Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Content-Based Permitting Fees for Demonstrations: Supreme Court Invalidates Forsyth County Ordinance Introduction Forsyth County, Georgia v. The Nationalist Movement, 505 U.S. 123 (1992), represents...
NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES: Affirming Federal Incentives While Preserving State Autonomy in Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Introduction In the landmark case New York, Petitioner v. United...
Supreme Court Upholds Sufficiency of Evidence in Grand Larceny Conviction: Wright v. Terry Introduction In Ellis B. Wright, Jr. Warden and Mary Sue Terry, Attorney of Virginia Petitioners v. Frank...
Facial Discrimination Against Foreign Commerce: Insights from Kraft General Foods, Inc. v. Iowa Department of Revenue Finance Introduction The landmark case Kraft General Foods, Inc. v. Iowa...
Nordlinger v. Hahn: Upholding Proposition 13's Acquisition Value Taxation System Introduction Stephanie Nordlinger v. Kenneth Hahn, in His Capacity as Tax Assessor for Los Angeles County, et al., 505...
Supremacy of Federal Occupational Safety Standards: Mary Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Association Introduction In the landmark case of Mary Gade, Director, Illinois Environmental...
Georgia v. McCollum: Extending Batson to Criminal Defendants’ Peremptory Challenges 1. Introduction Georgia v. McCollum, 505 U.S. 42 (1992), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Mandating 'Reverse-Witherspoon' Voir Dire in Capital Trials: Morgan v. Illinois Introduction Morgan v. Illinois, 504 U.S. 719 (1992), represents a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Reaffirmation of the Unitary Business Principle in State Taxation: Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation Introduction The case Allied-Signal, Inc., as Successor-in-Interest to Bendix...
Forcible Abduction and Judicial Jurisdiction: Analysis of UNITED STATES v. ALVAREZ-MACHAIN Introduction UNITED STATES v. ALVAREZ-MACHAIN, 504 U.S. 655 (1992), is a landmark case in U.S. jurisprudence...
Recognition and Limitation of the Domestic Relations Exception to Diversity Jurisdiction: Ankenbrandt v. Richards (1992) Introduction Ankenbrandt, as Next Friend and Mother of L.R., et al. v....
Enforcement of Federal Antialienation Provisions under Section 541(c)(2): Insights from Patterson v. Shumate Introduction Patterson, Trustee v. Shumate, 504 U.S. 753 (1992), is a landmark decision by...
Argentina v. Weltover: Expanding the Commercial Exception under FSIA Introduction Republic of Argentina et al. v. Weltover, Inc., et al., 504 U.S. 607 (1992), is a landmark decision by the United...
Supreme Court Upholds Montana's Venue Distinction for Corporate Defendants Under Equal Protection Introduction In the landmark case of Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. Ford et al., the United...
Strengthening Active Supervision for State Action Immunity Under the Federal Trade Commission Act: FTC v. Ticor Title Insurance Co. Introduction In the landmark case Federal Trade Commission v. Ticor...
Standing under the Endangered Species Act: Defenders of Wildlife v. Secretary of the Interior Introduction In the landmark case of Defenders of Wildlife et al. v. Secretary of the Interior, 504 U.S....
Rule of Lenity Applied to 'Making' Firearms under the NFA: United States v. Thompson/Center Arms Co. Introduction United States v. Thompson/Center Arms Co. (504 U.S. 505, 1992) is a pivotal Supreme...
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services: Establishing the Limits of Market Power in Tied Aftermarkets Introduction Case Citation: Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc., 504 U.S....
Supreme Court Upholds Hawaii's Write-In Voting Ban in BURDICK v. TAKUSHI Introduction BURDICK v. TAKUSHI, Director of Elections of Hawaii, et al., decided on June 8, 1992, by the United States...
Establishing Limits on Aggravating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Sochor v. Florida Introduction Sochor v. Florida, 504 U.S. 527 (1992), represents a pivotal moment in the landscape of...