Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Evans v. Warden Muncy: Reevaluating Future Dangerousness in Capital Sentencing Introduction Evans v. Warden Muncy (498 U.S. 927) is a pivotal case decided by the United States Supreme Court on...
Unified Consideration of Mitigating and Aggravating Circumstances in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Paul Gregory House v. Tennessee Introduction The case of Paul Gregory House v. Tennessee, 498...
Double Jeopardy and Reprosecution under Different Statutory Formulations: Analysis of William Frank Parker v. Arkansas Introduction The case of William Frank Parker v. Arkansas presents a significant...
Enhanced Rights for Indigent Defendants to Access Diagnostic Testing in Insanity Defense Cases Introduction The case of Robert Wayne Vickers v. Arizona (497 U.S. 1033) presents a critical examination...
Establishing Retroactivity of Constitutional Tax Rulings: Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Carlyl Introduction Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Carlyl, Tax Commissioner of West Virginia (497 U.S. 916, 1990) is a pivotal...
Supreme Court Upholds Narrowly Defined 'Especially Heinous, Cruel, or Depraved' Aggravating Circumstance in Death Penalty Cases Introduction In the landmark case Lewis, Director, Arizona Department...
Standing under the APA: Insights from Lujan Secretary of the Interior v. National Wildlife Federation Introduction Lujan Secretary of the Interior v. National Wildlife Federation, 497 U.S. 871...
Regulating Solicitation on Postal Sidewalks: First Amendment Boundaries Established in United States v. Kokinda Introduction United States v. Kokinda et al., 497 U.S. 720 (1990), is a pivotal Supreme...
Upholding Minority Ownership Policies in Broadcasting: Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC Introduction Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is a landmark United States...
Walton v. Arizona: Upholding Judge-Led Capital Sentencing under the Sixth and Eighth Amendments Introduction Walton v. Arizona (497 U.S. 639, 1990) is a significant United States Supreme Court...
Confrontation Clause Reinforced: Residual Hearsay Exception Disallowed in Child Testimony Cases Introduction Idaho v. Wright (497 U.S. 805), decided on June 27, 1990, marks a significant decision by...
Maryland v. Craig: Establishing Procedural Safeguards for Child Witness Testimony Introduction Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836 (1990), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Procedural Adequacy in Competency Hearings: Insights from Hamilton v. Texas Introduction Hamilton v. Texas, 497 U.S. 1016 (1990), is a pivotal case addressing the procedural standards required to...
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health: Establishing the Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment Introduction Cruzan v. Director, Missouri...
Enhanced Scope of Maritime Jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §1333(1): Sisson v. Ruby et al. Introduction Sisson v. Ruby et al., 497 U.S. 358 (1990), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
GEORGIA v. SOUTH CAROLINA (1990): Defining Interstate Boundaries and Sovereignty Over Riverine Islands Court: U.S. Supreme Court Date: June 25, 1990 Citation: 497 U.S. 376 Introduction GEORGIA v....
Clarifying Miranda Protections for Inmates: Insights from Bradley v. Ohio Introduction William J. Bradley v. Ohio (497 U.S. 1011, 1990) presents a critical examination of the application of Miranda...
Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health: Supreme Court Upholds Parental Notice Requirements for Minor's Abortions Introduction Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health et al. is a landmark...
Unconstitutional Two-Parent Notification in Minor Abortion Laws: Hodgson v. Minnesota Introduction Hodgson et al. v. Minnesota et al. (497 U.S. 417, 1990) is a pivotal decision by the United States...
Extending Elrod and Branti: Supreme Court Prohibits Patronage Hiring and Promotion Based on Political Affiliation Introduction Rutan et al. v. Republican Party of Illinois et al. is a landmark United...