Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Retroactive Application of New Legal Rules: Insights from James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. Georgia et al.

Retroactive Application of New Legal Rules: Insights from James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. Georgia et al.

Date: Jun 21, 1991
Retroactive Application of New Legal Rules: Insights from James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. Georgia et al. Introduction The case of James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. Georgia et al. (501 U.S. 529, 1991)...
Nonjusticiability and Standing in Political Endorsement Challenges: RENNE v. GEARY (1991)

Nonjusticiability and Standing in Political Endorsement Challenges: RENNE v. GEARY (1991)

Date: Jun 18, 1991
Nonjusticiability and Standing in Political Endorsement Challenges: RENNE v. GEARY (1991) Introduction The case of Renne, San Francisco City Attorney, et al. v. Geary et al., decided by the United...
Reinterpreting 'Originating Waters' and Conservation Storage Limits under the Canadian River Compact: Oklahoma v. New Mexico

Reinterpreting 'Originating Waters' and Conservation Storage Limits under the Canadian River Compact: Oklahoma v. New Mexico

Date: Jun 18, 1991
Reinterpreting 'Originating Waters' and Conservation Storage Limits under the Canadian River Compact: Oklahoma v. New Mexico Introduction The landmark case of Oklahoma v. New Mexico, decided by the...
Separation of Powers and Congressional Oversight in Airport Operations: An Analysis of Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority v. Citizens for the Abatement of Aircraft Noise, Inc.

Separation of Powers and Congressional Oversight in Airport Operations: An Analysis of Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority v. Citizens for the Abatement of Aircraft Noise, Inc.

Date: Jun 18, 1991
Separation of Powers and Congressional Oversight in Airport Operations Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority v. Citizens for the Abatement of Aircraft Noise, Inc., 501 U.S. 252 (1991)...
Deliberate Indifference and the Eighth Amendment in Prison Conditions: A Commentary on WILSON v. SEITER

Deliberate Indifference and the Eighth Amendment in Prison Conditions: A Commentary on WILSON v. SEITER

Date: Jun 18, 1991
Deliberate Indifference and the Eighth Amendment in Prison Conditions: A Commentary on WILSON v. SEITER Introduction WILSON v. SEITER et al., 501 U.S. 294 (1991), stands as a pivotal Supreme Court...
Limits on Arbitration of Post-Expiration Grievances under Expired Collective Bargaining Agreements

Limits on Arbitration of Post-Expiration Grievances under Expired Collective Bargaining Agreements

Date: Jun 14, 1991
Limits on Arbitration of Post-Expiration Grievances under Expired Collective Bargaining Agreements: Insights from Litton Financial Printing Division v. NLRB Introduction The case of Litton Financial...
McNeil v. Wisconsin: Reinforcing the Offense-Specific Nature of the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel

McNeil v. Wisconsin: Reinforcing the Offense-Specific Nature of the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel

Date: Jun 14, 1991
McNeil v. Wisconsin: Reinforcing the Offense-Specific Nature of the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel Introduction McNeil v. Wisconsin (501 U.S. 171, 1991) is a landmark Supreme Court decision that...
Notice Requirements for Sua Sponte Departures in Federal Sentencing: Burns v. United States

Notice Requirements for Sua Sponte Departures in Federal Sentencing: Burns v. United States

Date: Jun 14, 1991
Notice Requirements for Sua Sponte Departures in Federal Sentencing: Burns v. United States Introduction Burns v. United States, 501 U.S. 129 (1991), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that...
Expansion of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Relief to Individual Non-Business Debtors: Analysis of TOIBB v. RADLOFF

Expansion of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Relief to Individual Non-Business Debtors: Analysis of TOIBB v. RADLOFF

Date: Jun 14, 1991
Expansion of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Relief to Individual Non-Business Debtors: Analysis of TOIBB v. RADLOFF Introduction TOIBB v. RADLOFF, 501 U.S. 157 (1991), is a landmark decision by the United...
ASTORIA FEDERAL SAVINGS LOAN ASSOCIATION v. SOLIMINO: No Preclusive Effect of State Administrative Findings in Federal Age Discrimination Claims

ASTORIA FEDERAL SAVINGS LOAN ASSOCIATION v. SOLIMINO: No Preclusive Effect of State Administrative Findings in Federal Age Discrimination Claims

Date: Jun 11, 1991
ASTORIA FEDERAL SAVINGS LOAN ASSOCIATION v. SOLIMINO No Preclusive Effect of State Administrative Findings in Federal Age Discrimination Claims Introduction Astoria Federal Savings Loan Association...
Gollust v. Mendell: Affirming Continued §16(b) Standing After Corporate Merger

Gollust v. Mendell: Affirming Continued §16(b) Standing After Corporate Merger

Date: Jun 11, 1991
Gollust v. Mendell: Affirming Continued §16(b) Standing After Corporate Merger Introduction Gollust et al. v. Mendell et al. is a landmark 1991 decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Surviving Mortgage Liens as Claims in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy: Insights from Johnson v. Home State Bank

Surviving Mortgage Liens as Claims in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy: Insights from Johnson v. Home State Bank

Date: Jun 11, 1991
Surviving Mortgage Liens as Claims in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy: Insights from Johnson v. Home State Bank Introduction Johnson v. Home State Bank (501 U.S. 78, 1991) is a seminal United States Supreme...
Final Judgment in EAJA Fee Applications Limited to Court Decisions: Melkonyan v. Sullivan

Final Judgment in EAJA Fee Applications Limited to Court Decisions: Melkonyan v. Sullivan

Date: Jun 11, 1991
Final Judgment in EAJA Fee Applications Limited to Court Decisions: Melkonyan v. Sullivan Introduction Melkonyan v. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services, 501 U.S. 89 (1991), represents a...
Enhancing Due Process: Connecticut v. Doehr and the Necessity of Procedural Safeguards in Prejudgment Attachments

Enhancing Due Process: Connecticut v. Doehr and the Necessity of Procedural Safeguards in Prejudgment Attachments

Date: Jun 7, 1991
Enhancing Due Process: Connecticut v. Doehr and the Necessity of Procedural Safeguards in Prejudgment Attachments Introduction Connecticut v. Doehr, 501 U.S. 1 (1991), is a pivotal United States...
Affirmation of Inherent Power in Sanctioning Litigation Abuse: CHAMBERS v. NASCO, INC.

Affirmation of Inherent Power in Sanctioning Litigation Abuse: CHAMBERS v. NASCO, INC.

Date: Jun 7, 1991
Affirmation of Inherent Power in Sanctioning Litigation Abuse: CHAMBERS v. NASCO, INC. Introduction In CHAMBERS v. NASCO, INC., 501 U.S. 32 (1991), the United States Supreme Court addressed the scope...
Exxon Corp. v. Central Gulf Lines: Overruling Minturn and Expanding Admiralty Jurisdiction

Exxon Corp. v. Central Gulf Lines: Overruling Minturn and Expanding Admiralty Jurisdiction

Date: Jun 4, 1991
Exxon Corp. v. Central Gulf Lines: Overruling Minturn and Expanding Admiralty Jurisdiction Introduction Exxon Corp. v. Central Gulf Lines, Inc., et al. (500 U.S. 603, 1991) is a landmark decision by...
Strict Adherence to Section 5 Preclearance Under Voting Rights Act: Insights from Clark v. Roemer

Strict Adherence to Section 5 Preclearance Under Voting Rights Act: Insights from Clark v. Roemer

Date: Jun 4, 1991
Strict Adherence to Section 5 Preclearance Under Voting Rights Act: Insights from Clark v. Roemer Introduction Clark et al. v. Roemer, Governor of Louisiana, et al., 500 U.S. 646 (1991), is a...
Private Litigants and Racial Exclusion in Civil Jury Selection: Insights from EDMONSON v. LEESVILLE CONCRETE CO., INC.

Private Litigants and Racial Exclusion in Civil Jury Selection: Insights from EDMONSON v. LEESVILLE CONCRETE CO., INC.

Date: Jun 4, 1991
Private Litigants and Racial Exclusion in Civil Jury Selection: Insights from EDMONSON v. LEESVILLE CONCRETE CO., INC. Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case EDMONSON v. LEESVILLE CONCRETE CO.,...
Carrier Medium Weight Must Be Included in LSD Trafficking Sentencing: Chapman v. United States

Carrier Medium Weight Must Be Included in LSD Trafficking Sentencing: Chapman v. United States

Date: May 31, 1991
Carrier Medium Weight Must Be Included in LSD Trafficking Sentencing: Chapman v. United States Introduction Chapman et al. v. United States is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case decided on...
Chargeability of Union Expenditures: Insights from Lehnert v. Ferris Faculty Association

Chargeability of Union Expenditures: Insights from Lehnert v. Ferris Faculty Association

Date: May 31, 1991
Chargeability of Union Expenditures: Insights from Lehnert v. Ferris Faculty Association Introduction Lehnert et al. v. Ferris Faculty Association et al., 500 U.S. 507 (1991), is a landmark Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert