Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

eighth-circuit-rules-oklahoma&amp Case Commentaries

No Clearly Established Due Process Right in Inmate Craft‑Sale Proceeds: Fifth Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity in Savage v. Westcott

No Clearly Established Due Process Right in Inmate Craft‑Sale Proceeds: Fifth Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity in Savage v. Westcott

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Clearly Established Due Process Right in Inmate Craft‑Sale Proceeds: Fifth Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity in Savage v. Westcott Introduction In Savage v. Westcott, the United States Court of...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Broad Habitability Exclusions Defeat the Duty to Defend Even When Claims Are Pleaded as Negligence

Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Broad Habitability Exclusions Defeat the Duty to Defend Even When Claims Are Pleaded as Negligence

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Broad Habitability Exclusions Defeat the Duty to Defend Even When Claims Are Pleaded as Negligence Case: Atain Specialty Insurance Company v. Eagle's Pointe, LLC, No....
Time-of-Decision Controls Qualifying-Child Status Under § 1229b(b)(1)(D); Post-Loper Bright, No Agency Deference; BIA’s Waiver Determinations Constrained by 8 C.F.R. § 1003.3(b)

Time-of-Decision Controls Qualifying-Child Status Under § 1229b(b)(1)(D); Post-Loper Bright, No Agency Deference; BIA’s Waiver Determinations Constrained by 8 C.F.R. § 1003.3(b)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Time-of-Decision Controls Qualifying-Child Status Under § 1229b(b)(1)(D); Post-Loper Bright, No Agency Deference; BIA’s Waiver Determinations Constrained by 8 C.F.R. § 1003.3(b) Introduction In...
Failure to Attend Successor Onboarding Is Not an Adverse Action by the Outgoing Employer: The Tenth Circuit’s ADA Baseline in Swepson v. Aimbridge

Failure to Attend Successor Onboarding Is Not an Adverse Action by the Outgoing Employer: The Tenth Circuit’s ADA Baseline in Swepson v. Aimbridge

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Failure to Attend Successor Onboarding Is Not an Adverse Action by the Outgoing Employer: The Tenth Circuit’s ADA Baseline in Swepson v. Aimbridge Introduction In Swepson v. Aimbridge Employee...
Tenth Circuit Confirms Materiality of Form 4473 Indictment Question: § 922(a)(6) Convictions Stand Because § 922(n) Is Facially Constitutional (United States v. Peavler)

Tenth Circuit Confirms Materiality of Form 4473 Indictment Question: § 922(a)(6) Convictions Stand Because § 922(n) Is Facially Constitutional (United States v. Peavler)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Tenth Circuit Confirms Materiality of Form 4473 Indictment Question: § 922(a)(6) Convictions Stand Because § 922(n) Is Facially Constitutional (United States v. Peavler) Note: This Order and Judgment...
No Right to Nullify Materiality: Tenth Circuit Holds False Denial of Felony Indictment on Form 4473 Is Actionable Because § 922(n) Is Facially Valid

No Right to Nullify Materiality: Tenth Circuit Holds False Denial of Felony Indictment on Form 4473 Is Actionable Because § 922(n) Is Facially Valid

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Right to Nullify Materiality: Tenth Circuit Holds False Denial of Felony Indictment on Form 4473 Is Actionable Because § 922(n) Is Facially Valid Introduction In United States v. Reilly...
Judicial Notice of a Prior Competency Finding Is Permissible Without Vouching; Strict Timeliness for Rule 37 Appeals Confirmed — Commentary on United States v. Ferrer‑Sosa (1st Cir.)

Judicial Notice of a Prior Competency Finding Is Permissible Without Vouching; Strict Timeliness for Rule 37 Appeals Confirmed — Commentary on United States v. Ferrer‑Sosa (1st Cir.)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Judicial Notice of a Prior Competency Finding Is Permissible Without Vouching; Strict Timeliness for Rule 37 Appeals Confirmed — United States v. Ferrer‑Sosa (1st Cir.) Introduction This commentary...
Reasonable Efforts May Be Satisfied by Prior and Ongoing Services; Trial Court Credibility Findings Govern Post‑Termination Visitation (In re D.G. and L.G.)

Reasonable Efforts May Be Satisfied by Prior and Ongoing Services; Trial Court Credibility Findings Govern Post‑Termination Visitation (In re D.G. and L.G.)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reasonable Efforts May Be Satisfied by Prior and Ongoing Services; Trial Court Credibility Findings Govern Post‑Termination Visitation Commentary on In re D.G. and L.G., No. 24-595 (W. Va. Sept. 30,...
United States v. Luciano: Seventh Circuit Reaffirms Boundaries of Anders Review and Common Trial/Sentencing Claims in a Nonprecedential Disposition

United States v. Luciano: Seventh Circuit Reaffirms Boundaries of Anders Review and Common Trial/Sentencing Claims in a Nonprecedential Disposition

Date: Oct 1, 2025
United States v. Luciano: Seventh Circuit Reaffirms Boundaries of Anders Review and Common Trial/Sentencing Claims in a Nonprecedential Disposition Introduction This commentary examines the Seventh...
Seventh Circuit Reaffirms Reliability-Over-Suggestiveness for Single-Photo Identifications, Proper Venue in Conspiracy Cases, and Presumptive Reasonableness of Below-Guidelines Sentences in an Anders Dismissal

Seventh Circuit Reaffirms Reliability-Over-Suggestiveness for Single-Photo Identifications, Proper Venue in Conspiracy Cases, and Presumptive Reasonableness of Below-Guidelines Sentences in an Anders Dismissal

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Seventh Circuit Reaffirms Reliability-Over-Suggestiveness for Single-Photo Identifications, Proper Venue in Conspiracy Cases, and Presumptive Reasonableness of Below-Guidelines Sentences in an Anders...
Refusal Is Not a Shield: Seventh Circuit Confirms That “Reasonably Calculated” Notice, Including Alternative Delivery and Judicial Notice of Associated Addresses, Satisfies OSHA Service for Summary Enforcement

Refusal Is Not a Shield: Seventh Circuit Confirms That “Reasonably Calculated” Notice, Including Alternative Delivery and Judicial Notice of Associated Addresses, Satisfies OSHA Service for Summary Enforcement

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Refusal Is Not a Shield: Seventh Circuit Confirms That “Reasonably Calculated” Notice, Including Alternative Delivery and Judicial Notice of Associated Addresses, Satisfies OSHA Service for Summary...
Consent to Legal Guardianship Does Not Limit Court’s Authority to Terminate Parental Rights When No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction Exists

Consent to Legal Guardianship Does Not Limit Court’s Authority to Terminate Parental Rights When No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction Exists

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Consent to Legal Guardianship Does Not Limit Court’s Authority to Terminate Parental Rights When No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction Exists Introduction In a memorandum decision issued on...
No Clearly Established Fourth Amendment Bar to Trousers-Down Gun Search or 20‑Minute Seclusion in Schools; Sixth Circuit Affirms Interlocutory Review of Qualified Immunity on Plaintiff’s Facts

No Clearly Established Fourth Amendment Bar to Trousers-Down Gun Search or 20‑Minute Seclusion in Schools; Sixth Circuit Affirms Interlocutory Review of Qualified Immunity on Plaintiff’s Facts

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Clearly Established Fourth Amendment Bar to Trousers-Down Gun Search or 20‑Minute Seclusion in Schools; Sixth Circuit Affirms Interlocutory Review of Qualified Immunity on Plaintiff’s Facts...
Fair Access, Not Blind Deference: Sixth Circuit Limits Preclusion of Prison Disciplinary Findings and Clarifies Video-Based Summary Judgment

Fair Access, Not Blind Deference: Sixth Circuit Limits Preclusion of Prison Disciplinary Findings and Clarifies Video-Based Summary Judgment

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Fair Access, Not Blind Deference: Sixth Circuit Limits Preclusion of Prison Disciplinary Findings and Clarifies Video-Based Summary Judgment Introduction In Brent James Nash v. Austin Bryce and...
Only Executive Orders Are Appealable in GLC COAM Arbitrations: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies That Interim Awards Do Not Trigger the 10‑Day Review Deadline

Only Executive Orders Are Appealable in GLC COAM Arbitrations: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies That Interim Awards Do Not Trigger the 10‑Day Review Deadline

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Only Executive Orders Are Appealable in GLC COAM Arbitrations: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies That Interim Awards Do Not Trigger the 10‑Day Review Deadline Case: Ultra Group of Companies, Inc. v....
No Unwarranted Disparity Shown by Aggregate Statistics: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Statutory-Maximum Upward Variance and Consecutive Revocation Term for Immediate Recidivism in Child-Pornography Case

No Unwarranted Disparity Shown by Aggregate Statistics: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Statutory-Maximum Upward Variance and Consecutive Revocation Term for Immediate Recidivism in Child-Pornography Case

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Unwarranted Disparity Shown by Aggregate Statistics: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Statutory-Maximum Upward Variance and Consecutive Revocation Term for Immediate Recidivism in Child-Pornography Case...
No Cognizable PSG for Generic Police Informants and No Political-Opinion Nexus; CAT Requires Particularized Risk: Second Circuit’s Summary Order in Velecela Rojas v. Bondi

No Cognizable PSG for Generic Police Informants and No Political-Opinion Nexus; CAT Requires Particularized Risk: Second Circuit’s Summary Order in Velecela Rojas v. Bondi

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Cognizable PSG for Generic Police Informants and No Political-Opinion Nexus; CAT Requires Particularized Risk: Second Circuit’s Summary Order in Velecela Rojas v. Bondi Court: United States Court...
Futility Requires Evidence and CAT Demands Official Acquiescence: Guidance from Masaquiza‑Masaquiza v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Futility Requires Evidence and CAT Demands Official Acquiescence: Guidance from Masaquiza‑Masaquiza v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Futility Requires Evidence and CAT Demands Official Acquiescence: Guidance from Masaquiza‑Masaquiza v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025) Note: This decision is a Summary Order of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the...
Plain-View Hazards on Icy Roads: Comparative Negligence for the Jury; No Default Spoliation for Pre‑Notice Telematics Loss

Plain-View Hazards on Icy Roads: Comparative Negligence for the Jury; No Default Spoliation for Pre‑Notice Telematics Loss

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Plain-View Hazards on Icy Roads: Comparative Negligence for the Jury; No Default Spoliation for Pre‑Notice Telematics Loss Introduction In Fahrnow v. E-5 Oilfield Services, 2025 MT 220, the Montana...
No Automatic New Trial or Retroactive Exclusion When a Count Fails: Clarifying the Effect of a Reversed Street Gang Act Charge on Remaining Convictions

No Automatic New Trial or Retroactive Exclusion When a Count Fails: Clarifying the Effect of a Reversed Street Gang Act Charge on Remaining Convictions

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Automatic New Trial or Retroactive Exclusion When a Count Fails: Clarifying the Effect of a Reversed Street Gang Act Charge on Remaining Convictions Introduction In Bostic v. The State and Wright...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert