Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

affirmation-of-combination-jury-instructions-in-murder-conviction-upholds-kentucky& Case Commentaries

UTPA Administrative Subpoenas in Alaska: Probable Cause Not Required; Anonymous Tip With Corroboration Suffices To Support Attorney General’s Subpoena

UTPA Administrative Subpoenas in Alaska: Probable Cause Not Required; Anonymous Tip With Corroboration Suffices To Support Attorney General’s Subpoena

Date: Sep 8, 2025
UTPA Administrative Subpoenas in Alaska: Probable Cause Not Required; Anonymous Tip With Corroboration Suffices To Support Attorney General’s Subpoena Case: Business Doe, LLC v. State of Alaska, No....
Connecticut High Court Clarifies Broker’s Post‑Placement Duties: No Duty to Relay Nonrenewal Absent Undertaking; Longstanding Relationship Alone Is Insufficient

Connecticut High Court Clarifies Broker’s Post‑Placement Duties: No Duty to Relay Nonrenewal Absent Undertaking; Longstanding Relationship Alone Is Insufficient

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Connecticut High Court Clarifies Broker’s Post‑Placement Duties: No Duty to Relay Nonrenewal Absent Undertaking; Longstanding Relationship Alone Is Insufficient Introduction In Deer v. National...
Connecticut Supreme Court Clarifies: No Post‑Procurement Common‑Law Duty for Insurance Agents To Warn of Impending Cancellation/Nonrenewal; Dissent Proposes a Continuing Duty To Inform

Connecticut Supreme Court Clarifies: No Post‑Procurement Common‑Law Duty for Insurance Agents To Warn of Impending Cancellation/Nonrenewal; Dissent Proposes a Continuing Duty To Inform

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Connecticut Supreme Court Clarifies: No Post‑Procurement Common‑Law Duty for Insurance Agents To Warn of Impending Cancellation/Nonrenewal; Dissent Proposes a Continuing Duty To Inform Note: This...
Hawai‘i Supreme Court Clarifies Condo Resale Disclosures: Managing Agents Must Provide Online Downloads at No Cost and Must Produce Resale-Specific Documents

Hawai‘i Supreme Court Clarifies Condo Resale Disclosures: Managing Agents Must Provide Online Downloads at No Cost and Must Produce Resale-Specific Documents

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Hawai‘i Supreme Court Clarifies Condo Resale Disclosures: Managing Agents Must Provide Online Downloads at No Cost and Must Produce Resale-Specific Documents Introduction In Caven, Jr. v. Certified...
CZMA’s Statewide Reach Defines Environmental Due Process: Agencies Must Hold Contested Case Hearings Before Renewing Revocable Permits; Environmental Courts May Modify Permits on HRS § 91‑14 Review

CZMA’s Statewide Reach Defines Environmental Due Process: Agencies Must Hold Contested Case Hearings Before Renewing Revocable Permits; Environmental Courts May Modify Permits on HRS § 91‑14 Review

Date: Sep 8, 2025
CZMA’s Statewide Reach Defines Environmental Due Process: Agencies Must Hold Contested Case Hearings Before Renewing Revocable Permits; Environmental Courts May Modify Permits on HRS § 91‑14 Review...
No Constructive Amendment From Alternative MNPI Inferences; SDNY Venue Firmly Grounded for Nasdaq Trades: Commentary on United States v. Dagar (2d Cir. 2025)

No Constructive Amendment From Alternative MNPI Inferences; SDNY Venue Firmly Grounded for Nasdaq Trades: Commentary on United States v. Dagar (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
No Constructive Amendment From Alternative MNPI Inferences; SDNY Venue Firmly Grounded for Nasdaq Trades: Commentary on United States v. Dagar (2d Cir. 2025) Note on precedential status: The decision...
Oral Pronouncement or Express Incorporation Required for “Standard” Supervised Release Conditions; Defendant-Requested Special Conditions Are Waived: Commentary on United States v. Wilson (2d Cir. 2025)

Oral Pronouncement or Express Incorporation Required for “Standard” Supervised Release Conditions; Defendant-Requested Special Conditions Are Waived: Commentary on United States v. Wilson (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Oral Pronouncement or Express Incorporation Required for “Standard” Supervised Release Conditions; Defendant-Requested Special Conditions Are Waived: Commentary on United States v. Wilson (2d Cir....
De Novo Review of Equitable Tolling Diligence and No Tolling for Pending Rehearing/Certiorari in Immigration Motions to Reopen

De Novo Review of Equitable Tolling Diligence and No Tolling for Pending Rehearing/Certiorari in Immigration Motions to Reopen

Date: Sep 8, 2025
De Novo Review of Equitable Tolling Diligence and No Tolling for Pending Rehearing/Certiorari in Immigration Motions to Reopen Introduction In Sylvestre Esteeven Point du Jour v. U.S. Attorney...
Charge-Specific Probable Cause Not Clearly Established Pre‑Chiaverini: Third Circuit Affirms Dismissal, Applying Any‑Crime Rule to False Arrest and Qualified Immunity to Malicious Prosecution and False Imprisonment

Charge-Specific Probable Cause Not Clearly Established Pre‑Chiaverini: Third Circuit Affirms Dismissal, Applying Any‑Crime Rule to False Arrest and Qualified Immunity to Malicious Prosecution and False Imprisonment

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Charge-Specific Probable Cause Not Clearly Established Pre‑Chiaverini: Third Circuit Affirms Dismissal, Applying Any‑Crime Rule to False Arrest and Qualified Immunity to Malicious Prosecution and...
Disclosed Destination Charges Are Not Deceptive Per Se: Third Circuit Affirms Futility of Consumer‑Protection and Unjust‑Enrichment Claims Without Plausible Causation or Direct Benefit

Disclosed Destination Charges Are Not Deceptive Per Se: Third Circuit Affirms Futility of Consumer‑Protection and Unjust‑Enrichment Claims Without Plausible Causation or Direct Benefit

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Disclosed Destination Charges Are Not Deceptive Per Se: Third Circuit Affirms Futility of Consumer‑Protection and Unjust‑Enrichment Claims Without Plausible Causation or Direct Benefit Introduction...
No State “Need” Veto of FERC–Approved RTO Projects: Third Circuit Clarifies Supremacy Clause Limits on Siting Decisions

No State “Need” Veto of FERC–Approved RTO Projects: Third Circuit Clarifies Supremacy Clause Limits on Siting Decisions

Date: Sep 8, 2025
No State “Need” Veto of FERC–Approved RTO Projects: Third Circuit Clarifies Supremacy Clause Limits on Siting Decisions Introduction This precedential decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the...
Brito Guevara v. Francisco Castro: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms De Novo Review of the Hague Convention’s “Well‑Settled” Defense and Elevates Immigration Instability as a Weighty Consideration

Brito Guevara v. Francisco Castro: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms De Novo Review of the Hague Convention’s “Well‑Settled” Defense and Elevates Immigration Instability as a Weighty Consideration

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Brito Guevara v. Francisco Castro: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms De Novo Review of the Hague Convention’s “Well‑Settled” Defense and Elevates Immigration Instability as a Weighty Consideration Introduction...
Indictment Surplusage Is Not an Element on Federal Habeas; Circumstantial Digital Evidence Can Prove “Receipt” and Venue: Commentary on Lowe v. Mills

Indictment Surplusage Is Not an Element on Federal Habeas; Circumstantial Digital Evidence Can Prove “Receipt” and Venue: Commentary on Lowe v. Mills

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Indictment Surplusage Is Not an Element on Federal Habeas; Circumstantial Digital Evidence Can Prove “Receipt” and Venue: Commentary on Lowe v. Mills Introduction In Lowe v. Mills, the United States...
Municipal Electrical Permitting Preempts Texas Homeowner Exemption; Enforcement Upheld and Qualified Immunity Afforded to City Officials — Commentary on Rupe v. City of Jacksboro (5th Cir. 2025)

Municipal Electrical Permitting Preempts Texas Homeowner Exemption; Enforcement Upheld and Qualified Immunity Afforded to City Officials — Commentary on Rupe v. City of Jacksboro (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Municipal Electrical Permitting Preempts Texas Homeowner Exemption; Enforcement Upheld and Qualified Immunity Afforded to City Officials Introduction This commentary analyzes the Fifth Circuit’s...
PSR-Based Notice Satisfies Oral Pronouncement Requirements for Supervised Release: The Fifth Circuit’s Extension of Rule 32 Inferences in United States v. Lezama-Ramirez

PSR-Based Notice Satisfies Oral Pronouncement Requirements for Supervised Release: The Fifth Circuit’s Extension of Rule 32 Inferences in United States v. Lezama-Ramirez

Date: Sep 8, 2025
PSR-Based Notice Satisfies Oral Pronouncement Requirements for Supervised Release: The Fifth Circuit’s Extension of Rule 32 Inferences in United States v. Lezama-Ramirez Introduction United States v....
No Plain Error in Extending Garner: Fifth Circuit Requires Offense-Specific “Realistic Probability” to Disqualify Louisiana Aggravated Battery as a Crime of Violence; Bruen Does Not Render § 922(g)(1) Convictions Plainly Unconstitutional

No Plain Error in Extending Garner: Fifth Circuit Requires Offense-Specific “Realistic Probability” to Disqualify Louisiana Aggravated Battery as a Crime of Violence; Bruen Does Not Render § 922(g)(1) Convictions Plainly Unconstitutional

Date: Sep 8, 2025
No Plain Error in Extending Garner: Fifth Circuit Requires Offense-Specific “Realistic Probability” to Disqualify Louisiana Aggravated Battery as a Crime of Violence; Bruen Does Not Render §...
No Standing, No Fruit: Abandonment of a Borrowed Vehicle (and Phone) Bars Fourth Amendment Suppression — Commentary on United States v. Tsatenawa (5th Cir. 2025)

No Standing, No Fruit: Abandonment of a Borrowed Vehicle (and Phone) Bars Fourth Amendment Suppression — Commentary on United States v. Tsatenawa (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
No Standing, No Fruit: Abandonment of a Borrowed Vehicle (and Phone) Bars Fourth Amendment Suppression Commentary on United States v. Tsatenawa, No. 24-50034 (5th Cir. Sept. 5, 2025) (per curiam)...
Formal Military Status, Not Active-Duty Service, Controls: Tenth Circuit Confirms UCMJ Jurisdiction Over All Retirees, Including Medically Retired, Under the Make Rules Clause

Formal Military Status, Not Active-Duty Service, Controls: Tenth Circuit Confirms UCMJ Jurisdiction Over All Retirees, Including Medically Retired, Under the Make Rules Clause

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Formal Military Status, Not Active-Duty Service, Controls: Tenth Circuit Confirms UCMJ Jurisdiction Over All Retirees, Including Medically Retired, Under the Make Rules Clause Introduction In Wilson...
Seventh Circuit Reaffirms High Bar for Reversal Based on Closing-Argument Misconduct and Clarifies Evidentiary Predicate for “Future Emotional Distress” Instructions under Illinois Law

Seventh Circuit Reaffirms High Bar for Reversal Based on Closing-Argument Misconduct and Clarifies Evidentiary Predicate for “Future Emotional Distress” Instructions under Illinois Law

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Seventh Circuit Reaffirms High Bar for Reversal Based on Closing-Argument Misconduct and Clarifies Evidentiary Predicate for “Future Emotional Distress” Instructions under Illinois Law Introduction...
Missing a Ruth Categorical Challenge Is Not Per Se Ineffective Assistance: Stage‑Specific Limits and the “Clearly Stronger” Test in Neal v. United States (7th Cir. 2025)

Missing a Ruth Categorical Challenge Is Not Per Se Ineffective Assistance: Stage‑Specific Limits and the “Clearly Stronger” Test in Neal v. United States (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Missing a Ruth Categorical Challenge Is Not Per Se Ineffective Assistance: Stage‑Specific Limits and the “Clearly Stronger” Test in Neal v. United States (7th Cir. 2025) Introduction In Tyree M....
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert