Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

California v. Acevedo: Expanding Warrantless Searches of Containers within Automobiles under the Fourth Amendment

California v. Acevedo: Expanding Warrantless Searches of Containers within Automobiles under the Fourth Amendment

Date: May 31, 1991
California v. Acevedo: Expanding Warrantless Searches of Containers within Automobiles under the Fourth Amendment Introduction California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565 (1991), is a landmark decision by...
Prosecutorial Immunity in Judicial Proceedings: Insights from BURNS v. REED

Prosecutorial Immunity in Judicial Proceedings: Insights from BURNS v. REED

Date: May 31, 1991
Prosecutorial Immunity in Judicial Proceedings: Insights from BURNS v. REED Introduction BURNS v. REED, 500 U.S. 478 (1991), is a landmark case addressed by the United States Supreme Court that...
Mu’min v. Virginia: Scope of Voir Dire in Addressing Pretrial Publicity

Mu’min v. Virginia: Scope of Voir Dire in Addressing Pretrial Publicity

Date: May 31, 1991
Mu’min v. Virginia: Scope of Voir Dire in Addressing Pretrial Publicity Introduction Mu’min v. Virginia, 500 U.S. 415 (1991), represents a significant Supreme Court decision addressing the...
Establishing Historical Boundaries: Illinois v. Kentucky and the 1792 Low-Water Mark Principle

Establishing Historical Boundaries: Illinois v. Kentucky and the 1792 Low-Water Mark Principle

Date: May 29, 1991
Establishing Historical Boundaries: Illinois v. Kentucky and the 1792 Low-Water Mark Principle Introduction Illinois v. Kentucky (500 U.S. 380) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Strict Adherence to Harmless Error Standards in Jury Instructions: Analysis of Yates v. Evatt

Strict Adherence to Harmless Error Standards in Jury Instructions: Analysis of Yates v. Evatt

Date: May 29, 1991
Strict Adherence to Harmless Error Standards in Jury Instructions: Analysis of Yates v. Evatt Introduction The landmark case of Yates v. Evatt, adjudicated by the U.S. Supreme Court on May 28, 1991,...
Interpreting 'Specifically Establish' in Sentencing Stipulations: Insights from Braxton v. United States

Interpreting 'Specifically Establish' in Sentencing Stipulations: Insights from Braxton v. United States

Date: May 29, 1991
Interpreting 'Specifically Establish' in Sentencing Stipulations: Insights from Braxton v. United States Introduction Braxton v. United States, 500 U.S. 344 (1991), is a landmark Supreme Court...
Summit Health v. Pinhas: Expanding Sherman Act Jurisdiction to Encompass Potential Antitrust Harm

Summit Health v. Pinhas: Expanding Sherman Act Jurisdiction to Encompass Potential Antitrust Harm

Date: May 29, 1991
Summit Health v. Pinhas: Expanding Sherman Act Jurisdiction to Encompass Potential Antitrust Harm Introduction Case Citation: Summit Health, Ltd. et al. v. Pinhas, 500 U.S. 322 (1991) Court: United...
Affirmation of Batson's Framework: Prosecutor's Peremptory Challenges Must Be Race-Neutral

Affirmation of Batson's Framework: Prosecutor's Peremptory Challenges Must Be Race-Neutral

Date: May 29, 1991
Affirmation of Batson's Framework: Prosecutor's Peremptory Challenges Must Be Race-Neutral Introduction HERNANDEZ v. NEW YORK, 500 U.S. 352 (1991), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that reinforces...
Defamation, Qualified Immunity, and Constitutional Rights: A Comprehensive Analysis of SIEGERT v. GILLEY

Defamation, Qualified Immunity, and Constitutional Rights: A Comprehensive Analysis of SIEGERT v. GILLEY

Date: May 24, 1991
Defamation, Qualified Immunity, and Constitutional Rights: A Comprehensive Analysis of SIEGERT v. GILLEY Introduction SIEGERT v. GILLEY, 500 U.S. 226 (1991), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court...
Florida v. Jimeno: Expanding the Scope of Consent Searches in Vehicles

Florida v. Jimeno: Expanding the Scope of Consent Searches in Vehicles

Date: May 24, 1991
Florida v. Jimeno: Expanding the Scope of Consent Searches in Vehicles Introduction Florida v. Jimeno, 500 U.S. 248 (1991), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Federal Bankruptcy Code § 522(f) Preempts State Exclusion of Preexisting Judicial Liens: Owen v. Owen Analysis

Federal Bankruptcy Code § 522(f) Preempts State Exclusion of Preexisting Judicial Liens: Owen v. Owen Analysis

Date: May 24, 1991
Federal Bankruptcy Code § 522(f) Preempts State Exclusion of Preexisting Judicial Liens: Owen v. Owen Analysis Introduction Owen v. Owen, 500 U.S. 305 (1991), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that...
Permissible Construction of Abortion Restrictions under Title X: RUST v. SULLIVAN

Permissible Construction of Abortion Restrictions under Title X: RUST v. SULLIVAN

Date: May 24, 1991
Permissible Construction of Abortion Restrictions under Title X: RUST v. SULLIVAN Introduction RUST ET AL. v. SULLIVAN, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (500 U.S. 173) is a pivotal 1991...
Farrey v. Sanderfoot: Upholding Judicial Liens Under Bankruptcy Law

Farrey v. Sanderfoot: Upholding Judicial Liens Under Bankruptcy Law

Date: May 24, 1991
Farrey v. Sanderfoot: Upholding Judicial Liens Under Bankruptcy Law Introduction In the landmark case of Farrey, FKA Sanderfoot v. Sanderfoot, 500 U.S. 291 (1991), the United States Supreme Court...
Quid Pro Quo Requirement Established for Extortion Charges under the Hobbs Act in Elected Official Campaign Contributions

Quid Pro Quo Requirement Established for Extortion Charges under the Hobbs Act in Elected Official Campaign Contributions

Date: May 24, 1991
Quid Pro Quo Requirement Established for Extortion Charges under the Hobbs Act in Elected Official Campaign Contributions Introduction McCormick v. United States is a pivotal Supreme Court decision...
Michigan v. Lucas: Upholding Conditional Rape-Shield Statutes under the Sixth Amendment

Michigan v. Lucas: Upholding Conditional Rape-Shield Statutes under the Sixth Amendment

Date: May 21, 1991
Michigan v. Lucas: Upholding Conditional Rape-Shield Statutes under the Sixth Amendment Introduction Michigan v. Lucas (500 U.S. 145, 1991) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Ensuring Due Process in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Lankford v. Idaho

Ensuring Due Process in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Lankford v. Idaho

Date: May 21, 1991
Ensuring Due Process in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Lankford v. Idaho Introduction Lankford v. Idaho, 500 U.S. 110 (1991), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that addresses the procedural...
Demand Futility in Federal Derivative Actions Governed by State Law: KAMEN v. KEMPER Financial Services

Demand Futility in Federal Derivative Actions Governed by State Law: KAMEN v. KEMPER Financial Services

Date: May 21, 1991
Demand Futility in Federal Derivative Actions Governed by State Law: KAMEN v. KEMPER Financial Services Introduction KAMEN v. KEMPER FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. ET AL. (500 U.S. 90) is a pivotal U.S....
Clarifying Removal Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Limits 28 U.S.C. §1442(a)(1) to Federal Officers, Not Agencies

Clarifying Removal Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Limits 28 U.S.C. §1442(a)(1) to Federal Officers, Not Agencies

Date: May 21, 1991
Clarifying Removal Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Limits 28 U.S.C. §1442(a)(1) to Federal Officers, Not Agencies Introduction The Supreme Court case International Primate Protection League et al. v....
Upholding Delegated Authority: Touby v. United States and the Non-Delegation Doctrine

Upholding Delegated Authority: Touby v. United States and the Non-Delegation Doctrine

Date: May 21, 1991
Upholding Delegated Authority: Touby et ux. v. United States and the Non-Delegation Doctrine Introduction Touby et ux. v. United States, 500 U.S. 160 (1991), is a landmark Supreme Court case that...
Nonconsensual Magistrate Referrals in Prisoner Petitions: Insights from McCARTHY v. BRONSON

Nonconsensual Magistrate Referrals in Prisoner Petitions: Insights from McCARTHY v. BRONSON

Date: May 21, 1991
Nonconsensual Magistrate Referrals in Prisoner Petitions: Insights from McCARTHY v. BRONSON Introduction The U.S. Supreme Court case McCARTHY v. BRONSON, 500 U.S. 136 (1991), addressed the scope of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert