Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Comprehensive Commentary on PARKER v. DUGGER: Ensuring Adequate Consideration of Nonstatutory Mitigating Circumstances in Death Penalty Cases

Comprehensive Commentary on PARKER v. DUGGER: Ensuring Adequate Consideration of Nonstatutory Mitigating Circumstances in Death Penalty Cases

Date: Jan 23, 1991
Comprehensive Commentary on PARKER v. DUGGER: Ensuring Adequate Consideration of Nonstatutory Mitigating Circumstances in Death Penalty Cases Introduction PARKER v. DUGGER, 498 U.S. 308 (1991), is a...
Relevance and Reasonableness in Grand Jury Subpoenas: United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc. (1991)

Relevance and Reasonableness in Grand Jury Subpoenas: United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc. (1991)

Date: Jan 23, 1991
Relevance and Reasonableness in Grand Jury Subpoenas: United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc. (1991) Introduction United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc., et al. is a pivotal Supreme Court case that...
Dissolving Desegregation Decrees: Insights from Dowell v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City (1991)

Dissolving Desegregation Decrees: Insights from Dowell v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City (1991)

Date: Jan 16, 1991
Dissolving Desegregation Decrees: Insights from Dowell v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City (1991) Introduction Dowell v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City Public Schools, 498 U.S. 237 (1991), is...
Rule 4(a)(2) and Finality in Appeals: Insights from Firstier Mortgage Co. v. Investors Mortgage Insurance Co.

Rule 4(a)(2) and Finality in Appeals: Insights from Firstier Mortgage Co. v. Investors Mortgage Insurance Co.

Date: Jan 16, 1991
Rule 4(a)(2) and Finality in Appeals: Insights from Firstier Mortgage Co. v. Investors Mortgage Insurance Co. Introduction Firstier Mortgage Co., aka RealBanc, Inc. v. Investors Mortgage Insurance...
Preponderance of Evidence Standard Affirmed for Fraud Exceptions in Bankruptcy under §523(a) in GROGAN v. GARNER

Preponderance of Evidence Standard Affirmed for Fraud Exceptions in Bankruptcy under §523(a) in GROGAN v. GARNER

Date: Jan 16, 1991
Preponderance of Evidence Standard Affirmed for Fraud Exceptions in Bankruptcy under §523(a) in Grogan et al. v. Garner (498 U.S. 279) Introduction Grogan et al. v. Garner is a landmark 1991 decision...
FERC's Consolidation of Vintage Price Ceilings and Good Faith Negotiation Procedures Upheld Under the Natural Gas Policy Act

FERC's Consolidation of Vintage Price Ceilings and Good Faith Negotiation Procedures Upheld Under the Natural Gas Policy Act

Date: Jan 9, 1991
FERC's Consolidation of Vintage Price Ceilings and Good Faith Negotiation Procedures Upheld Under the Natural Gas Policy Act Introduction The landmark case Mobil Oil Exploration Producing Southeast,...
Cheek v. United States: Good-Faith Belief Negates Willfulness in Criminal Tax Cases

Cheek v. United States: Good-Faith Belief Negates Willfulness in Criminal Tax Cases

Date: Jan 9, 1991
Cheek v. United States: Good-Faith Belief Negates Willfulness in Criminal Tax Cases Introduction Cheek v. United States, 498 U.S. 192 (1991), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Inclusion of Incarcerated Witnesses Under 28 U.S.C. §1821: Analysis of DEMAREST v. MANSPEAKER

Inclusion of Incarcerated Witnesses Under 28 U.S.C. §1821: Analysis of DEMAREST v. MANSPEAKER

Date: Jan 9, 1991
Inclusion of Incarcerated Witnesses Under 28 U.S.C. §1821: Analysis of DEMAREST v. MANSPEAKER Introduction DEMAREST v. MANSPEAKER et al., 498 U.S. 184 (1991), is a pivotal case in understanding the...
In re Sindram: Limiting In Forma Pauperis Petitions for Extraordinary Relief

In re Sindram: Limiting In Forma Pauperis Petitions for Extraordinary Relief

Date: Jan 8, 1991
In re Sindram: Limiting In Forma Pauperis Petitions for Extraordinary Relief Introduction In re Sindram (498 U.S. 177) is a significant Supreme Court decision that addresses the balance between...
Judicial Remedies Under § 301 of LMRA Not Barred by Economic Recourse Provisions in CBAs

Judicial Remedies Under § 301 of LMRA Not Barred by Economic Recourse Provisions in CBAs

Date: Dec 11, 1990
Judicial Remedies Under § 301 of LMRA Not Barred by Economic Recourse Provisions in CBAs Introduction GROVES ET AL. v. RING SCREW WORKS, FERNDALE FASTENER DIVISION (498 U.S. 168) is a landmark...
Ensuring Impartiality in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Robertson v. California

Ensuring Impartiality in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Robertson v. California

Date: Dec 4, 1990
Ensuring Impartiality in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Robertson v. California Introduction Andrew Edward Robertson v. California, 498 U.S. 1004 (1990), represents a pivotal moment in the...
Minnick v. Mississippi: Reinforcing the Right to Counsel during Custodial Interrogations

Minnick v. Mississippi: Reinforcing the Right to Counsel during Custodial Interrogations

Date: Dec 4, 1990
Minnick v. Mississippi: Reinforcing the Right to Counsel during Custodial Interrogations Introduction Minnick v. Mississippi, 498 U.S. 146 (1990), represents a pivotal Supreme Court decision...
ERISA Preemption in Wrongful Discharge Claims: The Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendon Decision

ERISA Preemption in Wrongful Discharge Claims: The Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendon Decision

Date: Dec 4, 1990
ERISA Preemption in Wrongful Discharge Claims: The Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendon Decision Introduction The case of Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendon (498 U.S. 133, 1990) marks a significant milestone...
Jurisdictional Limits and Equitable Tolling in Federal Employment Discrimination: Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs

Jurisdictional Limits and Equitable Tolling in Federal Employment Discrimination: Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs

Date: Dec 4, 1990
Jurisdictional Limits and Equitable Tolling in Federal Employment Discrimination: Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs Introduction Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al., 498 U.S. 89...
Defining "Falsely Made" Securities under 18 U.S.C. §2314: An Analysis of Moskal v. United States

Defining "Falsely Made" Securities under 18 U.S.C. §2314: An Analysis of Moskal v. United States

Date: Dec 4, 1990
Defining "Falsely Made" Securities under 18 U.S.C. §2314: An Analysis of Moskal v. United States Introduction Moskal v. United States, 498 U.S. 103 (1990), is a seminal Supreme Court case that...
ERISA Preempts State Anti-Subrogation Laws: An In-Depth Analysis of FMC CORP. v. HOLLIDAY

ERISA Preempts State Anti-Subrogation Laws: An In-Depth Analysis of FMC CORP. v. HOLLIDAY

Date: Nov 28, 1990
ERISA Preempts State Anti-Subrogation Laws: An In-Depth Analysis of FMC CORP. v. HOLLIDAY Introduction FMC Corporation v. Holliday, 498 U.S. 52 (1990), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Interpretation of § 318: Supreme Court Defines SEC and FERC Jurisdictional Conflict

Interpretation of § 318: Supreme Court Defines SEC and FERC Jurisdictional Conflict

Date: Nov 28, 1990
Interpretation of § 318: Supreme Court Defines SEC and FERC Jurisdictional Conflict Introduction The case of Arcadia, Ohio, et al. v. Ohio Power Co., et al. addressed significant questions regarding...
Palmer v. BRG of Georgia: Supreme Court Establishes Per Se Illegality of Revenue-Sharing and Market Allocation Agreements Under the Sherman Act

Palmer v. BRG of Georgia: Supreme Court Establishes Per Se Illegality of Revenue-Sharing and Market Allocation Agreements Under the Sherman Act

Date: Nov 27, 1990
Palmer v. BRG of Georgia: Supreme Court Establishes Per Se Illegality of Revenue-Sharing and Market Allocation Agreements Under the Sherman Act Introduction In Palmer et al. v. BRG of Georgia, Inc.,...
Procedural Finality Upholds Execution in Wilbert Lee Evans v. Raymond Muncy

Procedural Finality Upholds Execution in Wilbert Lee Evans v. Raymond Muncy

Date: Nov 19, 1990
Procedural Finality Upholds Execution in Wilbert Lee Evans v. Raymond Muncy Introduction Wilbert Lee Evans v. Raymond Muncy, Warden (498 U.S. 927) is a pivotal case decided by the United States...
Miles v. Apex Marine Corp.: Scope and Limitations of Damages in Maritime Wrongful Death Actions

Miles v. Apex Marine Corp.: Scope and Limitations of Damages in Maritime Wrongful Death Actions

Date: Nov 7, 1990
Miles v. Apex Marine Corp.: Scope and Limitations of Damages in Maritime Wrongful Death Actions Introduction Miles, Individually and as Administratrix of the Succession of Torregano v. Apex Marine...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert