Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

first-circuit-reinforces-first-amendment-protections-for-secret-audio-recording-of-police-in-public:-interpretation-of-massachusetts& Case Commentaries

Express Statutory Designation Mandate for Parole Ineligibility Under Act 683

Express Statutory Designation Mandate for Parole Ineligibility Under Act 683

Date: May 9, 2025
Express Statutory Designation Mandate for Parole Ineligibility Under Act 683 Introduction This commentary examines the Arkansas Supreme Court’s decision in Arkansas Post-Prison Transfer Board, et al....
Establishing Self-Defense Jury Instruction Standards for Deadly Force in Vehicle Assaults

Establishing Self-Defense Jury Instruction Standards for Deadly Force in Vehicle Assaults

Date: May 9, 2025
Establishing Self-Defense Jury Instruction Standards for Deadly Force in Vehicle Assaults Introduction Bryant Ross Montoya v. State of Wyoming, 2025 WY 52 (May 8, 2025), is a Supreme Court of Wyoming...
Landlord Non-Liability for Tenant’s Concealed Dog under a “No-Pet” Lease: Actual or Constructive Knowledge Requirement Clarified

Landlord Non-Liability for Tenant’s Concealed Dog under a “No-Pet” Lease: Actual or Constructive Knowledge Requirement Clarified

Date: May 9, 2025
Landlord Non-Liability for Tenant’s Concealed Dog under a “No-Pet” Lease: Actual or Constructive Knowledge Requirement Clarified Introduction TLM Investments, LLC v. Shanda Yates, decided by the...
“Minor Political Assaults Outside Custodial Context Do Not Constitute Past Persecution” – A Commentary on Singh v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

“Minor Political Assaults Outside Custodial Context Do Not Constitute Past Persecution” – A Commentary on Singh v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: May 9, 2025
“Minor Political Assaults Outside Custodial Context Do Not Constitute Past Persecution” A Comprehensive Commentary on Singh v. Bondi, 23-6750-ag (2d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Case Overview. In Singh...
Predominant Intent Requirement for Statutory No-Fault Separation Divorce

Predominant Intent Requirement for Statutory No-Fault Separation Divorce

Date: May 9, 2025
Predominant Intent Requirement for Statutory No-Fault Separation Divorce Introduction Lisann v. Lisann is a 2025 decision of the Supreme Court of Virginia resolving a novel question about the intent...
Clarifying “Marriage Duration” and Res Judicata in Equitable Distribution: Nagle v. Nagle

Clarifying “Marriage Duration” and Res Judicata in Equitable Distribution: Nagle v. Nagle

Date: May 9, 2025
Clarifying “Marriage Duration” and Res Judicata in Equitable Distribution: Nagle v. Nagle Introduction Nagle v. Nagle, 2025 ND 94, is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of North Dakota issued...
Upholding Procedural Bars and Rejecting As-Applied Execution Claims: Rogers v. State

Upholding Procedural Bars and Rejecting As-Applied Execution Claims: Rogers v. State

Date: May 9, 2025
Upholding Procedural Bars and Rejecting As-Applied Execution Claims: Rogers v. State Introduction Glen Edward Rogers v. State of Florida (No. SC2025-0585) is a May 8, 2025 decision of the Supreme...
Parole Authority Jurisdiction and the Proper Use of Extraordinary Writs: State ex rel. Ellis v. Adult Parole Authority

Parole Authority Jurisdiction and the Proper Use of Extraordinary Writs: State ex rel. Ellis v. Adult Parole Authority

Date: May 9, 2025
Parole Authority Jurisdiction and the Proper Use of Extraordinary Writs Introduction State ex rel. Ellis v. Adult Parole Authority, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-1625, decided May 8, 2025, presented...
Reaffirming Qualified Immunity Boundaries: Reasonable Threat Perception in Winkley v. Blackwell

Reaffirming Qualified Immunity Boundaries: Reasonable Threat Perception in Winkley v. Blackwell

Date: May 9, 2025
Reaffirming Qualified Immunity Boundaries: Reasonable Threat Perception in Winkley v. Blackwell Introduction Winkley v. Blackwell, No. 24-60244 (5th Cir. May 8, 2025), represents a significant...
Clarification of Jurisdictional and Evidentiary Standards in I-130 Marriage Fraud Denials Under 8 U.S.C. §1154(c)

Clarification of Jurisdictional and Evidentiary Standards in I-130 Marriage Fraud Denials Under 8 U.S.C. §1154(c)

Date: May 9, 2025
Clarification of Jurisdictional and Evidentiary Standards in I-130 Marriage Fraud Denials Under 8 U.S.C. §1154(c) Introduction In Stacey Watson v. Attorney General United States of America, No....
AstraZeneca v. HHS: Defining Standing and Due-Process Limits in the IRA’s Drug Price Negotiation Program

AstraZeneca v. HHS: Defining Standing and Due-Process Limits in the IRA’s Drug Price Negotiation Program

Date: May 9, 2025
AstraZeneca v. HHS: Defining Standing and Due-Process Limits in the IRA’s Drug Price Negotiation Program Introduction In AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP v. Secretary, United States Department of...
Intervening Amendment to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 Redefines Generic Robbery and Permits Reassessment of Circuit Precedent

Intervening Amendment to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 Redefines Generic Robbery and Permits Reassessment of Circuit Precedent

Date: May 8, 2025
Intervening Amendment to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 Redefines Generic Robbery and Permits Reassessment of Circuit Precedent Introduction United States v. Wickware (5th Cir. 2025) addresses whether a 2023...
Kelsey v. Kessel – Second Circuit Clarifies that Eleventh-Amendment Dismissals Must Be Without Prejudice and Re-emphasises the “Ongoing-Violation” Prerequisite to Ex parte Young

Kelsey v. Kessel – Second Circuit Clarifies that Eleventh-Amendment Dismissals Must Be Without Prejudice and Re-emphasises the “Ongoing-Violation” Prerequisite to Ex parte Young

Date: May 8, 2025
Kelsey v. Kessel – Second Circuit Clarifies that Eleventh-Amendment Dismissals Must Be Without Prejudice and Re-emphasises the “Ongoing-Violation” Prerequisite to Ex parte Young 1. Introduction In...
Requirement of Reasoned Explanation for Denial of Asylum Based on Private‐Actor Persecution

Requirement of Reasoned Explanation for Denial of Asylum Based on Private‐Actor Persecution

Date: May 8, 2025
Requirement of Reasoned Explanation for Denial of Asylum Based on Private‐Actor Persecution Introduction In the unpublished per curiam decision Yamilet Del Carmen Garcia Chavez v. Pamela Bondi, No....
Recalibrating Home Rule: The Appellate Division Upholds New York’s Even-Year Election Law

Recalibrating Home Rule: The Appellate Division Upholds New York’s Even-Year Election Law

Date: May 8, 2025
Recalibrating Home Rule: The Appellate Division Upholds New York’s Even-Year Election Law Introduction County governments from eight regions (Onondaga, Nassau, Oneida, Rensselaer, Rockland, Dutchess,...
No larceny-by-conversion for contractor deposits absent specific earmarking or trust: People v. Clinton (Mich. 2025)

No larceny-by-conversion for contractor deposits absent specific earmarking or trust: People v. Clinton (Mich. 2025)

Date: May 8, 2025
No larceny-by-conversion for contractor deposits absent specific earmarking or trust: People v. Clinton (Mich. 2025) Introduction In People of the State of Michigan v. Christopher Robert Clinton, the...
Municipalities Liable for Frivolous Litigation Under New Jersey Frivolous Litigation Statute

Municipalities Liable for Frivolous Litigation Under New Jersey Frivolous Litigation Statute

Date: May 8, 2025
Municipalities Liable for Frivolous Litigation Under New Jersey Frivolous Litigation Statute Introduction Borough of Englewood Cliffs v. Thomas J. Trautner (Supreme Court of New Jersey, decided May...
“Notice-and-Knowledge” as the Linchpin of Retaliation: Collymore v. City of New York (2d Cir. 2025)

“Notice-and-Knowledge” as the Linchpin of Retaliation: Collymore v. City of New York (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: May 8, 2025
“Notice-and-Knowledge” as the Linchpin of Retaliation: Collymore v. City of New York (2d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction In Collymore v. City of New York, No. 23-1304 (2d Cir. May 7 2025), the United...
Limits on Standing and Waiver under the Specialty Doctrine in Extradition Treaties

Limits on Standing and Waiver under the Specialty Doctrine in Extradition Treaties

Date: May 8, 2025
Limits on Standing and Waiver under the Specialty Doctrine in Extradition Treaties Introduction Ricardo Alberto Martinelli Berrocal, a former President of the Republic of Panama, challenged his...
Ensuring Material Consistency in Supervised Release Conditions under Rogers: United States v. Aughenbaugh

Ensuring Material Consistency in Supervised Release Conditions under Rogers: United States v. Aughenbaugh

Date: May 8, 2025
Ensuring Material Consistency in Supervised Release Conditions under Rogers: United States v. Aughenbaugh Introduction In United States v. Ryan Aughenbaugh, decided May 7, 2025, the Fourth Circuit...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert