Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

defining-direct-and-derivative-claims:-delaware&amp Case Commentaries

After Goldey and Egbert: Third Circuit Reaffirms No Bivens for Federal Prison Conditions and Excessive Force, But Requires Leave to Amend for Rehabilitation Act and RFRA Claims

After Goldey and Egbert: Third Circuit Reaffirms No Bivens for Federal Prison Conditions and Excessive Force, But Requires Leave to Amend for Rehabilitation Act and RFRA Claims

Date: Oct 27, 2025
After Goldey and Egbert: Third Circuit Reaffirms No Bivens for Federal Prison Conditions and Excessive Force, But Requires Leave to Amend for Rehabilitation Act and RFRA Claims Introduction In Thomas...
Flow-Down Defective-Work Clauses Override Time-and-Materials Billing; Recoupment Permitted Against Same-Contract Sums

Flow-Down Defective-Work Clauses Override Time-and-Materials Billing; Recoupment Permitted Against Same-Contract Sums

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Flow-Down Defective-Work Clauses Override Time-and-Materials Billing; Recoupment Permitted Against Same-Contract Sums Case: Umoja Erectors LLC v. D.A. Nolt Inc., et al. Court: United States Court of...
Hermann Estoppel Revived and Provider Assignments Clarified: The Fifth Circuit’s Framework for Out‑of‑Network ERISA Claims in Angelina Emergency Med. v. Blue Cross

Hermann Estoppel Revived and Provider Assignments Clarified: The Fifth Circuit’s Framework for Out‑of‑Network ERISA Claims in Angelina Emergency Med. v. Blue Cross

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Hermann Estoppel Revived and Provider Assignments Clarified: The Fifth Circuit’s Framework for Out‑of‑Network ERISA Claims in Angelina Emergency Med. v. Blue Cross Introduction In Angelina Emergency...
No Statutory Lanham Act Damages Without a Registered Mark: Fifth Circuit Vacates Awards and Clarifies Limits on Attorney Immunity in Lewis Brisbois v. Bitgood

No Statutory Lanham Act Damages Without a Registered Mark: Fifth Circuit Vacates Awards and Clarifies Limits on Attorney Immunity in Lewis Brisbois v. Bitgood

Date: Oct 27, 2025
No Statutory Lanham Act Damages Without a Registered Mark: Fifth Circuit Vacates Awards and Clarifies Limits on Attorney Immunity in Lewis Brisbois v. Bitgood Introduction In an unpublished but...
No Post‑Termination Royalties Absent Express Language: “Developed and Manufactured During the Initial Term” Means What It Says

No Post‑Termination Royalties Absent Express Language: “Developed and Manufactured During the Initial Term” Means What It Says

Date: Oct 27, 2025
No Post‑Termination Royalties Absent Express Language: “Developed and Manufactured During the Initial Term” Means What It Says Case: Strategy and Execution, Inc. v. Black Rifle Coffee Company,...
General Compliance Clauses Do Not Waive Tribal Sovereign Immunity: Sixth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of FLSA Suit Against Tribally Owned Casino

General Compliance Clauses Do Not Waive Tribal Sovereign Immunity: Sixth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of FLSA Suit Against Tribally Owned Casino

Date: Oct 27, 2025
General Compliance Clauses Do Not Waive Tribal Sovereign Immunity: Sixth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of FLSA Suit Against Tribally Owned Casino Alexandria Parrotta v. Island Resort & Casino, No....
Undercover buyer’s export statement and contextual cues suffice for § 2K2.1(b)(6)(A): Sixth Circuit affirms export-enhancement, invited-error bar to acceptance-of-responsibility challenge, and within-Guidelines sentence in United States v. Darvell Jackson

Undercover buyer’s export statement and contextual cues suffice for § 2K2.1(b)(6)(A): Sixth Circuit affirms export-enhancement, invited-error bar to acceptance-of-responsibility challenge, and within-Guidelines sentence in United States v. Darvell Jackson

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Undercover buyer’s export statement and contextual cues suffice for § 2K2.1(b)(6)(A): Sixth Circuit affirms export-enhancement, invited-error bar to acceptance-of-responsibility challenge, and...
Sixth Circuit: Kentucky Wanton Second-Degree Manslaughter Is Not a “Crime of Violence” Under the Guidelines; Misclassification Is Plain Error (United States v. Tooley)

Sixth Circuit: Kentucky Wanton Second-Degree Manslaughter Is Not a “Crime of Violence” Under the Guidelines; Misclassification Is Plain Error (United States v. Tooley)

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Sixth Circuit: Kentucky Wanton Second-Degree Manslaughter Is Not a “Crime of Violence” Under the Guidelines; Misclassification Is Plain Error Introduction In United States v. Tooley, the Sixth...
Concurrent Sentence Doctrine Extends to Sentences Consecutive to Life; MVRA Permits Lost-Income Restitution to Deceased Victims’ Family Members (Clarified): Commentary on United States v. Lesley Green (and Philmon Chambers)

Concurrent Sentence Doctrine Extends to Sentences Consecutive to Life; MVRA Permits Lost-Income Restitution to Deceased Victims’ Family Members (Clarified): Commentary on United States v. Lesley Green (and Philmon Chambers)

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Concurrent Sentence Doctrine Extends to Sentences Consecutive to Life; MVRA Permits Lost-Income Restitution to Deceased Victims’ Family Members (Clarified) Commentary on United States v. Lesley Green...
United States v. Philmon Chambers (11th Cir. 2025): Eleventh Circuit Extends the Concurrent-Sentence Doctrine to Life-Plus Sentences and Affirms MVRA Restitution for Deceased Victims’ Family Members

United States v. Philmon Chambers (11th Cir. 2025): Eleventh Circuit Extends the Concurrent-Sentence Doctrine to Life-Plus Sentences and Affirms MVRA Restitution for Deceased Victims’ Family Members

Date: Oct 27, 2025
United States v. Philmon Chambers (11th Cir. 2025): Eleventh Circuit Extends the Concurrent-Sentence Doctrine to Life-Plus Sentences and Affirms MVRA Restitution for Deceased Victims’ Family Members...
Reciprocal Rule 404(b) Notice and No Remmer Hearing Absent Genuine External Influence: United States v. Acebo (10th Cir. 2025)

Reciprocal Rule 404(b) Notice and No Remmer Hearing Absent Genuine External Influence: United States v. Acebo (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Reciprocal Rule 404(b) Notice and No Remmer Hearing Absent Genuine External Influence: United States v. Acebo (10th Cir. 2025) United States v. Acebo, No. 24-8035 (10th Cir. Oct. 23, 2025) —...
Third Circuit Clarifies: No “Agency Exception” to Twombly/Iqbal and No Consumer‑Initiation Requirement under FCRA § 1681b(a)(3)(A)

Third Circuit Clarifies: No “Agency Exception” to Twombly/Iqbal and No Consumer‑Initiation Requirement under FCRA § 1681b(a)(3)(A)

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Third Circuit Clarifies: No “Agency Exception” to Twombly/Iqbal and No Consumer‑Initiation Requirement under FCRA § 1681b(a)(3)(A) Case: Eva Migliore v. Vision Solar LLC, et al. (Sunlight Financial...
Third Circuit Holds Section 1782 Petitions Are Not “Civil Actions” Under FAA § 4, So Arbitration Cannot Be Compelled From the § 1782 Docket

Third Circuit Holds Section 1782 Petitions Are Not “Civil Actions” Under FAA § 4, So Arbitration Cannot Be Compelled From the § 1782 Docket

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Third Circuit Holds Section 1782 Petitions Are Not “Civil Actions” Under FAA § 4, So Arbitration Cannot Be Compelled From the § 1782 Docket Note: The opinion is designated “Not Precedential,” but...
Arzamendi v. Hegseth: Rescission of Federal Vaccine Mandate Does Not Moot Damages Claims; Religious Accommodation Pleadings Must Specifically Tie Beliefs to Testing/Masking Protocols

Arzamendi v. Hegseth: Rescission of Federal Vaccine Mandate Does Not Moot Damages Claims; Religious Accommodation Pleadings Must Specifically Tie Beliefs to Testing/Masking Protocols

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Arzamendi v. Hegseth: Rescission of Federal Vaccine Mandate Does Not Moot Damages Claims; Religious Accommodation Pleadings Must Specifically Tie Beliefs to Testing/Masking Protocols Introduction In...
Common‑Area Visibility as the “Additional Nexus” for Proving Knowledge of Firearms in Joint‑Occupancy § 924(c) Cases

Common‑Area Visibility as the “Additional Nexus” for Proving Knowledge of Firearms in Joint‑Occupancy § 924(c) Cases

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Common‑Area Visibility as the “Additional Nexus” for Proving Knowledge of Firearms in Joint‑Occupancy § 924(c) Cases United States v. Aaric Murray and Richard Kirkland Johnson, No. 23‑4328 & 23‑4331...
United States v. Johnson (4th Cir. 2025): Circumstantial Proof of Firearm Knowledge in Jointly Occupied Homes Suffices for § 924(c) Aiding-and-Abetting

United States v. Johnson (4th Cir. 2025): Circumstantial Proof of Firearm Knowledge in Jointly Occupied Homes Suffices for § 924(c) Aiding-and-Abetting

Date: Oct 27, 2025
United States v. Johnson (4th Cir. 2025): Circumstantial Proof of Firearm Knowledge in Jointly Occupied Homes Suffices for § 924(c) Aiding-and-Abetting Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth...
Hall v. Nassau County: Standing for Systemic Tax-Assessment Challenges and Venue Transfer for Countywide Juror Interest

Hall v. Nassau County: Standing for Systemic Tax-Assessment Challenges and Venue Transfer for Countywide Juror Interest

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Hall v. Nassau County: Standing for Systemic Tax-Assessment Challenges and Venue Transfer for Countywide Juror Interest Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Second Department (Barros,...
Second Department Clarifies Limits on Trial Subpoenas in Fiduciary Accountings and Reaffirms Prudent‑Investor Deference for Intra‑Family Trust/GRAT Transactions

Second Department Clarifies Limits on Trial Subpoenas in Fiduciary Accountings and Reaffirms Prudent‑Investor Deference for Intra‑Family Trust/GRAT Transactions

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Second Department Clarifies Limits on Trial Subpoenas in Fiduciary Accountings and Reaffirms Prudent‑Investor Deference for Intra‑Family Trust/GRAT Transactions Case: Matter of Cheryl LaBella...
Primary-Use Gatekeeping Under RPTL 420-a: Member-Only Social Functions Defeat Exemption Despite Cultural Mission

Primary-Use Gatekeeping Under RPTL 420-a: Member-Only Social Functions Defeat Exemption Despite Cultural Mission

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Primary-Use Gatekeeping Under RPTL 420-a: Member-Only Social Functions Defeat Exemption Despite Cultural Mission Case: Matter of Germania of Poughkeepsie, Inc. v. Town of Poughkeepsie Citation: 2025...
People v. Lewis: Protective Frisks Stop at the Pat‑Down; Federal Harmless‑Error Standard Requires New Trial on Robbery‑Related Counts

People v. Lewis: Protective Frisks Stop at the Pat‑Down; Federal Harmless‑Error Standard Requires New Trial on Robbery‑Related Counts

Date: Oct 27, 2025
People v. Lewis: Protective Frisks Stop at the Pat‑Down; Federal Harmless‑Error Standard Requires New Trial on Robbery‑Related Counts Introduction In People v. Lewis (2025 NY Slip Op 05823), the...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert