Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

juvenile-sentencing-guidelines:-iowa-supreme-court Case Commentaries

“Circling Cars & Pocketed Hands” – The Sixth Circuit’s Refined Test for Linking Pedestrians to Nearby Stolen Vehicles (United States v. Lavonce Makiri Smith, 2025)

“Circling Cars & Pocketed Hands” – The Sixth Circuit’s Refined Test for Linking Pedestrians to Nearby Stolen Vehicles (United States v. Lavonce Makiri Smith, 2025)

Date: Jun 11, 2025
“Circling Cars & Pocketed Hands” – The Sixth Circuit’s Refined Test for Linking Pedestrians to Nearby Stolen Vehicles (United States v. Lavonce Makiri Smith, 2025) 1. Introduction United States v....
Clarifying the Knowledge-Based Application of the “Vulnerable Victim” Enhancement in Elder-Fraud Sentencings – A Commentary on United States v. McNamara (6th Cir. 2025)

Clarifying the Knowledge-Based Application of the “Vulnerable Victim” Enhancement in Elder-Fraud Sentencings – A Commentary on United States v. McNamara (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Clarifying the Knowledge-Based Application of the “Vulnerable Victim” Enhancement in Elder-Fraud Sentencings – A Commentary on United States v. McNamara (6th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction In United...
“A Limited-Time Offer”: Sixth Circuit Holds APA Claims Moot Once Statutory Spending Windows Close – Commentary on W6 Restaurant Group, Ltd. v. Loeffler

“A Limited-Time Offer”: Sixth Circuit Holds APA Claims Moot Once Statutory Spending Windows Close – Commentary on W6 Restaurant Group, Ltd. v. Loeffler

Date: Jun 11, 2025
“A Limited-Time Offer”: Sixth Circuit Holds APA Claims Moot Once Statutory Spending Windows Close – Commentary on W6 Restaurant Group, Ltd. v. Kelly Loeffler I. Introduction In W6 Restaurant Group,...
Partial Courtroom Closures in a Pandemic: Barrett v. Wyoming DOC Clarifies the Sixth-Amendment Standard

Partial Courtroom Closures in a Pandemic: Barrett v. Wyoming DOC Clarifies the Sixth-Amendment Standard

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Partial Courtroom Closures in a Pandemic: Barrett v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Clarifies the Sixth-Amendment Standard Introduction Barrett v. Wyoming Department of Corrections, No. 24-8062...
United States v. Nickols – Harmless Error and Misstatements about First Step Act Earned-Time Credits at Sentencing

United States v. Nickols – Harmless Error and Misstatements about First Step Act Earned-Time Credits at Sentencing

Date: Jun 11, 2025
United States v. Nickols – Harmless Error and Misstatements about First Step Act Earned-Time Credits at Sentencing I. Introduction United States v. Nickols, No. 24-5056 (10th Cir. June 9, 2025),...
Expanding Malicious-Prosecution Doctrine Beyond “Criminal” Prosecutions: Gervin v. Florence (11th Cir. 2025)

Expanding Malicious-Prosecution Doctrine Beyond “Criminal” Prosecutions: Gervin v. Florence (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Expanding Malicious-Prosecution Doctrine Beyond “Criminal” Prosecutions: Gervin v. Florence & Milton, 85 F.4th 1102 (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh...

        Seventh Circuit Tightens “Nexus” Showing for Gang-Recruitment Asylum Claims: 
        De Paz-Peraza v. Bondi (2025)

Seventh Circuit Tightens “Nexus” Showing for Gang-Recruitment Asylum Claims: De Paz-Peraza v. Bondi (2025)

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Seventh Circuit Tightens “Nexus” Showing for Gang-Recruitment Asylum Claims: De Paz-Peraza v. Bondi (2025) Introduction Carlos Antonio de Paz-Peraza, a 17-year-old Salvadoran targeted by the violent...
Forfeiture, Futility, and Exhaustion: The Seventh Circuit’s Clarification of Litigation Duties in Anderson v. United Airlines (2025)

Forfeiture, Futility, and Exhaustion: The Seventh Circuit’s Clarification of Litigation Duties in Anderson v. United Airlines (2025)

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Forfeiture, Futility, and Exhaustion: The Seventh Circuit’s Clarification of Litigation Duties in Anderson v. United Airlines (2025) 1. Introduction Case name: Thomas Anderson, et al. v. United...
“Full-Record Review” Standard Solidified: Minimal Oral Explanation Can Sustain Above-Guideline Sentences on Revocation of Supervised Release

“Full-Record Review” Standard Solidified: Minimal Oral Explanation Can Sustain Above-Guideline Sentences on Revocation of Supervised Release

Date: Jun 11, 2025
“Full-Record Review” Standard Solidified: Minimal Oral Explanation Can Sustain Above-Guideline Sentences on Revocation of Supervised Release 1. Introduction In United States v. Roger Snake,...
Beyond the Evidence Table: First Circuit Re-Affirms Courts’ “Un-Flagging Duty” to Investigate Any Contact between a Deliberating Jury and an Adversary’s Case Agent

Beyond the Evidence Table: First Circuit Re-Affirms Courts’ “Un-Flagging Duty” to Investigate Any Contact between a Deliberating Jury and an Adversary’s Case Agent

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Beyond the Evidence Table: First Circuit Re-Affirms Courts’ “Un-Flagging Duty” to Investigate Any Contact between a Deliberating Jury and an Adversary’s Case Agent 1. Introduction United States v....
United States v. Matta-Quiñones (1st Cir. 2025): The “Un-Flagging Duty” to Probe Case-Agent Contact with Deliberating Jurors

United States v. Matta-Quiñones (1st Cir. 2025): The “Un-Flagging Duty” to Probe Case-Agent Contact with Deliberating Jurors

Date: Jun 11, 2025
United States v. Matta-Quiñones (1st Cir. 2025): The “Un-Flagging Duty” to Probe Case-Agent Contact with Deliberating Jurors Introduction On 9 June 2025 the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Fraudulent Concealment by Unnecessary Surgery — A New Reading Emerge in Woodford v. Castro

Fraudulent Concealment by Unnecessary Surgery — A New Reading Emerge in Woodford v. Castro

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Fraudulent Concealment by Unnecessary Surgery — A New Reading Emerge in Woodford v. Castro 1. Introduction This commentary analyses the Michigan Supreme Court’s order in Tracie Woodford v. Dan J....
Hayes v. Watson: Clarifying Preservation After Motions in Limine and the “Any-Purpose” Rule for Adverse-Party Depositions

Hayes v. Watson: Clarifying Preservation After Motions in Limine and the “Any-Purpose” Rule for Adverse-Party Depositions

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Hayes v. Watson: Clarifying Preservation After Motions in Limine and the “Any-Purpose” Rule for Adverse-Party Depositions Introduction Hayes v. Watson, No. 85087 (Nev. Sup. Ct. June 6, 2025), is a...
Hyatt v. Franchise Tax Board: Nevada Supreme Court Reinforces Detailed Documentation for Discovery-Related Travel Costs and Confirms Broad Judicial Discretion for Enhanced Expert Fees

Hyatt v. Franchise Tax Board: Nevada Supreme Court Reinforces Detailed Documentation for Discovery-Related Travel Costs and Confirms Broad Judicial Discretion for Enhanced Expert Fees

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Hyatt v. Franchise Tax Board: Nevada Supreme Court Reinforces Detailed Documentation for Discovery-Related Travel Costs and Confirms Broad Judicial Discretion for Enhanced Expert Fees 1. Introduction...
“Exclusive Environmental Division Jurisdiction over Stand-Alone Zoning Declarations” – Commentary on 32 Intervale, LLC v. City of Burlington (2025)

“Exclusive Environmental Division Jurisdiction over Stand-Alone Zoning Declarations” – Commentary on 32 Intervale, LLC v. City of Burlington (2025)

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Exclusive Environmental Division Jurisdiction over Stand-Alone Zoning Declarations: An In-Depth Commentary on 32 Intervale, LLC v. City of Burlington, 2025 VT ___ 1. Introduction 32 Intervale, LLC v....
Jackson v. Jackson: Deference to Trial-Court Fact-Finding and a Flexible “Justice & Equity” Test for Fee-Shifting under 14A V.S.A. § 1004

Jackson v. Jackson: Deference to Trial-Court Fact-Finding and a Flexible “Justice & Equity” Test for Fee-Shifting under 14A V.S.A. § 1004

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Jackson v. Jackson: Deference to Trial-Court Fact-Finding and a Flexible “Justice & Equity” Test for Fee-Shifting under 14A V.S.A. § 1004 Introduction On 6 June 2025 the Supreme Court of Vermont...
“No Second Bite at the Apple” – Vermont Supreme Court Re-affirms the Non-Tolling, Strict 30-Day Deadline to Vacate Arbitration Awards

“No Second Bite at the Apple” – Vermont Supreme Court Re-affirms the Non-Tolling, Strict 30-Day Deadline to Vacate Arbitration Awards

Date: Jun 11, 2025
“No Second Bite at the Apple” – Vermont Supreme Court Re-affirms the Non-Tolling, Strict 30-Day Deadline to Vacate Arbitration Awards Introduction Flat Fee, LLC v. Northwest Vermont Realtor...
“Stone v. DOC”: Vermont Supreme Court Confirms Employer’s Right to Bypass Progressive Discipline for Repeated Discriminatory Language

“Stone v. DOC”: Vermont Supreme Court Confirms Employer’s Right to Bypass Progressive Discipline for Repeated Discriminatory Language

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Stone v. DOC: Vermont Supreme Court Confirms Employer’s Right to Bypass Progressive Discipline for Repeated Discriminatory Language Introduction In In re Grievance of Jonathan Stone, the Vermont...
Sita v. Department of Labor (2025): Clarifying “Good-Cause” Standards and Preservation Rules in Vermont Unemployment Appeals

Sita v. Department of Labor (2025): Clarifying “Good-Cause” Standards and Preservation Rules in Vermont Unemployment Appeals

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Sita v. Department of Labor (2025): Clarifying “Good-Cause” Standards and Preservation Rules in Vermont Unemployment Appeals 1. Introduction In Keren Sita v. Department of Labor, the Vermont Supreme...
Eddy v. Venturella: Vermont Supreme Court Re-Affirms Rule 11 Candor Duties for Self-Represented Litigants and Clarifies the Limited Grounds for Pre-Hearing Dismissal of RFA Petitions

Eddy v. Venturella: Vermont Supreme Court Re-Affirms Rule 11 Candor Duties for Self-Represented Litigants and Clarifies the Limited Grounds for Pre-Hearing Dismissal of RFA Petitions

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Eddy v. Venturella: Vermont Supreme Court Re-Affirms Rule 11 Candor Duties for Self-Represented Litigants and Clarifies the Limited Grounds for Pre-Hearing Dismissal of RFA Petitions 1. Introduction...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert