Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Reciprocal Disbarment Standard Established in In re Petition Against Madsen Marcellus, Jr.

Reciprocal Disbarment Standard Established in In re Petition Against Madsen Marcellus, Jr.

Date: Nov 23, 2024
Reciprocal Disbarment Standard Established in In re Petition Against Madsen Marcellus, Jr. Introduction The case In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Madsen Marcellus, Jr. serves as a...
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion for Drug-Dog Sniffs: State v. Garding

Establishing Reasonable Suspicion for Drug-Dog Sniffs: State v. Garding

Date: Aug 29, 2024
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion for Drug-Dog Sniffs: State v. Garding Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Jeron Garding, decided by the Supreme Court of Minnesota on August 28, 2024, the court...
Protection of Attorney-Client Privilege in Criminal Searches: Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes New Safeguards

Protection of Attorney-Client Privilege in Criminal Searches: Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes New Safeguards

Date: May 9, 2024
Protection of Attorney-Client Privilege in Criminal Searches: Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes New Safeguards Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Kristi Dannette McNeilly addresses...
Defining Dangerous Weapons and Separating Assault Charges: Comprehensive Insights from State v. Bradley Decision

Defining Dangerous Weapons and Separating Assault Charges: Comprehensive Insights from State v. Bradley Decision

Date: Mar 21, 2024
Defining Dangerous Weapons and Separating Assault Charges: Comprehensive Insights from State v. Bradley Decision Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. John Ishmael Bradley, III,...
State v. Kaiser: Affirmation of Larrison Test in Evaluating False Expert Testimony

State v. Kaiser: Affirmation of Larrison Test in Evaluating False Expert Testimony

Date: Mar 14, 2024
State v. Kaiser: Affirmation of Larrison Test in Evaluating False Expert Testimony Introduction In the landmark case Robert John Kaiser v. State of Minnesota, the Supreme Court of Minnesota addressed...
Indefinite Suspension of Attorney Joseph Kaminsky: Upholding Professional Conduct Standards

Indefinite Suspension of Attorney Joseph Kaminsky: Upholding Professional Conduct Standards

Date: Jan 11, 2024
Indefinite Suspension of Attorney Joseph Kaminsky: Upholding Professional Conduct Standards Introduction The Supreme Court of Minnesota recently rendered a pivotal decision in the case of In re...
State of Minnesota v. Henry Albert Allison, Jr.: Expanding the Definition of Victims for Restitution

State of Minnesota v. Henry Albert Allison, Jr.: Expanding the Definition of Victims for Restitution

Date: Jan 11, 2024
State of Minnesota v. Henry Albert Allison, Jr.: Expanding the Definition of Victims for Restitution Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. Henry Albert Allison, Jr., the Supreme...
Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies State's Burden in Restitution Orders

Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies State's Burden in Restitution Orders

Date: Mar 23, 2023
Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies State's Burden in Restitution Orders under Minn. Stat. § 611A.045, subd. 3(a) Introduction In the landmark case State of Minnesota v. Michael Phillip Cloutier, 987...
Establishing Attorney Accountability: The Suspension of Patrick Chinedu Nwaneri

Establishing Attorney Accountability: The Suspension of Patrick Chinedu Nwaneri

Date: Aug 25, 2022
Establishing Attorney Accountability: The Suspension of Patrick Chinedu Nwaneri Introduction The case of In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Patrick Chinedu Nwaneri (978 N.W.2d 878) serves...
State v. Paige: Upholding Speedy Trial Rights Amidst a Global Pandemic

State v. Paige: Upholding Speedy Trial Rights Amidst a Global Pandemic

Date: Jul 21, 2022
State v. Paige: Upholding Speedy Trial Rights Amidst a Global Pandemic Introduction State of Minnesota v. William Deshawn Paige, 977 N.W.2d 829 (Minn. 2022), is a landmark case addressed by the...
Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Conviction in STATE v. JONES: Upholding Evidentiary Sufficiency and Speedy Trial Rights

Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Conviction in STATE v. JONES: Upholding Evidentiary Sufficiency and Speedy Trial Rights

Date: Jul 7, 2022
Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Conviction in STATE v. JONES: Upholding Evidentiary Sufficiency and Speedy Trial Rights Introduction State of Minnesota v. Kevin Lemar Jones (977 N.W.2d 177, 2022)...
Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Priority of Best-Interests Standard under section 518.18(d)(i) in Custody Modification Cases

Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Priority of Best-Interests Standard under section 518.18(d)(i) in Custody Modification Cases

Date: Jun 16, 2022
Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Priority of Best-Interests Standard under section 518.18(d)(i) in Custody Modification Cases Introduction The case of In re the Marriage of Jonathan Richardson...
Comprehensive Commentary on State of Minnesota v. Barbara Ann Currin: Enhancing Restitution Calculations in Fraud Cases

Comprehensive Commentary on State of Minnesota v. Barbara Ann Currin: Enhancing Restitution Calculations in Fraud Cases

Date: May 26, 2022
State of Minnesota v. Barbara Ann Currin: Enhancing Restitution Calculations in Fraud Cases Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Barbara Ann Currin, 974 N.W.2d 567 (Minn. 2022), addresses...
Pulczinski v. State of Minnesota: Upholding Judicial Integrity Amidst Pandemic Restrictions

Pulczinski v. State of Minnesota: Upholding Judicial Integrity Amidst Pandemic Restrictions

Date: Apr 7, 2022
Pulczinski v. State of Minnesota: Upholding Judicial Integrity Amidst Pandemic Restrictions Introduction Devon James Pulczinski v. State of Minnesota, 972 N.W.2d 347 (Supreme Court of Minnesota,...
Expansion of "Newly Discovered Evidence" under Minnesota Statutes section 518.145: Bender v. Bernhard

Expansion of "Newly Discovered Evidence" under Minnesota Statutes section 518.145: Bender v. Bernhard

Date: Mar 10, 2022
Expansion of "Newly Discovered Evidence" under Minnesota Statutes section 518.145: Bender v. Bernhard Introduction Bender v. Bernhard, 971 N.W.2d 257 (Minn. 2022), is a pivotal case decided by the...
Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Predominant Purpose Test for Hybrid Contracts Involving Goods and Intangible Assets

Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Predominant Purpose Test for Hybrid Contracts Involving Goods and Intangible Assets

Date: Feb 3, 2022
Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Predominant Purpose Test for Hybrid Contracts Involving Goods and Intangible Assets Introduction In the landmark case of Vermillion State Bank v. Tennis Sanitation,...
Public Law 280 Upholds Minnesota's Criminal Jurisdiction in MARTIN v. STATE

Public Law 280 Upholds Minnesota's Criminal Jurisdiction in MARTIN v. STATE

Date: Jan 20, 2022
Public Law 280 Upholds Minnesota's Criminal Jurisdiction in MARTIN v. STATE Introduction MARTIN v. STATE, 969 N.W.2d 361 (Minn. 2022), is a pivotal case adjudged by the Supreme Court of Minnesota....
Defendant's Ability to Pay Must Be Explicitly Considered in Restitution Orders: State v. Wigham

Defendant's Ability to Pay Must Be Explicitly Considered in Restitution Orders: State v. Wigham

Date: Dec 23, 2021
Defendant's Ability to Pay Must Be Explicitly Considered in Restitution Orders: State of Minnesota v. Darrell James Wigham Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Darrell James Wigham, the Supreme...
Expansion of Traffic Stops: State v. Taylor Establishes Reasonable Suspicion Standards

Expansion of Traffic Stops: State v. Taylor Establishes Reasonable Suspicion Standards

Date: Oct 14, 2021
Expansion of Traffic Stops: State v. Taylor Establishes Reasonable Suspicion Standards Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Larry Dale Taylor (965 N.W.2d 747), decided on October 13, 2021, the...
Proximate Cause in Wrongful Death Claims: Staub v. Myrtle Lake Resort Establishes Key Precedent

Proximate Cause in Wrongful Death Claims: Staub v. Myrtle Lake Resort Establishes Key Precedent

Date: Sep 23, 2021
Proximate Cause in Wrongful Death Claims: Staub v. Myrtle Lake Resort Establishes Key Precedent Introduction Staub v. Myrtle Lake Resort, LLC, and James Lown is a landmark case decided by the Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert