Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

clarifying-the-&amp Case Commentaries

GML §239-m Referral as a Non-Waivable Jurisdictional Prerequisite for Non-Exempt Area Variances: Filing Does Not Trigger Limitations; ZBA Approval Is Null and Void

GML §239-m Referral as a Non-Waivable Jurisdictional Prerequisite for Non-Exempt Area Variances: Filing Does Not Trigger Limitations; ZBA Approval Is Null and Void

Date: Jul 26, 2025
GML §239-m Referral as a Non-Waivable Jurisdictional Prerequisite for Non-Exempt Area Variances: Filing Does Not Trigger Limitations; ZBA Approval Is Null and Void Introduction Matter of Johnson v....
Heinrich v. Serens: Clarifying Missing‑Witness Burdens and the Scope of Pleaded Negligence in Multi‑Provider Medical Malpractice Trials

Heinrich v. Serens: Clarifying Missing‑Witness Burdens and the Scope of Pleaded Negligence in Multi‑Provider Medical Malpractice Trials

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Heinrich v. Serens: Clarifying Missing‑Witness Burdens and the Scope of Pleaded Negligence in Multi‑Provider Medical Malpractice Trials Introduction In Heinrich v. Serens (2025 NY Slip Op 04318), the...
Limiting Labor Law § 200 to “Construction-Site” Context and Enforcing Broad Tenant Indemnity: Curran v. JJML, Inc. (4th Dep’t 2025)

Limiting Labor Law § 200 to “Construction-Site” Context and Enforcing Broad Tenant Indemnity: Curran v. JJML, Inc. (4th Dep’t 2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Limiting Labor Law § 200 to “Construction-Site” Context and Enforcing Broad Tenant Indemnity: Curran v. JJML, Inc. (4th Dep’t 2025) Introduction In Curran v. JJML, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 04356), the...
McGuire: Surrogate’s Courts May Compel Sibling DNA Testing to Establish Nonmarital Parentage Even in Testate Estates

McGuire: Surrogate’s Courts May Compel Sibling DNA Testing to Establish Nonmarital Parentage Even in Testate Estates

Date: Jul 26, 2025
McGuire: Surrogate’s Courts May Compel Sibling DNA Testing to Establish Nonmarital Parentage Even in Testate Estates Introduction This commentary analyzes the Appellate Division, Fourth Department’s...
No New Precedent: Denial of Review in People v. Terry, with a Dissent Urging Evidence-Based Causation and Aiding‑and‑Abetting Proof at Bindover

No New Precedent: Denial of Review in People v. Terry, with a Dissent Urging Evidence-Based Causation and Aiding‑and‑Abetting Proof at Bindover

Date: Jul 26, 2025
No New Precedent: Denial of Review in People v. Terry, with a Dissent Urging Evidence-Based Causation and Aiding‑and‑Abetting Proof at Bindover Introduction In People of Michigan v. Damaree Darvell...
Satisfying Nemeth in Friction-Product Asbestos Cases: Fourth Department Upholds Causation via Product-Specific Testing and Fiber‑Year Estimates

Satisfying Nemeth in Friction-Product Asbestos Cases: Fourth Department Upholds Causation via Product-Specific Testing and Fiber‑Year Estimates

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Satisfying Nemeth in Friction-Product Asbestos Cases: Fourth Department Upholds Causation via Product-Specific Testing and Fiber‑Year Estimates Introduction In Skrzynski v. Akebono Brake Corp. (2025...
Verbal “Stop” Command Alone Is Not a Seizure; Flight Plus Match to a Detailed 911 Description Creates Reasonable Suspicion for Pursuit — Commentary on People v. Wright (2025)

Verbal “Stop” Command Alone Is Not a Seizure; Flight Plus Match to a Detailed 911 Description Creates Reasonable Suspicion for Pursuit — Commentary on People v. Wright (2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Verbal “Stop” Command Alone Is Not a Seizure; Flight Plus Match to a Detailed 911 Description Creates Reasonable Suspicion for Pursuit In-depth Commentary on People v. Wright, 2025 NY Slip Op 04345...
A Roof Is Not the Home: Public Exposure Defines “Outside the Home” under Penal Law § 265.03(3) and Limits on Miranda in On‑Scene Questioning — Commentary on People v. Casiano (2025)

A Roof Is Not the Home: Public Exposure Defines “Outside the Home” under Penal Law § 265.03(3) and Limits on Miranda in On‑Scene Questioning — Commentary on People v. Casiano (2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
A Roof Is Not the Home: Public Exposure Defines “Outside the Home” under Penal Law § 265.03(3) and Limits on Miranda in On‑Scene Questioning Commentary on People v. Casiano, 2025 NY Slip Op 04316...
Clarifying “Diligent Efforts” in Permanent Neglect: Agency Need Not Rely on Foster-Parent Transportation; Offering Bus Tickets Suffices — Matter of Ayden G. (Nicky C.)

Clarifying “Diligent Efforts” in Permanent Neglect: Agency Need Not Rely on Foster-Parent Transportation; Offering Bus Tickets Suffices — Matter of Ayden G. (Nicky C.)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Clarifying “Diligent Efforts” in Permanent Neglect: Agency Need Not Rely on Foster-Parent Transportation; Offering Bus Tickets Suffices — Matter of Ayden G. (Nicky C.) Introduction This commentary...
Derivative Standing via Testamentary Trust Devolution and Temporal Limits on Faithless Servant Disgorgement: Commentary on Owen v. Hurlbut (2025 NY Slip Op 04311)

Derivative Standing via Testamentary Trust Devolution and Temporal Limits on Faithless Servant Disgorgement: Commentary on Owen v. Hurlbut (2025 NY Slip Op 04311)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Derivative Standing via Testamentary Trust Devolution and Temporal Limits on Faithless Servant Disgorgement: Commentary on Owen v. Hurlbut (2025 NY Slip Op 04311) Introduction Owen v. Hurlbut is a...
“One Letter Is Not Due Diligence”: People v. Ernst Clarifies Discovery Due Diligence and the Limits of CPL 30.30 Tolling for “Pending” Motions

“One Letter Is Not Due Diligence”: People v. Ernst Clarifies Discovery Due Diligence and the Limits of CPL 30.30 Tolling for “Pending” Motions

Date: Jul 26, 2025
“One Letter Is Not Due Diligence”: People v. Ernst Clarifies Discovery Due Diligence and the Limits of CPL 30.30 Tolling for “Pending” Motions Introduction People v. Ernst (2025 NY Slip Op 04329) is...
Directory Time Limits and Strict Accountability for Pro Hac Vice Admissions: The Delaware Supreme Court’s Decision in IMO John Du Wors

Directory Time Limits and Strict Accountability for Pro Hac Vice Admissions: The Delaware Supreme Court’s Decision in IMO John Du Wors

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Directory Time Limits and Strict Accountability for Pro Hac Vice Admissions: The Delaware Supreme Court’s Decision in IMO John Du Wors Introduction In In the Matter of John Du Wors, the Delaware...
“High-Seas” Jurisdiction Embraces the Exclusive Economic Zone: A Commentary on United States v. Jose Junior Bailon Franco (11th Cir. 2025)

“High-Seas” Jurisdiction Embraces the Exclusive Economic Zone: A Commentary on United States v. Jose Junior Bailon Franco (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 25, 2025
“High-Seas” Jurisdiction Embraces the Exclusive Economic Zone: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Jose Junior Bailon Franco (11th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction United States v. Jose Junior...
“EEZ = High Seas”: The Eleventh Circuit’s Unpublished Re-affirmation of Congress’s Plenary Power under the MDLEA

“EEZ = High Seas”: The Eleventh Circuit’s Unpublished Re-affirmation of Congress’s Plenary Power under the MDLEA

Date: Jul 25, 2025
“EEZ = High Seas”: The Eleventh Circuit’s Unpublished Re-affirmation of Congress’s Plenary Power under the MDLEA 1. Introduction United States v. Nilson Olaya Grueso, Nos. 22-11929, 22-11932,...

        Sixth Circuit Clarifies Strickland: Impeachment Cross-Examination that Adds Damaging Facts
        Can Still Be “Reasonable Trial Strategy” under AEDPA – Commentary on Mark Hartman v. Dave Yost

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Strickland: Impeachment Cross-Examination that Adds Damaging Facts Can Still Be “Reasonable Trial Strategy” under AEDPA – Commentary on Mark Hartman v. Dave Yost

Date: Jul 25, 2025
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Strickland: Impeachment Cross-Examination that Adds Damaging Facts Can Still Be “Reasonable Trial Strategy” under AEDPA Commentary on Mark Hartman v. Dave Yost, Nos....
Reaffirming the “Every Fair-Minded Jurist” Threshold: The Sixth Circuit’s Double-Deference Clarification in Hartman v. Yost

Reaffirming the “Every Fair-Minded Jurist” Threshold: The Sixth Circuit’s Double-Deference Clarification in Hartman v. Yost

Date: Jul 25, 2025
Reaffirming the “Every Fair-Minded Jurist” Threshold: The Sixth Circuit’s Double-Deference Clarification in Hartman v. Yost Introduction In Mark Hartman v. Dave Yost, the United States Court of...
United States v. Taylor: Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms Minimal Explanation Standard for Within-Guidelines Sentences

United States v. Taylor: Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms Minimal Explanation Standard for Within-Guidelines Sentences

Date: Jul 25, 2025
United States v. Taylor: Sixth Circuit Re-Affirms Minimal Explanation Standard for Within-Guidelines Sentences 1. Introduction In United States v. Marty Taylor, No. 25-3022 (6th Cir. July 24, 2025)...
Dangerousness Without Remand: United States v. Meeks Solidifies Williams Framework and Clarifies Sentencing Cross-Reference for Felon-in-Possession Cases

Dangerousness Without Remand: United States v. Meeks Solidifies Williams Framework and Clarifies Sentencing Cross-Reference for Felon-in-Possession Cases

Date: Jul 25, 2025
Dangerousness Without Remand: United States v. Meeks Sixth Circuit further refines the Williams “actual dangerousness” test and endorses robust use of the homicide cross-reference at sentencing I....
Removal Alone Does Not Waive the Right to Arbitrate – A Detailed Commentary on DeLaCruz-Bancroft v. Field Nation, LLC

Removal Alone Does Not Waive the Right to Arbitrate – A Detailed Commentary on DeLaCruz-Bancroft v. Field Nation, LLC

Date: Jul 25, 2025
Removal Alone Does Not Waive the Right to Arbitrate: Tenth Circuit Consolidates the Firm Waiver Rule and Morgan v. Sundance in DeLaCruz-Bancroft v. Field Nation 1. Introduction The Tenth Circuit’s...
Ogden v. Attorney General (10th Cir. 2025): Re-affirming the Non-Applicability of Good-Time Credits to Life Sentences and Clarifying COA Standards

Ogden v. Attorney General (10th Cir. 2025): Re-affirming the Non-Applicability of Good-Time Credits to Life Sentences and Clarifying COA Standards

Date: Jul 25, 2025
Ogden v. Attorney General for the State of New Mexico (10th Cir. 2025): Re-affirming the Non-Applicability of Good-Time Credits to Life Sentences and Clarifying the Certificate-of-Appealability...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert