Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

In re Blodgett: Supreme Court Reaffirms Limited Role of Mandamus in Appellate Delays

In re Blodgett: Supreme Court Reaffirms Limited Role of Mandamus in Appellate Delays

Date: Jan 14, 1992
In re Blodgett: Supreme Court Reaffirms Limited Role of Mandamus in Appellate Delays Introduction The case of In re Blodgett, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on January 13, 1992, addresses the...
Exemption 6 and Privacy: United States Department of State v. Michael D. Ray et al.

Exemption 6 and Privacy: United States Department of State v. Michael D. Ray et al.

Date: Dec 17, 1991
Exemption 6 and Privacy: United States Department of State v. Michael D. Ray et al. Introduction In United States Department of State v. Michael D. Ray et al., 502 U.S. 164 (1991), the U.S. Supreme...
Reaffirming FELA's Applicability to State-Owned Railroads: Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Commission

Reaffirming FELA's Applicability to State-Owned Railroads: Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Commission

Date: Dec 17, 1991
Reaffirming FELA's Applicability to State-Owned Railroads: Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Commission Introduction The case of Kenneth Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Commission...
Supreme Court Establishes Unlimited Reemployment Protection for Long-Term Military Service under 38 U.S.C. § 2024(d)

Supreme Court Establishes Unlimited Reemployment Protection for Long-Term Military Service under 38 U.S.C. § 2024(d)

Date: Dec 17, 1991
Unlimited Reemployment Protection for Long-Term Military Service under 38 U.S.C. § 2024(d) Introduction WILLIAM "SKY" KING, PETITIONER v. ST. VINCENT'S HOSPITAL (502 U.S. 215) is a landmark decision...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity for Secret Service Agents in Presidential Threat Case

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity for Secret Service Agents in Presidential Threat Case

Date: Dec 17, 1991
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity for Secret Service Agents in Presidential Threat Case Introduction Hunter v. Bryant (502 U.S. 224) is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court...
Affirmation of the Attorney General's Authority to Impose Unauthorized Employment Conditions on Release Bonds

Affirmation of the Attorney General's Authority to Impose Unauthorized Employment Conditions on Release Bonds

Date: Dec 17, 1991
Affirmation of the Attorney General's Authority to Impose Unauthorized Employment Conditions on Release Bonds Introduction The Supreme Court case Immigration and Naturalization Service et al. v....
Ordinary Course of Business Exception Extended to Long-Term Debt in Bankruptcy Preferences

Ordinary Course of Business Exception Extended to Long-Term Debt in Bankruptcy Preferences

Date: Dec 12, 1991
Ordinary Course of Business Exception Extended to Long-Term Debt in Bankruptcy Preferences Introduction The case of Union Bank, Petitioner v. Herbert Wolas, Chapter 7 Trustee for the Estate of ZZZZ...
Son of Sam Law Invalidated: First Amendment Protections Reinforced

Son of Sam Law Invalidated: First Amendment Protections Reinforced

Date: Dec 11, 1991
Son of Sam Law Invalidated: First Amendment Protections Reinforced Introduction In the landmark case Simon Schuster, Inc. v. Crime Victims Board, 502 U.S. 105 (1991), the United States Supreme Court...
EAJA Does Not Apply to Administrative Deportation Proceedings: Ardestani v. INS

EAJA Does Not Apply to Administrative Deportation Proceedings: Ardestani v. INS

Date: Dec 11, 1991
EAJA Does Not Apply to Administrative Deportation Proceedings: Ardestani v. INS Introduction The Supreme Court case Rafeh-Rafie Ardestani v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), 502 U.S. 129...
Wooddell v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers: Expanding Federal Jurisdiction Over Union Constitutions

Wooddell v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers: Expanding Federal Jurisdiction Over Union Constitutions

Date: Dec 5, 1991
Wooddell v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers: Expanding Federal Jurisdiction Over Union Constitutions Introduction Wooddell v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local...
Admissibility of Prior Injury Evidence in Second-Degree Murder: Analysis of Estelle v. McGuire (1991)

Admissibility of Prior Injury Evidence in Second-Degree Murder: Analysis of Estelle v. McGuire (1991)

Date: Dec 5, 1991
Admissibility of Prior Injury Evidence in Second-Degree Murder: Analysis of Estelle v. McGuire (1991) Introduction Wayne Estelle, Warden v. Mark Owen McGuire, 502 U.S. 62 (1991), is a pivotal U.S....
Dual Coverage under LHWCA and the Jones Act: Insights from Southwest Marine v. Gizoni

Dual Coverage under LHWCA and the Jones Act: Insights from Southwest Marine v. Gizoni

Date: Dec 5, 1991
Dual Coverage under LHWCA and the Jones Act: Insights from Southwest Marine v. Gizoni Introduction Southwest Marine, Inc. v. Byron Gizoni, 502 U.S. 81 (1991), is a landmark decision by the United...
Judicial Jurisdiction over Administrative Proceedings under FISA: Board of Governors v. MCorp Financial

Judicial Jurisdiction over Administrative Proceedings under FISA: Board of Governors v. MCorp Financial

Date: Dec 4, 1991
Judicial Jurisdiction over Administrative Proceedings under FISA: Board of Governors v. MCorp Financial Introduction Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System of the United States v. MCorp...
Griffin v. United States: Upholding General Verdicts in Multiple-Object Conspiracies

Griffin v. United States: Upholding General Verdicts in Multiple-Object Conspiracies

Date: Dec 4, 1991
Griffin v. United States: Upholding General Verdicts in Multiple-Object Conspiracies Introduction Griffin v. United States is a significant U.S. Supreme Court case decided on December 3, 1991. The...
Federal Habeas Review in Capital Cases: Insights from O'Dell v. Thompson

Federal Habeas Review in Capital Cases: Insights from O'Dell v. Thompson

Date: Dec 3, 1991
Federal Habeas Review in Capital Cases: Insights from O'Dell v. Thompson Introduction O'Dell v. Thompson is a pivotal case in the realm of federal habeas corpus review, particularly concerning...
Personal Liability of State Officers in § 1983 Actions: Insights from Hafer v. Melo, Jr.

Personal Liability of State Officers in § 1983 Actions: Insights from Hafer v. Melo, Jr.

Date: Nov 6, 1991
Personal Liability of State Officers in § 1983 Actions: Insights from Hafer v. Melo, Jr. Introduction The landmark case Hafer v. Melo, Jr., et al., decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on November 5,...
Mireles v. Waco: Reinforcing the Boundaries of Judicial Immunity

Mireles v. Waco: Reinforcing the Boundaries of Judicial Immunity

Date: Oct 22, 1991
Mireles v. Waco: Reinforcing the Boundaries of Judicial Immunity Introduction Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9 (1991), is a significant United States Supreme Court case that addresses the scope and...
Supreme Court Establishes Unified Rule for Timeliness of Government's Appeals in Criminal Cases: United States v. Ibarra AJ

Supreme Court Establishes Unified Rule for Timeliness of Government's Appeals in Criminal Cases: United States v. Ibarra AJ

Date: Oct 16, 1991
Supreme Court Establishes Unified Rule for Timeliness of Government's Appeals in Criminal Cases: United States v. Ibarra AJ Introduction In United States v. Ibarra AJ, 502 U.S. 1 (1991), the Supreme...
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Rector v. Bryant: Insights from Justice Marshall's Dissent on Mental Competence in Capital Punishment

Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Rector v. Bryant: Insights from Justice Marshall's Dissent on Mental Competence in Capital Punishment

Date: Sep 21, 1991
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Rector v. Bryant: Insights from Justice Marshall's Dissent on Mental Competence in Capital Punishment Introduction The case of Ricky Ray Rector v. Winston Bryant,...
Presumption of Adequate Resentencing in Death Penalty Cases: Analysis of Ralph Cecil Feltrop v. State of Missouri

Presumption of Adequate Resentencing in Death Penalty Cases: Analysis of Ralph Cecil Feltrop v. State of Missouri

Date: Jun 29, 1991
Presumption of Adequate Resentencing in Death Penalty Cases: Analysis of Ralph Cecil Feltrop v. State of Missouri Introduction The case of Ralph Cecil Feltrop v. State of Missouri, decided by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert