Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Government Entrapment in Child Pornography Cases: The Jacobson v. United States Decision Introduction Jacobson v. United States, 503 U.S. 540 (1992) is a landmark decision by the United States...
Trevino v. Texas: Reinforcing BATSON v. KENTUCKY in Equal Protection Claims Introduction Parties Involved: Petitioner: Joe Mario Trevino Respondent: State of Texas Case Background: In Trevino v....
Clarifying Physical Takings: Supreme Court in YEE ET AL. v. CITY OF ESCONDIDO Introduction In YEE ET AL. v. CITY OF ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA, 503 U.S. 519 (1992), the United States Supreme Court...
Upholding Congressional Apportionment Authority: Affirmation of the Equal Proportions Method Introduction In United States Department of Commerce, et al. v. Montana, et al. (503 U.S. 442, 1992), the...
Incremental Judicial Oversight in School Desegregation: Analyzing Freeman v. Pitts Introduction Freeman et al. v. Pitts et al. (503 U.S. 467, 1992) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Distinguishing Substantive and Conspiratorial Offenses under Double Jeopardy: An Analysis of United States v. Felix Introduction United States v. Felix, 503 U.S. 378 (1992), is a pivotal Supreme...
Date of Honor Rule Established for §547(b) Preference Actions in Bankruptcy Introduction BARNHILL v. JOHNSON, TRUSTEE, 503 U.S. 393 (1992), represents a pivotal decision by the United States Supreme...
Congressional Authority to Amend Environmental Laws: Robertson v. Seattle Audubon Society Introduction Case Citation: Robertson, Chief, United States Forest Service v. Seattle Audubon Society et al.,...
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION v. BOSTON MAINE CORPORATION: Expanding Amtrak's Condemnation Authority Introduction NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION v. BOSTON MAINE CORPORATION, 503...
Private Enforcement of Federal Child Welfare Statutes: Insights from Suter v. Artist M. et al. Introduction In Suter et al. v. Artist M. et al., 503 U.S. 347 (1992), the United States Supreme Court...
United States v. R.L.C.: Establishing Juvenile Sentencing Maximums Under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Introduction United States v. R.L.C., 503 U.S. 291 (1992), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision...
Defining 'Employee' under ERISA: Insights from Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Darden Introduction The United States Supreme Court case Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Darden, 502 U.S. 905...
Proximate Cause Requirement for Standing under RICO: HOLMES v. SIPC Introduction HOLMES v. SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION ET AL. (503 U.S. 258, 1992) is a landmark United States Supreme...
Authority over Detention Credit Computation in Federal Sentencing: A Commentary on UNITED STATES v. WILSON Introduction UNITED STATES v. WILSON (503 U.S. 329), decided on March 24, 1992, addresses a...
General Motors Corp. v. Romein: Supreme Court Upholds Michigan's Retroactive Workers' Compensation Statute Introduction The case of General Motors Corp. et al. v. Romein et al., decided by the United...
Williams v. United States: Appellate Review of Sentencing Departures Based on Mixed Factors Introduction Williams v. United States, 503 U.S. 193 (1992), is a landmark Supreme Court case that...
Protecting Defendants' Associational Rights: The Landmark Decision in Dawson v. Delaware Introduction Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 (1992), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case that...
Connecticut National Bank v. Germain: Interlocutory Appeals in Bankruptcy Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. §1292 Introduction Connecticut National Bank v. Germain Trustee for the Estate of O'Sullivan's...
Stringer v. Black: Clarifying the Applicability of Vague Aggravating Factors in Death Penalty Sentencing under the Eighth Amendment Introduction Stringer v. Black, 503 U.S. 222 (1992), is a pivotal...
Exemption from Exhaustion Requirement in Bivens Actions for Monetary Damages Introduction McCARTHY v. MADDIGAN et al. (503 U.S. 140, 1992) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...