Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

federal Case Commentaries

Post-Denial Medical Developments and the “Continuum of Reasonableness” Test under ERISA: A Commentary on Black v. Unum Life Insurance Co.

Post-Denial Medical Developments and the “Continuum of Reasonableness” Test under ERISA: A Commentary on Black v. Unum Life Insurance Co.

Date: Jul 30, 2025
Post-Denial Medical Developments and the “Continuum of Reasonableness” Test under ERISA: A Detailed Commentary on Black v. Unum Life Insurance Company (5th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction This commentary...
“Actual Knowledge” as the Linchpin of Calder-Effects Personal Jurisdiction: A Detailed Commentary on Boyd v. Cleara, L.L.C. (5th Cir. 2025)

“Actual Knowledge” as the Linchpin of Calder-Effects Personal Jurisdiction: A Detailed Commentary on Boyd v. Cleara, L.L.C. (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 30, 2025
“Actual Knowledge” as the Linchpin of Calder-Effects Personal Jurisdiction: A Detailed Commentary on Boyd v. Cleara, L.L.C. (5th Cir. 2025) Introduction Boyd v. Cleara, L.L.C., No. 24-10609, decided...
United States v. Bennett – Federal Eminent-Domain Supremacy over State Trespass-Fixture Claims

United States v. Bennett – Federal Eminent-Domain Supremacy over State Trespass-Fixture Claims

Date: Jul 30, 2025
Federal Eminent-Domain Supremacy over State Trespass-Fixture Claims: A Commentary on United States v. Bennett (5th Cir. 2025) Introduction United States v. Bennett squarely addresses whether a...
Vacated Procedural Dismissals & Damages-Only Suits: Seventh Circuit Clarifies “Law-of-the-Case” and Rooker-Feldman in Williams v. City of Aurora

Vacated Procedural Dismissals & Damages-Only Suits: Seventh Circuit Clarifies “Law-of-the-Case” and Rooker-Feldman in Williams v. City of Aurora

Date: Jul 30, 2025
Vacated Procedural Dismissals & Damages-Only Suits: Seventh Circuit Clarifies “Law-of-the-Case” and Rooker-Feldman in Williams v. City of Aurora Introduction In Andy Williams, Jr. v. City of Aurora,...
Schroeder v. Progressive: Seventh Circuit Rejects a Stand-Alone “Methodological Duty” in Actual-Cash-Value Calculations and Re-affirms Individualized Proof Requirement for Class Certification

Schroeder v. Progressive: Seventh Circuit Rejects a Stand-Alone “Methodological Duty” in Actual-Cash-Value Calculations and Re-affirms Individualized Proof Requirement for Class Certification

Date: Jul 30, 2025
Schroeder v. Progressive: Seventh Circuit Rejects a Stand-Alone “Methodological Duty” in Actual-Cash-Value Calculations and Re-affirms Individualized Proof Requirement for Class Certification 1....
“Prescription Alone Is Not Enough” – Howard v. Meli and the Knowledge Requirement for Deliberate-Indifference Claims

“Prescription Alone Is Not Enough” – Howard v. Meli and the Knowledge Requirement for Deliberate-Indifference Claims

Date: Jul 30, 2025
“Prescription Alone Is Not Enough” – Howard v. Meli and the Knowledge Requirement for Deliberate-Indifference Claims 1. Introduction In Joshua Howard v. Anthony Meli, No. 24-3162 (7th Cir. July 24,...
United States v. Sanders: Fourth Circuit Re-Affirms Deference to § 2B1.1 “Sophisticated Means” Commentary and Validates the “Secretive or Irregular Transaction” Intent Instruction

United States v. Sanders: Fourth Circuit Re-Affirms Deference to § 2B1.1 “Sophisticated Means” Commentary and Validates the “Secretive or Irregular Transaction” Intent Instruction

Date: Jul 30, 2025
United States v. Sanders: Fourth Circuit Re-Affirms Deference to § 2B1.1 “Sophisticated Means” Commentary and Validates the “Secretive or Irregular Transaction” Intent Instruction Introduction In...
Mandatory Issue Exhaustion and the Serious-Nonpolitical-Crime Bar Extending to CAT Relief – Commentary on Anaya v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Mandatory Issue Exhaustion and the Serious-Nonpolitical-Crime Bar Extending to CAT Relief – Commentary on Anaya v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Mandatory Issue Exhaustion and the Serious-Nonpolitical-Crime Bar Extending to CAT Relief – Commentary on Anaya v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025) Introduction Anaya v. Bondi is a July 24, 2025 summary order of...
Aucacama-Azogue v. Bondi: Reaffirming the Nexus Parity and Government-Protection Thresholds in Asylum, Withholding, and CAT Claims

Aucacama-Azogue v. Bondi: Reaffirming the Nexus Parity and Government-Protection Thresholds in Asylum, Withholding, and CAT Claims

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Aucacama-Azogue v. Bondi: Reaffirming the Nexus Parity and Government-Protection Thresholds in Asylum, Withholding, and CAT Claims 1. Introduction Aucacama-Azogue v. Bondi is a 2025 summary order of...
“Rough Justice, Not Auditing Perfection” – The Second Circuit’s Robust Deference to District-Court Fee Awards under the IDEA

“Rough Justice, Not Auditing Perfection” – The Second Circuit’s Robust Deference to District-Court Fee Awards under the IDEA

Date: Jul 26, 2025
“Rough Justice, Not Auditing Perfection” – The Second Circuit’s Robust Deference to District-Court Fee Awards under the IDEA Introduction In Y.G. v. New York City Department of Education and eighteen...
Blecher v. Holy See — The “Mandatory-Compliance Shield”: When Following a Foreign Sovereign’s Policy Restores Immunity under the FSIA

Blecher v. Holy See — The “Mandatory-Compliance Shield”: When Following a Foreign Sovereign’s Policy Restores Immunity under the FSIA

Date: Jul 26, 2025
The “Mandatory-Compliance Shield”: Second Circuit Holds that Obedience to a Foreign Sovereign’s Policy Triggers the FSIA Discretionary Function Exclusion Introduction In Blecher v. Holy See, the...
“Good-Faith Reasonableness” Becomes the Test for Substantial-Justification under the IDEA Fee-Cap: A Commentary on N.G.B. v. New York City Department of Education (2d Cir. 2025)

“Good-Faith Reasonableness” Becomes the Test for Substantial-Justification under the IDEA Fee-Cap: A Commentary on N.G.B. v. New York City Department of Education (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
“Good-Faith Reasonableness” Becomes the Test for Substantial-Justification Under the IDEA’s Attorneys’-Fees Cap A Detailed Commentary on N.G.B. v. New York City Department of Education, 2d Cir., 2025...
“From Use-Based to Evidence-Based Nexus”: Second Circuit Re-calibrates Probable-Cause Requirements for Digital-Device Warrants

“From Use-Based to Evidence-Based Nexus”: Second Circuit Re-calibrates Probable-Cause Requirements for Digital-Device Warrants

Date: Jul 26, 2025
“From Use-Based to Evidence-Based Nexus”: United States v. Silva (2d Cir. 2025) and the New Standard for Cell-Phone Search Warrants 1. Introduction United States v. Silva marks the Second Circuit’s...
“Written-Terms Trump Hand-to-Hand Cash” – The Second Circuit’s Clarification of
U.C.C. §2-201/2-209, Apparent Authority and Foreseeability in Vista Food Exchange, Inc. v. Comercial De Alimentos Sanchez (2025)

“Written-Terms Trump Hand-to-Hand Cash” – The Second Circuit’s Clarification of U.C.C. §2-201/2-209, Apparent Authority and Foreseeability in Vista Food Exchange, Inc. v. Comercial De Alimentos Sanchez (2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
“Written-Terms Trump Hand-to-Hand Cash” – The Second Circuit’s Clarification of U.C.C. §§ 2-201 & 2-209, Apparent Authority and Foreseeability in Vista Food Exchange, Inc. v. Comercial De Alimentos...
No Shortcuts Around Medicare’s Administrative Review Scheme: The Eleventh Circuit Fortifies § 405(g) Exclusivity in Bishins v. HHS

No Shortcuts Around Medicare’s Administrative Review Scheme: The Eleventh Circuit Fortifies § 405(g) Exclusivity in Bishins v. HHS

Date: Jul 26, 2025
No Shortcuts Around Medicare’s Administrative Review Scheme: The Eleventh Circuit Fortifies § 405(g) Exclusivity in Bishins v. HHS 1. Introduction Larry V. Bishins, a Medicare beneficiary and...
Exclusive Economic Zones Are “High Seas” for MDLEA Purposes: United States v. Quijije Mero, 22-11929 (11th Cir. 2025)

Exclusive Economic Zones Are “High Seas” for MDLEA Purposes: United States v. Quijije Mero, 22-11929 (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Exclusive Economic Zones Are “High Seas” for MDLEA Purposes: United States v. Quijije Mero, 22-11929 (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v. Nilson Olaya Grueso, José Junior Bailon Franco,...
“High-Seas” Jurisdiction Embraces the Exclusive Economic Zone: A Commentary on United States v. Jose Junior Bailon Franco (11th Cir. 2025)

“High-Seas” Jurisdiction Embraces the Exclusive Economic Zone: A Commentary on United States v. Jose Junior Bailon Franco (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 25, 2025
“High-Seas” Jurisdiction Embraces the Exclusive Economic Zone: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Jose Junior Bailon Franco (11th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction United States v. Jose Junior...
“EEZ = High Seas”: The Eleventh Circuit’s Unpublished Re-affirmation of Congress’s Plenary Power under the MDLEA

“EEZ = High Seas”: The Eleventh Circuit’s Unpublished Re-affirmation of Congress’s Plenary Power under the MDLEA

Date: Jul 25, 2025
“EEZ = High Seas”: The Eleventh Circuit’s Unpublished Re-affirmation of Congress’s Plenary Power under the MDLEA 1. Introduction United States v. Nilson Olaya Grueso, Nos. 22-11929, 22-11932,...

        Sixth Circuit Clarifies Strickland: Impeachment Cross-Examination that Adds Damaging Facts
        Can Still Be “Reasonable Trial Strategy” under AEDPA – Commentary on Mark Hartman v. Dave Yost

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Strickland: Impeachment Cross-Examination that Adds Damaging Facts Can Still Be “Reasonable Trial Strategy” under AEDPA – Commentary on Mark Hartman v. Dave Yost

Date: Jul 25, 2025
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Strickland: Impeachment Cross-Examination that Adds Damaging Facts Can Still Be “Reasonable Trial Strategy” under AEDPA Commentary on Mark Hartman v. Dave Yost, Nos....
Reaffirming the “Every Fair-Minded Jurist” Threshold: The Sixth Circuit’s Double-Deference Clarification in Hartman v. Yost

Reaffirming the “Every Fair-Minded Jurist” Threshold: The Sixth Circuit’s Double-Deference Clarification in Hartman v. Yost

Date: Jul 25, 2025
Reaffirming the “Every Fair-Minded Jurist” Threshold: The Sixth Circuit’s Double-Deference Clarification in Hartman v. Yost Introduction In Mark Hartman v. Dave Yost, the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert