Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Georgia Case Commentaries

Merits-First Discipline: Georgia Supreme Court Holds It an Abuse of Discretion to Enter Default When a Timely Answer Was Misfiled but Promptly Corrected

Merits-First Discipline: Georgia Supreme Court Holds It an Abuse of Discretion to Enter Default When a Timely Answer Was Misfiled but Promptly Corrected

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Merits-First Discipline: Georgia Supreme Court Holds It an Abuse of Discretion to Enter Default When a Timely Answer Was Misfiled but Promptly Corrected Case: In the Matter of Herald J.A. Alexander,...
Merritt v. State: Georgia Supreme Court reinforces preservation requirements for shackling and Brady claims and upholds strategic non‑objection under Strickland

Merritt v. State: Georgia Supreme Court reinforces preservation requirements for shackling and Brady claims and upholds strategic non‑objection under Strickland

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Merritt v. State: Georgia Supreme Court reinforces preservation requirements for shackling and Brady claims and upholds strategic non‑objection under Strickland Introduction In Merritt v. State,...
Stitts v. State: No Plain Error in Omitting Accomplice-Corroboration Instruction Where Independent Evidence Strongly Implicates the Accused

Stitts v. State: No Plain Error in Omitting Accomplice-Corroboration Instruction Where Independent Evidence Strongly Implicates the Accused

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Stitts v. State: No Plain Error in Omitting Accomplice-Corroboration Instruction Where Independent Evidence Strongly Implicates the Accused Introduction In Stitts v. State, decided November 4, 2025,...
Burks v. State: No Inherent Prejudice from Co‑Defendants’ Mid‑Voir Dire Guilty Pleas; Post‑Incision Autopsy Photos Admissible; Single Online Comment Insufficient for Change of Venue

Burks v. State: No Inherent Prejudice from Co‑Defendants’ Mid‑Voir Dire Guilty Pleas; Post‑Incision Autopsy Photos Admissible; Single Online Comment Insufficient for Change of Venue

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Burks v. State: No Inherent Prejudice from Co‑Defendants’ Mid‑Voir Dire Guilty Pleas; Post‑Incision Autopsy Photos Admissible; Single Online Comment Insufficient for Change of Venue Introduction In...
No Per Se Miranda Custody for 10-13 Behavioral Health Interviews; Pattern Insanity and Intoxication Instructions Suffice — Gravitt v. State (Ga. 2025)

No Per Se Miranda Custody for 10-13 Behavioral Health Interviews; Pattern Insanity and Intoxication Instructions Suffice — Gravitt v. State (Ga. 2025)

Date: Oct 22, 2025
No Per Se Miranda Custody for 10-13 Behavioral Health Interviews; Pattern Insanity and Intoxication Instructions Suffice Commentary on Gravitt v. State, Supreme Court of Georgia (Decided Oct. 21,...
Strategic Non-Objections and Prison Gang Expertise: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies Ineffective Assistance and Relevance Standards in Momon v. State

Strategic Non-Objections and Prison Gang Expertise: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies Ineffective Assistance and Relevance Standards in Momon v. State

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Strategic Non-Objections and Prison Gang Expertise: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies Ineffective Assistance and Relevance Standards in Momon v. State Introduction In Momon v. State, the Supreme Court...
Reid v. State: Perceived Rival-Gang Status Can Establish Motive; “Slight” Independent Evidence—Including Surveillance and Gang-Expert Testimony—Suffices to Corroborate Accomplice Testimony

Reid v. State: Perceived Rival-Gang Status Can Establish Motive; “Slight” Independent Evidence—Including Surveillance and Gang-Expert Testimony—Suffices to Corroborate Accomplice Testimony

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Reid v. State: Perceived Rival-Gang Status Can Establish Motive; “Slight” Independent Evidence—Including Surveillance and Gang-Expert Testimony—Suffices to Corroborate Accomplice Testimony...
Smith v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Harmless-Error Review for Minimally Used, Potentially Prejudicial Evidence

Smith v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Harmless-Error Review for Minimally Used, Potentially Prejudicial Evidence

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Smith v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Harmless-Error Review for Minimally Used, Potentially Prejudicial Evidence Introduction In Smith v. State, decided October 21, 2025, the Supreme Court...
Paragraph V(b)(2) Naming Defects Are Non‑Jurisdictional and Curable via OCGA § 9‑11‑21: Tussahaw Reserves, LLC v. Butts County

Paragraph V(b)(2) Naming Defects Are Non‑Jurisdictional and Curable via OCGA § 9‑11‑21: Tussahaw Reserves, LLC v. Butts County

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Paragraph V(b)(2) Naming Defects Are Non‑Jurisdictional and Curable via OCGA § 9‑11‑21: Tussahaw Reserves, LLC v. Butts County Introduction In Tussahaw Reserves, LLC et al. v. Butts County (Supreme...
Per-Unit Statute of Repose Under OCGA § 51-1-11(b)(2): Georgia Supreme Court Holds Repose Runs From the First Sale of Each Unit, Not From a Plaintiff’s Earliest Purchase

Per-Unit Statute of Repose Under OCGA § 51-1-11(b)(2): Georgia Supreme Court Holds Repose Runs From the First Sale of Each Unit, Not From a Plaintiff’s Earliest Purchase

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Per-Unit Statute of Repose Under OCGA § 51-1-11(b)(2): Georgia Supreme Court Holds Repose Runs From the First Sale of Each Unit, Not From a Plaintiff’s Earliest Purchase Introduction In Burroughs v....

      Georgia Supreme Court Bars Use of Arrest Warrants and Indictments for Impeachment Under OCGA § 24-6-609; Ineffective-Assistance Claims Fail Absent Prejudice — Commentary on Copney v. State (Ga. 2025)

Georgia Supreme Court Bars Use of Arrest Warrants and Indictments for Impeachment Under OCGA § 24-6-609; Ineffective-Assistance Claims Fail Absent Prejudice — Commentary on Copney v. State (Ga. 2025)

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Georgia Supreme Court Bars Use of Arrest Warrants and Indictments for Impeachment Under OCGA § 24-6-609; Ineffective-Assistance Claims Fail Absent Prejudice Introduction In Copney v. State, S25A0877...
Stormwater Utility Charges Are Fees, Not Taxes: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Homewood I and Clarifies Takings Doctrine After Sheetz

Stormwater Utility Charges Are Fees, Not Taxes: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Homewood I and Clarifies Takings Doctrine After Sheetz

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Stormwater Utility Charges Are Fees, Not Taxes: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Homewood I and Clarifies Takings Doctrine After Sheetz Introduction In Homewood Associates, Inc. et al. v. Unified...
Legitimation Against the Marital Presumption: Georgia Supreme Court Leaves Best‑Interests Framework Intact and Calls for Legislative Clarification

Legitimation Against the Marital Presumption: Georgia Supreme Court Leaves Best‑Interests Framework Intact and Calls for Legislative Clarification

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Legitimation Against the Marital Presumption: Georgia Supreme Court Leaves Best‑Interests Framework Intact and Calls for Legislative Clarification Introduction In Marquez v. Aguirre, Case No....
Moss v. State: Ambiguous Self-Referential Statements Do Not Clearly Trigger Georgia’s Confession-Corroboration Rule; Unsettled Status of Offense Captions as Factual Allegations; Particularity of Cell-Phone Warrants Reaffirmed Through Pugh/Wilson Framework

Moss v. State: Ambiguous Self-Referential Statements Do Not Clearly Trigger Georgia’s Confession-Corroboration Rule; Unsettled Status of Offense Captions as Factual Allegations; Particularity of Cell-Phone Warrants Reaffirmed Through Pugh/Wilson Framework

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Moss v. State: Ambiguous Self-Referential Statements Do Not Clearly Trigger Georgia’s Confession-Corroboration Rule; Unsettled Status of Offense Captions as Factual Allegations; Particularity of...
Redressability at the Core of Georgia’s Actual-Controversy Requirement: Plaintiffs Must Sue the Actor Causing the Injury

Redressability at the Core of Georgia’s Actual-Controversy Requirement: Plaintiffs Must Sue the Actor Causing the Injury

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Redressability at the Core of Georgia’s Actual-Controversy Requirement: Plaintiffs Must Sue the Actor Causing the Injury Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Georgia’s decision...
Plain Error at the Time of Appeal—With a Prospective Caveat: Georgia High Court Holds Daubert Inapplicable to Pre‑2022 Criminal Trials and Reaffirms Harper/Belton for Footwear Testimony

Plain Error at the Time of Appeal—With a Prospective Caveat: Georgia High Court Holds Daubert Inapplicable to Pre‑2022 Criminal Trials and Reaffirms Harper/Belton for Footwear Testimony

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Plain Error at the Time of Appeal—With a Prospective Caveat: Georgia High Court Holds Daubert Inapplicable to Pre‑2022 Criminal Trials and Reaffirms Harper/Belton for Footwear Testimony Introduction...
Actual Knowledge Is Awareness of the Hazard Itself, Not Its Precise Location: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies “Specific Hazard” and Limits Constructive-Knowledge Principles in Premises Liability

Actual Knowledge Is Awareness of the Hazard Itself, Not Its Precise Location: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies “Specific Hazard” and Limits Constructive-Knowledge Principles in Premises Liability

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Actual Knowledge Is Awareness of the Hazard Itself, Not Its Precise Location: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies “Specific Hazard” and Limits Constructive-Knowledge Principles in Premises Liability...
Smith v. State: Clarifying the Timberlake Framework for Extraordinary Motions Based on New Expert Scientific Analysis

Smith v. State: Clarifying the Timberlake Framework for Extraordinary Motions Based on New Expert Scientific Analysis

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Smith v. State: Clarifying the Timberlake Framework for Extraordinary Motions Based on New Expert Scientific Analysis Court: Supreme Court of Georgia Date: October 15, 2025 Citation: S25A0548 Author:...
No “Basic Fairness” Shortcut: Georgia Supreme Court Requires Explicit Rule 401/403 Analysis Before Excluding Social-Media Gang Evidence (State v. Sims)

No “Basic Fairness” Shortcut: Georgia Supreme Court Requires Explicit Rule 401/403 Analysis Before Excluding Social-Media Gang Evidence (State v. Sims)

Date: Oct 17, 2025
No “Basic Fairness” Shortcut: Georgia Supreme Court Requires Explicit Rule 401/403 Analysis Before Excluding Social-Media Gang Evidence Commentary on State v. Sims, Supreme Court of Georgia (Oct. 15,...
Taylor v. State: Unpreserved Fourth Amendment Attacks on Social Media and Cell-Phone Warrants Face Plain-Error Review; Cumulative Digital Communications Render Any Error Harmless

Taylor v. State: Unpreserved Fourth Amendment Attacks on Social Media and Cell-Phone Warrants Face Plain-Error Review; Cumulative Digital Communications Render Any Error Harmless

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Taylor v. State: Unpreserved Fourth Amendment Attacks on Social Media and Cell-Phone Warrants Face Plain-Error Review; Cumulative Digital Communications Render Any Error Harmless Introduction In...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert