Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Commerce Clause Violation: Supreme Court Invalidates Michigan's Waste Import Restrictions Introduction FORT GRATIOT SANITARY LANDFILL, INC. v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ET AL. is a...
Preemption of State Fare Advertising Regulations under the Airline Deregulation Act: Morales v. TWA Introduction Morales, Attorney General of Texas v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., et al. (504 U.S....
Chemical Waste Management v. Hunt: Commerce Clause Violation in Hazardous Waste Regulation Introduction Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Hunt, Governor of Alabama, et al., 504 U.S. 334 (1992), is a...
Enhancing Sentencing Standards: Insights from Larry Kinder v. United States Introduction Larry Kinder v. United States, 504 U.S. 946 (1992), presents a critical examination of sentencing procedures...
Backpay Awards under Title VII Not Excludable from Gross Income Introduction United States v. Burke et al. (504 U.S. 229, 1992) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court addressing...
EVANS v. UNITED STATES: Affirmation of Passive Bribe Acceptance Under the Hobbs Act Introduction The Supreme Court case of EVANS v. UNITED STATES (504 U.S. 255, 1992) marks a significant decision in...
Quill Corp. v. North Dakota: Establishing Modern Nexus Standards for State Taxation on Out-of-State Mail-Order Sellers Introduction In the landmark case of Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, decided by the...
Burson v. Freeman: Upholding Campaign-Free Zones as Constitutional Introduction Burson, Attorney General and Reporter for Tennessee v. Freeman (504 U.S. 191, 1992) is a landmark Supreme Court case...
FOUCHA v. LOUISIANA: Re-defining Due Process Protections for Insanity Acquittees 1. Introduction FOUCHA v. LOUISIANA is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision rendered on May 18, 1992,...
WYATT v. COLE et al.: Private Defendants and Qualified Immunity under §1983 Introduction WYATT v. COLE et al., 504 U.S. 158 (1992), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Riggins v. Nevada: Due Process Protections Against Involuntary Medication During Trial Introduction Riggins v. Nevada (504 U.S. 127, 1992) represents a pivotal moment in constitutional law,...
Authority of Federal District Courts to Review Government's Refusal to File Substantial-Assistance Motions: Analysis of Wade v. United States Introduction Wade v. United States, 504 U.S. 181 (1992),...
United States v. Williams: Indictments Remain Valid Despite Prosecutors' Failure to Present Exculpatory Evidence to Grand Jury Introduction United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 (1992), is a pivotal...
Expanding Court Discretion in Dismissing In Forma Pauperis Frivolous Complaints: DENTON v. HERNANDEZ Introduction Denton, Director of Corrections of California, et al. v. Hernandez is a pivotal 1992...
Keene v. Tamayo-Reyes: Establishing the Cause-and-Prejudice Standard in Habeas Corpus Proceedings Introduction Keene v. Tamayo-Reyes, 504 U.S. 1 (1992), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Broad Discretion of the Secretary of the Army Under the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act: UNITED STATES v. ALASKA Introduction UNITED STATES v. ALASKA (503 U.S. 569, 1992) is a landmark decision...
Gomez v. United States: Upholding Finality in Execution Proceedings and Limiting Successive §1983 Claims Introduction The landmark case Gomez et al. v. United States District Court for the Northern...
Kansas Military Retirement Taxation: A Landmark Ruling Introduction Barker et al. v. Kansas et al. (503 U.S. 594, 1992) is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case that addressed the...
TAYLOR v. FREELAND KRONZ: Limits on Bankruptcy Trustees to Challenge Exemptions Post 30-Day Period Introduction TAYLOR v. FREELAND KRONZ (503 U.S. 638) is a significant Supreme Court decision that...
Clarifying Federal Sovereign Immunity: No Waiver for State Imposed Civil Fines under CWA and RCRA Introduction In the landmark case of United States Department of Energy v. Ohio et al. (503 U.S. 607,...