Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Wisconsin Case Commentaries

Occupant Standing in Vehicular Stops: State v. Harris Establishes Bright Line Rule

Occupant Standing in Vehicular Stops: State v. Harris Establishes Bright Line Rule

Date: Dec 28, 1996
Occupant Standing in Vehicular Stops: State v. Harris Establishes Bright Line Rule Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Anthony Harris, 206 Wis. 2d 243 (1996), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Enforceability of Ambiguous Contracts and Standards for Punitive Damages: Supreme Court of Wisconsin in Management Computer Services, Inc. v. Hawkins, Ash, Baptie Co.

Enforceability of Ambiguous Contracts and Standards for Punitive Damages: Supreme Court of Wisconsin in Management Computer Services, Inc. v. Hawkins, Ash, Baptie Co.

Date: Dec 21, 1996
Enforceability of Ambiguous Contracts and Standards for Punitive Damages: Supreme Court of Wisconsin in Management Computer Services, Inc. v. Hawkins, Ash, Baptie Co. Introduction The case of...
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion in Investigatory Stops: Insights from State v. Waldner

Establishing Reasonable Suspicion in Investigatory Stops: Insights from State v. Waldner

Date: Dec 14, 1996
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion in Investigatory Stops: Insights from State v. Waldner Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Johnny J. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51 (1996), is a landmark decision by the...
Proper Forums for Addressing Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from State v. Rothering

Proper Forums for Addressing Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from State v. Rothering

Date: Oct 24, 1996
Proper Forums for Addressing Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from State of Wisconsin ex rel. Aaron S. Rothering Introduction The case of State of Wisconsin ex rel. Aaron S. Rothering...
Keeper Status Limits Strict Liability Claims Against Dog Owners: Armstrong v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance

Keeper Status Limits Strict Liability Claims Against Dog Owners: Armstrong v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance

Date: Jun 27, 1996
Keeper Status Limits Strict Liability Claims Against Dog Owners: Armstrong v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Introduction The case of Cheryl Armstrong v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Company et al....
State of Wisconsin v. Anthony T. Hicks: Ensuring Comprehensive Trial Proceedings in the Light of DNA Evidence

State of Wisconsin v. Anthony T. Hicks: Ensuring Comprehensive Trial Proceedings in the Light of DNA Evidence

Date: Jun 26, 1996
State of Wisconsin v. Anthony T. Hicks: Ensuring Comprehensive Trial Proceedings in the Light of DNA Evidence Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Anthony T. Hicks, 202 Wis. 2d 150 (Supreme Court of...
Strengthening Due Process and Separation of Powers: Wisconsin Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling on Counsel Appointment in CHIPS Proceedings

Strengthening Due Process and Separation of Powers: Wisconsin Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling on Counsel Appointment in CHIPS Proceedings

Date: Jun 14, 1996
Strengthening Due Process and Separation of Powers: Wisconsin Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling on Counsel Appointment in CHIPS Proceedings Introduction In the pivotal case of Joni B. and Richard S.,...
Judicial Estoppel and Statutory Bar to Prosecution: Analysis of STATE of Wisconsin v. Gary Lewis Petty

Judicial Estoppel and Statutory Bar to Prosecution: Analysis of STATE of Wisconsin v. Gary Lewis Petty

Date: Jun 1, 1996
Judicial Estoppel and Statutory Bar to Prosecution: Analysis of STATE of Wisconsin v. Gary Lewis Petty Introduction STATE of Wisconsin v. Gary Lewis Petty is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
STATE v. BENTLEY: Clarifying Requirements for Evidentiary Hearings in Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas

STATE v. BENTLEY: Clarifying Requirements for Evidentiary Hearings in Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas

Date: May 23, 1996
STATE v. BENTLEY: Clarifying Requirements for Evidentiary Hearings in Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas Introduction The Supreme Court of Wisconsin's decision in STATE v. BENTLEY, 201 Wis. 2d 303 (1996),...
Interpretation of Out-of-State Medical Expenses Under Wisconsin's Worker's Compensation Act

Interpretation of Out-of-State Medical Expenses Under Wisconsin's Worker's Compensation Act

Date: May 23, 1996
Interpretation of Out-of-State Medical Expenses Under Wisconsin's Worker's Compensation Act Introduction The case of UFE Incorporated and Pacific Indemnity Company v. Labor and Industry Review...
Burden of Proof in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: STATE of Wisconsin v. Mario Santiago Sanchez

Burden of Proof in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: STATE of Wisconsin v. Mario Santiago Sanchez

Date: May 22, 1996
Burden of Proof in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: STATE of Wisconsin v. Mario Santiago Sanchez Introduction The case of STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Mario Santiago Sanchez,...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Affirms Powers in John Doe Proceedings and Clarifies Right to Counsel

Wisconsin Supreme Court Affirms Powers in John Doe Proceedings and Clarifies Right to Counsel

Date: Apr 2, 1996
Wisconsin Supreme Court Affirms Powers in John Doe Proceedings and Clarifies Right to Counsel Introduction In the landmark cases State of Wisconsin v. Leon O. Cummings, D.D.S. and State of Wisconsin...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Includes Full Purchase Price as Pecuniary Damages in Lemon Law Cases

Wisconsin Supreme Court Includes Full Purchase Price as Pecuniary Damages in Lemon Law Cases

Date: Jan 18, 1996
Wisconsin Supreme Court Includes Full Purchase Price as Pecuniary Damages in Lemon Law Cases Introduction In the landmark case of John L. Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corporation (197 Wis. 2d 973,...
Reversing Duty of Care Liability for Guests in Recreational Settings: United Wisconsin Proservices v. Tynan

Reversing Duty of Care Liability for Guests in Recreational Settings: United Wisconsin Proservices v. Tynan

Date: Dec 21, 1995
Reversing Duty of Care Liability for Guests in Recreational Settings: United Wisconsin Proservices v. Tynan Introduction The Supreme Court of Wisconsin, in United Wisconsin Proservices v. Tynan,...
Supreme Court of Wisconsin Sets New Precedent on Expert Testimony in Insurance Bad Faith Claims

Supreme Court of Wisconsin Sets New Precedent on Expert Testimony in Insurance Bad Faith Claims

Date: Dec 16, 1995
Supreme Court of Wisconsin Sets New Precedent on Expert Testimony in Insurance Bad Faith Claims Introduction The case of James Weiss v. United Fire Casualty Company (No. 93-3341), decided by the...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Civil Commitment Statute for Sexually Violent Persons: State v. Carpenter and Schmidt

Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Civil Commitment Statute for Sexually Violent Persons: State v. Carpenter and Schmidt

Date: Dec 9, 1995
Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Civil Commitment Statute for Sexually Violent Persons: State v. Carpenter and Schmidt Introduction In the landmark cases of State of Wisconsin v. William Carpenter and...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of Chapter 980 Civil Commitment Statute for Sexually Violent Persons

Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of Chapter 980 Civil Commitment Statute for Sexually Violent Persons

Date: Dec 9, 1995
Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of Chapter 980 Civil Commitment Statute for Sexually Violent Persons Introduction The case of State of Wisconsin v. Samuel E. Post and State of...
Great Weight Deference to Administrative Agencies in Statutory Interpretation Affirmed in Harnischfeger v. LIRC

Great Weight Deference to Administrative Agencies in Statutory Interpretation Affirmed in Harnischfeger v. LIRC

Date: Oct 25, 1995
Great Weight Deference to Administrative Agencies in Statutory Interpretation Affirmed in Harnischfeger v. LIRC Introduction The case of Harnischfeger Corporation v. Labor Industry Review Commission...
Adoptive Admissions and Evidentiary Waiver: Insights from STATE v. Rogers

Adoptive Admissions and Evidentiary Waiver: Insights from STATE v. Rogers

Date: Sep 14, 1995
Adoptive Admissions and Evidentiary Waiver: Insights from STATE of Wisconsin v. Rogers Introduction In the case STATE of Wisconsin v. Donny Rogers, decided by the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin on...
Statute of Limitations and First Amendment Protections in Pritzlaff v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee

Statute of Limitations and First Amendment Protections in Pritzlaff v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee

Date: Jun 28, 1995
Statute of Limitations and First Amendment Protections in Pritzlaff v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee Introduction Pritzlaff v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert