentary: Strict Application of Lozada & Prejudice Standards in Ineffective-Assistance Motions – A Review of Salazar-Asencio v. Bondi

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Strict Application of Lozada & the “Reasonable Probability” Prejudice Test in Ineffective-Assistance Motions: Salazar-Asencio v. Bondi Introduction Salazar-Asencio v. Bondi (2d Cir. No. 24-1230, June...
Singh v. Bondi: Re-affirming the “Unable-or-Unwilling” Threshold and Issue-Exhaustion in Asylum & CAT Litigation

Singh v. Bondi: Re-affirming the “Unable-or-Unwilling” Threshold and Issue-Exhaustion in Asylum & CAT Litigation

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Singh v. Bondi: Re-affirming the “Unable-or-Unwilling” Threshold and Issue-Exhaustion in Asylum & CAT Litigation Introduction Bhupinder Singh, an Indian national and follower of a Sikh splinter...
Ventura-Duarte v. Bondi: Second Circuit Clarifies the “One-Central-Reason” Nexus in Gang-Related Asylum Claims after Matter of L-E-A-

Ventura-Duarte v. Bondi: Second Circuit Clarifies the “One-Central-Reason” Nexus in Gang-Related Asylum Claims after Matter of L-E-A-

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Ventura-Duarte v. Bondi: Second Circuit Clarifies the “One-Central-Reason” Nexus in Gang-Related Asylum Claims after Matter of L-E-A- 1. Introduction Ventura-Duarte v. Bondi is a 2025 summary order...
“Power of Attorney ≠ Article III Standing” – Commentary on Karkare v. International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental & Reinforcing Iron Workers Local 580

“Power of Attorney ≠ Article III Standing” – Commentary on Karkare v. International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental & Reinforcing Iron Workers Local 580

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Power of Attorney ≠ Article III Standing: The Second Circuit Reinforces the Real-Party-in-Interest Requirement in ERISA Litigation and Opens the Door to Rule 17 Substitution Introduction In Karkare...

        “The Underlying-Conduct Rule” – Second Circuit Holds that Extradition Depends on the Acts, not the Label: Comment on
        Lalama Gomez v. United States (2025)

“The Underlying-Conduct Rule” – Second Circuit Holds that Extradition Depends on the Acts, not the Label: Comment on Lalama Gomez v. United States (2025)

Date: Jun 11, 2025
“The Underlying-Conduct Rule” – Second Circuit Clarifies Extraditable-Offense Analysis in Lalama Gomez v. United States (2025) I. Introduction In Lalama Gomez v. United States, the U.S. Court of...
Zherka v. Bondi – The Second Circuit Confirms Congress’s Power to Disarm All Felons, Violent or Not, Without Individualized Review

Zherka v. Bondi – The Second Circuit Confirms Congress’s Power to Disarm All Felons, Violent or Not, Without Individualized Review

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Zherka v. Bondi – The Second Circuit Confirms Congress’s Power to Disarm All Felons, Violent or Not, Without Individualized Review 1. Introduction In Zherka v. Bondi, Docket No. 22-1108-cv (decided...
Affidavit-Based Probable Cause as a Complete Defense to First and Fourth Amendment Claims – Commentary on Youngblood v. City of Georgiana, 11th Cir. (2025)

Affidavit-Based Probable Cause as a Complete Defense to First and Fourth Amendment Claims – Commentary on Youngblood v. City of Georgiana, 11th Cir. (2025)

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Affidavit-Based Probable Cause as a Complete Defense to First and Fourth Amendment Claims Commentary on Eric Youngblood, Sr. v. City of Georgiana, Alabama, No. 23-13142 (11th Cir. June 9 2025)...

        The “Objective-and-Readily-Verifiable” Gatekeeper Doctrine: 11th Circuit Narrows FCRA Liability in Martino v. Bank of America (2025)

The “Objective-and-Readily-Verifiable” Gatekeeper Doctrine: 11th Circuit Narrows FCRA Liability in Martino v. Bank of America (2025)

Date: Jun 11, 2025
The “Objective-and-Readily-Verifiable” Gatekeeper Doctrine: 11th Circuit Narrows FCRA Liability in Martino v. Bank of America (2025) Introduction In Marcelo Martino v. Bank of America, N.A., the...
Dismissed-Conduct Still Counts: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Post-Amendment 826 Sentencing in United States v. Shanks

Dismissed-Conduct Still Counts: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Post-Amendment 826 Sentencing in United States v. Shanks

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Dismissed-Conduct Still Counts: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Post-Amendment 826 Sentencing in United States v. Ronald Rieco Shanks Introduction On 9 June 2025, the Eleventh Circuit delivered a...
Pickett v. City of Cleveland: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Article III Standing and Predominance Standards for FHA Disparate-Impact Class Actions

Pickett v. City of Cleveland: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Article III Standing and Predominance Standards for FHA Disparate-Impact Class Actions

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Pickett v. City of Cleveland: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Article III Standing and Predominance Standards for FHA Disparate-Impact Class Actions Introduction Albert Pickett Jr. and four other...
The Lyngaas II Precedent: Sender Liability for Third-Party Fax Promotions under the TCPA and the “Sufficiently Direct Profit Motive” Standard

The Lyngaas II Precedent: Sender Liability for Third-Party Fax Promotions under the TCPA and the “Sufficiently Direct Profit Motive” Standard

Date: Jun 11, 2025
The Lyngaas II Precedent: Sender Liability for Third-Party Fax Promotions under the TCPA and the “Sufficiently Direct Profit Motive” Standard Introduction In Brian J. Lyngaas, D.D.S., P.L.L.C. v....
Thomas v. Montgomery – Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms No Liberty Interest in Parole under Tennessee’s Post-2021 Scheme Despite Algorithmic STRONG-R Assessments

Thomas v. Montgomery – Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms No Liberty Interest in Parole under Tennessee’s Post-2021 Scheme Despite Algorithmic STRONG-R Assessments

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Thomas v. Montgomery – Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms No Liberty Interest in Parole under Tennessee’s Post-2021 Scheme Despite Algorithmic STRONG-R Assessments Introduction In Carvin L. Thomas & Terrell...
Clark v. Commissioner: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Broad ALJ Discretion under the 2017 Medical-Opinion Rule (§ 404.1520c)

Clark v. Commissioner: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Broad ALJ Discretion under the 2017 Medical-Opinion Rule (§ 404.1520c)

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Clark v. Commissioner: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Broad ALJ Discretion under the 2017 Medical-Opinion Rule (§ 404.1520c) 1. Introduction Donald Roy Clark, a former warehouse foreman and inside salesman,...
Sixth Circuit Narrows Unconscionability Challenges to Arbitration Clauses After Coinbase – Comment on Jessica Hines v. National Entertainment Group, LLC

Sixth Circuit Narrows Unconscionability Challenges to Arbitration Clauses After Coinbase – Comment on Jessica Hines v. National Entertainment Group, LLC

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Sixth Circuit Narrows Unconscionability Challenges to Arbitration Clauses After Coinbase – Comment on Jessica Hines v. National Entertainment Group, LLC (6th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction In a published...
Settlement-Induced Mootness and Discovery Confidentiality: 
            The Sixth Circuit’s Clarification in McGhee-Twilley v. CoreCivic

Settlement-Induced Mootness and Discovery Confidentiality: The Sixth Circuit’s Clarification in McGhee-Twilley v. CoreCivic

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Settlement-Induced Mootness and Discovery Confidentiality: The Sixth Circuit’s Clarification in McGhee-Twilley v. CoreCivic Introduction The Sixth Circuit’s unpublished opinion in Lakenya...

        “Reasonable Foreseeability through Continuous Participation” – 
        Sixth Circuit Clarifies When a Firearm Enhancement Applies in Hobbs Act Robbery Conspiracies

“Reasonable Foreseeability through Continuous Participation” – Sixth Circuit Clarifies When a Firearm Enhancement Applies in Hobbs Act Robbery Conspiracies

Date: Jun 11, 2025
“Reasonable Foreseeability through Continuous Participation” – Sixth Circuit Clarifies When a Firearm Enhancement Applies in Hobbs Act Robbery Conspiracies Introduction In United States v. Kyle Lynn...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert