Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

interpreting-& Case Commentaries

No Recantation, No Brady: Delaware Supreme Court Holds That a Victim’s “Drop the Charges” Affidavit Is Not a Recantation and Reaffirms That DNA Is Not Required to Sustain a Rape Conviction

No Recantation, No Brady: Delaware Supreme Court Holds That a Victim’s “Drop the Charges” Affidavit Is Not a Recantation and Reaffirms That DNA Is Not Required to Sustain a Rape Conviction

Date: Oct 18, 2025
No Recantation, No Brady: Delaware Supreme Court Holds That a Victim’s “Drop the Charges” Affidavit Is Not a Recantation and Reaffirms That DNA Is Not Required to Sustain a Rape Conviction...
Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies: No Duty to Disclose Preexisting Internal Projections and No Material Omission When Undisclosed Forecast Falls Within a Disclosed Range

Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies: No Duty to Disclose Preexisting Internal Projections and No Material Omission When Undisclosed Forecast Falls Within a Disclosed Range

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Internal Projections That Pre-Date a Solicitation and Fall Within a Disclosed Range Are Not Material Omissions Delaware Supreme Court affirms dismissal in Van den Wildenberg v. Sign‑Zone, refining...
Third Circuit Holds FLSA § 216(b) Does Not Bar Release of Unasserted FLSA Claims in Rule 23 Opt‑Out Settlements

Third Circuit Holds FLSA § 216(b) Does Not Bar Release of Unasserted FLSA Claims in Rule 23 Opt‑Out Settlements

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Third Circuit Holds FLSA § 216(b) Does Not Bar Release of Unasserted FLSA Claims in Rule 23 Opt‑Out Settlements Case: Graham Lundeen v. 10 West Ferry Street Operations LLC d/b/a Logan Inn, No....
No Count-by-Count Cure: Fifth Circuit Requires Dismissal of the Entire Indictment When Any Count Violates the Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial Right

No Count-by-Count Cure: Fifth Circuit Requires Dismissal of the Entire Indictment When Any Count Violates the Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial Right

Date: Oct 18, 2025
No Count-by-Count Cure: Fifth Circuit Requires Dismissal of the Entire Indictment When Any Count Violates the Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial Right Introduction In Berryman v. Huffman, No. 23-60627 (5th...
Predicate-Conviction-Specific Bruen Analysis: Fifth Circuit Remands § 922(g)(1) As-Applied Challenge in United States v. Smith

Predicate-Conviction-Specific Bruen Analysis: Fifth Circuit Remands § 922(g)(1) As-Applied Challenge in United States v. Smith

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Predicate-Conviction-Specific Bruen Analysis: Fifth Circuit Remands § 922(g)(1) As-Applied Challenge in United States v. Smith Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Date:...
Removal Waives Eleventh Amendment Immunity, Not General Sovereign Immunity; Equal Protection § 1983 Claims Require Specific Comparators and Impermissible Motive — Commentary on Bell v. University of the State of N.Y. (2d Cir. 2025)

Removal Waives Eleventh Amendment Immunity, Not General Sovereign Immunity; Equal Protection § 1983 Claims Require Specific Comparators and Impermissible Motive — Commentary on Bell v. University of the State of N.Y. (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Removal Waives Eleventh Amendment Immunity, Not General Sovereign Immunity; Equal Protection § 1983 Claims Require Specific Comparators and Impermissible Motive Case: Bell v. University of the State...
“Notice + Barricades” Suffice: Second Circuit Affirms No Jones Act Negligence or Unseaworthiness for a Temporarily Open Hatch, and Rejects Case-Dispositive Spoliation Sanctions

“Notice + Barricades” Suffice: Second Circuit Affirms No Jones Act Negligence or Unseaworthiness for a Temporarily Open Hatch, and Rejects Case-Dispositive Spoliation Sanctions

Date: Oct 18, 2025
“Notice + Barricades” Suffice: Second Circuit Affirms No Jones Act Negligence or Unseaworthiness for a Temporarily Open Hatch, and Rejects Case-Dispositive Spoliation Sanctions Court: U.S. Court of...
Second Circuit Reaffirms Three-Year Limitations and Narrow Continuing-Violation Doctrine for Title IX Claims; Upholds Early Conversion to Summary Judgment in Pund v. St. Francis College

Second Circuit Reaffirms Three-Year Limitations and Narrow Continuing-Violation Doctrine for Title IX Claims; Upholds Early Conversion to Summary Judgment in Pund v. St. Francis College

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Second Circuit Reaffirms Three-Year Limitations and Narrow Continuing-Violation Doctrine for Title IX Claims; Upholds Early Conversion to Summary Judgment in Pund v. St. Francis College Court: U.S....
No Habeas-by-Compassionate-Release: Second Circuit Affirms Denial Based on § 3553(a) and Individualized Circumstances in United States v. Andrews

No Habeas-by-Compassionate-Release: Second Circuit Affirms Denial Based on § 3553(a) and Individualized Circumstances in United States v. Andrews

Date: Oct 18, 2025
No Habeas-by-Compassionate-Release: Second Circuit Affirms Denial Based on § 3553(a) and Individualized Circumstances in United States v. Andrews Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit...
Reliable Hearsay and Foreign Seizure Evidence Are Sufficient To Support a 450-Kilogram Drug-Quantity Finding at Sentencing

Reliable Hearsay and Foreign Seizure Evidence Are Sufficient To Support a 450-Kilogram Drug-Quantity Finding at Sentencing

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Reliable Hearsay and Foreign Seizure Evidence Are Sufficient To Support a 450-Kilogram Drug-Quantity Finding at Sentencing Introduction In United States v. Francisco Javier Montano-Ortiz, the...
Clarifying MDLEA Statelessness: “Captain” Inquiry Plus Opportunity to Claim Nationality Suffices; EEZ Counts as “High Seas” Under the Felonies Clause

Clarifying MDLEA Statelessness: “Captain” Inquiry Plus Opportunity to Claim Nationality Suffices; EEZ Counts as “High Seas” Under the Felonies Clause

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Clarifying MDLEA Statelessness: “Captain” Inquiry Plus Opportunity to Claim Nationality Suffices; EEZ Counts as “High Seas” Under the Felonies Clause Introduction This consolidated, unpublished...
Asking “Captain” Is Enough: EEZ-as-High-Seas and Proof of Statelessness under the MDLEA in United States v. Guerrero‑Rosario

Asking “Captain” Is Enough: EEZ-as-High-Seas and Proof of Statelessness under the MDLEA in United States v. Guerrero‑Rosario

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Asking “Captain” Is Enough: EEZ-as-High-Seas and Proof of Statelessness under the MDLEA in United States v. Guerrero‑Rosario Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (Non-Argument...
Particularity Requires Internal Discreteness, Not Mere Descriptive Clarity: Sixth Circuit Rejects “Gender-Plus-One” PSGs and Holds “Honduran Women” Incognizable

Particularity Requires Internal Discreteness, Not Mere Descriptive Clarity: Sixth Circuit Rejects “Gender-Plus-One” PSGs and Holds “Honduran Women” Incognizable

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Particularity Requires Internal Discreteness, Not Mere Descriptive Clarity: Sixth Circuit Rejects “Gender-Plus-One” PSGs and Holds “Honduran Women” Incognizable Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the...
Dangerous-and-Unusual Doctrine Controls: Sixth Circuit Upholds NFA Registration for Short-Barreled Shotguns and Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) for “Dangerous” Felons

Dangerous-and-Unusual Doctrine Controls: Sixth Circuit Upholds NFA Registration for Short-Barreled Shotguns and Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) for “Dangerous” Felons

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Dangerous-and-Unusual Doctrine Controls: Sixth Circuit Upholds NFA Registration for Short-Barreled Shotguns and Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) for “Dangerous” Felons Case: United States v. Dalton Samuel...
“Reason to Believe” Means a Probable-Cause “Fair Probability”: Sixth Circuit Upholds §2K2.1 Firearms-Trafficking Enhancement for Undercover Sales and Rejects Double Counting

“Reason to Believe” Means a Probable-Cause “Fair Probability”: Sixth Circuit Upholds §2K2.1 Firearms-Trafficking Enhancement for Undercover Sales and Rejects Double Counting

Date: Oct 18, 2025
“Reason to Believe” Means a Probable-Cause “Fair Probability”: Sixth Circuit Upholds §2K2.1 Firearms-Trafficking Enhancement for Undercover Sales and Rejects Double Counting Introduction In United...
Ohio Aggravated Robbery by Theft (§ 2911.01(A)(1) + § 2913.02) Categorically Matches Guidelines “Extortion,” and Therefore Is a Crime of Violence

Ohio Aggravated Robbery by Theft (§ 2911.01(A)(1) + § 2913.02) Categorically Matches Guidelines “Extortion,” and Therefore Is a Crime of Violence

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Ohio Aggravated Robbery by Theft (§ 2911.01(A)(1) + § 2913.02) Categorically Matches Guidelines “Extortion,” and Therefore Is a Crime of Violence Introduction In United States v. Kenneth Evans, the...
Egregious Firearm Use and Combined Permanent–Life-Threatening Injury Take § 924(c) Cases Outside the Guidelines Heartland, Justifying Major Upward Variances

Egregious Firearm Use and Combined Permanent–Life-Threatening Injury Take § 924(c) Cases Outside the Guidelines Heartland, Justifying Major Upward Variances

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Egregious Firearm Use and Combined Permanent–Life-Threatening Injury Take § 924(c) Cases Outside the Guidelines Heartland, Justifying Major Upward Variances Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
United States v. Bycroft: Tenth Circuit Requires On-the-Record, Defendant-Specific §3583(d) Findings for Lifetime Internet Bans; Generic §3553(a) Recitations Are Insufficient

United States v. Bycroft: Tenth Circuit Requires On-the-Record, Defendant-Specific §3583(d) Findings for Lifetime Internet Bans; Generic §3553(a) Recitations Are Insufficient

Date: Oct 18, 2025
United States v. Bycroft: Tenth Circuit Requires On-the-Record, Defendant-Specific §3583(d) Findings for Lifetime Internet Bans; Generic §3553(a) Recitations Are Insufficient Introduction In United...
Scantland, Not Aimable, Governs FLSA Employee Status in the Eleventh Circuit: Scheduling Control, Nonnegotiable Day Rates, and Employer-Provided Systems Support Employee Classification

Scantland, Not Aimable, Governs FLSA Employee Status in the Eleventh Circuit: Scheduling Control, Nonnegotiable Day Rates, and Employer-Provided Systems Support Employee Classification

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Scantland, Not Aimable, Governs FLSA Employee Status in the Eleventh Circuit: Scheduling Control, Nonnegotiable Day Rates, and Employer-Provided Systems Support Employee Classification Case: Joel...
Opening the Door Is Not Consent: Eleventh Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity for Warrantless Entry and Subsumes Derivative Seizure/Excessive-Force Claims

Opening the Door Is Not Consent: Eleventh Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity for Warrantless Entry and Subsumes Derivative Seizure/Excessive-Force Claims

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Opening the Door Is Not Consent: Eleventh Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity for Warrantless Entry and Subsumes Derivative Seizure/Excessive-Force Claims Case: Terry Dukes, Sr. v. Chase Gregory Court:...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert