Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Wisconsin Case Commentaries

State v. Borrell and Smith: Upholding Judicial Discretion in Parole Eligibility Determinations under Sec. 973.014

State v. Borrell and Smith: Upholding Judicial Discretion in Parole Eligibility Determinations under Sec. 973.014

Date: Apr 28, 1992
State v. Borrell and Smith: Upholding Judicial Discretion in Parole Eligibility Determinations under Sec. 973.014 Introduction The case of State of Wisconsin v. Lazaro Borrell and Charles L. Smith...
State v. Mitchell: Miranda Warnings Do Not Mandate Advising the Right to Stop Answering

State v. Mitchell: Miranda Warnings Do Not Mandate Advising the Right to Stop Answering

Date: Apr 21, 1992
State v. Mitchell: Miranda Warnings Do Not Mandate Advising the Right to Stop Answering Introduction State of Wisconsin v. John P. Mitchell is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin...
WAUSHARA COUNTY v. GRAF: Upholding the Burden of Proof for Tax Exemption of Religious Organizations

WAUSHARA COUNTY v. GRAF: Upholding the Burden of Proof for Tax Exemption of Religious Organizations

Date: Feb 18, 1992
WAUSHARA COUNTY v. GRAF: Upholding the Burden of Proof for Tax Exemption of Religious Organizations Introduction In WAUSHARA COUNTY v. GRAF, 166 Wis. 2d 442 (Supreme Court of Wisconsin, 1992), the...
Attorney Disqualification Based on 'Substantial Relationship' Test: Burkes v. Hales

Attorney Disqualification Based on 'Substantial Relationship' Test: Burkes v. Hales

Date: Nov 15, 1991
Attorney Disqualification Based on 'Substantial Relationship' Test: Burkes v. Hales Introduction The case of Marshall Burkes v. Edward E. Hales addressed significant issues surrounding attorney...
Custodial Arrest Standards and the Limits of Search Incident to Arrest: State v. Swanson

Custodial Arrest Standards and the Limits of Search Incident to Arrest: State v. Swanson

Date: Oct 15, 1991
Custodial Arrest Standards and the Limits of Search Incident to Arrest: State v. Swanson Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Paul Lee Swanson is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin,...
Defining 'Mental Illness' Standards and Admissibility of Electronic Evidence in Juvenile Waiver Proceedings: In the Interest of J.A.L.

Defining 'Mental Illness' Standards and Admissibility of Electronic Evidence in Juvenile Waiver Proceedings: In the Interest of J.A.L.

Date: Jun 25, 1991
Defining 'Mental Illness' Standards and Admissibility of Electronic Evidence in Juvenile Waiver Proceedings: In the Interest of J.A.L. Introduction In the Interest of J.A.L. is a pivotal 1991...
Strict Adherence to Repeater Allegation Timelines: Analysis of STATE v. MARTIN & Robles

Strict Adherence to Repeater Allegation Timelines: Analysis of STATE v. MARTIN & Robles

Date: Jun 25, 1991
Strict Adherence to Repeater Allegation Timelines: Analysis of STATE v. MARTIN & Robles Introduction The landmark case State of Wisconsin v. Stanley E. Martin, Jr. and Jose L. Robles ([1991] 162...
Defining 'Abutting' Ownership in Street Discontinuance: VOSS v. CITY OF MIDDLETON

Defining 'Abutting' Ownership in Street Discontinuance: VOSS v. CITY OF MIDDLETON

Date: Jun 20, 1991
Defining 'Abutting' Ownership in Street Discontinuance: VOSS v. CITY OF MIDDLETON Introduction The landmark case of VOSS v. CITY OF MIDDLETON, decided by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin on June 19,...
STATE v. WITKOWSKI: Affirming Postconviction Motions Post-Death and Preventing Relitigation of Established Issues

STATE v. WITKOWSKI: Affirming Postconviction Motions Post-Death and Preventing Relitigation of Established Issues

Date: Jun 14, 1991
STATE v. WITKOWSKI: Affirming Postconviction Motions Post-Death and Preventing Relitigation of Established Issues Introduction In the landmark case of State of Wisconsin v. Gerald A. Witkowski,...
Strict Adherence to Scheduling Orders for Expert Witnesses Upheld: Schneller v. St. Mary’s

Strict Adherence to Scheduling Orders for Expert Witnesses Upheld: Schneller v. St. Mary’s

Date: Jun 6, 1991
Strict Adherence to Scheduling Orders for Expert Witnesses Upheld: Schneller v. St. Mary’s Introduction Schneller v. St. Mary’s Hospital Medical Center is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Johnson v. Allis Chalmers: Reinforcing Judicial Authority to Dismiss Egregiously Noncompliant Litigants

Johnson v. Allis Chalmers: Reinforcing Judicial Authority to Dismiss Egregiously Noncompliant Litigants

Date: Jun 6, 1991
Johnson v. Allis Chalmers: Reinforcing Judicial Authority to Dismiss Egregiously Noncompliant Litigants Introduction Robert H. Johnson and Cheryl L. Johnson (the "Johnsons") initiated a products...
Reaffirmation of 'Fair and Just Reason' Standard for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas: STATE v. CANEDY

Reaffirmation of 'Fair and Just Reason' Standard for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas: STATE v. CANEDY

Date: May 10, 1991
Reaffirmation of 'Fair and Just Reason' Standard for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas: STATE v. CANEDY Introduction The case of State of Wisconsin v. David Canedy (161 Wis. 2d 565) serves as a significant...
Affirmation of Search Warrant Scope and Pleading Sufficiency in Child Exploitation Case

Affirmation of Search Warrant Scope and Pleading Sufficiency in Child Exploitation Case

Date: May 7, 1991
Affirmation of Search Warrant Scope and Pleading Sufficiency in Child Exploitation Case Introduction The case of State of Wisconsin v. Jerry W. Petrone centers on Petrone's conviction for sexual...
Harmless Error in Mandatory Conclusive Presumptions: Insights from State v. Kuntz

Harmless Error in Mandatory Conclusive Presumptions: Insights from State v. Kuntz

Date: Apr 4, 1991
Harmless Error in Mandatory Conclusive Presumptions: Insights from State v. Kuntz Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Harold W. Kuntz is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin...
Extending the Firefighter's Rule: Manufacturers' Liability in Product Defect Cases

Extending the Firefighter's Rule: Manufacturers' Liability in Product Defect Cases

Date: Apr 3, 1991
Extending the Firefighter's Rule: Manufacturers' Liability in Product Defect Cases Introduction The case of Robert J. Hauboldt v. Union Carbide Corporation et al., decided by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Corroborative Evidence in Self-Defense: STATE of Wisconsin v. Michael Daniels

Affirmation of Corroborative Evidence in Self-Defense: STATE of Wisconsin v. Michael Daniels

Date: Feb 21, 1991
Affirmation of Corroborative Evidence in Self-Defense: STATE of Wisconsin v. Michael Daniels Introduction STATE of Wisconsin v. Michael Daniels is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Hennekens v. Hoerl: Applying the Discovery Rule to Legal Malpractice Claims in Wisconsin

Hennekens v. Hoerl: Applying the Discovery Rule to Legal Malpractice Claims in Wisconsin

Date: Feb 21, 1991
Hennekens v. Hoerl: Applying the Discovery Rule to Legal Malpractice Claims in Wisconsin Introduction In the landmark case Hennekens v. Hoerl, decided by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin on February...
Admissibility of Constitutionally Tainted Confessions at Preliminary Hearings: Insights from State v. Moats

Admissibility of Constitutionally Tainted Confessions at Preliminary Hearings: Insights from State v. Moats

Date: Jun 29, 1990
Admissibility of Constitutionally Tainted Confessions at Preliminary Hearings: Insights from State v. Moats Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Roy C. Moats, 156 Wis. 2d 74 (1990), adjudicated by the...
Corroborated Anonymous Tips and Reasonable Suspicion: Insights from STATE v. Richardson

Corroborated Anonymous Tips and Reasonable Suspicion: Insights from STATE v. Richardson

Date: Jun 29, 1990
Corroborated Anonymous Tips and Reasonable Suspicion: Insights from STATE v. Richardson Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of Wisconsin v. Glen P. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128 (1990), the...
VOLLMER v. LUETY: Expanded Scope of Discretionary Reversal for Unobjected Errors in Wisconsin Law

VOLLMER v. LUETY: Expanded Scope of Discretionary Reversal for Unobjected Errors in Wisconsin Law

Date: Jun 27, 1990
VOLLMER v. LUETY: Expanded Scope of Discretionary Reversal for Unobjected Errors in Wisconsin Law Introduction The case of Georgia Ann Vollmer v. Paul Luety and American Family Mutual Insurance...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert