Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

United Kingdom Case Commentaries

“No Deemed Fulfilment” in English Law: UK Supreme Court rejects Mackay v Dick as a rule of law and confirms Saleform deposits accrue only when express preconditions are satisfied

“No Deemed Fulfilment” in English Law: UK Supreme Court rejects Mackay v Dick as a rule of law and confirms Saleform deposits accrue only when express preconditions are satisfied

Date: Nov 14, 2025
“No Deemed Fulfilment” in English Law: UK Supreme Court rejects Mackay v Dick as a rule of law and confirms Saleform deposits accrue only when express preconditions are satisfied Introduction In King...
Recalibrating Collateral and Sexual History Evidence in Scottish Sexual Offence Trials: Article 6 Requires a Nuanced s 275 Balancing Approach (Daly v HMA & Keir v HMA) [2025] UKSC 38

Recalibrating Collateral and Sexual History Evidence in Scottish Sexual Offence Trials: Article 6 Requires a Nuanced s 275 Balancing Approach (Daly v HMA & Keir v HMA) [2025] UKSC 38

Date: Nov 14, 2025
Recalibrating Collateral and Sexual History Evidence in Scottish Sexual Offence Trials: Article 6 Requires a Nuanced s 275 Balancing Approach Case: Daly v His Majesty’s Advocate & Anor (Scotland)...
Only Binding Law Creates a “Special Legal Regime” for Article 13 PVD; Non‑Taxation of NHS Hospital Parking Significantly Distorts Competition

Only Binding Law Creates a “Special Legal Regime” for Article 13 PVD; Non‑Taxation of NHS Hospital Parking Significantly Distorts Competition

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Only Binding Law Creates a “Special Legal Regime” for Article 13 PVD; Non‑Taxation of NHS Hospital Parking Significantly Distorts Competition Introduction In Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation...
The Billing-Currency Rule for Costs: Costs orders lie in sterling or the solicitors’ billing currency, not the claimant’s “loss currency”

The Billing-Currency Rule for Costs: Costs orders lie in sterling or the solicitors’ billing currency, not the claimant’s “loss currency”

Date: Oct 23, 2025
The Billing-Currency Rule for Costs: Costs orders lie in sterling or the solicitors’ billing currency, not the claimant’s “loss currency” Case: Process & Industrial Developments Ltd v The Federal...
Policy Parity Is Not Legal Parity: Appropriate Assessment at the Discharge Stage for European Sites, but NPPF Ramsar Policy Cannot Override Vested Outline Permissions

Policy Parity Is Not Legal Parity: Appropriate Assessment at the Discharge Stage for European Sites, but NPPF Ramsar Policy Cannot Override Vested Outline Permissions

Date: Oct 23, 2025
Policy Parity Is Not Legal Parity: Appropriate Assessment at the Discharge Stage for European Sites, but NPPF Ramsar Policy Cannot Override Vested Outline Permissions Introduction This Supreme Court...
Contingent Success Fees Invoiced After Leaving a VAT Group Are Taxable: Article 64 PVD and Regulation 90 Create the Chargeable Event, Not the “Real‑World” Performance

Contingent Success Fees Invoiced After Leaving a VAT Group Are Taxable: Article 64 PVD and Regulation 90 Create the Chargeable Event, Not the “Real‑World” Performance

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Contingent Success Fees Invoiced After Leaving a VAT Group Are Taxable: Article 64 PVD and Regulation 90 Create the Chargeable Event, Not the “Real‑World” Performance Case: The Prudential Assurance...
A Clear Divide – UKSC Restricts the Tort of Bribery to Fiduciary Relationships and Rejects Implied Dealer Loyalty in Motor-Finance Transactions

A Clear Divide – UKSC Restricts the Tort of Bribery to Fiduciary Relationships and Rejects Implied Dealer Loyalty in Motor-Finance Transactions

Date: Aug 4, 2025
A Clear Divide – UK Supreme Court Restricts the Tort of Bribery to Fiduciary Relationships and Rejects Implied Dealer Loyalty in Motor-Finance Transactions Introduction The decision in Hopcraft and...
“From the Furnace, Not the Fence” – Supreme Court Clarifies the Measuring Point for Section 5 of the Cremation Act 1902

“From the Furnace, Not the Fence” – Supreme Court Clarifies the Measuring Point for Section 5 of the Cremation Act 1902

Date: Aug 1, 2025
“From the Furnace, Not the Fence” – Supreme Court Clarifies the Measuring Point for Section 5 of the Cremation Act 1902 Introduction Wathen-Fayed v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and...
“Wide-Margin Proportionality” – The UKSC’s New Framework for Judicial Scrutiny of Individual Sanctions (Shvidler & Dalston Projects Ltd v Secretaries of State)

“Wide-Margin Proportionality” – The UKSC’s New Framework for Judicial Scrutiny of Individual Sanctions (Shvidler & Dalston Projects Ltd v Secretaries of State)

Date: Jul 30, 2025
“Wide-Margin Proportionality” – The UKSC’s New Framework for Judicial Scrutiny of Individual Sanctions Introduction In Shvidler v Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Affairs...
No Mandatory Principal Hire Contract: Supreme Court Clarifies Operator Liability under the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976

No Mandatory Principal Hire Contract: Supreme Court Clarifies Operator Liability under the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976

Date: Jul 30, 2025
No Mandatory Principal Hire Contract: Supreme Court Clarifies Operator Liability under the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976 Introduction Delta Merseyside Ltd & Anor v Uber...
Stevens v Hotel Portfolio II UK Ltd –  The Supreme Court Broadens Equitable Compensation for Dishonest Assistance

Stevens v Hotel Portfolio II UK Ltd – The Supreme Court Broadens Equitable Compensation for Dishonest Assistance

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Stevens v Hotel Portfolio II UK Ltd – The Supreme Court Broadens Equitable Compensation for Dishonest Assistance 1. Introduction Stevens v Hotel Portfolio II UK Ltd & Anor ([2025] UKSC 28) is a...
“Opinion-Not-Construction” Rule for Benchmark-Fraud Cases – A Commentary on Hayes & Palombo ([2025] UKSC 29)

“Opinion-Not-Construction” Rule for Benchmark-Fraud Cases – A Commentary on Hayes & Palombo ([2025] UKSC 29)

Date: Jul 24, 2025
“Opinion-Not-Construction” Rule for Benchmark-Fraud Cases A Comprehensive Commentary on Hayes & Palombo ([2025] UKSC 29) 1. Introduction The joined appeals of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo provided the...
“One Balance to Rule Them All” – The Supreme Court Authorises Aggregated Public-Interest Balancing under FOIA 2000

“One Balance to Rule Them All” – The Supreme Court Authorises Aggregated Public-Interest Balancing under FOIA 2000

Date: Jul 24, 2025
“One Balance to Rule Them All” – The Supreme Court Authorises Aggregated Public-Interest Balancing under FOIA 2000 Introduction Department for Business and Trade v The Information Commissioner [2025]...
Standish v Standish – The Supreme Court Confines the Sharing Principle to Matrimonial Property and Re-defines “Matrimonialisation”

Standish v Standish – The Supreme Court Confines the Sharing Principle to Matrimonial Property and Re-defines “Matrimonialisation”

Date: Jul 4, 2025
Standish v Standish – The Supreme Court Confines the Sharing Principle to Matrimonial Property and Re-defines “Matrimonialisation” 1. Introduction Standish v Standish ([2025] UKSC 26) is the most...
The “Arising-From” Test for Incidental Use: Supreme Court Clarifies Section 356LA(3) CTA 2010 in Revenue and Customs v Dolphin Drilling Ltd

The “Arising-From” Test for Incidental Use: Supreme Court Clarifies Section 356LA(3) CTA 2010 in Revenue and Customs v Dolphin Drilling Ltd

Date: Jun 25, 2025
The “Arising-From” Test for Incidental Use: Revenue and Customs v Dolphin Drilling Ltd ([2025] UKSC 24) Introduction In Revenue and Customs v Dolphin Drilling Ltd the United Kingdom Supreme Court...
“Looking Beyond the Checkout”: The Supreme Court Affirms Post-Sale Context as a Stand-Alone Source of Trade-Mark Confusion – Commentary on Iconix Luxembourg Holdings SARL v Dream Pairs Europe Inc & Anor [2025] UKSC 25

“Looking Beyond the Checkout”: The Supreme Court Affirms Post-Sale Context as a Stand-Alone Source of Trade-Mark Confusion – Commentary on Iconix Luxembourg Holdings SARL v Dream Pairs Europe Inc & Anor [2025] UKSC 25

Date: Jun 25, 2025
“Looking Beyond the Checkout”: The Supreme Court Affirms Post-Sale Context as a Stand-Alone Source of Trade-Mark Confusion Commentary on Iconix Luxembourg Holdings SARL v Dream Pairs Europe Inc &...
The “Limited-Weight & Rare-Prediction” Principle:  UKSC settles the role of foreign early-release regimes in Article 8 extradition proportionality tests

The “Limited-Weight & Rare-Prediction” Principle: UKSC settles the role of foreign early-release regimes in Article 8 extradition proportionality tests

Date: Jun 12, 2025
The “Limited-Weight & Rare-Prediction” Principle Andrysiewicz v Circuit Court in Łódź, Poland ([2025] UKSC 23) 1. Introduction The United Kingdom Supreme Court (“UKSC”) has delivered a landmark...
Waller-Edwards v One Savings Bank Plc: The New Bright-Line Test for Hybrid Non-Commercial Loans

Waller-Edwards v One Savings Bank Plc: The New Bright-Line Test for Hybrid Non-Commercial Loans

Date: Jun 9, 2025
“Any Non-Commercial Loan with More Than a De Minimis Surety Element Puts the Lender on Inquiry” — A Commentary on Waller-Edwards v One Savings Bank Plc ([2025] UKSC 22) 1. Introduction In...
Supreme Court Confirms Statutory Right to Wild-Camp on Dartmoor: Darwall & Anor v Dartmoor National Park Authority [2025] UKSC 20

Supreme Court Confirms Statutory Right to Wild-Camp on Dartmoor: Darwall & Anor v Dartmoor National Park Authority [2025] UKSC 20

Date: May 22, 2025
Supreme Court Confirms Statutory Right to Wild-Camp on Dartmoor: Darwall & Anor v Dartmoor National Park Authority [2025] UKSC 20 1. Introduction The United Kingdom Supreme Court has delivered a...
“Payment Triggers Contribution” – The Supreme Court on Accrual of Contribution Claims and the Limits of Building Safety Act Retrospection (URS Corporation Ltd v BDW Trading Ltd [2025] UKSC 21)

“Payment Triggers Contribution” – The Supreme Court on Accrual of Contribution Claims and the Limits of Building Safety Act Retrospection (URS Corporation Ltd v BDW Trading Ltd [2025] UKSC 21)

Date: May 22, 2025
“Payment Triggers Contribution” – The Supreme Court on Accrual of Contribution Claims and the Limits of Building Safety Act Retrospection Commentary on URS Corporation Ltd v BDW Trading Ltd ([2025]...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert