Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

comprehensive-interpretation-of-&amp Case Commentaries

Supreme Court of Alabama Clarifies Enforceability of Text-Message Settlements: Definiteness and the Mirror-Image Rule Remain Paramount

Supreme Court of Alabama Clarifies Enforceability of Text-Message Settlements: Definiteness and the Mirror-Image Rule Remain Paramount

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Supreme Court of Alabama Clarifies Enforceability of Text-Message Settlements: Definiteness and the Mirror-Image Rule Remain Paramount Introduction In iWTNS, Inc.; Leveraged, LLC; and Bradley Lewis...
Escrow Is Not an Operating Account: First Department Clarifies Rule 1.15 and Rejects Preclusive Effect of Vacated Admonition (Matter of Edelman, 2025)

Escrow Is Not an Operating Account: First Department Clarifies Rule 1.15 and Rejects Preclusive Effect of Vacated Admonition (Matter of Edelman, 2025)

Date: Aug 22, 2025
Escrow Is Not an Operating Account: First Department Clarifies Rule 1.15 and Rejects Preclusive Effect of Vacated Admonition Introduction This commentary examines the Appellate Division, First...
No Stayed Probationary Suspensions and Narrow Nunc Pro Tunc Relief in Reciprocal Discipline: Commentary on Matter of Barocas (2025 NY Slip Op 04750)

No Stayed Probationary Suspensions and Narrow Nunc Pro Tunc Relief in Reciprocal Discipline: Commentary on Matter of Barocas (2025 NY Slip Op 04750)

Date: Aug 22, 2025
No Stayed Probationary Suspensions and Narrow Nunc Pro Tunc Relief in Reciprocal Discipline: Matter of Barocas (2025 NY Slip Op 04750) Introduction In Matter of Barocas (2025 NY Slip Op 04750), the...
The Excessive Fines Clause Meets Executive Law § 63(12): Appellate Division Vacates Disgorgement, Affirms Injunctive Remedies in People v. Trump

The Excessive Fines Clause Meets Executive Law § 63(12): Appellate Division Vacates Disgorgement, Affirms Injunctive Remedies in People v. Trump

Date: Aug 22, 2025
The Excessive Fines Clause Meets Executive Law § 63(12): Appellate Division Vacates Disgorgement, Affirms Injunctive Remedies in People v. Trump Introduction People v. Trump, 2025 NY Slip Op 04756...
Self-Created Stress Is Not Mitigation for Escrow Misappropriation: Second Department Reaffirms Strict Fiduciary Standards in Matter of Bachu

Self-Created Stress Is Not Mitigation for Escrow Misappropriation: Second Department Reaffirms Strict Fiduciary Standards in Matter of Bachu

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Self-Created Stress Is Not Mitigation for Escrow Misappropriation: Second Department Reaffirms Strict Fiduciary Standards in Matter of Bachu Introduction In Matter of Bachu (2025 NY Slip Op 04721),...
No Reset by Discontinuance or “Deceleration”: Second Department Applies FAPA Retroactively to Time‑Bar Mortgage Foreclosure (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Salko)

No Reset by Discontinuance or “Deceleration”: Second Department Applies FAPA Retroactively to Time‑Bar Mortgage Foreclosure (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Salko)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
No Reset by Discontinuance or “Deceleration”: Second Department Applies FAPA Retroactively to Time‑Bar Mortgage Foreclosure Introduction In Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Salko (2025 NY Slip Op 04743),...
Totality-of-Circumstances Standard and Respondent’s Burden at 22 NYCRR 1240.12(c)(3)(iii) Hearings: Six-Month Suspension for Repeated DWI Convictions, Probation Violations, and Failure to Report (Matter of Thwaites)

Totality-of-Circumstances Standard and Respondent’s Burden at 22 NYCRR 1240.12(c)(3)(iii) Hearings: Six-Month Suspension for Repeated DWI Convictions, Probation Violations, and Failure to Report (Matter of Thwaites)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Totality-of-Circumstances Standard and Respondent’s Burden at 22 NYCRR 1240.12(c)(3)(iii) Hearings: Six-Month Suspension for Repeated DWI Convictions, Probation Violations, and Failure to Report...
Second Department Extends ABC Law § 55‑c “Good Cause” Protections to Oral and Implied Beer Distribution Agreements

Second Department Extends ABC Law § 55‑c “Good Cause” Protections to Oral and Implied Beer Distribution Agreements

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Second Department Extends ABC Law § 55‑c “Good Cause” Protections to Oral and Implied Beer Distribution Agreements Case: Oak Beverages, Inc. v. D.G. Yuengling & Son, Inc. (2025 NYSlipOp 04730) —...
DHCR Legal Rent as the Measure of Use-and-Occupancy and Strict Rent‑Stabilization Notice Compliance for Ejectment: Commentary on Esposito v. Larig (2025 NY Slip Op 04704)

DHCR Legal Rent as the Measure of Use-and-Occupancy and Strict Rent‑Stabilization Notice Compliance for Ejectment: Commentary on Esposito v. Larig (2025 NY Slip Op 04704)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
DHCR Legal Rent as the Measure of Use-and-Occupancy and Strict Rent‑Stabilization Notice Compliance for Ejectment: Commentary on Esposito v. Larig (2025 NY Slip Op 04704) Introduction Esposito v....
Pleading Religious-Discrimination Claims in NYC Vaccine-Mandate Cases: Conclusory Allegations Are Insufficient; Post-Rescission Claims Are Moot

Pleading Religious-Discrimination Claims in NYC Vaccine-Mandate Cases: Conclusory Allegations Are Insufficient; Post-Rescission Claims Are Moot

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Pleading Religious-Discrimination Claims in NYC Vaccine-Mandate Cases: Conclusory Allegations Are Insufficient; Post-Rescission Claims Are Moot Introduction Currid v. City of New York, 2025 NY Slip...
“Watchful Waiting” as a Material Alternative in Informed Consent for YAG Vitreolysis; No Duty to Supervise a Referred Specialist — Clinkscales v. Tostanoski (2025)

“Watchful Waiting” as a Material Alternative in Informed Consent for YAG Vitreolysis; No Duty to Supervise a Referred Specialist — Clinkscales v. Tostanoski (2025)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
“Watchful Waiting” as a Material Alternative in Informed Consent for YAG Vitreolysis; No Duty to Supervise a Referred Specialist — Clinkscales v. Tostanoski (2025) Introduction In Clinkscales v....
RPAPL 1304 Compliance When Using Third‑Party Mailing Vendors: Tracking Numbers and RPAPL 1306 Filings Are Insufficient — Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Ricks

RPAPL 1304 Compliance When Using Third‑Party Mailing Vendors: Tracking Numbers and RPAPL 1306 Filings Are Insufficient — Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Ricks

Date: Aug 21, 2025
RPAPL 1304 Compliance When Using Third‑Party Mailing Vendors: Tracking Numbers and RPAPL 1306 Filings Are Insufficient Commentary on Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Ricks (2025 NY Slip Op 04728,...
Gomez v. Tilden Estates, LLC: Dust on Permanent Stairs as a Potential 12 NYCRR 23-1.7(d) “Slipping Hazard,” Limits on Untimely Cross-Motions, and No Automatic §240(1) Liability for Stairway Slips

Gomez v. Tilden Estates, LLC: Dust on Permanent Stairs as a Potential 12 NYCRR 23-1.7(d) “Slipping Hazard,” Limits on Untimely Cross-Motions, and No Automatic §240(1) Liability for Stairway Slips

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Gomez v. Tilden Estates, LLC: Dust on Permanent Stairs as a Potential 12 NYCRR 23-1.7(d) “Slipping Hazard,” Limits on Untimely Cross-Motions, and No Automatic §240(1) Liability for Stairway Slips...
Nominal Damages for Technical Trespass Are Discretionary Absent Prescriptive-Rights Risk; Landowner’s Retention of Trespasser’s Materials Constitutes Conversion — Commentary on Fairchild Corp. v. LIRR (2025 NY Slip Op 04705)

Nominal Damages for Technical Trespass Are Discretionary Absent Prescriptive-Rights Risk; Landowner’s Retention of Trespasser’s Materials Constitutes Conversion — Commentary on Fairchild Corp. v. LIRR (2025 NY Slip Op 04705)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Nominal Damages for Technical Trespass Are Discretionary Absent Prescriptive-Rights Risk; Landowner’s Retention of Trespasser’s Materials Constitutes Conversion — Commentary on Fairchild Corp. v....
Hansen v. Boise School District #1: Personal Property Injury as a Prerequisite to Takings Standing

Hansen v. Boise School District #1: Personal Property Injury as a Prerequisite to Takings Standing

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Hansen v. Boise School District #1 (Idaho 2025): Personal Property Injury as a Prerequisite to Takings Standing 1. Introduction In Hansen v. Boise School District #1, the Supreme Court of Idaho...
“The Boyer Confirmation” – Wyoming Re-Affirms that Dispatch-Derived License Information and a Single Observed Traffic Infraction Jointly Supply Reasonable Suspicion for a Stop

“The Boyer Confirmation” – Wyoming Re-Affirms that Dispatch-Derived License Information and a Single Observed Traffic Infraction Jointly Supply Reasonable Suspicion for a Stop

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“The Boyer Confirmation” – Wyoming Re-Affirms that Dispatch-Derived License Information and a Single Observed Traffic Infraction Jointly Supply Reasonable Suspicion for a Stop Introduction Andrew Lee...
Default, Progressive Discipline, and Revocation: The Kovac Decision’s Reinforcement of Wisconsin’s Lawyer-Regulation Framework

Default, Progressive Discipline, and Revocation: The Kovac Decision’s Reinforcement of Wisconsin’s Lawyer-Regulation Framework

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Default, Progressive Discipline, and Revocation: Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Peter J. Kovac and the Supreme Court of Wisconsin’s Latest Guidance on Attorney Misconduct 1. Introduction In Office of...
Brown v. McMillon: Eleventh Circuit Rejects “Administrative Default Judgments by Acquiescence” and Clarifies Futility Standard for Pro Se Pleadings

Brown v. McMillon: Eleventh Circuit Rejects “Administrative Default Judgments by Acquiescence” and Clarifies Futility Standard for Pro Se Pleadings

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Brown v. McMillon: Eleventh Circuit Rejects “Administrative Default Judgments by Acquiescence” and Clarifies Futility Standard for Pro Se Pleadings Introduction In Mubbrika S. Brown & Alquddus Brown...
The Vail-Romero Doctrine: Abandonment of the “Unable-or-Unwilling” Challenge as a Complete Bar to Asylum Relief in the Eleventh Circuit

The Vail-Romero Doctrine: Abandonment of the “Unable-or-Unwilling” Challenge as a Complete Bar to Asylum Relief in the Eleventh Circuit

Date: Aug 19, 2025
The Vail-Romero Doctrine: Abandonment of the “Unable-or-Unwilling” Challenge as a Complete Bar to Asylum Relief in the Eleventh Circuit 1. Introduction Sandra Vail-Romero, a young indigenous woman...
United States v. Grindle: Mental-Health Challenges Do Not Automatically Vitiate Knowing & Voluntary Sentence-Appeal Waivers

United States v. Grindle: Mental-Health Challenges Do Not Automatically Vitiate Knowing & Voluntary Sentence-Appeal Waivers

Date: Aug 19, 2025
United States v. Grindle: Mental-Health Challenges Do Not Automatically Vitiate Knowing & Voluntary Sentence-Appeal Waivers Introduction United States v. Nicholas Grindle (11th Cir. Aug. 15, 2025)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert