Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

eighth-circuit-rules-oklahoma&amp Case Commentaries

Reaffirming West Virginia’s 50-50 Custody Presumption: Trial Courts Must Apply § 48-9-102a, Analyze § 48-9-209(f) Factors, Enter Written Findings, and Maximize Parenting Time

Reaffirming West Virginia’s 50-50 Custody Presumption: Trial Courts Must Apply § 48-9-102a, Analyze § 48-9-209(f) Factors, Enter Written Findings, and Maximize Parenting Time

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reaffirming West Virginia’s 50-50 Custody Presumption: Trial Courts Must Apply § 48-9-102a, Analyze § 48-9-209(f) Factors, Enter Written Findings, and Maximize Parenting Time Case: In re R.L., No....
Reaffirming the Rule 8(a) Presumption and Tightening Limits on Child Confrontation, Discovery, and Sexual-History Evidence in Abuse-and-Neglect Adjudications

Reaffirming the Rule 8(a) Presumption and Tightening Limits on Child Confrontation, Discovery, and Sexual-History Evidence in Abuse-and-Neglect Adjudications

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reaffirming the Rule 8(a) Presumption and Tightening Limits on Child Confrontation, Discovery, and Sexual-History Evidence in Abuse-and-Neglect Adjudications Introduction In re L.H.-1, B.H., L.H.-2,...
Improvement Period May Be Denied When a Parent’s Promise to a Critical No‑Contact Condition Lacks Credibility, Even Amid Services Compliance

Improvement Period May Be Denied When a Parent’s Promise to a Critical No‑Contact Condition Lacks Credibility, Even Amid Services Compliance

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Improvement Period May Be Denied When a Parent’s Promise to a Critical No‑Contact Condition Lacks Credibility, Even Amid Services Compliance Introduction In In re I.R. and E.B., No. 24-496 (W. Va....
Noncompliance and Open‑Ended Incarceration: Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and No Post‑Dispositional Improvement Period

Noncompliance and Open‑Ended Incarceration: Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and No Post‑Dispositional Improvement Period

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Noncompliance and Open‑Ended Incarceration: Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and No Post‑Dispositional Improvement Period Case: In re A.F. and H.J., No. 24-574 Court: Supreme Court...
Consent to Guardianship Is Not a Safe Harbor: West Virginia Affirms Termination Where No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction Exists

Consent to Guardianship Is Not a Safe Harbor: West Virginia Affirms Termination Where No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction Exists

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Consent to Guardianship Is Not a Safe Harbor: West Virginia Affirms Termination Where No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction Exists Case: In re A.A., K.A., and A.R., No. 24-474 (W. Va. Sept. 30,...
In re G.J.: Refusal to Engage in Services Justifies Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and Supports Denial of Post‑Termination Visitation

In re G.J.: Refusal to Engage in Services Justifies Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and Supports Denial of Post‑Termination Visitation

Date: Oct 1, 2025
In re G.J.: Refusal to Engage in Services Justifies Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and Supports Denial of Post‑Termination Visitation Introduction In a memorandum decision dated...
In re G.A.: West Virginia High Court Reaffirms Written-Motion Prerequisite for Improvement Periods and Clarifies That Less Restrictive Alternatives Are Not Required When Statutory Termination Criteria Are Met

In re G.A.: West Virginia High Court Reaffirms Written-Motion Prerequisite for Improvement Periods and Clarifies That Less Restrictive Alternatives Are Not Required When Statutory Termination Criteria Are Met

Date: Oct 1, 2025
In re G.A.: Reaffirming the Written-Motion Requirement for Improvement Periods and the Permissibility of Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives Introduction In a memorandum decision issued...
Express Findings and Maximization Required to Deviate from West Virginia’s Statutory 50/50 Custody Presumption

Express Findings and Maximization Required to Deviate from West Virginia’s Statutory 50/50 Custody Presumption

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Express Findings and Maximization Required to Deviate from West Virginia’s Statutory 50/50 Custody Presumption Introduction In In re R.L., No. 24-395 (W. Va. Sept. 30, 2025), the Supreme Court of...
Reaffirming Denial of Improvement Periods and Termination Where Parent Fails to Engage: West Virginia High Court’s Memorandum Decision in In re J.H., J.M., T.K., and R.K.

Reaffirming Denial of Improvement Periods and Termination Where Parent Fails to Engage: West Virginia High Court’s Memorandum Decision in In re J.H., J.M., T.K., and R.K.

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reaffirming Denial of Improvement Periods and Termination Where Parent Fails to Engage: West Virginia High Court’s Memorandum Decision in In re J.H., J.M., T.K., and R.K. Introduction This commentary...
Competency ≠ Credibility: First Circuit Upholds Judicial Notice of Prior Plea Competency and Demands Timely Appeals from Rule 37 Indicative Rulings — United States v. Vázquez‑Rijos

Competency ≠ Credibility: First Circuit Upholds Judicial Notice of Prior Plea Competency and Demands Timely Appeals from Rule 37 Indicative Rulings — United States v. Vázquez‑Rijos

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Competency ≠ Credibility: First Circuit Upholds Judicial Notice of Prior Plea Competency and Demands Timely Appeals from Rule 37 Indicative Rulings Case: United States v. Vázquez‑Rijos (1st Cir.)...
Reasonable Efforts Clarified: Prior-Case Services and Futility Can Satisfy DHS’s Reunification Duty in Recidivist Neglect Cases

Reasonable Efforts Clarified: Prior-Case Services and Futility Can Satisfy DHS’s Reunification Duty in Recidivist Neglect Cases

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reasonable Efforts Clarified: Prior-Case Services and Futility Can Satisfy DHS’s Reunification Duty in Recidivist Neglect Cases Introduction In re D.G. and L.G., No. 24-620 (W. Va. Sept. 30, 2025),...
In re B.S.: The 15/22-Month Permanency Cap Meaningfully Limits Improvement-Period Extensions; Near-Completion of Treatment Is Not a “Compelling Circumstance”

In re B.S.: The 15/22-Month Permanency Cap Meaningfully Limits Improvement-Period Extensions; Near-Completion of Treatment Is Not a “Compelling Circumstance”

Date: Oct 1, 2025
In re B.S.: The 15/22-Month Permanency Cap Meaningfully Limits Improvement-Period Extensions; Near-Completion of Treatment Is Not a “Compelling Circumstance” Introduction In this memorandum decision,...
In re B.N.: Delineated, Best‑Interest Visitation for Relative Caregivers Without a Grandparent Visitation Act Motion—and Strict Standing Limits for Non‑Intervenor Grandparents

In re B.N.: Delineated, Best‑Interest Visitation for Relative Caregivers Without a Grandparent Visitation Act Motion—and Strict Standing Limits for Non‑Intervenor Grandparents

Date: Oct 1, 2025
In re B.N.: Delineated, Best‑Interest Visitation for Relative Caregivers Without a Grandparent Visitation Act Motion—and Strict Standing Limits for Non‑Intervenor Grandparents Introduction The...
Temporary Guardianship Does Not Defeat Abuse-and-Neglect Jurisdiction; Voluntary Relinquishment Bars Case-Plan Attacks — Commentary on In re A.F. and K.F. (W. Va. Sept. 30, 2025)

Temporary Guardianship Does Not Defeat Abuse-and-Neglect Jurisdiction; Voluntary Relinquishment Bars Case-Plan Attacks — Commentary on In re A.F. and K.F. (W. Va. Sept. 30, 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Temporary Guardianship Does Not Defeat Abuse-and-Neglect Jurisdiction; Voluntary Relinquishment Bars Case-Plan Attacks — Commentary on In re A.F. and K.F. (W. Va. Sept. 30, 2025) Introduction This...
Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and a Rigorous “Substantial Change” Threshold for Post‑Dispositional Improvement Periods: Commentary on In re A.F. and H.J.

Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and a Rigorous “Substantial Change” Threshold for Post‑Dispositional Improvement Periods: Commentary on In re A.F. and H.J.

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Termination Without Less Restrictive Alternatives and a Rigorous “Substantial Change” Threshold for Post‑Dispositional Improvement Periods: Commentary on In re A.F. and H.J. Introduction This...
Williams v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Broad Trial-Court Discretion to Admit Victims’ Domestic‑Violence Statements Under Rule 807

Williams v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Broad Trial-Court Discretion to Admit Victims’ Domestic‑Violence Statements Under Rule 807

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Williams v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Broad Trial-Court Discretion to Admit Victims’ Domestic‑Violence Statements Under Rule 807 Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date: September 30,...
Eleventh Circuit: Sentencing Statistics Alone Do Not Prove § 3553(a)(6) Disparity; Statutory-Max Upward Variance and Consecutive Revocation Term Upheld for Child-Pornography Recidivist

Eleventh Circuit: Sentencing Statistics Alone Do Not Prove § 3553(a)(6) Disparity; Statutory-Max Upward Variance and Consecutive Revocation Term Upheld for Child-Pornography Recidivist

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Eleventh Circuit: Sentencing Statistics Alone Do Not Prove § 3553(a)(6) Disparity; Statutory-Max Upward Variance and Consecutive Revocation Term Upheld for Child-Pornography Recidivist Introduction...
Direct Admissions as Direct Evidence: Green v. State Reaffirms That OCGA § 24-14-6 Does Not Apply When the State Presents Any Admission by the Accused

Direct Admissions as Direct Evidence: Green v. State Reaffirms That OCGA § 24-14-6 Does Not Apply When the State Presents Any Admission by the Accused

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Direct Admissions as Direct Evidence: Green v. State Reaffirms That OCGA § 24-14-6 Does Not Apply When the State Presents Any Admission by the Accused Introduction In Green v. State, the Supreme...
Separate Offenses Under Georgia’s Gang Act: Subsections (a) and (d) Do Not Merge

Separate Offenses Under Georgia’s Gang Act: Subsections (a) and (d) Do Not Merge

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Separate Offenses Under Georgia’s Gang Act: Subsections (a) and (d) Do Not Merge Introduction In Evans v. State and Miller v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia, Sept. 30, 2025), the Court resolved a...
Second Circuit Reaffirms Permissibility of §2L1.2 “Double Counting” and Deferential Substantive-Reasonableness Review in Illegal-Reentry Sentencing

Second Circuit Reaffirms Permissibility of §2L1.2 “Double Counting” and Deferential Substantive-Reasonableness Review in Illegal-Reentry Sentencing

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Second Circuit Reaffirms Permissibility of §2L1.2 “Double Counting” and Deferential Substantive-Reasonableness Review in Illegal-Reentry Sentencing Introduction In United States v. Garcia-Gonzalez,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert