Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Michigan v. Lucas: Upholding Conditional Rape-Shield Statutes under the Sixth Amendment Introduction Michigan v. Lucas (500 U.S. 145, 1991) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Ensuring Due Process in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Lankford v. Idaho Introduction Lankford v. Idaho, 500 U.S. 110 (1991), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that addresses the procedural...
Demand Futility in Federal Derivative Actions Governed by State Law: KAMEN v. KEMPER Financial Services Introduction KAMEN v. KEMPER FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. ET AL. (500 U.S. 90) is a pivotal U.S....
Clarifying Removal Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Limits 28 U.S.C. §1442(a)(1) to Federal Officers, Not Agencies Introduction The Supreme Court case International Primate Protection League et al. v....
Upholding Delegated Authority: Touby et ux. v. United States and the Non-Delegation Doctrine Introduction Touby et ux. v. United States, 500 U.S. 160 (1991), is a landmark Supreme Court case that...
Nonconsensual Magistrate Referrals in Prisoner Petitions: Insights from McCARTHY v. BRONSON Introduction The U.S. Supreme Court case McCARTHY v. BRONSON, 500 U.S. 136 (1991), addressed the scope of...
ADEA Claims Subject to Compulsory Arbitration: GILMER v. INTERSTATE/JOHNSON LANE CORP. Introduction GILMER v. INTERSTATE/JOHNSON LANE CORP., 500 U.S. 20 (1991), is a landmark United States Supreme...
Riverside County v. McLaughlin: Establishing the 48-Hour Standard for Probable Cause Determinations Introduction Riverside County v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44 (1991), is a landmark United States...
Timeliness of Civil Actions Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: Insights from Stevens v. Department of Treasury Introduction Stevens v. Department of Treasury et al. is a landmark U.S....
NLRB's Authority to Define Bargaining Units: American Hospital Association v. NLRB U.S. Supreme Court, 499 U.S. 606 (1991) Introduction The case of American Hospital Association v. National Labor...
Clarifying Fourth Amendment Seizure Standards in California v. Hodari D. Introduction California v. Hodari D., decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1991, addresses a pivotal question regarding the...
Enforcement of Forum Selection Clauses in Standardized Contracts: Analysis of Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute Introduction Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute et vir (499 U.S. 585, 1991) is a...
Strict Interpretation of 'Lesion Corporelle' under the Warsaw Convention: Mental Injury Exclusion in Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. Floyd Introduction In the landmark case of Eastern Airlines, Inc. v....
Material Difference in Property Exchanges: A New Precedent from Cottage Savings Association v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Introduction Cottage Savings Association v. Commissioner of Internal...
U.S. v. Centennial Savings Bank: Affirmation of Deductible Mortgage Exchange Losses and Rejection of Early Withdrawal Penalty Income Exclusion Introduction In the landmark case United States v....
Leathers v. Medlock: Supreme Court Upholds Differential Taxation of Cable Television Under the First Amendment Introduction Leathers, Commissioner of Revenues of Arkansas v. Medlock et al. is a...
McCLESKEY v. ZANT: Defining Abuse of the Writ in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction Case Title: McCLESKEY v. ZANT, Superintendent, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center (499 U.S....
Pro Se Attorneys and Attorney's Fees: Insights from KAY v. EHRLER ET AL. Introduction KAY v. EHRLER ET AL. (499 U.S. 432, 1991) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
State Action Immunity in Local Zoning Regulations Under Sherman Act: City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising Introduction City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc., 499 U.S. 365 (1991),...
Equal Protection in Jury Selection: Powers v. Ohio Expands Third-Party Standing to Challenge Racial Exclusions Introduction Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400 (1991), marks a significant development in the...