Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Content-Based Permitting Fees for Demonstrations: Supreme Court Invalidates Forsyth County Ordinance

Content-Based Permitting Fees for Demonstrations: Supreme Court Invalidates Forsyth County Ordinance

Date: Jun 20, 1992
Content-Based Permitting Fees for Demonstrations: Supreme Court Invalidates Forsyth County Ordinance Introduction Forsyth County, Georgia v. The Nationalist Movement, 505 U.S. 123 (1992), represents...
NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES: Affirming Federal Incentives While Preserving State Autonomy in Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management

NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES: Affirming Federal Incentives While Preserving State Autonomy in Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management

Date: Jun 20, 1992
NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES: Affirming Federal Incentives While Preserving State Autonomy in Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Introduction In the landmark case New York, Petitioner v. United...
Supreme Court Upholds Sufficiency of Evidence in Grand Larceny Conviction: Wright v. Terry

Supreme Court Upholds Sufficiency of Evidence in Grand Larceny Conviction: Wright v. Terry

Date: Jun 20, 1992
Supreme Court Upholds Sufficiency of Evidence in Grand Larceny Conviction: Wright v. Terry Introduction In Ellis B. Wright, Jr. Warden and Mary Sue Terry, Attorney of Virginia Petitioners v. Frank...
Facial Discrimination Against Foreign Commerce: Insights from Kraft General Foods v. Iowa Department of Revenue Finance

Facial Discrimination Against Foreign Commerce: Insights from Kraft General Foods v. Iowa Department of Revenue Finance

Date: Jun 19, 1992
Facial Discrimination Against Foreign Commerce: Insights from Kraft General Foods, Inc. v. Iowa Department of Revenue Finance Introduction The landmark case Kraft General Foods, Inc. v. Iowa...
Nordlinger v. Hahn: Upholding Proposition 13's Acquisition Value Taxation System

Nordlinger v. Hahn: Upholding Proposition 13's Acquisition Value Taxation System

Date: Jun 19, 1992
Nordlinger v. Hahn: Upholding Proposition 13's Acquisition Value Taxation System Introduction Stephanie Nordlinger v. Kenneth Hahn, in His Capacity as Tax Assessor for Los Angeles County, et al., 505...
Supremacy of Federal Occupational Safety Standards: Mary Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Association

Supremacy of Federal Occupational Safety Standards: Mary Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Association

Date: Jun 19, 1992
Supremacy of Federal Occupational Safety Standards: Mary Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Association Introduction In the landmark case of Mary Gade, Director, Illinois Environmental...
Georgia v. McCollum: Extending Batson to Criminal Defendants’ Peremptory Challenges

Georgia v. McCollum: Extending Batson to Criminal Defendants’ Peremptory Challenges

Date: Jun 19, 1992
Georgia v. McCollum: Extending Batson to Criminal Defendants’ Peremptory Challenges 1. Introduction Georgia v. McCollum, 505 U.S. 42 (1992), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Mandating 'Reverse-Witherspoon' Voir Dire in Capital Trials: Morgan v. Illinois

Mandating 'Reverse-Witherspoon' Voir Dire in Capital Trials: Morgan v. Illinois

Date: Jun 16, 1992
Mandating 'Reverse-Witherspoon' Voir Dire in Capital Trials: Morgan v. Illinois Introduction Morgan v. Illinois, 504 U.S. 719 (1992), represents a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Reaffirmation of the Unitary Business Principle in State Taxation: Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation

Reaffirmation of the Unitary Business Principle in State Taxation: Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation

Date: Jun 16, 1992
Reaffirmation of the Unitary Business Principle in State Taxation: Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation Introduction The case Allied-Signal, Inc., as Successor-in-Interest to Bendix...
Forcible Abduction and Judicial Jurisdiction: Analysis of UNITED STATES v. ALVAREZ-MACHAIN

Forcible Abduction and Judicial Jurisdiction: Analysis of UNITED STATES v. ALVAREZ-MACHAIN

Date: Jun 16, 1992
Forcible Abduction and Judicial Jurisdiction: Analysis of UNITED STATES v. ALVAREZ-MACHAIN Introduction UNITED STATES v. ALVAREZ-MACHAIN, 504 U.S. 655 (1992), is a landmark case in U.S. jurisprudence...
Recognition and Limitation of the Domestic Relations Exception to Diversity Jurisdiction: Ankenbrandt v. Richards (1992)

Recognition and Limitation of the Domestic Relations Exception to Diversity Jurisdiction: Ankenbrandt v. Richards (1992)

Date: Jun 16, 1992
Recognition and Limitation of the Domestic Relations Exception to Diversity Jurisdiction: Ankenbrandt v. Richards (1992) Introduction Ankenbrandt, as Next Friend and Mother of L.R., et al. v....
Enforcement of Federal Antialienation Provisions under Section 541(c)(2): Insights from Patterson v. Shumate

Enforcement of Federal Antialienation Provisions under Section 541(c)(2): Insights from Patterson v. Shumate

Date: Jun 16, 1992
Enforcement of Federal Antialienation Provisions under Section 541(c)(2): Insights from Patterson v. Shumate Introduction Patterson, Trustee v. Shumate, 504 U.S. 753 (1992), is a landmark decision by...
Argentina v. Weltover: Expanding the Commercial Exception under FSIA

Argentina v. Weltover: Expanding the Commercial Exception under FSIA

Date: Jun 13, 1992
Argentina v. Weltover: Expanding the Commercial Exception under FSIA Introduction Republic of Argentina et al. v. Weltover, Inc., et al., 504 U.S. 607 (1992), is a landmark decision by the United...
Supreme Court Upholds Montana's Venue Distinction for Corporate Defendants Under Equal Protection

Supreme Court Upholds Montana's Venue Distinction for Corporate Defendants Under Equal Protection

Date: Jun 13, 1992
Supreme Court Upholds Montana's Venue Distinction for Corporate Defendants Under Equal Protection Introduction In the landmark case of Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. Ford et al., the United...
Strengthening Active Supervision for State Action Immunity Under the Federal Trade Commission Act: FTC v. Ticor Title Insurance Co.

Strengthening Active Supervision for State Action Immunity Under the Federal Trade Commission Act: FTC v. Ticor Title Insurance Co.

Date: Jun 13, 1992
Strengthening Active Supervision for State Action Immunity Under the Federal Trade Commission Act: FTC v. Ticor Title Insurance Co. Introduction In the landmark case Federal Trade Commission v. Ticor...
Standing under the Endangered Species Act: Defenders of Wildlife v. Secretary of the Interior

Standing under the Endangered Species Act: Defenders of Wildlife v. Secretary of the Interior

Date: Jun 13, 1992
Standing under the Endangered Species Act: Defenders of Wildlife v. Secretary of the Interior Introduction In the landmark case of Defenders of Wildlife et al. v. Secretary of the Interior, 504 U.S....
Rule of Lenity Applied to 'Making' Firearms under the NFA: United States v. Thompson/Center Arms Co.

Rule of Lenity Applied to 'Making' Firearms under the NFA: United States v. Thompson/Center Arms Co.

Date: Jun 9, 1992
Rule of Lenity Applied to 'Making' Firearms under the NFA: United States v. Thompson/Center Arms Co. Introduction United States v. Thompson/Center Arms Co. (504 U.S. 505, 1992) is a pivotal Supreme...
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services: Establishing the Limits of Market Power in Tied Aftermarkets

Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services: Establishing the Limits of Market Power in Tied Aftermarkets

Date: Jun 9, 1992
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services: Establishing the Limits of Market Power in Tied Aftermarkets Introduction Case Citation: Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc., 504 U.S....
Supreme Court Upholds Hawaii's Write-In Voting Ban in BURDICK v. TAKUSHI

Supreme Court Upholds Hawaii's Write-In Voting Ban in BURDICK v. TAKUSHI

Date: Jun 9, 1992
Supreme Court Upholds Hawaii's Write-In Voting Ban in BURDICK v. TAKUSHI Introduction BURDICK v. TAKUSHI, Director of Elections of Hawaii, et al., decided on June 8, 1992, by the United States...
Establishing Limits on Aggravating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Sochor v. Florida

Establishing Limits on Aggravating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Sochor v. Florida

Date: Jun 9, 1992
Establishing Limits on Aggravating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Sochor v. Florida Introduction Sochor v. Florida, 504 U.S. 527 (1992), represents a pivotal moment in the landscape of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert