Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New York Case Commentaries

Laches and Missing Proof Bar Post‑Satisfaction Attacks on Article 52 Enforcement; Renewal Requires Strict Justification — Commentary on GTR Source, LLC v. Zomongo.TV USA, Inc.

Laches and Missing Proof Bar Post‑Satisfaction Attacks on Article 52 Enforcement; Renewal Requires Strict Justification — Commentary on GTR Source, LLC v. Zomongo.TV USA, Inc.

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Laches and Missing Proof Bar Post‑Satisfaction Attacks on Article 52 Enforcement; Renewal Requires Strict Justification Introduction This commentary examines the Appellate Division, Second...
Barron v. City of New York: Inspection and Routine Maintenance Outside Labor Law §§ 240(1) and 241(6); “Storm in Progress” Bars § 200/Common-Law Negligence; Defense-Cost Indemnification Claim Survives

Barron v. City of New York: Inspection and Routine Maintenance Outside Labor Law §§ 240(1) and 241(6); “Storm in Progress” Bars § 200/Common-Law Negligence; Defense-Cost Indemnification Claim Survives

Date: Oct 2, 2025
Barron v. City of New York: Inspection and Routine Maintenance Outside Labor Law §§ 240(1) and 241(6); “Storm in Progress” Bars § 200/Common-Law Negligence; Defense-Cost Indemnification Claim...
No Executive Exception to Civil Wage Theft Liability Under Labor Law §§ 193 and 198 After the No Wage Theft Loophole Act

No Executive Exception to Civil Wage Theft Liability Under Labor Law §§ 193 and 198 After the No Wage Theft Loophole Act

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Executive Exception to Civil Wage Theft Liability Under Labor Law §§ 193 and 198 After the No Wage Theft Loophole Act Patel v. Maybank Kim Eng Securities USA Inc., 2025 NY Slip Op 05194 (1st Dep’t...
No Initial Nonschedule Award, No Bar to SLU: Third Department Confirms SLU Eligibility and Retroactive Reopening Post‑Taher

No Initial Nonschedule Award, No Bar to SLU: Third Department Confirms SLU Eligibility and Retroactive Reopening Post‑Taher

Date: Sep 27, 2025
No Initial Nonschedule Award, No Bar to SLU: Third Department Confirms SLU Eligibility and Retroactive Reopening Post‑Taher Case: Matter of Romero v. Akorn Inc., 2025 NY Slip Op 05128 (App Div, 3d...
Nexus-Based Duty for Off‑Campus Abuse and Pleading-Stage Punitive Damages in CVA School Cases: Commentary on C.R. v. Episcopal Diocese of N.Y. (2025 NY Slip Op 05144)

Nexus-Based Duty for Off‑Campus Abuse and Pleading-Stage Punitive Damages in CVA School Cases: Commentary on C.R. v. Episcopal Diocese of N.Y. (2025 NY Slip Op 05144)

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Nexus-Based Duty for Off‑Campus Abuse and Pleading-Stage Punitive Damages in CVA School Cases: C.R. v. Episcopal Diocese of N.Y. Introduction In C.R. v. Episcopal Diocese of New York, 2025 NY Slip Op...
Express “Street and Sidewalk Appurtenance” Agreements Control Fixture Status: City Owns and May Remove Pike Plan Canopies

Express “Street and Sidewalk Appurtenance” Agreements Control Fixture Status: City Owns and May Remove Pike Plan Canopies

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Express “Street and Sidewalk Appurtenance” Agreements Control Fixture Status: City Owns and May Remove Pike Plan Canopies Introduction In 306 Wall St. Owners, LLC v. City of Kingston, the Appellate...
No Guarantees Required: 90% Earnings Letters Satisfy “Reasonable Assurance” for Per Diem Substitutes under New York Labor Law § 590(10)

No Guarantees Required: 90% Earnings Letters Satisfy “Reasonable Assurance” for Per Diem Substitutes under New York Labor Law § 590(10)

Date: Sep 27, 2025
No Guarantees Required: 90% Earnings Letters Satisfy “Reasonable Assurance” for Per Diem Substitutes under New York Labor Law § 590(10) Introduction In Matter of Caruso (Shenendehowa Cent. Sch....
Available, Unused Safety Devices Create Triable Issues Under Labor Law § 240(1) in Roof‑Hatch Falls; Conclusory Motions to Strike Affirmative Defenses Rejected

Available, Unused Safety Devices Create Triable Issues Under Labor Law § 240(1) in Roof‑Hatch Falls; Conclusory Motions to Strike Affirmative Defenses Rejected

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Available, Unused Safety Devices Create Triable Issues Under Labor Law § 240(1) in Roof‑Hatch Falls; Conclusory Motions to Strike Affirmative Defenses Rejected Case: Blachowicz v. City of New York,...
Blank v. Acker: Emails and Revocable Wills Cannot Enforce Oral Promises to Devise Real Property; Lease Terms Defeat Unjust Enrichment; Subjective Performance Critiques Are Nonactionable Opinion

Blank v. Acker: Emails and Revocable Wills Cannot Enforce Oral Promises to Devise Real Property; Lease Terms Defeat Unjust Enrichment; Subjective Performance Critiques Are Nonactionable Opinion

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Blank v. Acker: Emails and Revocable Wills Cannot Enforce Oral Promises to Devise Real Property; Lease Terms Defeat Unjust Enrichment; Subjective Performance Critiques Are Nonactionable Opinion...
GBL § 349, Article 36‑A, and Lien Law Article 3‑A Do Not Create an Independent Tort Duty for Contractors: Second Department Refines Pleading Boundaries in Home-Renovation Disputes (Kovalenko v. Bhatti Gen. Contr. & Dev., LLC)

GBL § 349, Article 36‑A, and Lien Law Article 3‑A Do Not Create an Independent Tort Duty for Contractors: Second Department Refines Pleading Boundaries in Home-Renovation Disputes (Kovalenko v. Bhatti Gen. Contr. & Dev., LLC)

Date: Sep 26, 2025
GBL § 349, Article 36‑A, and Lien Law Article 3‑A Do Not Create an Independent Tort Duty for Contractors: Second Department Refines Pleading Boundaries in Home-Renovation Disputes Case: Kovalenko v....
When the Accident Itself Is in Dispute: Second Department Clarifies CPLR 4404(a) and Endorses Jury Instructions Allowing Non‑Occurrence Findings

When the Accident Itself Is in Dispute: Second Department Clarifies CPLR 4404(a) and Endorses Jury Instructions Allowing Non‑Occurrence Findings

Date: Sep 26, 2025
When the Accident Itself Is in Dispute: Second Department Clarifies CPLR 4404(a) and Endorses Jury Instructions Allowing Non‑Occurrence Findings Introduction In Krohn v. Schultz Ford Lincoln, Inc.,...
Matter of Brody: Disbarment by Consent with Restitution Convertible to a Civil Judgment under Judiciary Law § 90(6-a)

Matter of Brody: Disbarment by Consent with Restitution Convertible to a Civil Judgment under Judiciary Law § 90(6-a)

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Matter of Brody: Disbarment by Consent with Restitution Convertible to a Civil Judgment under Judiciary Law § 90(6-a) Introduction In Matter of Brody, 2025 NY Slip Op 05079 (Appellate Division,...
Consent Discipline for Neglect and Communication Failures: Second Department Affirms One‑Year Suspension and Underscores Bankruptcy Reporting Duties (Matter of Mulhearn, 2025)

Consent Discipline for Neglect and Communication Failures: Second Department Affirms One‑Year Suspension and Underscores Bankruptcy Reporting Duties (Matter of Mulhearn, 2025)

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Consent Discipline for Neglect and Communication Failures: Second Department Affirms One‑Year Suspension and Underscores Bankruptcy Reporting Duties Matter of Mulhearn, 2025 NY Slip Op 05086 (App....
Misdemeanor Tax Fraud as a “Serious Crime” Meriting a Prospective Six‑Month Suspension: Matter of Ortega

Misdemeanor Tax Fraud as a “Serious Crime” Meriting a Prospective Six‑Month Suspension: Matter of Ortega

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Misdemeanor Tax Fraud as a “Serious Crime” Meriting a Prospective Six‑Month Suspension: Matter of Ortega Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Second Department (Per Curiam) Decision Date:...
Only the CBA’s Named Parties May Demand Arbitration: Representative’s Signature Alone Does Not Confer Party Status

Only the CBA’s Named Parties May Demand Arbitration: Representative’s Signature Alone Does Not Confer Party Status

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Only the CBA’s Named Parties May Demand Arbitration: Representative’s Signature Alone Does Not Confer Party Status Introduction In Matter of Village of Walden v. Teamsters Local Union No. 445, the...
Meikle v. Medcare, LLC: Permanent Disability Allegations Open HIV, Mental Health, and Substance-Use Records to Discovery, With Mandatory Public Health Law § 2785(3) Protections

Meikle v. Medcare, LLC: Permanent Disability Allegations Open HIV, Mental Health, and Substance-Use Records to Discovery, With Mandatory Public Health Law § 2785(3) Protections

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Meikle v. Medcare, LLC: Permanent Disability Allegations Open HIV, Mental Health, and Substance-Use Records to Discovery, With Mandatory Public Health Law § 2785(3) Protections Introduction In Meikle...
People v. Reaves: New York Tightens Admissibility of Rap Lyrics—Qualified Expertise, Specific Nexus, and Molineux Balancing Required

People v. Reaves: New York Tightens Admissibility of Rap Lyrics—Qualified Expertise, Specific Nexus, and Molineux Balancing Required

Date: Sep 26, 2025
People v. Reaves: New York Tightens Admissibility of Rap Lyrics—Qualified Expertise, Specific Nexus, and Molineux Balancing Required Introduction In People v. Reaves, 2025 NY Slip Op 05107 (App Div,...
Second Department Clarifies: Waiving a Deficiency Judgment Does Not Eliminate the Borrower as a Necessary Party in Foreclosure

Second Department Clarifies: Waiving a Deficiency Judgment Does Not Eliminate the Borrower as a Necessary Party in Foreclosure

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Second Department Clarifies: Waiving a Deficiency Judgment Does Not Eliminate the Borrower as a Necessary Party in Foreclosure Introduction In Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB v. Loubriel, 2025...
No Safe Harbor in Post-Default Litigation: First Department Holds General Litigation Activity Does Not Satisfy CPLR 3215(c) Absent an Explicit “Sufficient Cause” Showing

No Safe Harbor in Post-Default Litigation: First Department Holds General Litigation Activity Does Not Satisfy CPLR 3215(c) Absent an Explicit “Sufficient Cause” Showing

Date: Sep 25, 2025
No Safe Harbor in Post-Default Litigation: First Department Holds General Litigation Activity Does Not Satisfy CPLR 3215(c) Absent an Explicit “Sufficient Cause” Showing Introduction In 938 St....
When Two Weeks Are Enough: Police-Involved Exchange Conflicts and a Communication Breakdown as a “Change in Circumstances” Justifying Sole Legal Custody; Child-as-Messenger Violations Supporting Civil Contempt and Counsel-Fee Fines; Harassment-by-Course-of-Conduct Sustaining a Family Offense Order of Protection

When Two Weeks Are Enough: Police-Involved Exchange Conflicts and a Communication Breakdown as a “Change in Circumstances” Justifying Sole Legal Custody; Child-as-Messenger Violations Supporting Civil Contempt and Counsel-Fee Fines; Harassment-by-Course-of-Conduct Sustaining a Family Offense Order of Protection

Date: Sep 12, 2025
When Two Weeks Are Enough: Police-Involved Exchange Conflicts and a Communication Breakdown as a “Change in Circumstances” Justifying Sole Legal Custody; Child-as-Messenger Violations Supporting...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert