Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Wisconsin Case Commentaries

Harmless Error in Mandatory Conclusive Presumptions: Insights from State v. Kuntz

Harmless Error in Mandatory Conclusive Presumptions: Insights from State v. Kuntz

Date: Apr 4, 1991
Harmless Error in Mandatory Conclusive Presumptions: Insights from State v. Kuntz Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Harold W. Kuntz is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin...
Extending the Firefighter's Rule: Manufacturers' Liability in Product Defect Cases

Extending the Firefighter's Rule: Manufacturers' Liability in Product Defect Cases

Date: Apr 3, 1991
Extending the Firefighter's Rule: Manufacturers' Liability in Product Defect Cases Introduction The case of Robert J. Hauboldt v. Union Carbide Corporation et al., decided by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Corroborative Evidence in Self-Defense: STATE of Wisconsin v. Michael Daniels

Affirmation of Corroborative Evidence in Self-Defense: STATE of Wisconsin v. Michael Daniels

Date: Feb 21, 1991
Affirmation of Corroborative Evidence in Self-Defense: STATE of Wisconsin v. Michael Daniels Introduction STATE of Wisconsin v. Michael Daniels is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Hennekens v. Hoerl: Applying the Discovery Rule to Legal Malpractice Claims in Wisconsin

Hennekens v. Hoerl: Applying the Discovery Rule to Legal Malpractice Claims in Wisconsin

Date: Feb 21, 1991
Hennekens v. Hoerl: Applying the Discovery Rule to Legal Malpractice Claims in Wisconsin Introduction In the landmark case Hennekens v. Hoerl, decided by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin on February...
Admissibility of Constitutionally Tainted Confessions at Preliminary Hearings: Insights from State v. Moats

Admissibility of Constitutionally Tainted Confessions at Preliminary Hearings: Insights from State v. Moats

Date: Jun 29, 1990
Admissibility of Constitutionally Tainted Confessions at Preliminary Hearings: Insights from State v. Moats Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Roy C. Moats, 156 Wis. 2d 74 (1990), adjudicated by the...
Corroborated Anonymous Tips and Reasonable Suspicion: Insights from STATE v. Richardson

Corroborated Anonymous Tips and Reasonable Suspicion: Insights from STATE v. Richardson

Date: Jun 29, 1990
Corroborated Anonymous Tips and Reasonable Suspicion: Insights from STATE v. Richardson Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of Wisconsin v. Glen P. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128 (1990), the...
VOLLMER v. LUETY: Expanded Scope of Discretionary Reversal for Unobjected Errors in Wisconsin Law

VOLLMER v. LUETY: Expanded Scope of Discretionary Reversal for Unobjected Errors in Wisconsin Law

Date: Jun 27, 1990
VOLLMER v. LUETY: Expanded Scope of Discretionary Reversal for Unobjected Errors in Wisconsin Law Introduction The case of Georgia Ann Vollmer v. Paul Luety and American Family Mutual Insurance...
Smith v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company: Clarifying 'Underinsured Motor Vehicle' in UIM Coverage

Smith v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company: Clarifying 'Underinsured Motor Vehicle' in UIM Coverage

Date: Jun 26, 1990
Smith v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company: Clarifying 'Underinsured Motor Vehicle' in UIM Coverage Introduction Cynthia Smith, the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner, initiated a lawsuit against...
Ambiguity in "Sudden and Accidental" Pollution Exclusion: Wisconsin Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Ambiguity in "Sudden and Accidental" Pollution Exclusion: Wisconsin Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Date: Jun 20, 1990
Ambiguity in "Sudden and Accidental" Pollution Exclusion: Wisconsin Supreme Court Sets New Precedent Introduction The landmark decision in Thomas S. Just et al. v. Land Reclamation, Ltd. et al.,...
Confrontation and Compulsory Process Rights Affirmed in STATE of Wisconsin v. Pulizzano

Confrontation and Compulsory Process Rights Affirmed in STATE of Wisconsin v. Pulizzano

Date: Jun 13, 1990
Confrontation and Compulsory Process Rights Affirmed in STATE of Wisconsin v. Pulizzano Introduction STATE of Wisconsin v. Angela Pulizzano, 155 Wis. 2d 633 (1990), is a pivotal case in Wisconsin...
Flight from Police as Reasonable Suspicion: STATE of Wisconsin v. Anderson

Flight from Police as Reasonable Suspicion: STATE of Wisconsin v. Anderson

Date: May 10, 1990
Flight from Police as Reasonable Suspicion: STATE of Wisconsin v. Anderson Introduction State of Wisconsin v. David Paul Anderson, 155 Wis.2d 77 (1990), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin,...
Uniform Standards for Sufficiency of Evidence in Criminal Convictions: An Analysis of State v. Poellinger

Uniform Standards for Sufficiency of Evidence in Criminal Convictions: An Analysis of State v. Poellinger

Date: Mar 1, 1990
Uniform Standards for Sufficiency of Evidence in Criminal Convictions: An Analysis of State v. Poellinger Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Karin S. Poellinger, 153 Wis. 2d 493 (1990), is a pivotal...
Reaffirming Conviction Despite Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from STATE v. JOHNSON

Reaffirming Conviction Despite Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from STATE v. JOHNSON

Date: Jan 19, 1990
Reaffirming Conviction Despite Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from STATE v. JOHNSON Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Edward Johnson is a significant case decided by the Supreme Court...
Affirmation of Per Se Breath Alcohol Standards in State v. McManus and Pangman

Affirmation of Per Se Breath Alcohol Standards in State v. McManus and Pangman

Date: Nov 16, 1989
Affirmation of Per Se Breath Alcohol Standards in State of Wisconsin v. McManus and Pangman Introduction The case of State of Wisconsin v. Michael J. McManus and William A. Pangman ([152 Wis. 2d...
Affirmation of John Doe Criminal Proceedings and Overruling Separation of Powers Precedent in STATE v. Unnamed Defendant

Affirmation of John Doe Criminal Proceedings and Overruling Separation of Powers Precedent in STATE v. Unnamed Defendant

Date: Jun 23, 1989
Affirmation of John Doe Criminal Proceedings and Overruling Separation of Powers Precedent in STATE of Wisconsin v. Unnamed Defendant Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Unnamed Defendant, 150 Wis. 2d...
STATE v. WILSON: Upholding Second-Degree Murder Conviction and Addressing Lesser-Included Offense Instruction

STATE v. WILSON: Upholding Second-Degree Murder Conviction and Addressing Lesser-Included Offense Instruction

Date: May 31, 1989
STATE v. WILSON: Upholding Second-Degree Murder Conviction and Addressing Lesser-Included Offense Instruction Introduction State of Wisconsin v. David James Wilson is a landmark decision by the...
Admissibility of Co-Conspirator Statements in Conspiracy Cases: Insights from STATE of Wisconsin v. Shelby Blalock

Admissibility of Co-Conspirator Statements in Conspiracy Cases: Insights from STATE of Wisconsin v. Shelby Blalock

Date: May 5, 1989
Admissibility of Co-Conspirator Statements in Conspiracy Cases: Insights from STATE of Wisconsin v. Shelby Blalock Introduction In the landmark case STATE of Wisconsin v. Shelby Blalock, decided on...
Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Sentence Modification: STATE v. Franklin

Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Sentence Modification: STATE v. Franklin

Date: Feb 3, 1989
Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Sentence Modification: STATE of Wisconsin v. Franklin Introduction STATE of Wisconsin v. Michael D. Franklin, 148 Wis. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Wisconsin,...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Establishes New Standards for Trade Secret Misappropriation Under UTSA

Wisconsin Supreme Court Establishes New Standards for Trade Secret Misappropriation Under UTSA

Date: Feb 2, 1989
Wisconsin Supreme Court Establishes New Standards for Trade Secret Misappropriation Under UTSA Introduction The case of Minuteman, Inc. v. L.D. Alexander, George Cash, and Amity, Inc. (147 Wis. 2d...
Flight from Police as Reasonable Suspicion: Analysis of State of Wisconsin v. Jackson

Flight from Police as Reasonable Suspicion: Analysis of State of Wisconsin v. Jackson

Date: Jan 26, 1989
Flight from Police as Reasonable Suspicion: Analysis of State of Wisconsin v. Jackson Introduction State of Wisconsin v. David William Jackson, 147 Wis. 2d 824 (1989), is a seminal case adjudicated...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert