Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

“No Sentence Means No Bar” – Hewitt v. United States and the Present-Perfect Test for First-Step-Act Retroactivity

“No Sentence Means No Bar” – Hewitt v. United States and the Present-Perfect Test for First-Step-Act Retroactivity

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“No Sentence Means No Bar” – Hewitt v. United States (2025) and the Present-Perfect Test for Retroactivity under §403(b) of the First Step Act 1. Introduction In Hewitt v. United States, 606 U.S. ___...
Medina v. Planned Parenthood: A Landmark Restriction on Private §1983 Actions Under Spending-Clause Statutes

Medina v. Planned Parenthood: A Landmark Restriction on Private §1983 Actions Under Spending-Clause Statutes

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic (2025): The Supreme Court Narrows §1983 Enforcement of Spending-Clause Statutes Introduction On 26 June 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Medina v....
Riley v. Bondi: Clarifying “Final Orders of Removal” and Re-branding the §1252(b)(1) Deadline as a Non-Jurisdictional Claims-Processing Rule

Riley v. Bondi: Clarifying “Final Orders of Removal” and Re-branding the §1252(b)(1) Deadline as a Non-Jurisdictional Claims-Processing Rule

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Riley v. Bondi: Clarifying “Final Orders of Removal” and Re-branding the §1252(b)(1) Deadline as a Non-Jurisdictional Claims-Processing Rule 1. Introduction In Riley v. Bondi, 606 U.S. ____ (2025),...
“From Notice to Nowhere:” DHS v. D.V.D. and the Supreme Court’s Expansion of Executive Latitude in Third-Country Removals

“From Notice to Nowhere:” DHS v. D.V.D. and the Supreme Court’s Expansion of Executive Latitude in Third-Country Removals

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“From Notice to Nowhere:” DHS v. D.V.D. and the Supreme Court’s Expansion of Executive Latitude in Third-Country Removals Introduction In Department of Homeland Security v. D.V.D., 606 U.S. ___...
Re-Drawing the Boundaries of Equitable Relief: DHS v. D.V.D. and the Supreme Court’s Expanded Deference to Executive Removal Authority

Re-Drawing the Boundaries of Equitable Relief: DHS v. D.V.D. and the Supreme Court’s Expanded Deference to Executive Removal Authority

Date: Jun 24, 2025
Re-Drawing the Boundaries of Equitable Relief: Department of Homeland Security v. D.V.D. (606 U.S. ___, 2025) Introduction On 23 June 2025 the U.S. Supreme Court, acting on an emergency application,...
“Commonsense Redressability” — Diamond Alternative Energy v. EPA and the Expansion of Article III Standing

“Commonsense Redressability” — Diamond Alternative Energy v. EPA and the Expansion of Article III Standing

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Commonsense Redressability” — Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA and the Expansion of Article III Standing 1. Introduction Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. Environmental Protection Agency, 606...

        “No Retribution on Revocation” –  The Supervised-Release Principle in Esteras v. United States (2025)

“No Retribution on Revocation” – The Supervised-Release Principle in Esteras v. United States (2025)

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“No Retribution on Revocation” – The New Supervised-Release Principle in Esteras v. United States (606 U.S.___ 2025) I. Introduction On 20 June 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court, in Esteras v. United...
“Any Person Adversely Affected” Means What It Says:  FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co. and the Expansion of Statutory Standing Under the Tobacco Control Act

“Any Person Adversely Affected” Means What It Says: FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co. and the Expansion of Statutory Standing Under the Tobacco Control Act

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Any Person Adversely Affected” Means What It Says: FDA v. R. J. Reynolds Vapor Co. (2025) and the Expansion of Statutory Standing Under the Tobacco Control Act 1. Introduction The United States...
Beyond “Minimum Contacts” – The U.S. Supreme Court Widens the Fifth-Amendment Horizon for Federal Personal-Jurisdiction in Anti-Terrorism Litigation

Beyond “Minimum Contacts” – The U.S. Supreme Court Widens the Fifth-Amendment Horizon for Federal Personal-Jurisdiction in Anti-Terrorism Litigation

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Beyond “Minimum Contacts” – The Fifth Amendment, Foreign Affairs, and the New Constitutional Standard for Federal Personal-Jurisdiction 1. Introduction In Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization,...
“Exclusive” No More?  McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp. and the Re-Opening of District-Court Review under the Hobbs Act

“Exclusive” No More? McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp. and the Re-Opening of District-Court Review under the Hobbs Act

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Exclusive” No More? McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp. and the Re-Opening of District-Court Review under the Hobbs Act 1. Introduction On 20 June 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court...
Stanley v. City of Sanford — Cementing a Temporal Limit on “Qualified Individual” Status under ADA Title I

Stanley v. City of Sanford — Cementing a Temporal Limit on “Qualified Individual” Status under ADA Title I

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Stanley v. City of Sanford (2025): The Supreme Court Imposes a Temporal Boundary on Who Qualifies as a “Qualified Individual” under ADA Title I 1. Introduction Stanley v. City of Sanford, 606 U.S....
Beyond the Job: Stanley v. City of Sanford and the Temporal Limits of “Qualified Individual” Status Under the ADA

Beyond the Job: Stanley v. City of Sanford and the Temporal Limits of “Qualified Individual” Status Under the ADA

Date: Jun 21, 2025
Beyond the Job: Stanley v. City of Sanford and the Temporal Limits of “Qualified Individual” Status Under the ADA Introduction Stanley v. City of Sanford, 606 U.S. ___ (2025), is the Supreme Court’s...
From Local Petitions to National Venue: The Supreme Court’s Two-Step Test for the CAA’s “Nationwide Scope or Effect” Exception — Commentary on EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C. (2025)

From Local Petitions to National Venue: The Supreme Court’s Two-Step Test for the CAA’s “Nationwide Scope or Effect” Exception — Commentary on EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C. (2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
From Local Petitions to National Venue: The Supreme Court’s Two-Step Test for the Clean Air Act’s “Nationwide Scope or Effect” Exception I. Introduction EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C.,...
Hobbs Act Party Status Clarified: NRC v. Texas (2025)

Hobbs Act Party Status Clarified: NRC v. Texas (2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Only Applicants and Successful Intervenors May Sue”: Supreme Court Tightens the Hobbs Act’s “Party Aggrieved” Test in NRC v. Texas (2025) Introduction In Nuclear Regulatory Commission et al. v....
Oklahoma v. EPA: Individual SIP Disapprovals Are Regionally Reviewable – Refining the Venue Framework Under CAA §7607(b)(1)

Oklahoma v. EPA: Individual SIP Disapprovals Are Regionally Reviewable – Refining the Venue Framework Under CAA §7607(b)(1)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Oklahoma v. EPA: Individual SIP Disapprovals Are Regionally Reviewable – Refining the Venue Framework Under CAA §7607(b)(1) 1. Introduction In Oklahoma v. Environmental Protection Agency, 605 U.S....
“Intertwined-Issue Jury Right” — Perttu v. Richards Recasts the PLRA Exhaustion Debate

“Intertwined-Issue Jury Right” — Perttu v. Richards Recasts the PLRA Exhaustion Debate

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Intertwined-Issue Jury Right” — Perttu v. Richards Recasts the PLRA Exhaustion Debate 1  Introduction Perttu v. Richards, 605 U.S. ___ (2025), is the Supreme Court’s first major encounter with the...

        Transgender Treatment Bans and Equal Protection: United States v. Skrmetti Establishes
        Rational-Basis Review for State Restrictions on Gender-Affirming Care for Minors

Transgender Treatment Bans and Equal Protection: United States v. Skrmetti Establishes Rational-Basis Review for State Restrictions on Gender-Affirming Care for Minors

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Transgender Treatment Bans and Equal Protection: United States v. Skrmetti (2025) Sets the Rational-Basis Benchmark Introduction In United States v. Skrmetti, No. 23-477 (June 18 2025), the U.S....
“One Standard for All” – The Supreme Court Abolishes the “Bad-Faith or Gross-Misjudgment” Hurdle in ADA & §504 Education Cases

“One Standard for All” – The Supreme Court Abolishes the “Bad-Faith or Gross-Misjudgment” Hurdle in ADA & §504 Education Cases

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“One Standard for All” – The Supreme Court Abolishes the “Bad-Faith or Gross-Misjudgment” Hurdle in ADA & §504 Education Cases Introduction In A. J. T. v. Osseo Area Schools, Indep. Sch. Dist....
“When the Levy Vanishes, So Does Jurisdiction” –  Commissioner v. Zuch and the New Limits on Tax Court Review under 26 U.S.C. § 6330

“When the Levy Vanishes, So Does Jurisdiction” – Commissioner v. Zuch and the New Limits on Tax Court Review under 26 U.S.C. § 6330

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“When the Levy Vanishes, So Does Jurisdiction” – Commissioner v. Zuch and the New Limits on Tax Court Review under 26 U.S.C. § 6330 I. Introduction Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Zuch, 605 U.S....

    Narrowing the FTCA Exceptions: Martin v. United States
    Establishes that the “Law-Enforcement Proviso” Overrides
    Only §2680(h) and Rejects a Supremacy-Clause Defense

Narrowing the FTCA Exceptions: Martin v. United States Establishes that the “Law-Enforcement Proviso” Overrides Only §2680(h) and Rejects a Supremacy-Clause Defense

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Narrowing the FTCA Exceptions: Martin v. United States (2025) Clarifies the Limited Reach of the “Law-Enforcement Proviso” and Eliminates the Eleventh Circuit’s Supremacy-Clause Defense I....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert