Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Imposition of Rule 11 Sanctions Despite Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Insights from WILLY v. COASTAL CORP.

Imposition of Rule 11 Sanctions Despite Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Insights from WILLY v. COASTAL CORP.

Date: Mar 4, 1992
Imposition of Rule 11 Sanctions Despite Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Insights from WILLY v. COASTAL CORP. Introduction WILLY v. COASTAL CORP. ET AL., 503 U.S. 131 (1992), is a landmark...
FRANKLIN v. GWINNETT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: Establishing a Damages Remedy Under Title IX

FRANKLIN v. GWINNETT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: Establishing a Damages Remedy Under Title IX

Date: Feb 27, 1992
FRANKLIN v. GWINNETT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: Establishing a Damages Remedy Under Title IX Introduction FRANKLIN v. GWINNETT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 503 U.S. 60 (1992), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court...
EPA's Authority to Enforce Downstream State Water Quality Standards in NPDES Permits: Arkansas v. Oklahoma Analysis

EPA's Authority to Enforce Downstream State Water Quality Standards in NPDES Permits: Arkansas v. Oklahoma Analysis

Date: Feb 27, 1992
EPA's Authority to Enforce Downstream State Water Quality Standards in NPDES Permits: Arkansas v. Oklahoma Analysis Introduction Arkansas et al. v. Oklahoma et al., 503 U.S. 91 (1992), is a landmark...
Limitation of §1983 Claims for Workplace Safety: Insights from Collins v. City of Harker Heights

Limitation of §1983 Claims for Workplace Safety: Insights from Collins v. City of Harker Heights

Date: Feb 27, 1992
Limitation of §1983 Claims for Workplace Safety: Insights from Collins v. City of Harker Heights Introduction COLLINS v. CITY OF HARKER HEIGHTS, TEXas (503 U.S. 115) is a seminal case adjudicated by...
INDOPCO v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue: Capitalization of Acquisition-Related Expenses

INDOPCO v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue: Capitalization of Acquisition-Related Expenses

Date: Feb 27, 1992
INDOPCO v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue: Capitalization of Acquisition-Related Expenses Introduction INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 503 U.S. 79 (1992), is a seminal case in...
Excessive Force Against Prisoners: Establishing Cruel and Unusual Punishment Without Significant Injury - Hudson v. McMillian

Excessive Force Against Prisoners: Establishing Cruel and Unusual Punishment Without Significant Injury - Hudson v. McMillian

Date: Feb 26, 1992
Excessive Force Against Prisoners: Establishing Cruel and Unusual Punishment Without Significant Injury - Hudson v. McMillian Introduction Hudson v. McMillian (503 U.S. 1) is a landmark decision by...
Supreme Court Affirms Sovereign Immunity from Monetary Recovery in Bankruptcy Proceedings Under §106(c)

Supreme Court Affirms Sovereign Immunity from Monetary Recovery in Bankruptcy Proceedings Under §106(c)

Date: Feb 26, 1992
Supreme Court Affirms Sovereign Immunity from Monetary Recovery in Bankruptcy Proceedings Under §106(c) Introduction United States v. Nordic Village, Inc., 503 U.S. 30 (1992), is a landmark decision...
Smith's Fiduciary Duties Under IRC: A New Precedent in HOLYWELL CORPORATION v. SMITH

Smith's Fiduciary Duties Under IRC: A New Precedent in HOLYWELL CORPORATION v. SMITH

Date: Feb 26, 1992
Smith's Fiduciary Duties Under IRC: A New Precedent in HOLYWELL CORPORATION v. SMITH Introduction In the landmark case of HOLYWELL CORPORATION v. SMITH (503 U.S. 47), the United States Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Limits Scope of Voting Rights Act Section 5 to Direct Voting Changes

Supreme Court Limits Scope of Voting Rights Act Section 5 to Direct Voting Changes

Date: Jan 28, 1992
Supreme Court Limits Scope of Voting Rights Act Section 5 to Direct Voting Changes Introduction In the landmark case of Presley v. Etowah County Commission et al. (502 U.S. 491, 1992), the United...
Lechmere Inc. v. NLRB: Affirming Employer Rights to Exclude Nonemployee Union Organizers Under the NLRA

Lechmere Inc. v. NLRB: Affirming Employer Rights to Exclude Nonemployee Union Organizers Under the NLRA

Date: Jan 28, 1992
Lechmere Inc. v. NLRB: Affirming Employer Rights to Exclude Nonemployee Union Organizers Under the NLRA Introduction Lechmere, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (502 U.S. 527, 1992) is a...
Defining Political Opinion in Asylum Claims: INS v. Elias-Zacarias

Defining Political Opinion in Asylum Claims: INS v. Elias-Zacarias

Date: Jan 23, 1992
Defining Political Opinion in Asylum Claims: INS v. Elias-Zacarias Introduction The case of Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Jairo Jonathan Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478 (1992), addresses a...
Wyoming v. Oklahoma: Strengthening State Standing in Commerce Clause Litigation

Wyoming v. Oklahoma: Strengthening State Standing in Commerce Clause Litigation

Date: Jan 23, 1992
Wyoming v. Oklahoma: Strengthening State Standing in Commerce Clause Litigation 1. Introduction In State of Wyoming v. State of Oklahoma, 502 U.S. 437 (1992), the United States Supreme Court...
INS v. Doherty: Affirming the Attorney General's Broad Discretion in Deportation Proceedings

INS v. Doherty: Affirming the Attorney General's Broad Discretion in Deportation Proceedings

Date: Jan 16, 1992
INS v. Doherty: Affirming the Attorney General's Broad Discretion in Deportation Proceedings Introduction The case of Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Joseph Patrick Doherty, 502 U.S. 314...
Supreme Court Ruling on §506(d) Bankruptcy Code: Implications for Secured Claims in Dewsnup v. Timm

Supreme Court Ruling on §506(d) Bankruptcy Code: Implications for Secured Claims in Dewsnup v. Timm

Date: Jan 16, 1992
Supreme Court Ruling on §506(d) Bankruptcy Code: Implications for Secured Claims in Dewsnup v. Timm Introduction Aletha Dewsnup v. Louis L. Timm Et Al., 502 U.S. 410 (1992), is a significant Supreme...
White v. Illinois: Clarifying Confrontation Clause Application to Hearsay Exceptions

White v. Illinois: Clarifying Confrontation Clause Application to Hearsay Exceptions

Date: Jan 16, 1992
White v. Illinois: Clarifying Confrontation Clause Application to Hearsay Exceptions Introduction Randall D. White v. Illinois, 502 U.S. 346 (1992) is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case that...
Flexible Modification Standard for Consent Decrees Established in Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail

Flexible Modification Standard for Consent Decrees Established in Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail

Date: Jan 16, 1992
Flexible Modification Standard for Consent Decrees Established in Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail Introduction Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail, 502 U.S. 367 (1992), is a landmark...
Yakima County v. Confederated Tribes: Ad Valorem Tax Permitted, Excise Tax Prohibited

Yakima County v. Confederated Tribes: Ad Valorem Tax Permitted, Excise Tax Prohibited

Date: Jan 15, 1992
Yakima County v. Confederated Tribes: Ad Valorem Tax Permitted, Excise Tax Prohibited Introduction Yakima County, Washington, imposed an ad valorem levy on taxable real property within its...
Molzof v. United States: Clarifying the Scope of Punitive Damages under the FTCA

Molzof v. United States: Clarifying the Scope of Punitive Damages under the FTCA

Date: Jan 15, 1992
Molzof v. United States: Clarifying the Scope of Punitive Damages under the FTCA Introduction Molzof v. United States, 502 U.S. 301 (1992), represents a pivotal Supreme Court decision that elucidates...
Functional Equivalence of Appellate Briefs as Notices of Appeal: Smith v. Barry

Functional Equivalence of Appellate Briefs as Notices of Appeal: Smith v. Barry

Date: Jan 15, 1992
Functional Equivalence of Appellate Briefs as Notices of Appeal: Smith v. Barry Introduction Smith v. Barry et al., 502 U.S. 244 (1992) is a significant United States Supreme Court case that...
Norman v. Reed: U.S. Supreme Court Strengthens Access to Ballot for New Political Parties

Norman v. Reed: U.S. Supreme Court Strengthens Access to Ballot for New Political Parties

Date: Jan 15, 1992
Norman v. Reed: U.S. Supreme Court Strengthens Access to Ballot for New Political Parties Introduction Norman v. Reed et al., 502 U.S. 279 (1992), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert