Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Vagueness of Aggravating Factors Under the Eighth Amendment: Insights from RICHMOND v. LEWIS Introduction RICHMOND v. LEWIS, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al. is a landmark decision...
Due Process and Burden-Shifting in Recidivism Proceedings: Parker v. Raley Analysis 1. Introduction Parker v. Raley (506 U.S. 20) is a seminal United States Supreme Court case adjudicated on December...
Maintaining Appellate Jurisdiction over IRS Summons Enforcement Orders: Insights from Church of Scientology v. United States Introduction Church of Scientology of California v. United States et al.,...
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: Reaffirming Reproductive Rights Under the Undue Burden Standard Introduction Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505...
Total Regulatory Takings and Just Compensation: An Analysis of Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council Introduction Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992), is a landmark...
Fordice v. Governor of Mississippi: Reinforcing Standards for Desegregating Higher Education Systems Introduction United States v. Fordice, Governor of Mississippi, et al., 505 U.S. 717 (1992), is a...
Inherently Distinctive Trade Dress Protection Under §43(a): Analyzing Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc. Introduction Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc., 505 U.S. 763 (1992), is a landmark...
Non-Public Forum Status of Airport Terminals and Solicitation Regulations: ISKCON v. Lee Introduction International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc., et al. v. Lee, Superintendent of Port...
Franklin v. Massachusetts: Upholding "Home of Record" Allocation in Census Apportionment Introduction The landmark case of Franklin, Secretary of Commerce, et al. v. Massachusetts et al., decided by...
Limitation on Contingency Fee Enhancements under Fee-Shifting Statutes: Analysis of Burlington v. Dague Introduction In City of Burlington v. Dague, 505 U.S. 557 (1992), the United States Supreme...
Excessive Government Delay in Indictment Violates Sixth Amendment: Doggett v. United States Introduction Doggett v. United States, 505 U.S. 647 (1992), is a landmark Supreme Court case that addresses...
Establishment Clause and Public School Graduation Ceremonies: The Precedent in Lee v. Weisman Introduction Lee v. Weisman, 505 U.S. 577 (1992), is a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed the...
Preemption of State Common Law Claims Under Federal Cigarette Labeling Acts: Cipollone v. Liggett Group Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case, Thomas Cipollone, Individually and as Executor of...
SAWYER v. WHITLEY: Establishing the "Actual Innocence" Standard in Capital Habeas Review Introduction SAWYER v. WHITLEY is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court, delivered on June...
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul: Establishing Limits on Content-Based Hate-Crime Ordinances under the First Amendment Introduction R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (505 U.S. 377, 1992) is a landmark Supreme...
Supreme Court Establishes Clear Forfeiture Rule under LHWCA in Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co. 1. Introduction The case of Estate of Floyd Cowart, Petitioner v. Nicklos Drilling Company et al.,...
Supreme Court Upholds Defendant-Burdened Standard for Competency to Stand Trial Introduction Teofilo Medina, Jr. v. California (505 U.S. 437, 1992) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
United States v. Salerno: Affirming the Strict Application of Rule 804(b)(1) Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Anthony Salerno et al., decided on June 19, 1992, the U.S. Supreme...
Wrigley v. Wisconsin: Expanding the Scope of Solicitation under § 381(a) Introduction WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. WILLIAM WRIGLEY, JR., CO. (505 U.S. 214) is a landmark decision by the United...
Red Cross 'Sue and Be Sued' Provision Confers Original Federal Jurisdiction Introduction American National Red Cross v. S.G. and A.E., 505 U.S. 247 (1992), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that...