Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Vagueness of Aggravating Factors Under the Eighth Amendment: Insights from RICHMOND v. LEWIS

Vagueness of Aggravating Factors Under the Eighth Amendment: Insights from RICHMOND v. LEWIS

Date: Dec 2, 1992
Vagueness of Aggravating Factors Under the Eighth Amendment: Insights from RICHMOND v. LEWIS Introduction RICHMOND v. LEWIS, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al. is a landmark decision...
Due Process and Burden-Shifting in Recidivism Proceedings: Parker v. Raley Analysis

Due Process and Burden-Shifting in Recidivism Proceedings: Parker v. Raley Analysis

Date: Dec 2, 1992
Due Process and Burden-Shifting in Recidivism Proceedings: Parker v. Raley Analysis 1. Introduction Parker v. Raley (506 U.S. 20) is a seminal United States Supreme Court case adjudicated on December...
Maintaining Appellate Jurisdiction over IRS Summons Enforcement Orders: Insights from Church of Scientology v. United States

Maintaining Appellate Jurisdiction over IRS Summons Enforcement Orders: Insights from Church of Scientology v. United States

Date: Nov 17, 1992
Maintaining Appellate Jurisdiction over IRS Summons Enforcement Orders: Insights from Church of Scientology v. United States Introduction Church of Scientology of California v. United States et al.,...
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: Reaffirming Reproductive Rights Under the Undue Burden Standard

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: Reaffirming Reproductive Rights Under the Undue Burden Standard

Date: Jun 30, 1992
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: Reaffirming Reproductive Rights Under the Undue Burden Standard Introduction Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505...
Total Regulatory Takings and Just Compensation: An Analysis of Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council

Total Regulatory Takings and Just Compensation: An Analysis of Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council

Date: Jun 30, 1992
Total Regulatory Takings and Just Compensation: An Analysis of Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council Introduction Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992), is a landmark...
Fordice v. Governor of Mississippi: Reinforcing Standards for Desegregating Higher Education Systems

Fordice v. Governor of Mississippi: Reinforcing Standards for Desegregating Higher Education Systems

Date: Jun 27, 1992
Fordice v. Governor of Mississippi: Reinforcing Standards for Desegregating Higher Education Systems Introduction United States v. Fordice, Governor of Mississippi, et al., 505 U.S. 717 (1992), is a...
Inherently Distinctive Trade Dress Protection Under §43(a): Analyzing Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.

Inherently Distinctive Trade Dress Protection Under §43(a): Analyzing Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.

Date: Jun 27, 1992
Inherently Distinctive Trade Dress Protection Under §43(a): Analyzing Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc. Introduction Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc., 505 U.S. 763 (1992), is a landmark...
Non-Public Forum Status of Airport Terminals and Solicitation Regulations: ISKCON v. Lee

Non-Public Forum Status of Airport Terminals and Solicitation Regulations: ISKCON v. Lee

Date: Jun 27, 1992
Non-Public Forum Status of Airport Terminals and Solicitation Regulations: ISKCON v. Lee Introduction International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc., et al. v. Lee, Superintendent of Port...
Franklin v. Massachusetts: Upholding "Home of Record" Allocation in Census Apportionment

Franklin v. Massachusetts: Upholding "Home of Record" Allocation in Census Apportionment

Date: Jun 27, 1992
Franklin v. Massachusetts: Upholding "Home of Record" Allocation in Census Apportionment Introduction The landmark case of Franklin, Secretary of Commerce, et al. v. Massachusetts et al., decided by...
Limitation on Contingency Fee Enhancements under Fee-Shifting Statutes: Analysis of Burlington v. Dague

Limitation on Contingency Fee Enhancements under Fee-Shifting Statutes: Analysis of Burlington v. Dague

Date: Jun 25, 1992
Limitation on Contingency Fee Enhancements under Fee-Shifting Statutes: Analysis of Burlington v. Dague Introduction In City of Burlington v. Dague, 505 U.S. 557 (1992), the United States Supreme...
Excessive Government Delay in Indictment Violates Sixth Amendment: Doggett v. United States

Excessive Government Delay in Indictment Violates Sixth Amendment: Doggett v. United States

Date: Jun 25, 1992
Excessive Government Delay in Indictment Violates Sixth Amendment: Doggett v. United States Introduction Doggett v. United States, 505 U.S. 647 (1992), is a landmark Supreme Court case that addresses...
Establishment Clause and Public School Graduation Ceremonies: The Precedent in Lee v. Weisman

Establishment Clause and Public School Graduation Ceremonies: The Precedent in Lee v. Weisman

Date: Jun 25, 1992
Establishment Clause and Public School Graduation Ceremonies: The Precedent in Lee v. Weisman Introduction Lee v. Weisman, 505 U.S. 577 (1992), is a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed the...
Preemption of State Common Law Claims Under Federal Cigarette Labeling Acts: Cipollone v. Liggett Group

Preemption of State Common Law Claims Under Federal Cigarette Labeling Acts: Cipollone v. Liggett Group

Date: Jun 25, 1992
Preemption of State Common Law Claims Under Federal Cigarette Labeling Acts: Cipollone v. Liggett Group Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case, Thomas Cipollone, Individually and as Executor of...
SAWYER v. WHITLEY: Establishing the "Actual Innocence" Standard in Capital Habeas Review

SAWYER v. WHITLEY: Establishing the "Actual Innocence" Standard in Capital Habeas Review

Date: Jun 23, 1992
SAWYER v. WHITLEY: Establishing the "Actual Innocence" Standard in Capital Habeas Review Introduction SAWYER v. WHITLEY is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court, delivered on June...
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul: Establishing Limits on Content-Based Hate-Crime Ordinances under the First Amendment

R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul: Establishing Limits on Content-Based Hate-Crime Ordinances under the First Amendment

Date: Jun 23, 1992
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul: Establishing Limits on Content-Based Hate-Crime Ordinances under the First Amendment Introduction R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (505 U.S. 377, 1992) is a landmark Supreme...
Supreme Court Establishes Clear Forfeiture Rule under LHWCA in Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co.

Supreme Court Establishes Clear Forfeiture Rule under LHWCA in Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co.

Date: Jun 23, 1992
Supreme Court Establishes Clear Forfeiture Rule under LHWCA in Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co. 1. Introduction The case of Estate of Floyd Cowart, Petitioner v. Nicklos Drilling Company et al.,...
Supreme Court Upholds Defendant-Burdened Standard for Competency to Stand Trial

Supreme Court Upholds Defendant-Burdened Standard for Competency to Stand Trial

Date: Jun 23, 1992
Supreme Court Upholds Defendant-Burdened Standard for Competency to Stand Trial Introduction Teofilo Medina, Jr. v. California (505 U.S. 437, 1992) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
United States v. Salerno: Affirming the Strict Application of Rule 804(b)(1)

United States v. Salerno: Affirming the Strict Application of Rule 804(b)(1)

Date: Jun 20, 1992
United States v. Salerno: Affirming the Strict Application of Rule 804(b)(1) Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Anthony Salerno et al., decided on June 19, 1992, the U.S. Supreme...
Wrigley v. Wisconsin: Expanding the Scope of Solicitation under § 381(a)

Wrigley v. Wisconsin: Expanding the Scope of Solicitation under § 381(a)

Date: Jun 20, 1992
Wrigley v. Wisconsin: Expanding the Scope of Solicitation under § 381(a) Introduction WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. WILLIAM WRIGLEY, JR., CO. (505 U.S. 214) is a landmark decision by the United...
Red Cross 'Sue and Be Sued' Provision Confers Original Federal Jurisdiction

Red Cross 'Sue and Be Sued' Provision Confers Original Federal Jurisdiction

Date: Jun 20, 1992
Red Cross 'Sue and Be Sued' Provision Confers Original Federal Jurisdiction Introduction American National Red Cross v. S.G. and A.E., 505 U.S. 247 (1992), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert