Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

affirmation-of-combination-jury-instructions-in-murder-conviction-upholds-kentucky& Case Commentaries

“Any Person” Embraces “Any Persons”: Kentucky Supreme Court Authorises Joint Adoption by Unmarried Couples

“Any Person” Embraces “Any Persons”: Kentucky Supreme Court Authorises Joint Adoption by Unmarried Couples

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Any Person” Embraces “Any Persons”: Kentucky Supreme Court Authorises Joint Adoption by Unmarried Couples Introduction On 20 June 2025 the Supreme Court of Kentucky released G.G. and T.S. v. Cabinet...
“Waiver of Particular-Case Jurisdiction for Unverified RCr 11.42 Motions and the Narrow Path to Mandamus” – A Commentary on Glenn A. Peeler, Jr. v. John D. Simcoe

“Waiver of Particular-Case Jurisdiction for Unverified RCr 11.42 Motions and the Narrow Path to Mandamus” – A Commentary on Glenn A. Peeler, Jr. v. John D. Simcoe

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Waiver of Particular-Case Jurisdiction for Unverified RCr 11.42 Motions and the Narrow Path to Mandamus” Commentary on Supreme Court of Kentucky’s decision in Glenn A. Peeler, Jr. v. John D. Simcoe...
“No Irreparable Harm, No Writ” – The Kentucky Supreme Court’s Re-affirmation of Strict Prerequisites for Prohibition Relief in Evidence-Suppression Cases

“No Irreparable Harm, No Writ” – The Kentucky Supreme Court’s Re-affirmation of Strict Prerequisites for Prohibition Relief in Evidence-Suppression Cases

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“No Irreparable Harm, No Writ” – The Kentucky Supreme Court’s Re-affirmation of Strict Prerequisites for Prohibition Relief in Evidence-Suppression Cases Introduction In James Lynch v. Commonwealth...
“Beyond the Interview Room” – Kentucky Supreme Court Tightens the Reins on Forensic-Interviewer Testimony and Clarifies Waiver of Instructional Error (Jamie Boggs v. Commonwealth, 2025)

“Beyond the Interview Room” – Kentucky Supreme Court Tightens the Reins on Forensic-Interviewer Testimony and Clarifies Waiver of Instructional Error (Jamie Boggs v. Commonwealth, 2025)

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Beyond the Interview Room” – Kentucky Supreme Court Tightens the Reins on Forensic-Interviewer Testimony and Clarifies Waiver of Instructional Error Commentary on Jamie Boggs v. Commonwealth of...
Commonwealth v. Mills: Kentucky Adopts the “Favourability-Only” Test for Mid-Trial Brady Disclosures

Commonwealth v. Mills: Kentucky Adopts the “Favourability-Only” Test for Mid-Trial Brady Disclosures

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Commonwealth v. Mills: Kentucky Adopts the “Favourability-Only” Test for Mid-Trial Brady Disclosures 1. Introduction In Jeremy Daniel Mills v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, the Supreme Court of Kentucky...
“Silent Waiver”: Kentucky Supreme Court Clarifies When a Faretta Hearing Is Required

“Silent Waiver”: Kentucky Supreme Court Clarifies When a Faretta Hearing Is Required

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Silent Waiver”: Kentucky Supreme Court Clarifies When a Faretta Hearing Is Required Introduction In Keithyon Nelson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, the Supreme Court of Kentucky delivered a memorandum...
Moore v. Commonwealth: Re-Drawing the Line Between Police Narrative and “Investigative Hearsay” in Kentucky

Moore v. Commonwealth: Re-Drawing the Line Between Police Narrative and “Investigative Hearsay” in Kentucky

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Moore v. Commonwealth: Re-Drawing the Line Between Police Narrative and “Investigative Hearsay” in Kentucky Introduction On 20 June 2025, the Supreme Court of Kentucky, in a not-to-be-published...
The “West Doctrine”: Vacatur of Fines and Costs upon Commonwealth Concession Post-Jeffreys

The “West Doctrine”: Vacatur of Fines and Costs upon Commonwealth Concession Post-Jeffreys

Date: Jun 23, 2025
The “West Doctrine”: Vacatur of Fines and Costs upon Commonwealth Concession Post-Jeffreys Introduction In Kristopher Shane West v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, the Supreme Court of Kentucky affirmed a...
“Vacate-the-Lesser” Rule Reaffirmed: Supreme Court of Kentucky Clarifies Remedy for Mutually-Exclusive Verdicts in Taylor v. Commonwealth

“Vacate-the-Lesser” Rule Reaffirmed: Supreme Court of Kentucky Clarifies Remedy for Mutually-Exclusive Verdicts in Taylor v. Commonwealth

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Vacate-the-Lesser” Rule Reaffirmed: Supreme Court of Kentucky Clarifies Remedy for Mutually-Exclusive Verdicts in Taylor v. Commonwealth Introduction On 20 June 2025, the Supreme Court of Kentucky...
Consistency of Medical Causation Evidence in Kentucky Workers’ Compensation –  A Commentary on Michael Hardin v. Ford Motor Co. (Ky. 2025)

Consistency of Medical Causation Evidence in Kentucky Workers’ Compensation – A Commentary on Michael Hardin v. Ford Motor Co. (Ky. 2025)

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Consistency of Medical Causation Evidence in Kentucky Workers’ Compensation – A Comprehensive Commentary on Michael Hardin v. Ford Motor Co. (Sup. Ct. Ky. 2025) 1. Introduction In Michael Hardin v....
Clarifying the Limits of Prosecutorial Argument & Bolstering:
            The Unpublished Guidance of Rivak C. Kalfus v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (2025)

Clarifying the Limits of Prosecutorial Argument & Bolstering: The Unpublished Guidance of Rivak C. Kalfus v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (2025)

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Clarifying the Limits of Prosecutorial Argument & Bolstering: The Unpublished Guidance of Rivak C. Kalfus v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Ky. 2025) Introduction In Rivak C. Kalfus v. Commonwealth of...
Voluntary Payments Bar Common-Law Refunds: Kentucky Supreme Court Reaffirms Inland Container Test in T-Mobile v. Kentucky 911 Services Board

Voluntary Payments Bar Common-Law Refunds: Kentucky Supreme Court Reaffirms Inland Container Test in T-Mobile v. Kentucky 911 Services Board

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Voluntary Payments Bar Common-Law Refunds: Kentucky Supreme Court Reaffirms Inland Container Test in T-Mobile South LLC v. Kentucky 911 Services Board 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of Kentucky’s...
“Abandonment-by-Conduct”: Kentucky Supreme Court Re-affirms that a Defendant’s Post-Invocation Behavior Can Waive the Right to Self-Representation

“Abandonment-by-Conduct”: Kentucky Supreme Court Re-affirms that a Defendant’s Post-Invocation Behavior Can Waive the Right to Self-Representation

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Abandonment-by-Conduct”: Kentucky Supreme Court Re-affirms that a Defendant’s Post-Invocation Behavior Can Waive the Right to Self-Representation Introduction The Supreme Court of Kentucky’s...
Impairment over Intoxication: Kentucky Supreme Court Clarifies Elements of the 2023 Vehicular-Homicide Statute in Jent v. Commonwealth

Impairment over Intoxication: Kentucky Supreme Court Clarifies Elements of the 2023 Vehicular-Homicide Statute in Jent v. Commonwealth

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Impairment over Intoxication: Kentucky Supreme Court Clarifies Elements of the 2023 Vehicular-Homicide Statute in Jent v. Commonwealth 1. Introduction In Tracie Jent v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, the...
“Contractual Standing” and Co-Defendant Plea Agreements: A Commentary on People of Guam v. Duayne Richard Peters (2025 Guam 1)

“Contractual Standing” and Co-Defendant Plea Agreements: A Commentary on People of Guam v. Duayne Richard Peters (2025 Guam 1)

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Contractual Standing” and Co-Defendant Plea Agreements: A Comprehensive Commentary on People of Guam v. Duayne Richard Peters (2025 Guam 1) Author: AI Legal Commentary Service 1. Introduction In...
“Waivers Mean Waivers” – United States v. Nyandoro and the Fifth Circuit’s Re-Statement on Appeal Waivers, Factual-Insufficiency, and Second-Amendment Challenges

“Waivers Mean Waivers” – United States v. Nyandoro and the Fifth Circuit’s Re-Statement on Appeal Waivers, Factual-Insufficiency, and Second-Amendment Challenges

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Waivers Mean Waivers” – United States v. Nyandoro and the Fifth Circuit’s Re-Statement on Appeal Waivers, Factual-Insufficiency, and Second-Amendment Challenges 1. Introduction United States v....
“From Cafeteria Line to Taxable Line Item” – Aramark Corp. v. Harris Clarifies the Sales-Tax Treatment of Contract Food-Service Arrangements in Ohio

“From Cafeteria Line to Taxable Line Item” – Aramark Corp. v. Harris Clarifies the Sales-Tax Treatment of Contract Food-Service Arrangements in Ohio

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“From Cafeteria Line to Taxable Line Item” – Aramark Corp. v. Harris Clarifies the Sales-Tax Treatment of Contract Food-Service Arrangements in Ohio 1. Introduction On 18 June 2025 the Supreme Court...
“From Tort to Contract: Ohio’s Discretionary Sovereign Immunity Now Bars State-Contract Suits” — Commentary on 06/18/2025 Case Announcements #2, 2025-Ohio-2119

“From Tort to Contract: Ohio’s Discretionary Sovereign Immunity Now Bars State-Contract Suits” — Commentary on 06/18/2025 Case Announcements #2, 2025-Ohio-2119

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“From Tort to Contract: Ohio’s Discretionary Sovereign Immunity Now Bars State-Contract Suits” 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of Ohio, in its 06/18/2025 Case Announcements #2 (2025-Ohio-2119),...
From “Actual-Authority” to “Possession & Pass-Through”: The Supreme Court of Ohio Narrows the Agency Exclusion under the Commercial-Activity Tax (Aramark Corp. v. Harris, 2025-Ohio-2114)

From “Actual-Authority” to “Possession & Pass-Through”: The Supreme Court of Ohio Narrows the Agency Exclusion under the Commercial-Activity Tax (Aramark Corp. v. Harris, 2025-Ohio-2114)

Date: Jun 23, 2025
From “Actual-Authority” to “Possession & Pass-Through”: The Supreme Court of Ohio Narrows the Agency Exclusion under the Commercial-Activity Tax (Commentary on Aramark Corp. v. Harris,...
“Received, Used, or Followed”: State ex rel. Ayers v. Sackett (2025) Fortifies Ohio’s Public-Records Duty and Dispels Exhaustion Myth for Inmate Requesters

“Received, Used, or Followed”: State ex rel. Ayers v. Sackett (2025) Fortifies Ohio’s Public-Records Duty and Dispels Exhaustion Myth for Inmate Requesters

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Received, Used, or Followed”: State ex rel. Ayers v. Sackett (2025) Fortifies Ohio’s Public-Records Duty and Dispels Exhaustion Myth for Inmate Requesters Supreme Court of Ohio – Slip Opinion No....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert