Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
“Reasonable Notice to Seek Habeas Relief” – The Supreme Court’s New Due-Process Standard for Alien Enemies Act Removals Introduction A.A.R.P. v. Trump, 605 U.S. ___ (2025), marks the Supreme Court’s...
Barnes v. Felix: No “Chronological Blinders” — Courts Must Consider the Entire Encounter in Fourth Amendment Excessive-Force Cases U.S. Supreme Court, May 15, 2025 (605 U.S. ___) Introduction In a...
Temporal Sufficiency for Differential Pay: The New “During a National Emergency” Rule in Feliciano v. Department of Transportation I. Introduction On 30 April 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered...
From “Program Enrollment” to “Monthly Cash-Payment Eligibility”: The Supreme Court Adopts a Narrow, Month-By-Month SSI Standard for Medicare DSH Calculations Introduction Advocate Christ Medical...
“Velázquez Deadline Extension Doctrine” Weekends and Holidays Toll the 60-Day Voluntary-Departure Period under 8 U.S.C. §1229c(b)(2) I. Introduction In Monsalvo Velázquez v. Bondi, No. 23-929 (Apr....
“Affirmative-Defense Allocation” under ERISA: Plaintiffs Need Not Plead §1108 Exemptions to State a §1106 Prohibited-Transaction Claim 1. Introduction In Cunningham v. Cornell University, 604 U.S....
“Venue Is the Jailhouse”: The Supreme Court Makes Habeas the Exclusive Path for Challenging Alien-Enemies Act Removals 1. Introduction On 7 April 2025 the Supreme Court, per curiam, issued an...
Constraining APA Remedies: Supreme Court Signals That District Courts Cannot Compel Agency Grant Disbursements and Channels Such Relief to the Court of Federal Claims Introduction In Department of...
No Antecedent‑Personal‑Injury Bar Under Civil RICO: Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn Introduction In Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn, 604 U.S. ___ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court resolved a deep...
Clarifying Agency Policy Shifts and Harmless-Error Review Under the APA: FDA v. Wages & White Lion (2025) Case Snapshot Court: U.S. Supreme Court Citation: 604 U.S. ___ (2025) Date: April 2, 2025...
“A Circuit Justice or Judge” Means One Judge Suffices: Justice Sotomayor’s Dissent in Shockley v. Vandergriff and the Unresolved COA Rule Introduction In Shockley v. Vandergriff, 604 U.S. ___ (2025),...
United States v. Miller: Section 106(a) Waives Sovereign Immunity Only for the §544 Cause of Action—Not for the State-Law “Applicable Law” Under §544(b) Introduction In United States v. Miller, 604...
“Readily Convertible” and Artifact Nouns: The Supreme Court Confirms the GCA Reaches Some Weapon Parts Kits and Unfinished Frames Commentary on Bondi v. Vanderstok, 604 U.S. ___ (2025) Introduction...
Franklin v. New York: A Supreme Court Signal To Reconsider Crawford and the “Primary‑Purpose” Test in Confrontation Clause Law Introduction In Franklin v. New York (604 U.S. ___, Mar. 24, 2025), the...
“False” Means “Not True”: Section 1014 Does Not Criminalize Merely Misleading Statements Thompson v. United States, 604 U.S. ___ (2025) Introduction In a unanimous opinion authored by Chief Justice...
Using Force by Omission: Supreme Court Holds Intentional Harm by Inaction Qualifies as “Use of Physical Force” Under §924(c)’s Elements Clause Introduction In Delligatti v. United States (U.S....
Reevaluating the McDonnell Douglas Framework: Clarifying Title VII Discrimination Standards in Summary Judgment Contexts Introduction The case of Ronald Hittle v. City of Stockton, California, et...
Judicial Limits on Enforcing Non-Appealable TROs: Redefining Government Payment Obligations and Sovereign Immunity Introduction The case, Department of State, et al. v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy...
The Standard of Review for VA’s Benefit-of-the-Doubt Determinations: Clear-Error Review Affirmed I. Introduction This commentary examines the recent Supreme Court judgment in Joshua E. Bufkin,...
Limiting the Limits: Reaffirming EPA’s Boundaries on End‐Result Requirements under the Clean Water Act Introduction The case, City and County of San Francisco, California, Petitioner v. Environmental...