Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Deference to Secretary of Labor's Interpretation in Ambiguous OSHA Regulations – Martin v. OSHA Review Commission

Deference to Secretary of Labor's Interpretation in Ambiguous OSHA Regulations – Martin v. OSHA Review Commission

Date: Mar 21, 1991
Deference to Secretary of Labor's Interpretation in Ambiguous OSHA Regulations – Martin v. OSHA Review Commission Introduction Martin Secretary of Labor v. Occupational Safety and Health Review...
Johnson Controls v. UAW: Reinforcing Anti-Discrimination in Fetal Protection Policies

Johnson Controls v. UAW: Reinforcing Anti-Discrimination in Fetal Protection Policies

Date: Mar 21, 1991
Johnson Controls v. United Auto Workers (UAW): Reinforcing Anti-Discrimination in Fetal Protection Policies Introduction Johnson Controls, Inc. v. United Auto Workers (UAW), 499 U.S. 187 (1991), is a...
Establishing Exclusive Remedies: FLRA Immunizes Federal Employees Even When FTCA Exceptions Apply

Establishing Exclusive Remedies: FLRA Immunizes Federal Employees Even When FTCA Exceptions Apply

Date: Mar 21, 1991
Establishing Exclusive Remedies: FLRA Immunizes Federal Employees Even When FTCA Exceptions Apply Introduction United States et al. v. Smith et al., 499 U.S. 160 (1991) is a landmark decision by the...
Reaffirmation of the Duty of Fair Representation in Union Negotiations: Insights from Air Line Pilots Association, International v. O'Neill et al.

Reaffirmation of the Duty of Fair Representation in Union Negotiations: Insights from Air Line Pilots Association, International v. O'Neill et al.

Date: Mar 20, 1991
Reaffirmation of the Duty of Fair Representation in Union Negotiations: Insights from Air Line Pilots Association, International v. O'Neill et al. Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case, Air...
Supremacy of §11341(a) Over Collective Bargaining Agreements in Railway Consolidations

Supremacy of §11341(a) Over Collective Bargaining Agreements in Railway Consolidations

Date: Mar 20, 1991
Supremacy of §11341(a) Over Collective Bargaining Agreements in Railway Consolidations Introduction The Supreme Court case Norfolk Western Railway Co. et al. v. American Train Dispatchers'...
Expert Fees Excluded from Attorney's Fee Awards under 42 U.S.C. §1988: Insights from West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. Casey

Expert Fees Excluded from Attorney's Fee Awards under 42 U.S.C. §1988: Insights from West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. Casey

Date: Mar 20, 1991
Expert Fees Excluded from Attorney's Fee Awards under 42 U.S.C. §1988: Insights from West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. Casey Introduction The Supreme Court case West Virginia University...
Pacific Mutual v. Haslip: Reinforcing Constitutionality of Punitive Damages under Due Process

Pacific Mutual v. Haslip: Reinforcing Constitutionality of Punitive Damages under Due Process

Date: Mar 5, 1991
Pacific Mutual v. Haslip: Reinforcing Constitutionality of Punitive Damages under Due Process Introduction In Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Haslip et al., the United States Supreme Court...
Tribal Sovereign Immunity in State Taxation: Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe

Tribal Sovereign Immunity in State Taxation: Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe

Date: Feb 27, 1991
Tribal Sovereign Immunity in State Taxation: Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe Introduction The case of Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe...
Postal Service Monopoly Reinforced: Standing of Unions Under the Private Express Statutes

Postal Service Monopoly Reinforced: Standing of Unions Under the Private Express Statutes

Date: Feb 27, 1991
Postal Service Monopoly Reinforced: Standing of Unions Under the Private Express Statutes Introduction In the landmark case of Air Courier Conference of America v. American Postal Workers Union,...
Business Guides v. Chromatic: Rule 11's Objective Reasonableness Standard Extended to Represented Parties

Business Guides v. Chromatic: Rule 11's Objective Reasonableness Standard Extended to Represented Parties

Date: Feb 27, 1991
Business Guides v. Chromatic: Rule 11's Objective Reasonableness Standard Extended to Represented Parties Introduction Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc. et al., 498...
Ensuring Voluntary Waivers of Jury Trials in Capital Cases: Insights from Reginald Jells v. Ohio

Ensuring Voluntary Waivers of Jury Trials in Capital Cases: Insights from Reginald Jells v. Ohio

Date: Feb 21, 1991
Ensuring Voluntary Waivers of Jury Trials in Capital Cases: Insights from Reginald Jells v. Ohio Introduction Reginald Jells v. Ohio (498 U.S. 1111) is a significant case that addresses the...
Section 401(c) LMRDA Prioritizes Candidate Requests' Reasonableness Over Union Rules

Section 401(c) LMRDA Prioritizes Candidate Requests' Reasonableness Over Union Rules

Date: Feb 21, 1991
Section 401(c) LMRDA Prioritizes Candidate Requests' Reasonableness Over Union Rules Introduction The case of International Organization of Masters, Mates, Pilots et al v. Brown (498 U.S. 466)...
Expanding §1983: Dennis v. Higgins and the Commerce Clause

Expanding §1983: Dennis v. Higgins and the Commerce Clause

Date: Feb 21, 1991
Expanding §1983: Dennis v. Higgins and the Commerce Clause Introduction Dennis v. Higgins, 498 U.S. 439 (1991), represents a significant development in the interpretation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983...
Federal District Court Jurisdiction Affirmed in SAW Program Challenges

Federal District Court Jurisdiction Affirmed in SAW Program Challenges

Date: Feb 21, 1991
Federal District Court Jurisdiction Affirmed in SAW Program Challenges Introduction In the landmark case McNARY, COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION, ET AL. v. HAITIAN REFUGEE CENTER,...
Supervised Release Applicability in Drug Offenses: Gozlon-Peretz v. United States

Supervised Release Applicability in Drug Offenses: Gozlon-Peretz v. United States

Date: Feb 20, 1991
Supervised Release Applicability in Drug Offenses: Gozlon-Peretz v. United States Introduction Gozlon-Peretz v. United States, 498 U.S. 395 (1991), addresses a critical issue in federal drug...
Presumption of Correctness in Habeas Corpus: BURDEN v. ZANT, WARDEN

Presumption of Correctness in Habeas Corpus: BURDEN v. ZANT, WARDEN

Date: Feb 20, 1991
Presumption of Correctness in Habeas Corpus: BURDEN v. ZANT, WARDEN Introduction BURDEN v. ZANT, WARDEN (498 U.S. 433) is a landmark 1991 decision by the United States Supreme Court that addresses...
Ford v. Georgia: Strengthening Federal Oversight of Racial Bias in Jury Selection

Ford v. Georgia: Strengthening Federal Oversight of Racial Bias in Jury Selection

Date: Feb 20, 1991
Ford v. Georgia: Strengthening Federal Oversight of Racial Bias in Jury Selection Introduction Ford v. Georgia (1991) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that addressed the...
Apportionment of Value Added Taxes Under the Commerce Clause: Trinova Corp. v. Michigan Department of Treasury

Apportionment of Value Added Taxes Under the Commerce Clause: Trinova Corp. v. Michigan Department of Treasury

Date: Feb 20, 1991
Upholding Fair Apportionment in Value Added Taxes: Trinova Corp. v. Michigan Department of Treasury Introduction Trinova Corp. v. Michigan Department of Treasury is a landmark 1991 decision by the...
McDermott International, Inc. v. Wilander: Redefining "Seaman" Under the Jones Act

McDermott International, Inc. v. Wilander: Redefining "Seaman" Under the Jones Act

Date: Feb 20, 1991
McDermott International, Inc. v. Wilander: Redefining "Seaman" Under the Jones Act Introduction McDermott International, Inc. v. Wilander (498 U.S. 337, 1991) represents a pivotal moment in maritime...
Unanimous Mitigating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Frank D. Rodriguez v. Colorado

Unanimous Mitigating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Frank D. Rodriguez v. Colorado

Date: Jan 23, 1991
Unanimous Mitigating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Frank D. Rodriguez v. Colorado Introduction Frank D. Rodriguez v. Colorado, 498 U.S. 1055 (1991), is a pivotal case in the realm of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert