Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Delaware Case Commentaries

Rule 61 Applied As of Filing Date: Limits on Successive Postconviction Motions (Washington v. State)

Rule 61 Applied As of Filing Date: Limits on Successive Postconviction Motions (Washington v. State)

Date: Apr 23, 2025
Rule 61 Applied As of Filing Date: Limits on Successive Postconviction Motions (Washington v. State) Introduction Washington v. State, decided April 22, 2025 by the Supreme Court of Delaware,...
Ambiguous Post-Closing Waivers Do Not Bar Fraud Claims & Toll Survival Periods by Fraudulent Concealment

Ambiguous Post-Closing Waivers Do Not Bar Fraud Claims & Toll Survival Periods by Fraudulent Concealment

Date: Apr 23, 2025
Ambiguous Post-Closing Waivers Do Not Bar Fraud Claims & Toll Survival Periods by Fraudulent Concealment Introduction In LGM Holdings, LLC v. Gideon Schurder, 290 A.3d 1 (Del. 2025), the Delaware...
Watson v. State: New Precedent on Concealment Evidence in Carrying Concealed Deadly Weapons Charges

Watson v. State: New Precedent on Concealment Evidence in Carrying Concealed Deadly Weapons Charges

Date: Apr 15, 2025
Watson v. State: New Precedent on Concealment Evidence in Carrying Concealed Deadly Weapons Charges Introduction Watson v. State is a 2025 decision of the Supreme Court of Delaware that clarifies the...
The Implied Willfulness Requirement for Disregarding a Police Officer’s Signal

The Implied Willfulness Requirement for Disregarding a Police Officer’s Signal

Date: Apr 15, 2025
The Implied Willfulness Requirement for Disregarding a Police Officer’s Signal Introduction In Waller v. State, 285 A.2d 805 (Del. 2025), the Supreme Court of Delaware addressed the mens rea element...
Kent v. State (Del. 2025): Strategic Impeachment That Backfired Is Not Ineffective Assistance; Child Testimony and Circumstantial Access Sustain Continuous Sexual Abuse Conviction

Kent v. State (Del. 2025): Strategic Impeachment That Backfired Is Not Ineffective Assistance; Child Testimony and Circumstantial Access Sustain Continuous Sexual Abuse Conviction

Date: Apr 1, 2025
Kent v. State (Del. 2025): Strategic Impeachment That Backfired Is Not Ineffective Assistance; Child Testimony and Circumstantial Access Sustain Continuous Sexual Abuse Conviction Introduction In...
Jewell v. State: Delaware Supreme Court mandates Rule 403 balancing for racially charged evidence; harmless-error review applies; and speech-based stalking requires a subjective mens rea

Jewell v. State: Delaware Supreme Court mandates Rule 403 balancing for racially charged evidence; harmless-error review applies; and speech-based stalking requires a subjective mens rea

Date: Apr 1, 2025
Jewell v. State: Rule 403 gatekeeping for racially charged evidence, Chapman harmless-error review, and Counterman-aligned mens rea for speech-based stalking Introduction In Jewell v. State (Del....
Durham v. Grapetree, LLC: Outstanding Document Demands Do Not Stall Approval of a Liquidating Trustee’s Final Distribution; Corporate‑Benefit Fees Unavailable for Waived, Unincurred Attorney Bills

Durham v. Grapetree, LLC: Outstanding Document Demands Do Not Stall Approval of a Liquidating Trustee’s Final Distribution; Corporate‑Benefit Fees Unavailable for Waived, Unincurred Attorney Bills

Date: Mar 26, 2025
Outstanding Document Demands Do Not Stall Approval of a Liquidating Trustee’s Final Distribution; Corporate‑Benefit Fees Unavailable for Waived, Unincurred Attorney Bills Case: Durham v. Grapetree,...
Warncke v. State: Delaware Supreme Court Reaffirms Rule 61(i)(4)’s Former-Adjudication Bar and Strickland’s Prejudice Requirement—No Relief for Failure to Object to Racial-Slur Testimony Absent Outcome-Differential Impact

Warncke v. State: Delaware Supreme Court Reaffirms Rule 61(i)(4)’s Former-Adjudication Bar and Strickland’s Prejudice Requirement—No Relief for Failure to Object to Racial-Slur Testimony Absent Outcome-Differential Impact

Date: Mar 25, 2025
Warncke v. State: Delaware Supreme Court Reaffirms Rule 61(i)(4)’s Former-Adjudication Bar and Strickland’s Prejudice Requirement—No Relief for Failure to Object to Racial-Slur Testimony Absent...
Clarifying Grandparent Third-Party Visitation Under 13 Del. C. § 2412: Evidence and Jurisdictional Standards

Clarifying Grandparent Third-Party Visitation Under 13 Del. C. § 2412: Evidence and Jurisdictional Standards

Date: Mar 25, 2025
Clarifying Grandparent Third-Party Visitation Under 13 Del. C. § 2412: Evidence and Jurisdictional Standards Introduction Burk v. Kurtis (Del. Mar. 24, 2025) presents a landmark delineation of the...
McMahon v. McMahon: Delaware Supreme Court Reinforces Specificity in Defamation Pleadings—“Filing a False Police Report” Is Not, By Itself, a Statutory Crime

McMahon v. McMahon: Delaware Supreme Court Reinforces Specificity in Defamation Pleadings—“Filing a False Police Report” Is Not, By Itself, a Statutory Crime

Date: Mar 25, 2025
McMahon v. McMahon: Delaware Supreme Court Reinforces Specificity in Defamation Pleadings—“Filing a False Police Report” Is Not, By Itself, a Statutory Crime Introduction In McMahon v. McMahon, No....
No Duty Absent Unusual Circumstances: Delaware Supreme Court Holds Disputed Theft Details Are Immaterial in Third‑Party Injury Cases Involving Stolen Vehicles

No Duty Absent Unusual Circumstances: Delaware Supreme Court Holds Disputed Theft Details Are Immaterial in Third‑Party Injury Cases Involving Stolen Vehicles

Date: Mar 20, 2025
No Duty Absent Unusual Circumstances: Delaware Supreme Court Holds Disputed Theft Details Are Immaterial in Third‑Party Injury Cases Involving Stolen Vehicles Introduction In Carroll v. Forewinds...
Affirming Limits on Postconviction Relief: Analyzing Ineffective Assistance and Evidentiary Discrepancies in Davis v. State

Affirming Limits on Postconviction Relief: Analyzing Ineffective Assistance and Evidentiary Discrepancies in Davis v. State

Date: Mar 14, 2025
Affirming Limits on Postconviction Relief: Analyzing Ineffective Assistance and Evidentiary Discrepancies in Davis v. State Introduction The case of Andre Davis v. State of Delaware presents a...
The Adequacy of Writ of Certiorari in Quasi-Judicial Permit Approvals: A New Delaware Precedent

The Adequacy of Writ of Certiorari in Quasi-Judicial Permit Approvals: A New Delaware Precedent

Date: Mar 13, 2025
The Adequacy of Writ of Certiorari in Quasi-Judicial Permit Approvals: A New Delaware Precedent Introduction The recent decision in Citizens Against Solar Pollution et al. v. Kent County, et al.,...
Governor’s Withdrawal Right: A New Precedent on Nominations Under Article III, Section 9 of the Delaware Constitution

Governor’s Withdrawal Right: A New Precedent on Nominations Under Article III, Section 9 of the Delaware Constitution

Date: Mar 11, 2025
Governor’s Withdrawal Right: A New Precedent on Nominations Under Article III, Section 9 of the Delaware Constitution Introduction The Delaware Supreme Court’s recent advisory opinion addresses a...
Sufficiency of DNA Evidence in Establishing Possession: A New Precedent in PFBPP Convictions

Sufficiency of DNA Evidence in Establishing Possession: A New Precedent in PFBPP Convictions

Date: Mar 8, 2025
Sufficiency of DNA Evidence in Establishing Possession: A New Precedent in PFBPP Convictions Introduction The case of William Sawyer v. State of Delaware represents a significant decision by the...
Establishing the “Failure to Plan” Standard in Termination of Parental Rights Cases

Establishing the “Failure to Plan” Standard in Termination of Parental Rights Cases

Date: Mar 7, 2025
Establishing the “Failure to Plan” Standard in Termination of Parental Rights Cases Introduction This Judgment, rendered by the Supreme Court of Delaware on March 4, 2025, addresses a contentious...
Defining Failure to Plan: Affirming Child Welfare and Termination of Parental Rights

Defining Failure to Plan: Affirming Child Welfare and Termination of Parental Rights

Date: Mar 7, 2025
Defining Failure to Plan: Affirming Child Welfare and Termination of Parental Rights Introduction The case of Nadine Morris v. Department of Services for Children, Youth and Their Families/Division...
Reaffirming the Limits of Interlocutory Review in Conflicted Transactions: A New Framework for Applying Section 7.10(b) in Merger Disputes

Reaffirming the Limits of Interlocutory Review in Conflicted Transactions: A New Framework for Applying Section 7.10(b) in Merger Disputes

Date: Mar 1, 2025
Reaffirming the Limits of Interlocutory Review in Conflicted Transactions: A New Framework for Applying Section 7.10(b) in Merger Disputes Introduction The recent decision in American Midstream GP,...
Establishing the Threshold for Termination of Parental Rights: The Failure to Plan under 13 Del. C. § 1103

Establishing the Threshold for Termination of Parental Rights: The Failure to Plan under 13 Del. C. § 1103

Date: Feb 28, 2025
Establishing the Threshold for Termination of Parental Rights: The Failure to Plan under 13 Del. C. § 1103 Introduction In the case of GEORGE FROST and JANE BURTON v. DEPARTMENT OF SERVICES FOR...
Affirming Convictions under Domestic Violence Protective Orders: Clarifying Plain Error and Multiplicity Doctrine Standards

Affirming Convictions under Domestic Violence Protective Orders: Clarifying Plain Error and Multiplicity Doctrine Standards

Date: Feb 25, 2025
Affirming Convictions under Domestic Violence Protective Orders: Clarifying Plain Error and Multiplicity Doctrine Standards Introduction The case of Larry Ross v. State of Delaware presents an...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert