Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Supreme Court of Minnesota Upholds Mootness in Rental Ordinance Challenge

Supreme Court of Minnesota Upholds Mootness in Rental Ordinance Challenge

Date: Aug 6, 2015
Supreme Court of Minnesota Upholds Mootness in Rental Ordinance Challenge Ethan Dean, et al. v. City of Winona, 868 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 2015) Introduction In Ethan Dean, et al. v. City of Winona (868...
Establishing Exclusive Restitution Factors: Analysis of Minnesota State v. Riggs

Establishing Exclusive Restitution Factors: Analysis of Minnesota State v. Riggs

Date: Jul 2, 2015
Establishing Exclusive Restitution Factors: Analysis of Minnesota State v. Riggs Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Brandon Wayne Riggs, 865 N.W.2d 679 (Minn. 2015), the Supreme Court of Minnesota...
Supreme Court of Minnesota Clarifies MUFTA's Stance on Ponzi-Scheme Presumptions

Supreme Court of Minnesota Clarifies MUFTA's Stance on Ponzi-Scheme Presumptions

Date: Feb 19, 2015
Supreme Court of Minnesota Clarifies MUFTA's Stance on Ponzi-Scheme Presumptions Introduction In the landmark case of Patrick Finn and Lighthouse Management Group, Inc. v. Alliance Bank et al., 860...
Beaulieu v. State: Clarifying Procedural Due Process Rights and Waiver in Probation Revocation Proceedings

Beaulieu v. State: Clarifying Procedural Due Process Rights and Waiver in Probation Revocation Proceedings

Date: Feb 5, 2015
Beaulieu v. State: Clarifying Procedural Due Process Rights and Waiver in Probation Revocation Proceedings Introduction Beaulieu v. State is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Minnesota that...
Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes "Particular Amenability to Probation" Standard in State v. Soto

Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes "Particular Amenability to Probation" Standard in State v. Soto

Date: Oct 23, 2014
Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes "Particular Amenability to Probation" Standard in State v. Soto Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. Jose Arriaga Soto, Jr., the Supreme...
Life Without Parole Sentencing for Juveniles Unconstitutional: Insights from STATE of Minnesota v. Mahdi Hassan ALI

Life Without Parole Sentencing for Juveniles Unconstitutional: Insights from STATE of Minnesota v. Mahdi Hassan ALI

Date: Oct 9, 2014
Life Without Parole Sentencing for Juveniles Unconstitutional: Insights from STATE of Minnesota v. Mahdi Hassan ALI Introduction STATE of Minnesota v. Mahdi Hassan ALI (855 N.W.2d 235) is a landmark...
Affirmation of Standards Governing Eyewitness Identification and Prosecutorial Conduct: Mosley v. State

Affirmation of Standards Governing Eyewitness Identification and Prosecutorial Conduct: Mosley v. State

Date: Sep 25, 2014
Affirmation of Standards Governing Eyewitness Identification and Prosecutorial Conduct: Mosley v. State Introduction State of Minnesota v. Eddie Matthew Mosley (853 N.W.2d 789) is a significant case...
Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Traditional Pleading Standard in Civil Actions

Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Traditional Pleading Standard in Civil Actions

Date: Aug 7, 2014
Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Traditional Pleading Standard in Civil Actions Introduction In the case of Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A. (851 N.W.2d 598), the Supreme Court of Minnesota addressed...
Enforceability of Future Legal Compliance Representations in Breach of Contract Claims: Minnesota's Landmark Ruling in Lyon Financial Services v. Illinois Paper

Enforceability of Future Legal Compliance Representations in Breach of Contract Claims: Minnesota's Landmark Ruling in Lyon Financial Services v. Illinois Paper

Date: Jul 3, 2014
Enforceability of Future Legal Compliance Representations in Breach of Contract Claims: Minnesota's Landmark Ruling in Lyon Financial Services v. Illinois Paper Introduction In the case of Lyon...
Interpreting Minn.Stat. § 609.035: Limits on Multiple Sentences for Single Conduct in State v. Jones

Interpreting Minn.Stat. § 609.035: Limits on Multiple Sentences for Single Conduct in State v. Jones

Date: Jul 3, 2014
Interpreting Minn.Stat. § 609.035: Limits on Multiple Sentences for Single Conduct in State v. Jones Introduction State of Minnesota v. Don Antoine Jones, 848 N.W.2d 528 (Minn. 2014), addresses the...
Procedural Bars and Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence in Upholding Premeditated Murder Conviction

Procedural Bars and Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence in Upholding Premeditated Murder Conviction

Date: May 15, 2014
Procedural Bars and Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence in Upholding Premeditated Murder Conviction Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Prince Oliver Moore, Jr. (846 N.W.2d 83) presents...
STATE v. VANG (847 N.W.2d 248): Defining 'Drive-by Shooting' in Felony Murder and Affirming Jurisdiction Over Juvenile Offenders Post-Age 21

STATE v. VANG (847 N.W.2d 248): Defining 'Drive-by Shooting' in Felony Murder and Affirming Jurisdiction Over Juvenile Offenders Post-Age 21

Date: May 8, 2014
STATE v. VANG (847 N.W.2d 248): Defining 'Drive-by Shooting' in Felony Murder and Affirming Jurisdiction Over Juvenile Offenders Post-Age 21 Introduction State of Minnesota v. Jerry Vang is a...
Extending Orders for Protection: Minnesota Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling in Bergstrom v. Rew

Extending Orders for Protection: Minnesota Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling in Bergstrom v. Rew

Date: May 1, 2014
Extending Orders for Protection: Minnesota Supreme Court's Landmark Ruling in Bergstrom v. Rew Introduction The Minnesota Supreme Court's decision in Bergstrom v. Rew, 845 N.W.2d 764 (2014), marks a...
Impact of Jury Instruction Omissions on Substantial Rights: Analyzing State v. Watkins

Impact of Jury Instruction Omissions on Substantial Rights: Analyzing State v. Watkins

Date: Dec 5, 2013
Impact of Jury Instruction Omissions on Substantial Rights: Analyzing State v. Watkins Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. George Cornelius Watkins addresses a critical issue in criminal...
Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Conviction and Public Trial Rights in STATE v. Silvernail

Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Conviction and Public Trial Rights in STATE v. Silvernail

Date: Jun 1, 2013
Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Conviction and Public Trial Rights in STATE v. Silvernail Introduction STATE of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Allen Silvernail (831 N.W.2d 594) is a landmark decision by the...
State v. Joel Marvin Munt: Juror Impartiality in Mental Illness Defenses

State v. Joel Marvin Munt: Juror Impartiality in Mental Illness Defenses

Date: Jun 1, 2013
State v. Joel Marvin Munt: Juror Impartiality in Mental Illness Defenses Court: Supreme Court of Minnesota Date: May 31, 2013 Citation: 831 N.W.2d 569 Introduction In the landmark case of State of...
Carbon Monoxide Classified as a Pollutant under Absolute Pollution Exclusion: Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wolters

Carbon Monoxide Classified as a Pollutant under Absolute Pollution Exclusion: Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wolters

Date: Jun 1, 2013
Carbon Monoxide Classified as a Pollutant under Absolute Pollution Exclusion: Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wolters Introduction The case of Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Company v....
State v. Nicks: Minnesota Supreme Court Sets Comprehensive Standards for Evidentiary Hearings in Ineffective Assistance Claims

State v. Nicks: Minnesota Supreme Court Sets Comprehensive Standards for Evidentiary Hearings in Ineffective Assistance Claims

Date: Jun 1, 2013
State v. Nicks: Minnesota Supreme Court Sets Comprehensive Standards for Evidentiary Hearings in Ineffective Assistance Claims Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. Nidjia Dean...
Recognition of Parentage as a Proceeding for Grandparent Visitation Rights under Minn.Stat. §257C.08

Recognition of Parentage as a Proceeding for Grandparent Visitation Rights under Minn.Stat. §257C.08

Date: Jun 1, 2013
Recognition of Parentage as a Proceeding for Grandparent Visitation Rights under Minn.Stat. §257C.08 Introduction The case of Joane M. Christianson v. Travis Henke, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Standards for Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment Claims Under MHRA

Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Standards for Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment Claims Under MHRA

Date: May 23, 2013
Minnesota Supreme Court Clarifies Standards for Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment Claims Under MHRA Introduction In the landmark case of Jaime Rasmussen, et al. v. Two Harbors Fish Company...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert