Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Clarifying “Ascertainable” Medical Benefits for Roraff Fees: WCCA Must Apply a Reasonable-Mind/Record-as-a-Whole Review

Clarifying “Ascertainable” Medical Benefits for Roraff Fees: WCCA Must Apply a Reasonable-Mind/Record-as-a-Whole Review

Date: May 1, 2025
Clarifying “Ascertainable” Medical Benefits for Roraff Fees: WCCA Must Apply a Reasonable-Mind/Record-as-a-Whole Review Court: Minnesota Supreme Court Case: Rodney Dean Bjornson, Relator v. McNeilus...
Impeachment-Only Evidence Cannot Revive Untimely Postconviction Petitions; “Interests of Justice” Requires an Injustice that Caused the Late Filing

Impeachment-Only Evidence Cannot Revive Untimely Postconviction Petitions; “Interests of Justice” Requires an Injustice that Caused the Late Filing

Date: May 1, 2025
Impeachment-Only Evidence Cannot Revive Untimely Postconviction Petitions; “Interests of Justice” Requires an Injustice that Caused the Late Filing Case: Leroy Roderick Paul v. State of Minnesota, 20...
No Contemporaneity Requirement: “Operating” Need Not Occur at the Moment of Collision for Criminal Vehicular Homicide (Leaving the Scene) in Minnesota

No Contemporaneity Requirement: “Operating” Need Not Occur at the Moment of Collision for Criminal Vehicular Homicide (Leaving the Scene) in Minnesota

Date: Apr 17, 2025
No Contemporaneity Requirement: “Operating” Need Not Occur at the Moment of Collision for Criminal Vehicular Homicide (Leaving the Scene) in Minnesota Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Henry Lee...
Clarifying the Reinstatement Burden: Minnesota Endorses “High-Probability” Clear-and-Convincing Standard and Requires Corroborated Proof of Competence

Clarifying the Reinstatement Burden: Minnesota Endorses “High-Probability” Clear-and-Convincing Standard and Requires Corroborated Proof of Competence

Date: Apr 17, 2025
Clarifying the Reinstatement Burden: Minnesota Endorses “High-Probability” Clear-and-Convincing Standard and Requires Corroborated Proof of Competence Introduction In In re Petition for Reinstatement...
Rebutting the PTD Retirement Presumption at Age 67: Minnesota Supreme Court Confirms Preponderance Standard and Case-Specific Balancing

Rebutting the PTD Retirement Presumption at Age 67: Minnesota Supreme Court Confirms Preponderance Standard and Case-Specific Balancing

Date: Apr 17, 2025
Rebutting the PTD Retirement Presumption at Age 67: Minnesota Supreme Court Confirms Preponderance Standard and Case-Specific Balancing Introduction In Simonson v. Douglas County, 19 N.W.3d 447...
No “Material and Favorable” Showing Required for Non‑Confidential Criminal Discovery under Minn. R. Crim. P. 9.01, subd. 2(3)

No “Material and Favorable” Showing Required for Non‑Confidential Criminal Discovery under Minn. R. Crim. P. 9.01, subd. 2(3)

Date: Apr 10, 2025
No “Material and Favorable” Showing Required for Non‑Confidential Criminal Discovery under Minn. R. Crim. P. 9.01, subd. 2(3) Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Christopher Lee Manska, 19 N.W.3d...
No Extrajudicial Modifications of Child Support; “Alternative Effective Date” Applies Only to Subsequent Court Orders

No Extrajudicial Modifications of Child Support; “Alternative Effective Date” Applies Only to Subsequent Court Orders

Date: Apr 10, 2025
No Extrajudicial Modifications of Child Support; “Alternative Effective Date” Applies Only to Subsequent Court Orders Introduction In Leslie E. Sheehy Lee v. Travis W. Kalis, County of Le Sueur, 19...
Mandated Reporting Extends to Disclosures After the Victim Turns 18 When the Abuse Occurred Within Three Years: State v. Martens (Minn. 2025)

Mandated Reporting Extends to Disclosures After the Victim Turns 18 When the Abuse Occurred Within Three Years: State v. Martens (Minn. 2025)

Date: Apr 3, 2025
Mandated Reporting Extends to Disclosures After the Victim Turns 18 When the Abuse Occurred Within Three Years Introduction This commentary analyzes the Minnesota Supreme Court’s decision in State of...
Bright-Line Disbarment for Felony Theft by Swindle Absent Mitigation: In re McNeilly, 18 N.W.3d 774 (Minn. 2025)

Bright-Line Disbarment for Felony Theft by Swindle Absent Mitigation: In re McNeilly, 18 N.W.3d 774 (Minn. 2025)

Date: Apr 3, 2025
Bright-Line Disbarment for Felony Theft by Swindle Absent Mitigation Case: In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Kristi D. McNeilly, A22-0574 Citation: 18 N.W.3d 774 (Minn. 2025) Court:...
Reciprocal Discipline Clarified: Minnesota May Disbar Lawyers Licensed and Practicing in Minnesota for Out-of-State Discipline Under RLPR 12(d)

Reciprocal Discipline Clarified: Minnesota May Disbar Lawyers Licensed and Practicing in Minnesota for Out-of-State Discipline Under RLPR 12(d)

Date: Mar 27, 2025
Reciprocal Discipline Clarified: Minnesota May Disbar Lawyers Licensed and Practicing in Minnesota for Out-of-State Discipline Under RLPR 12(d) Introduction This commentary examines the Minnesota...
Establishing Reciprocal Disbarment for Unauthorized, Incompetent, and Non-Cooperative Legal Practice

Establishing Reciprocal Disbarment for Unauthorized, Incompetent, and Non-Cooperative Legal Practice

Date: Mar 13, 2025
Establishing Reciprocal Disbarment for Unauthorized, Incompetent, and Non-Cooperative Legal Practice Introduction The Judgment in In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Jay A. Rosenberg...
Non-Appealability of DHS Correction Orders via Certiorari: Establishing the Limits of Quasi-Judicial Review

Non-Appealability of DHS Correction Orders via Certiorari: Establishing the Limits of Quasi-Judicial Review

Date: Mar 13, 2025
Non-Appealability of DHS Correction Orders via Certiorari: Establishing the Limits of Quasi-Judicial Review Introduction The case of Alex Lancaster, Relator, v. Department of Human Services,...
Interlocutory Non-Finality in Tax Court Jurisdictional Orders: A New Standard

Interlocutory Non-Finality in Tax Court Jurisdictional Orders: A New Standard

Date: Mar 4, 2025
Interlocutory Non-Finality in Tax Court Jurisdictional Orders: A New Standard Introduction In County of Hennepin Relator, v. Hollydale Land LLC, the Minnesota Supreme Court revisited the longstanding...
Revisiting Municipal Immunity in Hiring Decisions: Clarifying the Limits of the Discretionary-Function Exception in Minnesota

Revisiting Municipal Immunity in Hiring Decisions: Clarifying the Limits of the Discretionary-Function Exception in Minnesota

Date: Mar 2, 2025
Revisiting Municipal Immunity in Hiring Decisions: Clarifying the Limits of the Discretionary-Function Exception in Minnesota Introduction The Judgment in Minor Doe 601, a minor, by and through his...
Redefining "Public Place": Affirming the Interior of a Motor Vehicle on a Public Road as a Public Place Under Minn. Stat. § 624.7181

Redefining "Public Place": Affirming the Interior of a Motor Vehicle on a Public Road as a Public Place Under Minn. Stat. § 624.7181

Date: Feb 23, 2025
Redefining "Public Place": Affirming the Interior of a Motor Vehicle on a Public Road as a Public Place Under Minn. Stat. § 624.7181 Introduction This commentary examines the recent decision in the...
Rigorous Standards for Postconviction Relief Affirmed in Ezeka v. State of Minnesota

Rigorous Standards for Postconviction Relief Affirmed in Ezeka v. State of Minnesota

Date: Feb 6, 2025
Rigorous Standards for Postconviction Relief Affirmed in Ezeka v. State of Minnesota Introduction Joshua Chiazor Ezeka v. State of Minnesota is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Minnesota,...
Expanding the Definition of "Family or Household Member" in Domestic Assault Cases: State v. Latino

Expanding the Definition of "Family or Household Member" in Domestic Assault Cases: State v. Latino

Date: Jan 14, 2025
Expanding the Definition of "Family or Household Member" in Domestic Assault Cases: State v. Latino Introduction In the landmark case State of Minnesota v. Edgard Francisco Talave Latino, decided on...
Refining Taxpayer Standing: Minnesota Supreme Court Reiterates Central Disbursement Requirement

Refining Taxpayer Standing: Minnesota Supreme Court Reiterates Central Disbursement Requirement

Date: Jan 14, 2025
Refining Taxpayer Standing: Minnesota Supreme Court Reiterates Central Disbursement Requirement Introduction The Minnesota Supreme Court's decision in Deborah Jane Clapp v. Dr. Lisa Sayles-Adams...
Supreme Court Upholds Summary Denial of Postconviction Relief in Davis v. State of Minnesota

Supreme Court Upholds Summary Denial of Postconviction Relief in Davis v. State of Minnesota

Date: Jan 14, 2025
Supreme Court Upholds Summary Denial of Postconviction Relief in Davis v. State of Minnesota Introduction In Davis v. State of Minnesota, the Supreme Court of Minnesota affirmed the district court's...
Supreme Court of Minnesota Mandates Transparency in Postconviction Relief Denials

Supreme Court of Minnesota Mandates Transparency in Postconviction Relief Denials

Date: Dec 18, 2024
Supreme Court of Minnesota Mandates Transparency in Postconviction Relief Denials Introduction The case of Ricky Darnell Waiters v. State of Minnesota presents a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert