Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Florida Case Commentaries

No Postconviction Do‑Over on Competency and No Ineffectiveness for Futile Evaluations: The Florida Supreme Court’s Clarification in Damas v. State

No Postconviction Do‑Over on Competency and No Ineffectiveness for Futile Evaluations: The Florida Supreme Court’s Clarification in Damas v. State

Date: Oct 4, 2025
No Postconviction Do‑Over on Competency and No Ineffectiveness for Futile Evaluations: The Florida Supreme Court’s Clarification in Damas v. State Court: Supreme Court of Florida Decision date:...
No Stipulation to Competency by Agreeing to Written Reports: Florida Supreme Court Reaffirms Procedural Bars, Strickland, and Rule 3.852 Limits in Mesac Damas v. State

No Stipulation to Competency by Agreeing to Written Reports: Florida Supreme Court Reaffirms Procedural Bars, Strickland, and Rule 3.852 Limits in Mesac Damas v. State

Date: Oct 2, 2025
No Stipulation to Competency by Agreeing to Written Reports: Florida Supreme Court Reaffirms Procedural Bars, Strickland, and Rule 3.852 Limits in Mesac Damas v. State Introduction This commentary...
From Schedules to Standards: Florida Supreme Court Mandates Consideration of Statutory Factors, Authorizes Pre–First Appearance Release, and Permits Bail Reconsideration for Inability to Pay under Amended Rule 3.131

From Schedules to Standards: Florida Supreme Court Mandates Consideration of Statutory Factors, Authorizes Pre–First Appearance Release, and Permits Bail Reconsideration for Inability to Pay under Amended Rule 3.131

Date: Sep 27, 2025
From Schedules to Standards: Florida Supreme Court Mandates Consideration of Statutory Factors, Authorizes Pre–First Appearance Release, and Permits Bail Reconsideration for Inability to Pay under...
Florida Supreme Court Front-Loads Postconviction Pleading and Expert Disclosures: New Specificity Requirements for “Failure to Call Witnesses” Ineffective-Assistance Claims and Clarified DNA-Testing Appeal Time

Florida Supreme Court Front-Loads Postconviction Pleading and Expert Disclosures: New Specificity Requirements for “Failure to Call Witnesses” Ineffective-Assistance Claims and Clarified DNA-Testing Appeal Time

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Florida Supreme Court Front-Loads Postconviction Pleading and Expert Disclosures: New Specificity Requirements for “Failure to Call Witnesses” Ineffective-Assistance Claims and Clarified DNA-Testing...
Eligibility Confirmation Under §16.63 Is Not Newly Discovered Evidence: Florida Supreme Court Tightens Successive Mitigation and Post‑Warrant Records Practice in Capital Cases

Eligibility Confirmation Under §16.63 Is Not Newly Discovered Evidence: Florida Supreme Court Tightens Successive Mitigation and Post‑Warrant Records Practice in Capital Cases

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Eligibility Confirmation Under §16.63 Is Not Newly Discovered Evidence: Florida Supreme Court Tightens Successive Mitigation and Post‑Warrant Records Practice in Capital Cases Introduction In Victor...
Florida Supreme Court Clarifies That Eligibility Under the Dozier/Okeechobee Victim-Compensation Program Is Not “Newly Discovered Evidence” and Tightens Limits on Post‑Warrant Records and Due Process Challenges

Florida Supreme Court Clarifies That Eligibility Under the Dozier/Okeechobee Victim-Compensation Program Is Not “Newly Discovered Evidence” and Tightens Limits on Post‑Warrant Records and Due Process Challenges

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Florida Supreme Court Clarifies That Eligibility Under the Dozier/Okeechobee Victim-Compensation Program Is Not “Newly Discovered Evidence” and Tightens Limits on Post‑Warrant Records and Due Process...
Florida Supreme Court Requires Online Publication of Local Rules and Administrative Orders and Establishes Electronic Permanence for Court Records

Florida Supreme Court Requires Online Publication of Local Rules and Administrative Orders and Establishes Electronic Permanence for Court Records

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Florida Supreme Court Requires Online Publication of Local Rules and Administrative Orders and Establishes Electronic Permanence for Court Records Introduction In this administrative rulemaking...
Pittman v. State: Florida Supreme Court Reaffirms Phillips—Hall Not Retroactive and Procedural Bars Apply to Successive Intellectual-Disability Claims

Pittman v. State: Florida Supreme Court Reaffirms Phillips—Hall Not Retroactive and Procedural Bars Apply to Successive Intellectual-Disability Claims

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Pittman v. State: Florida Supreme Court Reaffirms Phillips—Hall Not Retroactive and Procedural Bars Apply to Successive Intellectual-Disability Claims Court: Supreme Court of Florida Date: September...
Pittman v. State (Fla. 2025): Reaffirming Phillips—Hall Is Not Retroactive and Intellectual-Disability Claims Remain Subject to Strict Time and Successiveness Bars

Pittman v. State (Fla. 2025): Reaffirming Phillips—Hall Is Not Retroactive and Intellectual-Disability Claims Remain Subject to Strict Time and Successiveness Bars

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Pittman v. State (Fla. 2025): Reaffirming Phillips—Hall Is Not Retroactive and Intellectual-Disability Claims Remain Subject to Strict Time and Successiveness Bars Introduction In David Joseph...
Ancillary Evidence Does Not Reset the Rule 3.851 Clock: Florida Supreme Court Clarifies “Predicate Facts,” Due Diligence, and Third‑Party Confession Standards in Suggs v. State

Ancillary Evidence Does Not Reset the Rule 3.851 Clock: Florida Supreme Court Clarifies “Predicate Facts,” Due Diligence, and Third‑Party Confession Standards in Suggs v. State

Date: Sep 9, 2025
Ancillary Evidence Does Not Reset the Rule 3.851 Clock: Florida Supreme Court Clarifies “Predicate Facts,” Due Diligence, and Third‑Party Confession Standards in Suggs v. State Introduction This...
Admissibility and Diligence as Gatekeepers in Successive Rule 3.851 Motions: Florida Supreme Court Rejects Third-Party Confession Declarations and “New Support for Old Claims”

Admissibility and Diligence as Gatekeepers in Successive Rule 3.851 Motions: Florida Supreme Court Rejects Third-Party Confession Declarations and “New Support for Old Claims”

Date: Sep 5, 2025
Admissibility and Diligence as Gatekeepers in Successive Rule 3.851 Motions: Florida Supreme Court Rejects Third-Party Confession Declarations and “New Support for Old Claims” Introduction In Ernest...
Authorizing Substitute Service for Unascertainable Respondents in Vulnerable-Adult Exploitation Injunctions: Florida Supreme Court’s Fast-Track Amendment to Probate Rule 5.920

Authorizing Substitute Service for Unascertainable Respondents in Vulnerable-Adult Exploitation Injunctions: Florida Supreme Court’s Fast-Track Amendment to Probate Rule 5.920

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Authorizing Substitute Service for Unascertainable Respondents in Vulnerable-Adult Exploitation Injunctions: Florida Supreme Court’s Fast-Track Amendment to Probate Rule 5.920 Introduction On August...
Florida Supreme Court Standardizes New-Member Bar Fees and Adds Annual Reporting for Non-Florida Lawyers: 2025 Amendments to Chapter 1

Florida Supreme Court Standardizes New-Member Bar Fees and Adds Annual Reporting for Non-Florida Lawyers: 2025 Amendments to Chapter 1

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Florida Supreme Court Standardizes New-Member Bar Fees and Adds Annual Reporting for Non-Florida Lawyers: 2025 Amendments to Chapter 1 Introduction In a rulemaking opinion issued on August 28, 2025,...
Due Process Recalibrated in Florida Bar Discipline: Immediate Challenges to Interim Probation, Unified Briefing Deadlines, and Narrowed Judicial Referral Authority

Due Process Recalibrated in Florida Bar Discipline: Immediate Challenges to Interim Probation, Unified Briefing Deadlines, and Narrowed Judicial Referral Authority

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Due Process Recalibrated in Florida Bar Discipline: Immediate Challenges to Interim Probation, Unified Briefing Deadlines, and Narrowed Judicial Referral Authority Introduction In this administrative...
Bell v. State (Fla. 2025): Speculative Custodial-Coercion Allegations Cannot Overcome Record-Clear Waivers; Rule 3.130 Delay Alone Is Not Fundamental Error

Bell v. State (Fla. 2025): Speculative Custodial-Coercion Allegations Cannot Overcome Record-Clear Waivers; Rule 3.130 Delay Alone Is Not Fundamental Error

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Bell v. State (Fla. 2025): Speculative Custodial-Coercion Allegations Cannot Overcome Record-Clear Waivers; Rule 3.130 Delay Alone Is Not Fundamental Error Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
Colloquy Controls Postconviction: Florida Supreme Court Clarifies that Speculative Prison‑Abuse Allegations Cannot Undermine Waiver Voluntariness, and Rule 3.130 Delays Are Not Fundamental Error Absent Prejudice

Colloquy Controls Postconviction: Florida Supreme Court Clarifies that Speculative Prison‑Abuse Allegations Cannot Undermine Waiver Voluntariness, and Rule 3.130 Delays Are Not Fundamental Error Absent Prejudice

Date: Aug 29, 2025
Colloquy Controls Postconviction: Florida Supreme Court Clarifies that Speculative Prison‑Abuse Allegations Cannot Undermine Waiver Voluntariness, and Rule 3.130 Delays Are Not Fundamental Error...
No Retroactive Right to Qualified Capital Counsel: The Florida Supreme Court’s Clarification in Windom v. State (2025)

No Retroactive Right to Qualified Capital Counsel: The Florida Supreme Court’s Clarification in Windom v. State (2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
No Retroactive Right to Qualified Capital Counsel: Windom v. State of Florida & the Limits of “Evolving Standards” Introduction In Curtis Windom v. State of Florida, Nos. SC2025-1179 & SC2025-1182...
Windom v. Florida: No Sixth Amendment “Evolving Standards of Decency”; Rule 3.112 Not Retroactive; Strict Limits on Successive Capital Postconviction Relief Reaffirmed

Windom v. Florida: No Sixth Amendment “Evolving Standards of Decency”; Rule 3.112 Not Retroactive; Strict Limits on Successive Capital Postconviction Relief Reaffirmed

Date: Aug 22, 2025
Windom v. Florida: No Sixth Amendment “Evolving Standards of Decency”; Rule 3.112 Not Retroactive; Strict Limits on Successive Capital Postconviction Relief Reaffirmed Introduction In Curtis Windom...
Bates v. State of Florida (2025): Florida Supreme Court Re-affirms the Strict Procedural & Temporal Limits on Successive Post-Conviction Relief

Bates v. State of Florida (2025): Florida Supreme Court Re-affirms the Strict Procedural & Temporal Limits on Successive Post-Conviction Relief

Date: Aug 14, 2025
Bates v. State of Florida (2025): Florida Supreme Court Re-affirms the Strict Procedural & Temporal Limits on Successive Post-Conviction Relief 1. Introduction Kayle Barrington Bates’s capital...
Bates v. Florida: Reaffirming Strict Procedural Bars and Narrow Warrant‑Period Rights in Capital Postconviction Practice

Bates v. Florida: Reaffirming Strict Procedural Bars and Narrow Warrant‑Period Rights in Capital Postconviction Practice

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Bates v. Florida: Reaffirming Strict Procedural Bars and Narrow Warrant‑Period Rights in Capital Postconviction Practice Introduction In Kayle B. Bates v. State of Florida and Kayle B. Bates v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert