Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Keene v. Tamayo-Reyes: Establishing the Cause-and-Prejudice Standard in Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Keene v. Tamayo-Reyes: Establishing the Cause-and-Prejudice Standard in Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Date: May 5, 1992
Keene v. Tamayo-Reyes: Establishing the Cause-and-Prejudice Standard in Habeas Corpus Proceedings Introduction Keene v. Tamayo-Reyes, 504 U.S. 1 (1992), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Broad Discretion of the Secretary of the Army Under the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act: UNITED STATES v. ALASKA

Broad Discretion of the Secretary of the Army Under the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act: UNITED STATES v. ALASKA

Date: Apr 22, 1992
Broad Discretion of the Secretary of the Army Under the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act: UNITED STATES v. ALASKA Introduction UNITED STATES v. ALASKA (503 U.S. 569, 1992) is a landmark decision...
Gomez v. U.S.: Upholding Finality in Execution Proceedings and Limiting Successive §1983 Claims

Gomez v. U.S.: Upholding Finality in Execution Proceedings and Limiting Successive §1983 Claims

Date: Apr 22, 1992
Gomez v. United States: Upholding Finality in Execution Proceedings and Limiting Successive §1983 Claims Introduction The landmark case Gomez et al. v. United States District Court for the Northern...
Kansas Military Retirement Taxation: A Landmark Ruling

Kansas Military Retirement Taxation: A Landmark Ruling

Date: Apr 22, 1992
Kansas Military Retirement Taxation: A Landmark Ruling Introduction Barker et al. v. Kansas et al. (503 U.S. 594, 1992) is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case that addressed the...
TAYLOR v. FREELAND KRONZ: Limits on Bankruptcy Trustees to Challenge Exemptions Post 30-Day Period

TAYLOR v. FREELAND KRONZ: Limits on Bankruptcy Trustees to Challenge Exemptions Post 30-Day Period

Date: Apr 22, 1992
TAYLOR v. FREELAND KRONZ: Limits on Bankruptcy Trustees to Challenge Exemptions Post 30-Day Period Introduction TAYLOR v. FREELAND KRONZ (503 U.S. 638) is a significant Supreme Court decision that...
Clarifying Federal Sovereign Immunity: No Waiver for State Imposed Civil Fines under CWA and RCRA

Clarifying Federal Sovereign Immunity: No Waiver for State Imposed Civil Fines under CWA and RCRA

Date: Apr 22, 1992
Clarifying Federal Sovereign Immunity: No Waiver for State Imposed Civil Fines under CWA and RCRA Introduction In the landmark case of United States Department of Energy v. Ohio et al. (503 U.S. 607,...
Government Entrapment in Child Pornography Cases: The Jacobson v. United States Decision

Government Entrapment in Child Pornography Cases: The Jacobson v. United States Decision

Date: Apr 7, 1992
Government Entrapment in Child Pornography Cases: The Jacobson v. United States Decision Introduction Jacobson v. United States, 503 U.S. 540 (1992) is a landmark decision by the United States...
Trevino v. Texas: Reinforcing BATSON v. KENTUCKY in Equal Protection Claims

Trevino v. Texas: Reinforcing BATSON v. KENTUCKY in Equal Protection Claims

Date: Apr 7, 1992
Trevino v. Texas: Reinforcing BATSON v. KENTUCKY in Equal Protection Claims Introduction Parties Involved: Petitioner: Joe Mario Trevino Respondent: State of Texas Case Background: In Trevino v....
Clarifying Physical Takings: Supreme Court in YEE ET AL. v. CITY OF ESCONDIDO

Clarifying Physical Takings: Supreme Court in YEE ET AL. v. CITY OF ESCONDIDO

Date: Apr 2, 1992
Clarifying Physical Takings: Supreme Court in YEE ET AL. v. CITY OF ESCONDIDO Introduction In YEE ET AL. v. CITY OF ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA, 503 U.S. 519 (1992), the United States Supreme Court...
Upholding Congressional Apportionment Authority: Affirmation of the Equal Proportions Method

Upholding Congressional Apportionment Authority: Affirmation of the Equal Proportions Method

Date: Apr 1, 1992
Upholding Congressional Apportionment Authority: Affirmation of the Equal Proportions Method Introduction In United States Department of Commerce, et al. v. Montana, et al. (503 U.S. 442, 1992), the...
Incremental Judicial Oversight in School Desegregation: Analyzing Freeman v. Pitts

Incremental Judicial Oversight in School Desegregation: Analyzing Freeman v. Pitts

Date: Apr 1, 1992
Incremental Judicial Oversight in School Desegregation: Analyzing Freeman v. Pitts Introduction Freeman et al. v. Pitts et al. (503 U.S. 467, 1992) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Distinguishing Substantive and Conspiratorial Offenses under Double Jeopardy: An Analysis of United States v. Felix

Distinguishing Substantive and Conspiratorial Offenses under Double Jeopardy: An Analysis of United States v. Felix

Date: Mar 26, 1992
Distinguishing Substantive and Conspiratorial Offenses under Double Jeopardy: An Analysis of United States v. Felix Introduction United States v. Felix, 503 U.S. 378 (1992), is a pivotal Supreme...
Date of Honor Rule Established for §547(b) Preference Actions in Bankruptcy

Date of Honor Rule Established for §547(b) Preference Actions in Bankruptcy

Date: Mar 26, 1992
Date of Honor Rule Established for §547(b) Preference Actions in Bankruptcy Introduction BARNHILL v. JOHNSON, TRUSTEE, 503 U.S. 393 (1992), represents a pivotal decision by the United States Supreme...
Congressional Authority to Amend Environmental Laws: Robertson v. Seattle Audubon Society

Congressional Authority to Amend Environmental Laws: Robertson v. Seattle Audubon Society

Date: Mar 26, 1992
Congressional Authority to Amend Environmental Laws: Robertson v. Seattle Audubon Society Introduction Case Citation: Robertson, Chief, United States Forest Service v. Seattle Audubon Society et al.,...
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION v. BOSTON MAINE CORPORATION: Expanding Amtrak's Condemnation Authority

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION v. BOSTON MAINE CORPORATION: Expanding Amtrak's Condemnation Authority

Date: Mar 26, 1992
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION v. BOSTON MAINE CORPORATION: Expanding Amtrak's Condemnation Authority Introduction NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION v. BOSTON MAINE CORPORATION, 503...
Private Enforcement of Federal Child Welfare Statutes: Insights from Suter v. Artist M. et al.

Private Enforcement of Federal Child Welfare Statutes: Insights from Suter v. Artist M. et al.

Date: Mar 26, 1992
Private Enforcement of Federal Child Welfare Statutes: Insights from Suter v. Artist M. et al. Introduction In Suter et al. v. Artist M. et al., 503 U.S. 347 (1992), the United States Supreme Court...
United States v. R.L.C.: Establishing Juvenile Sentencing Maximums Under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines

United States v. R.L.C.: Establishing Juvenile Sentencing Maximums Under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines

Date: Mar 25, 1992
United States v. R.L.C.: Establishing Juvenile Sentencing Maximums Under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Introduction United States v. R.L.C., 503 U.S. 291 (1992), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision...
Defining 'Employee' under ERISA: Insights from Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Darden

Defining 'Employee' under ERISA: Insights from Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Darden

Date: Mar 25, 1992
Defining 'Employee' under ERISA: Insights from Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Darden Introduction The United States Supreme Court case Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Darden, 502 U.S. 905...
Proximate Cause Requirement for Standing under RICO: HOLMES v. SIPC

Proximate Cause Requirement for Standing under RICO: HOLMES v. SIPC

Date: Mar 25, 1992
Proximate Cause Requirement for Standing under RICO: HOLMES v. SIPC Introduction HOLMES v. SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION ET AL. (503 U.S. 258, 1992) is a landmark United States Supreme...
Authority over Detention Credit Computation in Federal Sentencing: A Commentary on UNITED STATES v. WILSON

Authority over Detention Credit Computation in Federal Sentencing: A Commentary on UNITED STATES v. WILSON

Date: Mar 25, 1992
Authority over Detention Credit Computation in Federal Sentencing: A Commentary on UNITED STATES v. WILSON Introduction UNITED STATES v. WILSON (503 U.S. 329), decided on March 24, 1992, addresses a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert