Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Implicit Waiver of Miranda Rights and Application of Minnesota Statute 609.04 in State v. Balandin

Implicit Waiver of Miranda Rights and Application of Minnesota Statute 609.04 in State v. Balandin

Date: Jun 4, 2020
Implicit Waiver of Miranda Rights and Application of Minnesota Statute 609.04 in State v. Balandin Introduction State of Minnesota v. Sergey Nikolae Balandin, 944 N.W.2d 204, was adjudicated by the...
Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Reasonable Suspicion Requirement for Hotel Guest Registry Searches

Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Reasonable Suspicion Requirement for Hotel Guest Registry Searches

Date: May 14, 2020
Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes Reasonable Suspicion Requirement for Hotel Guest Registry Searches Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. John Thomas Leonard, the Minnesota...
Expanding Administrative Authority: Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Commissioner’s Power to Rename Lakes Beyond 40-Year Limit

Expanding Administrative Authority: Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Commissioner’s Power to Rename Lakes Beyond 40-Year Limit

Date: May 14, 2020
Expanding Administrative Authority: Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Commissioner’s Power to Rename Lakes Beyond 40-Year Limit Introduction The Minnesota Supreme Court, in the landmark decision of Sa...
State v. Garland: Upholding Admissibility of DNA Evidence and Correcting Sentencing Errors in Minnesota

State v. Garland: Upholding Admissibility of DNA Evidence and Correcting Sentencing Errors in Minnesota

Date: May 7, 2020
State v. Garland: Upholding Admissibility of DNA Evidence and Correcting Sentencing Errors in Minnesota Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. Matthew Michael Garland, decided on...
Rule 106 Application in Criminal Sexual Conduct Case: Dolo v. State of Minnesota

Rule 106 Application in Criminal Sexual Conduct Case: Dolo v. State of Minnesota

Date: Apr 30, 2020
Rule 106 Application in Criminal Sexual Conduct Case: Dolo v. State of Minnesota Introduction The case of Abraham Tony Dolo v. State of Minnesota (942 N.W.2d 357, 2020) presents a pivotal examination...
State of Minnesota v. Reek: Upholding Judicial Impartiality and Standards for Jury Instructions on Accomplice Liability

State of Minnesota v. Reek: Upholding Judicial Impartiality and Standards for Jury Instructions on Accomplice Liability

Date: Apr 23, 2020
State of Minnesota v. Reek: Upholding Judicial Impartiality and Standards for Jury Instructions on Accomplice Liability Introduction State of Minnesota v. Kevin Reek is a significant judicial...
Reaffirmation of Rule 807: Trustworthiness and Admissibility of Residual Hearsay in State v. Ven Vangrevenhof

Reaffirmation of Rule 807: Trustworthiness and Admissibility of Residual Hearsay in State v. Ven Vangrevenhof

Date: Apr 16, 2020
Reaffirmation of Rule 807: Trustworthiness and Admissibility of Residual Hearsay in State of Minnesota v. Brian Ven Vangrevenhof Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. Brian Ven...
Objective Intent in Parental Rights Deprivation: Insights from State of Minnesota v. Cul

Objective Intent in Parental Rights Deprivation: Insights from State of Minnesota v. Cul

Date: Apr 2, 2020
Objective Intent in Parental Rights Deprivation: Insights from State of Minnesota v. Cul Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Jennifer Ann Cul, reported at 941 N.W.2d 134 (2020), serves as...
Reaffirmation of Standards for Postconviction Relief: Andersen v. State of Minnesota

Reaffirmation of Standards for Postconviction Relief: Andersen v. State of Minnesota

Date: Mar 12, 2020
Reaffirmation of Standards for Postconviction Relief: Andersen v. State of Minnesota Introduction Andersen v. State of Minnesota (940 N.W.2d 172) is a pivotal case in Minnesota's jurisprudence...
Minnesota Supreme Court Limits on Greater-Than-Double Durational Departures in Criminal Sexual Conduct Cases

Minnesota Supreme Court Limits on Greater-Than-Double Durational Departures in Criminal Sexual Conduct Cases

Date: Feb 6, 2020
Minnesota Supreme Court Limits on Greater-Than-Double Durational Departures in Criminal Sexual Conduct Cases Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Brian Arthur Barthman, 938 N.W.2d 257 (2020), the...
Unified Warranty Dates for Condominium Buildings under Minn. Stat. § 541.051: Analyzing Village Lofts v. Housing Partners

Unified Warranty Dates for Condominium Buildings under Minn. Stat. § 541.051: Analyzing Village Lofts v. Housing Partners

Date: Jan 16, 2020
Unified Warranty Dates for Condominium Buildings under Minn. Stat. § 541.051: Analyzing Village Lofts v. Housing Partners Introduction Village Lofts at St. Anthony Falls Association v. Housing...
Clarifying Custodial Presumptions in Domestic Abuse Cases: Thornton v. Bosquez

Clarifying Custodial Presumptions in Domestic Abuse Cases: Thornton v. Bosquez

Date: Oct 3, 2019
Clarifying Custodial Presumptions in Domestic Abuse Cases: Thornton v. Bosquez Introduction The Supreme Court of Minnesota, in In re the Matter of: Matthew Lawson Thornton, Appellant, v. Jessica...
Indefinite Suspension of Attorney Christopher J. Nelson: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Professional Conduct in Minnesota

Indefinite Suspension of Attorney Christopher J. Nelson: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Professional Conduct in Minnesota

Date: Sep 12, 2019
Indefinite Suspension of Attorney Christopher J. Nelson: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Professional Conduct in Minnesota Introduction The case of In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against...
State v. Harvey: Upholding CSLI and GAR Evidence Admissibility and Affirming Proper Batson Analysis

State v. Harvey: Upholding CSLI and GAR Evidence Admissibility and Affirming Proper Batson Analysis

Date: Aug 29, 2019
State v. Harvey: Upholding CSLI and GAR Evidence Admissibility and Affirming Proper Batson Analysis Minnesota Supreme Court Decision, 2019 Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Nigeria Lee...
Direct Causation Standard in Criminal Restitution: State v. Boettcher

Direct Causation Standard in Criminal Restitution: State v. Boettcher

Date: Jul 18, 2019
Direct Causation Standard in Criminal Restitution: State of Minnesota v. Colton Tyler Boettcher Introduction State of Minnesota v. Colton Tyler Boettcher, 931 N.W.2d 376 (Minn. 2019), is a pivotal...
State v. Hallmark: Expanding the Residual Hearsay Exception and Clarifying Lesser-Included Offense Convictions

State v. Hallmark: Expanding the Residual Hearsay Exception and Clarifying Lesser-Included Offense Convictions

Date: May 16, 2019
State v. Hallmark: Expanding the Residual Hearsay Exception and Clarifying Lesser-Included Offense Convictions Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. Marcus Allen Wayne Hallmark,...
Pakhnyuk Decision: Narrow Interpretation of Specific Intent in Interference with Privacy Statute

Pakhnyuk Decision: Narrow Interpretation of Specific Intent in Interference with Privacy Statute

Date: May 9, 2019
Pakhnyuk Decision: Narrow Interpretation of Specific Intent in Interference with Privacy Statute Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Fedor Pakhnyuk (926 N.W.2d 914, 2019), the Minnesota Supreme...
Forfeiture of Appearance-of-Bias Claims in Pre-Bid Protests: Rochester City Lines Co. v. City of Rochester

Forfeiture of Appearance-of-Bias Claims in Pre-Bid Protests: Rochester City Lines Co. v. City of Rochester

Date: Jun 21, 2018
Forfeiture of Appearance-of-Bias Claims in Pre-Bid Protests: Rochester City Lines Co. v. City of Rochester Introduction The case of Rochester City Lines Co. v. City of Rochester addresses critical...
Affirmation of Harmless Error Doctrine in State v. Williams

Affirmation of Harmless Error Doctrine in State v. Williams

Date: Mar 8, 2018
Affirmation of Harmless Error Doctrine in State of Minnesota v. Jamaine Jamie Williams Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. Jamaine Jamie Williams, the Supreme Court of...
Entitlement and Disqualification Standards in CCAP Billing Fraud: Salim v. Commissioner of Human Services

Entitlement and Disqualification Standards in CCAP Billing Fraud: Salim v. Commissioner of Human Services

Date: Nov 23, 2017
Entitlement and Disqualification Standards in CCAP Billing Fraud: Salim v. Commissioner of Human Services Introduction The case Salim v. Commissioner of Human Services (905 N.W.2d 1) adjudicated by...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert