Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Presumption of Correctness in Habeas Corpus: BURDEN v. ZANT, WARDEN Introduction BURDEN v. ZANT, WARDEN (498 U.S. 433) is a landmark 1991 decision by the United States Supreme Court that addresses...
Ford v. Georgia: Strengthening Federal Oversight of Racial Bias in Jury Selection Introduction Ford v. Georgia (1991) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that addressed the...
Upholding Fair Apportionment in Value Added Taxes: Trinova Corp. v. Michigan Department of Treasury Introduction Trinova Corp. v. Michigan Department of Treasury is a landmark 1991 decision by the...
McDermott International, Inc. v. Wilander: Redefining "Seaman" Under the Jones Act Introduction McDermott International, Inc. v. Wilander (498 U.S. 337, 1991) represents a pivotal moment in maritime...
Unanimous Mitigating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Frank D. Rodriguez v. Colorado Introduction Frank D. Rodriguez v. Colorado, 498 U.S. 1055 (1991), is a pivotal case in the realm of...
Comprehensive Commentary on PARKER v. DUGGER: Ensuring Adequate Consideration of Nonstatutory Mitigating Circumstances in Death Penalty Cases Introduction PARKER v. DUGGER, 498 U.S. 308 (1991), is a...
Relevance and Reasonableness in Grand Jury Subpoenas: United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc. (1991) Introduction United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc., et al. is a pivotal Supreme Court case that...
Dissolving Desegregation Decrees: Insights from Dowell v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City (1991) Introduction Dowell v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City Public Schools, 498 U.S. 237 (1991), is...
Rule 4(a)(2) and Finality in Appeals: Insights from Firstier Mortgage Co. v. Investors Mortgage Insurance Co. Introduction Firstier Mortgage Co., aka RealBanc, Inc. v. Investors Mortgage Insurance...
Preponderance of Evidence Standard Affirmed for Fraud Exceptions in Bankruptcy under §523(a) in Grogan et al. v. Garner (498 U.S. 279) Introduction Grogan et al. v. Garner is a landmark 1991 decision...
FERC's Consolidation of Vintage Price Ceilings and Good Faith Negotiation Procedures Upheld Under the Natural Gas Policy Act Introduction The landmark case Mobil Oil Exploration Producing Southeast,...
Cheek v. United States: Good-Faith Belief Negates Willfulness in Criminal Tax Cases Introduction Cheek v. United States, 498 U.S. 192 (1991), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Inclusion of Incarcerated Witnesses Under 28 U.S.C. §1821: Analysis of DEMAREST v. MANSPEAKER Introduction DEMAREST v. MANSPEAKER et al., 498 U.S. 184 (1991), is a pivotal case in understanding the...
In re Sindram: Limiting In Forma Pauperis Petitions for Extraordinary Relief Introduction In re Sindram (498 U.S. 177) is a significant Supreme Court decision that addresses the balance between...
Judicial Remedies Under § 301 of LMRA Not Barred by Economic Recourse Provisions in CBAs Introduction GROVES ET AL. v. RING SCREW WORKS, FERNDALE FASTENER DIVISION (498 U.S. 168) is a landmark...
Ensuring Impartiality in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Robertson v. California Introduction Andrew Edward Robertson v. California, 498 U.S. 1004 (1990), represents a pivotal moment in the...
Minnick v. Mississippi: Reinforcing the Right to Counsel during Custodial Interrogations Introduction Minnick v. Mississippi, 498 U.S. 146 (1990), represents a pivotal Supreme Court decision...
ERISA Preemption in Wrongful Discharge Claims: The Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendon Decision Introduction The case of Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendon (498 U.S. 133, 1990) marks a significant milestone...
Jurisdictional Limits and Equitable Tolling in Federal Employment Discrimination: Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs Introduction Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al., 498 U.S. 89...
Defining "Falsely Made" Securities under 18 U.S.C. §2314: An Analysis of Moskal v. United States Introduction Moskal v. United States, 498 U.S. 103 (1990), is a seminal Supreme Court case that...