Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Wisconsin Case Commentaries

Limiting Sec. 974.06 Motions to Previously Unraised Grounds: State v. Escalona-Naranjo

Limiting Sec. 974.06 Motions to Previously Unraised Grounds: State v. Escalona-Naranjo

Date: Jun 23, 1994
Limiting Sec. 974.06 Motions to Previously Unraised Grounds: State v. Escalona-Naranjo Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Barbaro Escalona-Naranjo is a significant judicial decision rendered by the...
Effective Communication of No Merit Reports: Insights from STATE v. FLORES

Effective Communication of No Merit Reports: Insights from STATE v. FLORES

Date: May 26, 1994
Effective Communication of No Merit Reports: Insights from STATE v. FLORES Introduction State of Wisconsin Ex Rel. Robert Flores v. State of Wisconsin, reported at 183 Wis. 2d 587 (1994), is a...
State v. Bowen: Redefining Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress in Wisconsin

State v. Bowen: Redefining Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress in Wisconsin

Date: May 26, 1994
State v. Bowen: Redefining Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress in Wisconsin Introduction State v. Bowen is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin, rendered on May 25, 1994. The...
Issue Preclusion in Section 1983 Employment Discrimination Claims: LINDAS v. CADY

Issue Preclusion in Section 1983 Employment Discrimination Claims: LINDAS v. CADY

Date: May 18, 1994
Issue Preclusion in Section 1983 Employment Discrimination Claims: LINDAS v. CADY Sets New Precedent Introduction In the landmark case of Kathleen Lindas v. Elmer Cady, Robert Hable, State of...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Establishes Enhanced Role for Guardians ad Litem and Grandparents in Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings

Wisconsin Supreme Court Establishes Enhanced Role for Guardians ad Litem and Grandparents in Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings

Date: Nov 4, 1993
Wisconsin Supreme Court Establishes Enhanced Role for Guardians ad Litem and Grandparents in Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings Introduction The Wisconsin Supreme Court's decision in In re...
Expanded Duty to Defend: Citizens Security Mutual Insurance Company's Liability for Excess Judgments

Expanded Duty to Defend: Citizens Security Mutual Insurance Company's Liability for Excess Judgments

Date: Jun 16, 1993
Expanded Duty to Defend: Citizens Security Mutual Insurance Company's Liability for Excess Judgments Introduction The case of Robert C. Newhouse v. Citizens Security Mutual Insurance Company...
Establishing the Retroactive 48-Hour Probable Cause Determination in Wisconsin: State v. Koch

Establishing the Retroactive 48-Hour Probable Cause Determination in Wisconsin: State v. Koch

Date: May 11, 1993
Establishing the Retroactive 48-Hour Probable Cause Determination in Wisconsin: State v. Koch Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Robert Koch, 175 Wis. 2d 684 (1993), is a landmark case in Wisconsin...
Affirmation of Trial Court Discretion in Jury Verdict Processes and Sentencing: State v. Echols

Affirmation of Trial Court Discretion in Jury Verdict Processes and Sentencing: State v. Echols

Date: May 7, 1993
Affirmation of Trial Court Discretion in Jury Verdict Processes and Sentencing: State v. Echols Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Veronica F. Echols is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Evidence Exclusion for Sleep-Related Expert Testimony in Sexual Assault Cases

Affirmation of Evidence Exclusion for Sleep-Related Expert Testimony in Sexual Assault Cases

Date: Mar 11, 1993
Affirmation of Evidence Exclusion for Sleep-Related Expert Testimony in Sexual Assault Cases Introduction The case of State of Wisconsin v. Anthony Pittman (174 Wis. 2d 255) presents a critical...
Affirmation of Offensive Collateral Estoppel in Sexual Assault Cases: Michelle T. v. Cecil Crozier

Affirmation of Offensive Collateral Estoppel in Sexual Assault Cases: Michelle T. v. Cecil Crozier

Date: Feb 19, 1993
Affirmation of Offensive Collateral Estoppel in Sexual Assault Cases: Michelle T. v. Cecil Crozier Introduction Michelle T., a minor, by Gary C. Sumpter, her guardian ad litem,...
Exigent Circumstances for Warrantless Blood Draws in DUI Cases Established under State v. Bohling

Exigent Circumstances for Warrantless Blood Draws in DUI Cases Established under State v. Bohling

Date: Jan 27, 1993
Exigent Circumstances for Warrantless Blood Draws in DUI Cases Established under State v. Bohling Introduction State of Wisconsin v. David J. Bohling is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Admissibility of Prior Sexual Assault Convictions for Motive in Wisconsin: Plymesser v. State

Admissibility of Prior Sexual Assault Convictions for Motive in Wisconsin: Plymesser v. State

Date: Dec 24, 1992
Admissibility of Prior Sexual Assault Convictions for Motive in Wisconsin: Plymesser v. State Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Gary L. Plymesser is a pivotal case that addresses the admissibility...
STATE v. GUY: Upholding Frisk and Seizure During Drug Warrants

STATE v. GUY: Upholding Frisk and Seizure During Drug Warrants

Date: Dec 10, 1992
STATE v. GUY: Upholding Frisk and Seizure During Drug Warrants Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Robin H. Guy is a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin in 1992 that addresses the...
Intent to Steal and 'Self-Help' Defense in Armed Burglary Cases: Analysis of State v. Pettit

Intent to Steal and 'Self-Help' Defense in Armed Burglary Cases: Analysis of State v. Pettit

Date: Oct 8, 1992
Intent to Steal and 'Self-Help' Defense in Armed Burglary Cases: Analysis of State of Wisconsin v. Jason Pettit Introduction In the landmark case of State of Wisconsin v. Jason Pettit, decided by the...
Insurance Coverage Limitations in Civil Rights Litigation: Shorewood v. Wausau Insurance Companies

Insurance Coverage Limitations in Civil Rights Litigation: Shorewood v. Wausau Insurance Companies

Date: Aug 28, 1992
Insurance Coverage Limitations in Civil Rights Litigation: Shorewood v. Wausau Insurance Companies Introduction In the landmark case of School District of Shorewood v. Wausau Insurance Companies, the...
Entitlement of Insured to Recover Attorney Fees in Successful Coverage Defense: ELLIOTT v. DONAHUE

Entitlement of Insured to Recover Attorney Fees in Successful Coverage Defense: ELLIOTT v. DONAHUE

Date: Jun 26, 1992
Entitlement of Insured to Recover Attorney Fees in Successful Coverage Defense: ELLIOTT v. DONAHUE Introduction The case ELLIOTT v. DONAHUE, decided by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin on June 25,...
Establishing the Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel in Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings

Establishing the Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel in Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings

Date: Jun 18, 1992
Establishing the Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel in Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings Introduction The Supreme Court of Wisconsin, in the landmark case A.S. v. State of Wisconsin...
Substantial Factor Test Reaffirmed in Causation Analysis: Fischer v. Ganju and Jumes

Substantial Factor Test Reaffirmed in Causation Analysis: Fischer v. Ganju and Jumes

Date: Jun 17, 1992
Substantial Factor Test Reaffirmed in Causation Analysis: Fischer v. Ganju and Jumes Introduction Fischer v. Ganju and Jumes is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin on June...
State v. Knight: Proper Procedure for Asserting Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel Claims

State v. Knight: Proper Procedure for Asserting Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel Claims

Date: Jun 4, 1992
State v. Knight: Proper Procedure for Asserting Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel Claims Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Christopher Knight is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Double Jeopardy Clarified: Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Multiple Sexual Assault Convictions in STATE v. SAUCEDA

Double Jeopardy Clarified: Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Multiple Sexual Assault Convictions in STATE v. SAUCEDA

Date: Jun 2, 1992
Double Jeopardy Clarified: Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Multiple Sexual Assault Convictions in STATE v. SAUCEDA Introduction In the landmark case of State v. Abel Sauceda, the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert