Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New York Case Commentaries

Ordinary Diligence Defeats Fraud-Based Attacks on Broad Employment Releases: Trepeta v. Mobiquity Technologies, Inc.

Ordinary Diligence Defeats Fraud-Based Attacks on Broad Employment Releases: Trepeta v. Mobiquity Technologies, Inc.

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Ordinary Diligence Defeats Fraud-Based Attacks on Broad Employment Releases: Trepeta v. Mobiquity Technologies, Inc. Introduction This commentary analyzes the Appellate Division, Second Department’s...
FAPA as a Change in Law: Voluntary Discontinuance Cannot De‑Accelerate a Mortgage; Renewal Granted and Foreclosure Claims Time‑Barred — Commentary on U.S. Bank N.A. v. Mongru (2025 NY Slip Op 04807)

FAPA as a Change in Law: Voluntary Discontinuance Cannot De‑Accelerate a Mortgage; Renewal Granted and Foreclosure Claims Time‑Barred — Commentary on U.S. Bank N.A. v. Mongru (2025 NY Slip Op 04807)

Date: Sep 2, 2025
FAPA as a Change in Law: Voluntary Discontinuance Cannot De‑Accelerate a Mortgage; Renewal Granted and Foreclosure Claims Time‑Barred — U.S. Bank N.A. v. Mongru (App Div 2d Dept, 2025) Introduction...
Future Pain-and-Suffering Damages Do Not Require a “Permanent Injury” Finding; Unsafe Backing Under VTL § 1211(a) Is Negligence Per Se — A Second Department Benchmark on Remittitur for Post-Spinal-Surgery Claims

Future Pain-and-Suffering Damages Do Not Require a “Permanent Injury” Finding; Unsafe Backing Under VTL § 1211(a) Is Negligence Per Se — A Second Department Benchmark on Remittitur for Post-Spinal-Surgery Claims

Date: Sep 2, 2025
Future Pain-and-Suffering Damages Do Not Require a “Permanent Injury” Finding; Unsafe Backing Under VTL § 1211(a) Is Negligence Per Se — A Second Department Benchmark on Remittitur for...
Escrow Is Not an Operating Account: First Department Clarifies Rule 1.15 and Rejects Preclusive Effect of Vacated Admonition (Matter of Edelman, 2025)

Escrow Is Not an Operating Account: First Department Clarifies Rule 1.15 and Rejects Preclusive Effect of Vacated Admonition (Matter of Edelman, 2025)

Date: Aug 22, 2025
Escrow Is Not an Operating Account: First Department Clarifies Rule 1.15 and Rejects Preclusive Effect of Vacated Admonition Introduction This commentary examines the Appellate Division, First...
No Stayed Probationary Suspensions and Narrow Nunc Pro Tunc Relief in Reciprocal Discipline: Commentary on Matter of Barocas (2025 NY Slip Op 04750)

No Stayed Probationary Suspensions and Narrow Nunc Pro Tunc Relief in Reciprocal Discipline: Commentary on Matter of Barocas (2025 NY Slip Op 04750)

Date: Aug 22, 2025
No Stayed Probationary Suspensions and Narrow Nunc Pro Tunc Relief in Reciprocal Discipline: Matter of Barocas (2025 NY Slip Op 04750) Introduction In Matter of Barocas (2025 NY Slip Op 04750), the...
The Excessive Fines Clause Meets Executive Law § 63(12): Appellate Division Vacates Disgorgement, Affirms Injunctive Remedies in People v. Trump

The Excessive Fines Clause Meets Executive Law § 63(12): Appellate Division Vacates Disgorgement, Affirms Injunctive Remedies in People v. Trump

Date: Aug 22, 2025
The Excessive Fines Clause Meets Executive Law § 63(12): Appellate Division Vacates Disgorgement, Affirms Injunctive Remedies in People v. Trump Introduction People v. Trump, 2025 NY Slip Op 04756...
Self-Created Stress Is Not Mitigation for Escrow Misappropriation: Second Department Reaffirms Strict Fiduciary Standards in Matter of Bachu

Self-Created Stress Is Not Mitigation for Escrow Misappropriation: Second Department Reaffirms Strict Fiduciary Standards in Matter of Bachu

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Self-Created Stress Is Not Mitigation for Escrow Misappropriation: Second Department Reaffirms Strict Fiduciary Standards in Matter of Bachu Introduction In Matter of Bachu (2025 NY Slip Op 04721),...
No Reset by Discontinuance or “Deceleration”: Second Department Applies FAPA Retroactively to Time‑Bar Mortgage Foreclosure (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Salko)

No Reset by Discontinuance or “Deceleration”: Second Department Applies FAPA Retroactively to Time‑Bar Mortgage Foreclosure (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Salko)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
No Reset by Discontinuance or “Deceleration”: Second Department Applies FAPA Retroactively to Time‑Bar Mortgage Foreclosure Introduction In Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Salko (2025 NY Slip Op 04743),...
Totality-of-Circumstances Standard and Respondent’s Burden at 22 NYCRR 1240.12(c)(3)(iii) Hearings: Six-Month Suspension for Repeated DWI Convictions, Probation Violations, and Failure to Report (Matter of Thwaites)

Totality-of-Circumstances Standard and Respondent’s Burden at 22 NYCRR 1240.12(c)(3)(iii) Hearings: Six-Month Suspension for Repeated DWI Convictions, Probation Violations, and Failure to Report (Matter of Thwaites)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Totality-of-Circumstances Standard and Respondent’s Burden at 22 NYCRR 1240.12(c)(3)(iii) Hearings: Six-Month Suspension for Repeated DWI Convictions, Probation Violations, and Failure to Report...
Second Department Extends ABC Law § 55‑c “Good Cause” Protections to Oral and Implied Beer Distribution Agreements

Second Department Extends ABC Law § 55‑c “Good Cause” Protections to Oral and Implied Beer Distribution Agreements

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Second Department Extends ABC Law § 55‑c “Good Cause” Protections to Oral and Implied Beer Distribution Agreements Case: Oak Beverages, Inc. v. D.G. Yuengling & Son, Inc. (2025 NYSlipOp 04730) —...
DHCR Legal Rent as the Measure of Use-and-Occupancy and Strict Rent‑Stabilization Notice Compliance for Ejectment: Commentary on Esposito v. Larig (2025 NY Slip Op 04704)

DHCR Legal Rent as the Measure of Use-and-Occupancy and Strict Rent‑Stabilization Notice Compliance for Ejectment: Commentary on Esposito v. Larig (2025 NY Slip Op 04704)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
DHCR Legal Rent as the Measure of Use-and-Occupancy and Strict Rent‑Stabilization Notice Compliance for Ejectment: Commentary on Esposito v. Larig (2025 NY Slip Op 04704) Introduction Esposito v....
Pleading Religious-Discrimination Claims in NYC Vaccine-Mandate Cases: Conclusory Allegations Are Insufficient; Post-Rescission Claims Are Moot

Pleading Religious-Discrimination Claims in NYC Vaccine-Mandate Cases: Conclusory Allegations Are Insufficient; Post-Rescission Claims Are Moot

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Pleading Religious-Discrimination Claims in NYC Vaccine-Mandate Cases: Conclusory Allegations Are Insufficient; Post-Rescission Claims Are Moot Introduction Currid v. City of New York, 2025 NY Slip...
“Watchful Waiting” as a Material Alternative in Informed Consent for YAG Vitreolysis; No Duty to Supervise a Referred Specialist — Clinkscales v. Tostanoski (2025)

“Watchful Waiting” as a Material Alternative in Informed Consent for YAG Vitreolysis; No Duty to Supervise a Referred Specialist — Clinkscales v. Tostanoski (2025)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
“Watchful Waiting” as a Material Alternative in Informed Consent for YAG Vitreolysis; No Duty to Supervise a Referred Specialist — Clinkscales v. Tostanoski (2025) Introduction In Clinkscales v....
RPAPL 1304 Compliance When Using Third‑Party Mailing Vendors: Tracking Numbers and RPAPL 1306 Filings Are Insufficient — Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Ricks

RPAPL 1304 Compliance When Using Third‑Party Mailing Vendors: Tracking Numbers and RPAPL 1306 Filings Are Insufficient — Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Ricks

Date: Aug 21, 2025
RPAPL 1304 Compliance When Using Third‑Party Mailing Vendors: Tracking Numbers and RPAPL 1306 Filings Are Insufficient Commentary on Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Ricks (2025 NY Slip Op 04728,...
Gomez v. Tilden Estates, LLC: Dust on Permanent Stairs as a Potential 12 NYCRR 23-1.7(d) “Slipping Hazard,” Limits on Untimely Cross-Motions, and No Automatic §240(1) Liability for Stairway Slips

Gomez v. Tilden Estates, LLC: Dust on Permanent Stairs as a Potential 12 NYCRR 23-1.7(d) “Slipping Hazard,” Limits on Untimely Cross-Motions, and No Automatic §240(1) Liability for Stairway Slips

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Gomez v. Tilden Estates, LLC: Dust on Permanent Stairs as a Potential 12 NYCRR 23-1.7(d) “Slipping Hazard,” Limits on Untimely Cross-Motions, and No Automatic §240(1) Liability for Stairway Slips...
Nominal Damages for Technical Trespass Are Discretionary Absent Prescriptive-Rights Risk; Landowner’s Retention of Trespasser’s Materials Constitutes Conversion — Commentary on Fairchild Corp. v. LIRR (2025 NY Slip Op 04705)

Nominal Damages for Technical Trespass Are Discretionary Absent Prescriptive-Rights Risk; Landowner’s Retention of Trespasser’s Materials Constitutes Conversion — Commentary on Fairchild Corp. v. LIRR (2025 NY Slip Op 04705)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Nominal Damages for Technical Trespass Are Discretionary Absent Prescriptive-Rights Risk; Landowner’s Retention of Trespasser’s Materials Constitutes Conversion — Commentary on Fairchild Corp. v....
Extended-Block Visitation and IDEA “Comparable Services” Under Tropea: First Department Affirms Out‑of‑State Relocation Without Requiring Economic Necessity (Matter of Jasmine M. v. Albert M., 2025)

Extended-Block Visitation and IDEA “Comparable Services” Under Tropea: First Department Affirms Out‑of‑State Relocation Without Requiring Economic Necessity (Matter of Jasmine M. v. Albert M., 2025)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Extended-Block Visitation and IDEA “Comparable Services” Under Tropea: First Department Affirms Out‑of‑State Relocation Without Requiring Economic Necessity Introduction This commentary examines the...
Prevailing “In Whole” Without Judicial Imprimatur: Third Department Adopts a Text‑Driven Catalyst Rule Under New York’s EAJA and Overrules Clarke v. Annucci

Prevailing “In Whole” Without Judicial Imprimatur: Third Department Adopts a Text‑Driven Catalyst Rule Under New York’s EAJA and Overrules Clarke v. Annucci

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Prevailing “In Whole” Without Judicial Imprimatur: Third Department Adopts a Text‑Driven Catalyst Rule Under New York’s EAJA and Overrules Clarke v. Annucci Case: Matter of Markey v. Tietz, 2025 NY...
Approval-as-Injury: New York Recognizes Organizational Standing to Preemptively Challenge Certified Voting Machines and Permits Recasting of Article 78 Relief

Approval-as-Injury: New York Recognizes Organizational Standing to Preemptively Challenge Certified Voting Machines and Permits Recasting of Article 78 Relief

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Approval-as-Injury: New York Recognizes Organizational Standing to Preemptively Challenge Certified Voting Machines and Permits Recasting of Article 78 Relief Introduction In Matter of Common Cause...
The Three-Day Filing Rule Is Jurisdictional: First Department Vacates Neglect Finding and Declares Prolonged Removal Unlawful in Matter of Kaius A. v. Abigail H.

The Three-Day Filing Rule Is Jurisdictional: First Department Vacates Neglect Finding and Declares Prolonged Removal Unlawful in Matter of Kaius A. v. Abigail H.

Date: Aug 15, 2025
The Three-Day Filing Rule Is Jurisdictional: First Department Vacates Neglect Finding and Declares Prolonged Removal Unlawful in Matter of Kaius A. v. Abigail H. Introduction This commentary examines...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert