Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

“A Circuit Justice or Judge” Means One Judge Suffices: Justice Sotomayor’s Dissent in Shockley v. Vandergriff and the Unresolved COA Rule

“A Circuit Justice or Judge” Means One Judge Suffices: Justice Sotomayor’s Dissent in Shockley v. Vandergriff and the Unresolved COA Rule

Date: Apr 1, 2025
“A Circuit Justice or Judge” Means One Judge Suffices: Justice Sotomayor’s Dissent in Shockley v. Vandergriff and the Unresolved COA Rule Introduction In Shockley v. Vandergriff, 604 U.S. ___ (2025),...
United States v. Miller: Section 106(a) Waives Sovereign Immunity Only for the §544 Cause of Action—Not for the State-Law “Applicable Law” Under §544(b)

United States v. Miller: Section 106(a) Waives Sovereign Immunity Only for the §544 Cause of Action—Not for the State-Law “Applicable Law” Under §544(b)

Date: Mar 27, 2025
United States v. Miller: Section 106(a) Waives Sovereign Immunity Only for the §544 Cause of Action—Not for the State-Law “Applicable Law” Under §544(b) Introduction In United States v. Miller, 604...
“Readily Convertible” and Artifact Nouns: The Supreme Court Confirms the GCA Reaches Some Weapon Parts Kits and Unfinished Frames (Bondi v. Vanderstok)

“Readily Convertible” and Artifact Nouns: The Supreme Court Confirms the GCA Reaches Some Weapon Parts Kits and Unfinished Frames (Bondi v. Vanderstok)

Date: Mar 27, 2025
“Readily Convertible” and Artifact Nouns: The Supreme Court Confirms the GCA Reaches Some Weapon Parts Kits and Unfinished Frames Commentary on Bondi v. Vanderstok, 604 U.S. ___ (2025) Introduction...
Franklin v. New York: A Supreme Court Signal To Reconsider Crawford and the “Primary‑Purpose” Test in Confrontation Clause Law

Franklin v. New York: A Supreme Court Signal To Reconsider Crawford and the “Primary‑Purpose” Test in Confrontation Clause Law

Date: Mar 25, 2025
Franklin v. New York: A Supreme Court Signal To Reconsider Crawford and the “Primary‑Purpose” Test in Confrontation Clause Law Introduction In Franklin v. New York (604 U.S. ___, Mar. 24, 2025), the...
“False” Means “Not True”: Section 1014 Does Not Criminalize Merely Misleading Statements — Thompson v. United States

“False” Means “Not True”: Section 1014 Does Not Criminalize Merely Misleading Statements — Thompson v. United States

Date: Mar 22, 2025
“False” Means “Not True”: Section 1014 Does Not Criminalize Merely Misleading Statements Thompson v. United States, 604 U.S. ___ (2025) Introduction In a unanimous opinion authored by Chief Justice...
Using Force by Omission: Supreme Court Holds Intentional Harm by Inaction Qualifies as “Use of Physical Force” Under §924(c)’s Elements Clause

Using Force by Omission: Supreme Court Holds Intentional Harm by Inaction Qualifies as “Use of Physical Force” Under §924(c)’s Elements Clause

Date: Mar 22, 2025
Using Force by Omission: Supreme Court Holds Intentional Harm by Inaction Qualifies as “Use of Physical Force” Under §924(c)’s Elements Clause Introduction In Delligatti v. United States (U.S....
Reevaluating the McDonnell Douglas Framework: Clarifying Title VII Discrimination Standards in Summary Judgment Contexts

Reevaluating the McDonnell Douglas Framework: Clarifying Title VII Discrimination Standards in Summary Judgment Contexts

Date: Mar 13, 2025
Reevaluating the McDonnell Douglas Framework: Clarifying Title VII Discrimination Standards in Summary Judgment Contexts Introduction The case of Ronald Hittle v. City of Stockton, California, et...
Judicial Limits on Enforcing Non-Appealable TROs: Redefining Government Payment Obligations and Sovereign Immunity

Judicial Limits on Enforcing Non-Appealable TROs: Redefining Government Payment Obligations and Sovereign Immunity

Date: Mar 10, 2025
Judicial Limits on Enforcing Non-Appealable TROs: Redefining Government Payment Obligations and Sovereign Immunity Introduction The case, Department of State, et al. v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy...
The Standard of Review for VA’s Benefit-of-the-Doubt Determinations: Clear-Error Review Affirmed

The Standard of Review for VA’s Benefit-of-the-Doubt Determinations: Clear-Error Review Affirmed

Date: Mar 10, 2025
The Standard of Review for VA’s Benefit-of-the-Doubt Determinations: Clear-Error Review Affirmed I. Introduction This commentary examines the recent Supreme Court judgment in Joshua E. Bufkin,...
Limiting the Limits: Reaffirming EPA’s Boundaries on End‐Result Requirements under the Clean Water Act

Limiting the Limits: Reaffirming EPA’s Boundaries on End‐Result Requirements under the Clean Water Act

Date: Mar 6, 2025
Limiting the Limits: Reaffirming EPA’s Boundaries on End‐Result Requirements under the Clean Water Act Introduction The case, City and County of San Francisco, California, Petitioner v. Environmental...
Bias Response Teams and the Right to Challenge University Policies: Establishing New Standards for First Amendment Standing

Bias Response Teams and the Right to Challenge University Policies: Establishing New Standards for First Amendment Standing

Date: Mar 5, 2025
Bias Response Teams and the Right to Challenge University Policies: Establishing New Standards for First Amendment Standing Introduction The case of Speech First, Inc. v. Pamela Whitten, et al....
Upholding Corporate Separateness: Redefining "Defendant's Profits" Under the Lanham Act

Upholding Corporate Separateness: Redefining "Defendant's Profits" Under the Lanham Act

Date: Mar 2, 2025
Upholding Corporate Separateness: Redefining "Defendant's Profits" Under the Lanham Act Introduction The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Dewberry Group, Inc. fka Dewberry Capital Corporation v....
Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice Recognized as a "Final Proceeding" Under Rule 60(b)

Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice Recognized as a "Final Proceeding" Under Rule 60(b)

Date: Mar 2, 2025
Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice Recognized as a "Final Proceeding" Under Rule 60(b) Introduction The Supreme Court’s decision in Gary Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. establishes a...
New Precedent: Enduring Judicial Relief Required for Prevailing Party Status under §1988(b)

New Precedent: Enduring Judicial Relief Required for Prevailing Party Status under §1988(b)

Date: Mar 1, 2025
New Precedent: Enduring Judicial Relief Required for Prevailing Party Status under §1988(b) Introduction This commentary analyzes the United States Supreme Court’s decision in the case of GERALD F....
Reconciling the Hatch Rule with Double Jeopardy: A New Frontier in Dismissal Standards

Reconciling the Hatch Rule with Double Jeopardy: A New Frontier in Dismissal Standards

Date: Feb 28, 2025
Reconciling the Hatch Rule with Double Jeopardy: A New Frontier in Dismissal Standards Introduction The case of John Kevin Woodward v. California, et al. presents a complex intersection between state...
Realigning Federal Tort Liability: A Call to Overrule the Feres Doctrine

Realigning Federal Tort Liability: A Call to Overrule the Feres Doctrine

Date: Feb 28, 2025
Realigning Federal Tort Liability: A Call to Overrule the Feres Doctrine Introduction The case of RYAN G. CARTER, et al. v. UNITED STATES revisits one of the most controversial doctrines in federal...
Prosecutorial Duty to Correct False Testimony: A New Precedent in Napue Violations and Post‐Conviction Review

Prosecutorial Duty to Correct False Testimony: A New Precedent in Napue Violations and Post‐Conviction Review

Date: Feb 28, 2025
Prosecutorial Duty to Correct False Testimony: A New Precedent in Napue Violations and Post‐Conviction Review I. Introduction The Supreme Court’s judgment in Richard Eugene Glossip v. Oklahoma has...
Establishing the 'In-the-Presence' Requirement: A New Inquiry into Warrantless Misdemeanor Arrests Under the Fourth Amendment

Establishing the 'In-the-Presence' Requirement: A New Inquiry into Warrantless Misdemeanor Arrests Under the Fourth Amendment

Date: Feb 28, 2025
Establishing the 'In-the-Presence' Requirement: A New Inquiry into Warrantless Misdemeanor Arrests Under the Fourth Amendment Introduction The case of Victor Javier Grandia Gonzalez v. United States...
Reassessing Content-Neutrality in Buffer Zone Cases: The Erosion of Hill's Precedent

Reassessing Content-Neutrality in Buffer Zone Cases: The Erosion of Hill's Precedent

Date: Feb 28, 2025
Reassessing Content-Neutrality in Buffer Zone Cases: The Erosion of Hill's Precedent Introduction The case of Coalition Life v. City of Carbondale, Illinois, presents a significant moment in the...
Overcoming the Catch-22: Preemption of State Administrative-Exhaustion Requirements in §1983 Unemployment Claims

Overcoming the Catch-22: Preemption of State Administrative-Exhaustion Requirements in §1983 Unemployment Claims

Date: Feb 24, 2025
Overcoming the Catch-22: Preemption of State Administrative-Exhaustion Requirements in §1983 Unemployment Claims Introduction The recent Supreme Court decision in Nancy Williams, et al. v. Greg Reed,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert