Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Federal Habeas Review in Capital Cases: Insights from O'Dell v. Thompson

Federal Habeas Review in Capital Cases: Insights from O'Dell v. Thompson

Date: Dec 3, 1991
Federal Habeas Review in Capital Cases: Insights from O'Dell v. Thompson Introduction O'Dell v. Thompson is a pivotal case in the realm of federal habeas corpus review, particularly concerning...
Personal Liability of State Officers in § 1983 Actions: Insights from Hafer v. Melo, Jr.

Personal Liability of State Officers in § 1983 Actions: Insights from Hafer v. Melo, Jr.

Date: Nov 6, 1991
Personal Liability of State Officers in § 1983 Actions: Insights from Hafer v. Melo, Jr. Introduction The landmark case Hafer v. Melo, Jr., et al., decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on November 5,...
Mireles v. Waco: Reinforcing the Boundaries of Judicial Immunity

Mireles v. Waco: Reinforcing the Boundaries of Judicial Immunity

Date: Oct 22, 1991
Mireles v. Waco: Reinforcing the Boundaries of Judicial Immunity Introduction Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9 (1991), is a significant United States Supreme Court case that addresses the scope and...
Supreme Court Establishes Unified Rule for Timeliness of Government's Appeals in Criminal Cases: United States v. Ibarra AJ

Supreme Court Establishes Unified Rule for Timeliness of Government's Appeals in Criminal Cases: United States v. Ibarra AJ

Date: Oct 16, 1991
Supreme Court Establishes Unified Rule for Timeliness of Government's Appeals in Criminal Cases: United States v. Ibarra AJ Introduction In United States v. Ibarra AJ, 502 U.S. 1 (1991), the Supreme...
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Rector v. Bryant: Insights from Justice Marshall's Dissent on Mental Competence in Capital Punishment

Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Rector v. Bryant: Insights from Justice Marshall's Dissent on Mental Competence in Capital Punishment

Date: Sep 21, 1991
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Rector v. Bryant: Insights from Justice Marshall's Dissent on Mental Competence in Capital Punishment Introduction The case of Ricky Ray Rector v. Winston Bryant,...
Presumption of Adequate Resentencing in Death Penalty Cases: Analysis of Ralph Cecil Feltrop v. State of Missouri

Presumption of Adequate Resentencing in Death Penalty Cases: Analysis of Ralph Cecil Feltrop v. State of Missouri

Date: Jun 29, 1991
Presumption of Adequate Resentencing in Death Penalty Cases: Analysis of Ralph Cecil Feltrop v. State of Missouri Introduction The case of Ralph Cecil Feltrop v. State of Missouri, decided by the...
Virginia Bankshares v. Sandberg: Expanding Liability for Misleading Proxy Statements

Virginia Bankshares v. Sandberg: Expanding Liability for Misleading Proxy Statements

Date: Jun 28, 1991
Virginia Bankshares v. Sandberg: Expanding Liability for Misleading Proxy Statements Introduction Virginia Bankshares, Inc., et al. v. Sandberg et al. is a landmark case decided by the United States...
Payne v. Tennessee: Reaffirming Victim Impact Evidence in Capital Sentencing

Payne v. Tennessee: Reaffirming Victim Impact Evidence in Capital Sentencing

Date: Jun 28, 1991
Payne v. Tennessee: Reaffirming Victim Impact Evidence in Capital Sentencing Introduction Payne v. Tennessee, 498 U.S. 1076 (1991), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Harmelin v. Michigan: Affirmation of Mandatory Life Imprisonment for Drug Possession Under the Eighth Amendment

Harmelin v. Michigan: Affirmation of Mandatory Life Imprisonment for Drug Possession Under the Eighth Amendment

Date: Jun 28, 1991
Harmelin v. Michigan: Affirmation of Mandatory Life Imprisonment for Drug Possession Under the Eighth Amendment Introduction Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957 (1991), is a landmark decision by the...
FREYTAG v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE: Upholding Tax Court's Authority and Appointments Clause Compliance

FREYTAG v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE: Upholding Tax Court's Authority and Appointments Clause Compliance

Date: Jun 28, 1991
FREYTAG v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE: Upholding Tax Court's Authority and Appointments Clause Compliance Introduction The Supreme Court case Freytag et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue,...
Magistrate Supervision of Felony Jury Selection with Defendant Consent: PERETZ v. United States

Magistrate Supervision of Felony Jury Selection with Defendant Consent: PERETZ v. United States

Date: Jun 28, 1991
Magistrate Supervision of Felony Jury Selection with Defendant Consent: PERETZ v. United States Introduction PERETZ v. UNITED STATES, 501 U.S. 923 (1991), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision...
GENTILE v. STATE BAR of Nevada: Voiding Vague Professional Conduct Rules Protecting Attorney Speech

GENTILE v. STATE BAR of Nevada: Voiding Vague Professional Conduct Rules Protecting Attorney Speech

Date: Jun 28, 1991
GENTILE v. STATE BAR of Nevada: Voiding Vague Professional Conduct Rules Protecting Attorney Speech Introduction GENTILE v. STATE BAR of Nevada (501 U.S. 1030, 1991) is a pivotal Supreme Court...
COHEN v. COWLES MEDIA CO.: Affirming Promissory Estoppel Amid First Amendment Considerations

COHEN v. COWLES MEDIA CO.: Affirming Promissory Estoppel Amid First Amendment Considerations

Date: Jun 25, 1991
COHEN v. COWLES MEDIA CO.: Affirming Promissory Estoppel Amid First Amendment Considerations Introduction COHEN v. COWLES MEDIA CO., DBA Minneapolis Star Tribune Co. is a landmark 1991 Supreme Court...
Eleventh Amendment Bars Tribal Suits Against States: Insights from Blatchford v. Native Village of Noatak

Eleventh Amendment Bars Tribal Suits Against States: Insights from Blatchford v. Native Village of Noatak

Date: Jun 25, 1991
Eleventh Amendment Bars Tribal Suits Against States: Insights from Blatchford v. Native Village of Noatak Introduction Blatchford, Commissioner, Department of Community and Regional Affairs of Alaska...
Unexplained State Habeas Denials Do Not Lift Procedural Bar: Ylst v. Nunnemaker

Unexplained State Habeas Denials Do Not Lift Procedural Bar: Ylst v. Nunnemaker

Date: Jun 25, 1991
Unexplained State Habeas Denials Do Not Lift Procedural Bar: Ylst v. Nunnemaker Introduction Ylst v. Nunnemaker, 501 U.S. 797 (1991), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court decision that addresses...
Supreme Court Upholds Department of Labor's Regulations under Black Lung Benefits Act

Supreme Court Upholds Department of Labor's Regulations under Black Lung Benefits Act

Date: Jun 25, 1991
Supreme Court Upholds Department of Labor's Regulations under Black Lung Benefits Act Introduction The United States Supreme Court, on June 24, 1991, delivered a pivotal decision in the case of...
Procedural Default and Federal Habeas Review: Insights from COLEMAN v. THOMPSON

Procedural Default and Federal Habeas Review: Insights from COLEMAN v. THOMPSON

Date: Jun 25, 1991
Procedural Default and Federal Habeas Review: Insights from COLEMAN v. THOMPSON Introduction COLEMAN v. THOMPSON, 501 U.S. 722 (1991) is a landmark Supreme Court case that delves into the intricate...
Schad v. Arizona: Upholding Jury Verdict Flexibility in First-Degree Murder Cases

Schad v. Arizona: Upholding Jury Verdict Flexibility in First-Degree Murder Cases

Date: Jun 22, 1991
Schad v. Arizona: Upholding Jury Verdict Flexibility in First-Degree Murder Cases Introduction Schad v. Arizona, 501 U.S. 625 (1991), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
FIFRA Does Not Preempt Local Pesticide Regulation: Analysis of Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. Mortier

FIFRA Does Not Preempt Local Pesticide Regulation: Analysis of Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. Mortier

Date: Jun 22, 1991
FIFRA Does Not Preempt Local Pesticide Regulation: Analysis of Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. Mortier Introduction Wisconsin Public Intervenor et al. v. Mortier et al., 501 U.S. 597 (1991), is a...
Upholding Public Indecency Statutes in the Face of Expressive Conduct Challenges: Barnes v. Glen Theatre

Upholding Public Indecency Statutes in the Face of Expressive Conduct Challenges: Barnes v. Glen Theatre

Date: Jun 22, 1991
Upholding Public Indecency Statutes in the Face of Expressive Conduct Challenges: Barnes v. Glen Theatre Introduction BARNES, PROSECUTING ATTORNEY OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, INDIANA, ET AL. v. GLEN...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert