Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Strengthening Active Supervision for State Action Immunity Under the Federal Trade Commission Act: FTC v. Ticor Title Insurance Co. Introduction In the landmark case Federal Trade Commission v. Ticor...
Standing under the Endangered Species Act: Defenders of Wildlife v. Secretary of the Interior Introduction In the landmark case of Defenders of Wildlife et al. v. Secretary of the Interior, 504 U.S....
Rule of Lenity Applied to 'Making' Firearms under the NFA: United States v. Thompson/Center Arms Co. Introduction United States v. Thompson/Center Arms Co. (504 U.S. 505, 1992) is a pivotal Supreme...
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services: Establishing the Limits of Market Power in Tied Aftermarkets Introduction Case Citation: Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc., 504 U.S....
Supreme Court Upholds Hawaii's Write-In Voting Ban in BURDICK v. TAKUSHI Introduction BURDICK v. TAKUSHI, Director of Elections of Hawaii, et al., decided on June 8, 1992, by the United States...
Establishing Limits on Aggravating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Sochor v. Florida Introduction Sochor v. Florida, 504 U.S. 527 (1992), represents a pivotal moment in the landscape of...
Commerce Clause Violation: Supreme Court Invalidates Michigan's Waste Import Restrictions Introduction FORT GRATIOT SANITARY LANDFILL, INC. v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ET AL. is a...
Preemption of State Fare Advertising Regulations under the Airline Deregulation Act: Morales v. TWA Introduction Morales, Attorney General of Texas v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., et al. (504 U.S....
Chemical Waste Management v. Hunt: Commerce Clause Violation in Hazardous Waste Regulation Introduction Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Hunt, Governor of Alabama, et al., 504 U.S. 334 (1992), is a...
Backpay Awards under Title VII Not Excludable from Gross Income Introduction United States v. Burke et al. (504 U.S. 229, 1992) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court addressing...
Enhancing Sentencing Standards: Insights from Larry Kinder v. United States Introduction Larry Kinder v. United States, 504 U.S. 946 (1992), presents a critical examination of sentencing procedures...
EVANS v. UNITED STATES: Affirmation of Passive Bribe Acceptance Under the Hobbs Act Introduction The Supreme Court case of EVANS v. UNITED STATES (504 U.S. 255, 1992) marks a significant decision in...
Quill Corp. v. North Dakota: Establishing Modern Nexus Standards for State Taxation on Out-of-State Mail-Order Sellers Introduction In the landmark case of Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, decided by the...
Burson v. Freeman: Upholding Campaign-Free Zones as Constitutional Introduction Burson, Attorney General and Reporter for Tennessee v. Freeman (504 U.S. 191, 1992) is a landmark Supreme Court case...
FOUCHA v. LOUISIANA: Re-defining Due Process Protections for Insanity Acquittees 1. Introduction FOUCHA v. LOUISIANA is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision rendered on May 18, 1992,...
WYATT v. COLE et al.: Private Defendants and Qualified Immunity under §1983 Introduction WYATT v. COLE et al., 504 U.S. 158 (1992), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Riggins v. Nevada: Due Process Protections Against Involuntary Medication During Trial Introduction Riggins v. Nevada (504 U.S. 127, 1992) represents a pivotal moment in constitutional law,...
Authority of Federal District Courts to Review Government's Refusal to File Substantial-Assistance Motions: Analysis of Wade v. United States Introduction Wade v. United States, 504 U.S. 181 (1992),...
United States v. Williams: Indictments Remain Valid Despite Prosecutors' Failure to Present Exculpatory Evidence to Grand Jury Introduction United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 (1992), is a pivotal...
Expanding Court Discretion in Dismissing In Forma Pauperis Frivolous Complaints: DENTON v. HERNANDEZ Introduction Denton, Director of Corrections of California, et al. v. Hernandez is a pivotal 1992...