Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

“Reasonable Notice to Seek Habeas Relief” – The Supreme Court’s New Due-Process Standard for Alien Enemies Act Removals

“Reasonable Notice to Seek Habeas Relief” – The Supreme Court’s New Due-Process Standard for Alien Enemies Act Removals

Date: May 17, 2025
“Reasonable Notice to Seek Habeas Relief” – The Supreme Court’s New Due-Process Standard for Alien Enemies Act Removals Introduction A.A.R.P. v. Trump, 605 U.S. ___ (2025), marks the Supreme Court’s...
Barnes v. Felix: No “Chronological Blinders” — Courts Must Consider the Entire Encounter in Fourth Amendment Excessive-Force Cases

Barnes v. Felix: No “Chronological Blinders” — Courts Must Consider the Entire Encounter in Fourth Amendment Excessive-Force Cases

Date: May 16, 2025
Barnes v. Felix: No “Chronological Blinders” — Courts Must Consider the Entire Encounter in Fourth Amendment Excessive-Force Cases U.S. Supreme Court, May 15, 2025 (605 U.S. ___) Introduction In a...
Temporal Sufficiency for Differential Pay: The New “During a National Emergency” Rule in Feliciano v. Department of Transportation

Temporal Sufficiency for Differential Pay: The New “During a National Emergency” Rule in Feliciano v. Department of Transportation

Date: May 1, 2025
Temporal Sufficiency for Differential Pay: The New “During a National Emergency” Rule in Feliciano v. Department of Transportation I. Introduction On 30 April 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered...
From “Program Enrollment” to “Monthly Cash-Payment Eligibility”: The Supreme Court Adopts a Narrow, Month-By-Month SSI Standard for Medicare DSH Calculations

From “Program Enrollment” to “Monthly Cash-Payment Eligibility”: The Supreme Court Adopts a Narrow, Month-By-Month SSI Standard for Medicare DSH Calculations

Date: Apr 30, 2025
From “Program Enrollment” to “Monthly Cash-Payment Eligibility”: The Supreme Court Adopts a Narrow, Month-By-Month SSI Standard for Medicare DSH Calculations Introduction Advocate Christ Medical...
“Velázquez Deadline Extension Doctrine” — Weekends and Holidays Toll the 60-Day Voluntary-Departure Period under 8 U.S.C. §1229c(b)(2)

“Velázquez Deadline Extension Doctrine” — Weekends and Holidays Toll the 60-Day Voluntary-Departure Period under 8 U.S.C. §1229c(b)(2)

Date: Apr 23, 2025
“Velázquez Deadline Extension Doctrine” Weekends and Holidays Toll the 60-Day Voluntary-Departure Period under 8 U.S.C. §1229c(b)(2) I. Introduction In Monsalvo Velázquez v. Bondi, No. 23-929 (Apr....
“Affirmative-Defense Allocation” under ERISA: Plaintiffs Need Not Plead §1108 Exemptions to State a §1106 Prohibited-Transaction Claim

“Affirmative-Defense Allocation” under ERISA: Plaintiffs Need Not Plead §1108 Exemptions to State a §1106 Prohibited-Transaction Claim

Date: Apr 18, 2025
“Affirmative-Defense Allocation” under ERISA: Plaintiffs Need Not Plead §1108 Exemptions to State a §1106 Prohibited-Transaction Claim 1. Introduction In Cunningham v. Cornell University, 604 U.S....
“Venue Is the Jailhouse”:  The Supreme Court Makes Habeas the Exclusive Path for Challenging Alien-Enemies Act Removals

“Venue Is the Jailhouse”: The Supreme Court Makes Habeas the Exclusive Path for Challenging Alien-Enemies Act Removals

Date: Apr 8, 2025
“Venue Is the Jailhouse”: The Supreme Court Makes Habeas the Exclusive Path for Challenging Alien-Enemies Act Removals 1. Introduction On 7 April 2025 the Supreme Court, per curiam, issued an...
Constraining APA Remedies: Supreme Court Signals That District Courts Cannot Compel Agency Grant Disbursements and Channels Such Relief to the Court of Federal Claims

Constraining APA Remedies: Supreme Court Signals That District Courts Cannot Compel Agency Grant Disbursements and Channels Such Relief to the Court of Federal Claims

Date: Apr 5, 2025
Constraining APA Remedies: Supreme Court Signals That District Courts Cannot Compel Agency Grant Disbursements and Channels Such Relief to the Court of Federal Claims Introduction In Department of...
No Antecedent‑Personal‑Injury Bar Under Civil RICO: Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn

No Antecedent‑Personal‑Injury Bar Under Civil RICO: Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn

Date: Apr 3, 2025
No Antecedent‑Personal‑Injury Bar Under Civil RICO: Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn Introduction In Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn, 604 U.S. ___ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court resolved a deep...
Clarifying Agency Policy Shifts and Harmless-Error Review Under the APA: FDA v. Wages & White Lion (2025)

Clarifying Agency Policy Shifts and Harmless-Error Review Under the APA: FDA v. Wages & White Lion (2025)

Date: Apr 3, 2025
Clarifying Agency Policy Shifts and Harmless-Error Review Under the APA: FDA v. Wages & White Lion (2025) Case Snapshot Court: U.S. Supreme Court Citation: 604 U.S. ___ (2025) Date: April 2, 2025...
“A Circuit Justice or Judge” Means One Judge Suffices: Justice Sotomayor’s Dissent in Shockley v. Vandergriff and the Unresolved COA Rule

“A Circuit Justice or Judge” Means One Judge Suffices: Justice Sotomayor’s Dissent in Shockley v. Vandergriff and the Unresolved COA Rule

Date: Apr 1, 2025
“A Circuit Justice or Judge” Means One Judge Suffices: Justice Sotomayor’s Dissent in Shockley v. Vandergriff and the Unresolved COA Rule Introduction In Shockley v. Vandergriff, 604 U.S. ___ (2025),...
United States v. Miller: Section 106(a) Waives Sovereign Immunity Only for the §544 Cause of Action—Not for the State-Law “Applicable Law” Under §544(b)

United States v. Miller: Section 106(a) Waives Sovereign Immunity Only for the §544 Cause of Action—Not for the State-Law “Applicable Law” Under §544(b)

Date: Mar 27, 2025
United States v. Miller: Section 106(a) Waives Sovereign Immunity Only for the §544 Cause of Action—Not for the State-Law “Applicable Law” Under §544(b) Introduction In United States v. Miller, 604...
“Readily Convertible” and Artifact Nouns: The Supreme Court Confirms the GCA Reaches Some Weapon Parts Kits and Unfinished Frames (Bondi v. Vanderstok)

“Readily Convertible” and Artifact Nouns: The Supreme Court Confirms the GCA Reaches Some Weapon Parts Kits and Unfinished Frames (Bondi v. Vanderstok)

Date: Mar 27, 2025
“Readily Convertible” and Artifact Nouns: The Supreme Court Confirms the GCA Reaches Some Weapon Parts Kits and Unfinished Frames Commentary on Bondi v. Vanderstok, 604 U.S. ___ (2025) Introduction...
Franklin v. New York: A Supreme Court Signal To Reconsider Crawford and the “Primary‑Purpose” Test in Confrontation Clause Law

Franklin v. New York: A Supreme Court Signal To Reconsider Crawford and the “Primary‑Purpose” Test in Confrontation Clause Law

Date: Mar 25, 2025
Franklin v. New York: A Supreme Court Signal To Reconsider Crawford and the “Primary‑Purpose” Test in Confrontation Clause Law Introduction In Franklin v. New York (604 U.S. ___, Mar. 24, 2025), the...
“False” Means “Not True”: Section 1014 Does Not Criminalize Merely Misleading Statements — Thompson v. United States

“False” Means “Not True”: Section 1014 Does Not Criminalize Merely Misleading Statements — Thompson v. United States

Date: Mar 22, 2025
“False” Means “Not True”: Section 1014 Does Not Criminalize Merely Misleading Statements Thompson v. United States, 604 U.S. ___ (2025) Introduction In a unanimous opinion authored by Chief Justice...
Using Force by Omission: Supreme Court Holds Intentional Harm by Inaction Qualifies as “Use of Physical Force” Under §924(c)’s Elements Clause

Using Force by Omission: Supreme Court Holds Intentional Harm by Inaction Qualifies as “Use of Physical Force” Under §924(c)’s Elements Clause

Date: Mar 22, 2025
Using Force by Omission: Supreme Court Holds Intentional Harm by Inaction Qualifies as “Use of Physical Force” Under §924(c)’s Elements Clause Introduction In Delligatti v. United States (U.S....
Reevaluating the McDonnell Douglas Framework: Clarifying Title VII Discrimination Standards in Summary Judgment Contexts

Reevaluating the McDonnell Douglas Framework: Clarifying Title VII Discrimination Standards in Summary Judgment Contexts

Date: Mar 13, 2025
Reevaluating the McDonnell Douglas Framework: Clarifying Title VII Discrimination Standards in Summary Judgment Contexts Introduction The case of Ronald Hittle v. City of Stockton, California, et...
Judicial Limits on Enforcing Non-Appealable TROs: Redefining Government Payment Obligations and Sovereign Immunity

Judicial Limits on Enforcing Non-Appealable TROs: Redefining Government Payment Obligations and Sovereign Immunity

Date: Mar 10, 2025
Judicial Limits on Enforcing Non-Appealable TROs: Redefining Government Payment Obligations and Sovereign Immunity Introduction The case, Department of State, et al. v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy...
The Standard of Review for VA’s Benefit-of-the-Doubt Determinations: Clear-Error Review Affirmed

The Standard of Review for VA’s Benefit-of-the-Doubt Determinations: Clear-Error Review Affirmed

Date: Mar 10, 2025
The Standard of Review for VA’s Benefit-of-the-Doubt Determinations: Clear-Error Review Affirmed I. Introduction This commentary examines the recent Supreme Court judgment in Joshua E. Bufkin,...
Limiting the Limits: Reaffirming EPA’s Boundaries on End‐Result Requirements under the Clean Water Act

Limiting the Limits: Reaffirming EPA’s Boundaries on End‐Result Requirements under the Clean Water Act

Date: Mar 6, 2025
Limiting the Limits: Reaffirming EPA’s Boundaries on End‐Result Requirements under the Clean Water Act Introduction The case, City and County of San Francisco, California, Petitioner v. Environmental...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert