Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
California v. Acevedo: Expanding Warrantless Searches of Containers within Automobiles under the Fourth Amendment Introduction California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565 (1991), is a landmark decision by...
Prosecutorial Immunity in Judicial Proceedings: Insights from BURNS v. REED Introduction BURNS v. REED, 500 U.S. 478 (1991), is a landmark case addressed by the United States Supreme Court that...
Mu’min v. Virginia: Scope of Voir Dire in Addressing Pretrial Publicity Introduction Mu’min v. Virginia, 500 U.S. 415 (1991), represents a significant Supreme Court decision addressing the...
Establishing Historical Boundaries: Illinois v. Kentucky and the 1792 Low-Water Mark Principle Introduction Illinois v. Kentucky (500 U.S. 380) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Strict Adherence to Harmless Error Standards in Jury Instructions: Analysis of Yates v. Evatt Introduction The landmark case of Yates v. Evatt, adjudicated by the U.S. Supreme Court on May 28, 1991,...
Interpreting 'Specifically Establish' in Sentencing Stipulations: Insights from Braxton v. United States Introduction Braxton v. United States, 500 U.S. 344 (1991), is a landmark Supreme Court...
Summit Health v. Pinhas: Expanding Sherman Act Jurisdiction to Encompass Potential Antitrust Harm Introduction Case Citation: Summit Health, Ltd. et al. v. Pinhas, 500 U.S. 322 (1991) Court: United...
Affirmation of Batson's Framework: Prosecutor's Peremptory Challenges Must Be Race-Neutral Introduction HERNANDEZ v. NEW YORK, 500 U.S. 352 (1991), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that reinforces...
Defamation, Qualified Immunity, and Constitutional Rights: A Comprehensive Analysis of SIEGERT v. GILLEY Introduction SIEGERT v. GILLEY, 500 U.S. 226 (1991), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court...
Florida v. Jimeno: Expanding the Scope of Consent Searches in Vehicles Introduction Florida v. Jimeno, 500 U.S. 248 (1991), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Federal Bankruptcy Code § 522(f) Preempts State Exclusion of Preexisting Judicial Liens: Owen v. Owen Analysis Introduction Owen v. Owen, 500 U.S. 305 (1991), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that...
Permissible Construction of Abortion Restrictions under Title X: RUST v. SULLIVAN Introduction RUST ET AL. v. SULLIVAN, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (500 U.S. 173) is a pivotal 1991...
Farrey v. Sanderfoot: Upholding Judicial Liens Under Bankruptcy Law Introduction In the landmark case of Farrey, FKA Sanderfoot v. Sanderfoot, 500 U.S. 291 (1991), the United States Supreme Court...
Quid Pro Quo Requirement Established for Extortion Charges under the Hobbs Act in Elected Official Campaign Contributions Introduction McCormick v. United States is a pivotal Supreme Court decision...
Michigan v. Lucas: Upholding Conditional Rape-Shield Statutes under the Sixth Amendment Introduction Michigan v. Lucas (500 U.S. 145, 1991) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Ensuring Due Process in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Lankford v. Idaho Introduction Lankford v. Idaho, 500 U.S. 110 (1991), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that addresses the procedural...
Demand Futility in Federal Derivative Actions Governed by State Law: KAMEN v. KEMPER Financial Services Introduction KAMEN v. KEMPER FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. ET AL. (500 U.S. 90) is a pivotal U.S....
Clarifying Removal Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Limits 28 U.S.C. §1442(a)(1) to Federal Officers, Not Agencies Introduction The Supreme Court case International Primate Protection League et al. v....
Upholding Delegated Authority: Touby et ux. v. United States and the Non-Delegation Doctrine Introduction Touby et ux. v. United States, 500 U.S. 160 (1991), is a landmark Supreme Court case that...
Nonconsensual Magistrate Referrals in Prisoner Petitions: Insights from McCARTHY v. BRONSON Introduction The U.S. Supreme Court case McCARTHY v. BRONSON, 500 U.S. 136 (1991), addressed the scope of...