Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New Hampshire Case Commentaries

State v. Raymond: Experience-Based “General Education” Expert Testimony on Domestic-Violence Dynamics Is Admissible Without Daubert Factor Analysis Under RSA 516:29-a

State v. Raymond: Experience-Based “General Education” Expert Testimony on Domestic-Violence Dynamics Is Admissible Without Daubert Factor Analysis Under RSA 516:29-a

Date: Jul 16, 2025
State v. Raymond: Experience-Based “General Education” Expert Testimony on Domestic-Violence Dynamics Is Admissible Without Daubert Factor Analysis Under RSA 516:29-a Introduction In State v....
EES Pre‑Placement Due Process Clarified; Trial Courts Must Apply the 2024 “Activity Logs” Standard to “Potentially Exculpatory” Determinations

EES Pre‑Placement Due Process Clarified; Trial Courts Must Apply the 2024 “Activity Logs” Standard to “Potentially Exculpatory” Determinations

Date: Jul 3, 2025
EES Pre‑Placement Due Process Clarified; Trial Courts Must Apply the 2024 “Activity Logs” Standard to “Potentially Exculpatory” Determinations Introduction In John Doe v. Town of Lisbon & a., No....
Weaponizing Social Media as a “Course of Conduct” Under New Hampshire’s Stalking Statute: No Direct Threat Requirement in D.V. v. R.G.

Weaponizing Social Media as a “Course of Conduct” Under New Hampshire’s Stalking Statute: No Direct Threat Requirement in D.V. v. R.G.

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Weaponizing Social Media as a “Course of Conduct” Under New Hampshire’s Stalking Statute: No Direct Threat Requirement in D.V. v. R.G. Introduction In D.V. v. R.G. (N.H. July 2, 2025), the Supreme...
Differentiated Aid Cannot Backfill Base Adequacy: N.H. Supreme Court Strikes RSA 198:40-a, II(a), Endorses a “Conservative Minimum Threshold” (But Bars Immediate Court-Ordered Payments)

Differentiated Aid Cannot Backfill Base Adequacy: N.H. Supreme Court Strikes RSA 198:40-a, II(a), Endorses a “Conservative Minimum Threshold” (But Bars Immediate Court-Ordered Payments)

Date: Jul 2, 2025
Differentiated Aid Cannot Backfill Base Adequacy: N.H. Supreme Court Strikes RSA 198:40-a, II(a), Endorses a “Conservative Minimum Threshold” (But Bars Immediate Court-Ordered Payments) Introduction...
One-Time Selective Timber Harvest Is Not “Commercial Activity” Under Residential Restrictive Covenants in New Hampshire

One-Time Selective Timber Harvest Is Not “Commercial Activity” Under Residential Restrictive Covenants in New Hampshire

Date: Jul 2, 2025
One-Time Selective Timber Harvest Is Not “Commercial Activity” Under Residential Restrictive Covenants in New Hampshire Case: Kathryn Wolf v. Patrick Brown (No. 2024-0068) Court: Supreme Court of New...
EES Placement Requires Reasonably Foreseeable Admissibility and Tailored Due Process Where No Prior Adjudication: Commentary on Pivero v. Attorney General & a.

EES Placement Requires Reasonably Foreseeable Admissibility and Tailored Due Process Where No Prior Adjudication: Commentary on Pivero v. Attorney General & a.

Date: Jun 28, 2025
EES Placement Requires Reasonably Foreseeable Admissibility and Tailored Due Process Where No Prior Adjudication: Commentary on Pivero v. Attorney General & a. Introduction In Anthony Pivero v....
Opening the Road as a Ministerial Act: New Hampshire Clarifies Limits of Discretionary Function Immunity in Traffic Control Plan Implementation

Opening the Road as a Ministerial Act: New Hampshire Clarifies Limits of Discretionary Function Immunity in Traffic Control Plan Implementation

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Opening the Road as a Ministerial Act: New Hampshire Clarifies Limits of Discretionary Function Immunity in Traffic Control Plan Implementation Introduction In Tamre McCrea & a. v. New Hampshire...
Fee Owners Retain Standing to Exclude Unauthorized Users of Private Roads Despite Maintenance Agreements; Planning Board Minutes Alone Do Not Create Easements

Fee Owners Retain Standing to Exclude Unauthorized Users of Private Roads Despite Maintenance Agreements; Planning Board Minutes Alone Do Not Create Easements

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Fee Owners Retain Standing to Exclude Unauthorized Users of Private Roads Despite Maintenance Agreements; Planning Board Minutes Alone Do Not Create Easements Introduction This commentary analyzes...
Treating-Physician Opinions Carry “Substantial Weight” But Are Not Controlling; Lack of Medical Consensus Can Defeat Causation; Medical Journal Articles Are “Medical Evidence” Subject to the Five-Business-Day Disclosure Rule

Treating-Physician Opinions Carry “Substantial Weight” But Are Not Controlling; Lack of Medical Consensus Can Defeat Causation; Medical Journal Articles Are “Medical Evidence” Subject to the Five-Business-Day Disclosure Rule

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Treating-Physician Opinions Carry “Substantial Weight” But Are Not Controlling; Lack of Medical Consensus Can Defeat Causation; Medical Journal Articles Are “Medical Evidence” Subject to the...
Laches Bars Collateral Attacks on Foreign Divorces Under RSA 459:1; Rescission of Real Property Deeds Governed by RSA 508:2

Laches Bars Collateral Attacks on Foreign Divorces Under RSA 459:1; Rescission of Real Property Deeds Governed by RSA 508:2

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Laches Bars Collateral Attacks on Foreign Divorces Under RSA 459:1; Rescission of Real Property Deeds Governed by RSA 508:2 Introduction In Wagner v. Chislett, 2025 N.H. 28, the Supreme Court of New...
Beattie II: Net‑Public Benefit Review in Highway Takings Is Limited to Evidence Available at the Time of Condemnation; CLOMR Is Not Required Where “No‑Rise” Is Shown Under 44 C.F.R. § 60.3(d)(3)

Beattie II: Net‑Public Benefit Review in Highway Takings Is Limited to Evidence Available at the Time of Condemnation; CLOMR Is Not Required Where “No‑Rise” Is Shown Under 44 C.F.R. § 60.3(d)(3)

Date: Jun 19, 2025
Beattie II: Net‑Public Benefit Review in Highway Takings Is Limited to Evidence Available at the Time of Condemnation; CLOMR Is Not Required Where “No‑Rise” Is Shown Under 44 C.F.R. § 60.3(d)(3)...
No Standing Once Eligibility Expires: Cepiel v. NHIAA Clarifies Persistent Redressability and Limits Antitrust Standing in New Hampshire Scholastic Athletics

No Standing Once Eligibility Expires: Cepiel v. NHIAA Clarifies Persistent Redressability and Limits Antitrust Standing in New Hampshire Scholastic Athletics

Date: Jun 18, 2025
No Standing Once Eligibility Expires: Cepiel v. NHIAA Clarifies Persistent Redressability and Limits Antitrust Standing in New Hampshire Scholastic Athletics Introduction In Quinton Cepiel & a. v....
Harmless Error, Cumulative Digital Evidence, and “Open-the-Door” Cures in AFSA Prosecutions: State v. Viveney (N.H. 2025)

Harmless Error, Cumulative Digital Evidence, and “Open-the-Door” Cures in AFSA Prosecutions: State v. Viveney (N.H. 2025)

Date: Jun 14, 2025
Harmless Error, Cumulative Digital Evidence, and “Open-the-Door” Cures in AFSA Prosecutions: State v. Viveney (N.H. 2025) Introduction In State of New Hampshire v. Christopher Viveney, the Supreme...
Rand v. State (2025 N.H. 27): Uniformity Measured at Assessment—Municipal Retention of Excess SWEPT Upheld; Negative Local Offsets in Unincorporated Places Unconstitutional

Rand v. State (2025 N.H. 27): Uniformity Measured at Assessment—Municipal Retention of Excess SWEPT Upheld; Negative Local Offsets in Unincorporated Places Unconstitutional

Date: Jun 11, 2025
Uniformity Measured at Assessment—Municipal Retention of Excess SWEPT Upheld; Negative Local Offsets in Unincorporated Places Unconstitutional Introduction In Rand v. State, 2025 N.H. 27 (N.H. June...
Indirect Contact via Public Social Media Posts Violates Stalking Protection Orders: RSA 173‑B’s “Contact” Definition Governs RSA 633:3‑a Orders

Indirect Contact via Public Social Media Posts Violates Stalking Protection Orders: RSA 173‑B’s “Contact” Definition Governs RSA 633:3‑a Orders

Date: Jun 7, 2025
Indirect Contact via Public Social Media Posts Violates Stalking Protection Orders: RSA 173‑B’s “Contact” Definition Governs RSA 633:3‑a Orders Introduction In State v. Dunbar, 2025 N.H. 26, the New...
Plain-Error Limits on Unpreserved Challenges in Probation Revocations: Assumed Extra-Record Error Harmless Where Record Evidence Suffices (State v. Collins)

Plain-Error Limits on Unpreserved Challenges in Probation Revocations: Assumed Extra-Record Error Harmless Where Record Evidence Suffices (State v. Collins)

Date: Jun 5, 2025
Plain-Error Limits on Unpreserved Challenges in Probation Revocations: Assumed Extra-Record Error Harmless Where Record Evidence Suffices Introduction In State of New Hampshire v. Douglas Collins...
No Duty to Maximize Dedicated Districts: Legislative Policy Preferences Suffice as a Rational Basis Under Part II, Article 11

No Duty to Maximize Dedicated Districts: Legislative Policy Preferences Suffice as a Rational Basis Under Part II, Article 11

Date: Jun 5, 2025
No Duty to Maximize Dedicated Districts: Legislative Policy Preferences Suffice as a Rational Basis Under Part II, Article 11 Introduction In City of Dover & a. v. Secretary of State & a. (N.H. June...
Landscaping Within a Shared Right‑of‑Way Is Not Adverse Possession: New Hampshire Reaffirms Strict Notoriety and Exclusivity and Limits Tacking

Landscaping Within a Shared Right‑of‑Way Is Not Adverse Possession: New Hampshire Reaffirms Strict Notoriety and Exclusivity and Limits Tacking

Date: Jun 4, 2025
Landscaping Within a Shared Right‑of‑Way Is Not Adverse Possession: New Hampshire Reaffirms Strict Notoriety and Exclusivity and Limits Tacking Case: Yvonne Downes v. Kenneth Sarpi & a. Court:...
When Parallel, Consolidated Class Actions Are One “First Litigation”: Dismissal of Medical Monitoring Claims Without Present Injury Does Not Preclude Separate Property Damage Claims (Hermens v. TCI, N.H. 2025)

When Parallel, Consolidated Class Actions Are One “First Litigation”: Dismissal of Medical Monitoring Claims Without Present Injury Does Not Preclude Separate Property Damage Claims (Hermens v. TCI, N.H. 2025)

Date: May 31, 2025
When Parallel, Consolidated Class Actions Are One “First Litigation”: Dismissal of Medical Monitoring Claims Without Present Injury Does Not Preclude Separate Property Damage Claims Case: John...
Asset-Based Alimony Payments Permissible; Modified Amounts Must Relate Back to Notice and Future Reinstatements Require Evidence — In the Matter of Donald Nixon & Roxanne Nixon (N.H. 2025)

Asset-Based Alimony Payments Permissible; Modified Amounts Must Relate Back to Notice and Future Reinstatements Require Evidence — In the Matter of Donald Nixon & Roxanne Nixon (N.H. 2025)

Date: May 31, 2025
Asset-Based Alimony Payments Permissible; Modified Amounts Must Relate Back to Notice and Future Reinstatements Require Evidence In the Matter of Donald Nixon and Roxanne Nixon, Supreme Court of New...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert