Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Arkansas Case Commentaries

Admitting Non‑Contact Sexualized Conduct Under Arkansas’s Pedophile Exception and Reaffirming Course‑of‑Conduct Nonhearsay: Commentary on Meacham v. State, 2025 Ark. 27

Admitting Non‑Contact Sexualized Conduct Under Arkansas’s Pedophile Exception and Reaffirming Course‑of‑Conduct Nonhearsay: Commentary on Meacham v. State, 2025 Ark. 27

Date: Apr 4, 2025
Admitting Non‑Contact Sexualized Conduct Under Arkansas’s Pedophile Exception and Reaffirming Course‑of‑Conduct Nonhearsay: Commentary on Meacham v. State, 2025 Ark. 27 Introduction In Dean Leroy...
Corroborating an Accomplice with Forensic and Digital Evidence; “Any Person” in First‑Degree Battery Includes Unintended Victims

Corroborating an Accomplice with Forensic and Digital Evidence; “Any Person” in First‑Degree Battery Includes Unintended Victims

Date: Mar 21, 2025
Corroborating an Accomplice with Forensic and Digital Evidence; “Any Person” in First‑Degree Battery Includes Unintended Victims Introduction In Justin Mays v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 25, the...
Affirmation of De Facto Judicial Authority: Establishing the Limits of Oath-of-Office Challenges in Habeas Corpus Petitions

Affirmation of De Facto Judicial Authority: Establishing the Limits of Oath-of-Office Challenges in Habeas Corpus Petitions

Date: Mar 14, 2025
Affirmation of De Facto Judicial Authority: Establishing the Limits of Oath-of-Office Challenges in Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction The case of Rolandis Chatmon v. Dexter Payne, Director,...
Clarifying the Voluntariness Standard: Misrepresentations and Ambiguous Promises in Custodial Interrogations

Clarifying the Voluntariness Standard: Misrepresentations and Ambiguous Promises in Custodial Interrogations

Date: Mar 14, 2025
Clarifying the Voluntariness Standard: Misrepresentations and Ambiguous Promises in Custodial Interrogations Introduction The Supreme Court of Arkansas’s decision in Billy Michael Nelson v. State of...
Electronic Signatures and Facial Validity: Affirming Judicial Efficiency in Habeas Proceedings

Electronic Signatures and Facial Validity: Affirming Judicial Efficiency in Habeas Proceedings

Date: Mar 14, 2025
Electronic Signatures and Facial Validity: Affirming Judicial Efficiency in Habeas Proceedings Introduction In the case of Alvin Dejuan Aikens v. Dexter Payne (2025 Ark. 18), the Supreme Court of...
Clarifying Interrogation Techniques: Distinguishing Misrepresentations from Coercive Promises in Custodial Statements

Clarifying Interrogation Techniques: Distinguishing Misrepresentations from Coercive Promises in Custodial Statements

Date: Mar 14, 2025
Clarifying Interrogation Techniques: Distinguishing Misrepresentations from Coercive Promises in Custodial Statements Introduction The case of Billy Michael Nelson Appellant v. State of Arkansas...
Reaffirming the Mandate Rule’s Binding Authority: Jurisdiction over Collateral Motions and Attorney’s Fee Awards

Reaffirming the Mandate Rule’s Binding Authority: Jurisdiction over Collateral Motions and Attorney’s Fee Awards

Date: Mar 11, 2025
Reaffirming the Mandate Rule’s Binding Authority: Jurisdiction over Collateral Motions and Attorney’s Fee Awards Introduction The case of DONNELL BAUER AND MARILYN BAUER v. JESSE LEE BEAMON, JR. and...
Retention of Trial-Court Jurisdiction Over Collateral Postmandate Motions

Retention of Trial-Court Jurisdiction Over Collateral Postmandate Motions

Date: Mar 7, 2025
Retention of Trial-Court Jurisdiction Over Collateral Postmandate Motions Introduction Donnell and Marilyn Bauer (“the Bauers”) sold real property to Jesse Lee Beamon Jr. and Mary A. Beamon (“the...
Clarifying Jurisdictional Limits on Juror Misconduct Appeals Under Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure–Criminal 2(b)(2)

Clarifying Jurisdictional Limits on Juror Misconduct Appeals Under Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure–Criminal 2(b)(2)

Date: Feb 28, 2025
Clarifying Jurisdictional Limits on Juror Misconduct Appeals Under Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure–Criminal 2(b)(2) Introduction In Eathan Cypert v. State of Arkansas (2025 Ark. 11), the Supreme...
Affirming Substantial Evidence and the Pedophile Exception: A New Precedent in Child Sexual Abuse Trials

Affirming Substantial Evidence and the Pedophile Exception: A New Precedent in Child Sexual Abuse Trials

Date: Feb 19, 2025
Affirming Substantial Evidence and the Pedophile Exception: A New Precedent in Child Sexual Abuse Trials Introduction The Supreme Court of Arkansas in Hunter de la Garza Ppellant v. State of Arkansas...
Substantial Evidence Standard in Child Sexual Exploitation Cases: Affirmation of Convictions in Woods v. State of Arkansas

Substantial Evidence Standard in Child Sexual Exploitation Cases: Affirmation of Convictions in Woods v. State of Arkansas

Date: Feb 19, 2025
Substantial Evidence Standard in Child Sexual Exploitation Cases: Affirmation of Convictions in Woods v. State of Arkansas Introduction In the recent Supreme Court of Arkansas decision, James Woods...
New Insights into Felony-Murder and Aggravated Robbery: The Role of Digital Evidence in CHRIS ALLEN OLIGER v. STATE OF ARKANSAS

New Insights into Felony-Murder and Aggravated Robbery: The Role of Digital Evidence in CHRIS ALLEN OLIGER v. STATE OF ARKANSAS

Date: Feb 18, 2025
New Insights into Felony-Murder and Aggravated Robbery: The Role of Digital Evidence in CHRIS ALLEN OLIGER v. STATE OF ARKANSAS Introduction The case of CHRIS ALLEN OLIGER v. STATE OF ARKANSAS...
Affirmation of Circumstantial Evidence Sufficiency in Child Pornography Convictions: James Woods v. Arkansas

Affirmation of Circumstantial Evidence Sufficiency in Child Pornography Convictions: James Woods v. Arkansas

Date: Feb 14, 2025
Affirmation of Circumstantial Evidence Sufficiency in Child Pornography Convictions: James Woods v. Arkansas Introduction In James Woods v. State of Arkansas (2025 Ark. 9), the Supreme Court of...
Felony-Murder Doctrine Reinforced: Social-Media Evidence and Transactional Unity in Capital Murder

Felony-Murder Doctrine Reinforced: Social-Media Evidence and Transactional Unity in Capital Murder

Date: Feb 14, 2025
Felony-Murder Doctrine Reinforced: Social-Media Evidence and Transactional Unity in Capital Murder Introduction In Chris Allen Oliger v. State of Arkansas (2025 Ark. 8), the Arkansas Supreme Court...
Pedophile Exception Affirmed: Admissibility of Similar Acts and Evidence Sufficiency in Child Rape Cases

Pedophile Exception Affirmed: Admissibility of Similar Acts and Evidence Sufficiency in Child Rape Cases

Date: Feb 14, 2025
Pedophile Exception Affirmed: Admissibility of Similar Acts and Evidence Sufficiency in Child Rape Cases Introduction In Hunter De La Garza v. State of Arkansas (2025 Ark. 10), the Supreme Court of...
Enhancing Judicial Flexibility: Analysis of the Amendment to Administrative Order No. 16 by the Arkansas Supreme Court

Enhancing Judicial Flexibility: Analysis of the Amendment to Administrative Order No. 16 by the Arkansas Supreme Court

Date: Feb 1, 2025
Enhancing Judicial Flexibility: Analysis of the Amendment to Administrative Order No. 16 by the Arkansas Supreme Court Introduction On January 27, 2025, the Supreme Court of Arkansas issued an...
Exchange of Jurisdiction by Joint Order: New Section V in A.O. No. 16

Exchange of Jurisdiction by Joint Order: New Section V in A.O. No. 16

Date: Jan 28, 2025
Exchange of Jurisdiction by Joint Order: New Section V in A.O. No. 16 Introduction In Re Amendment to Administrative Order No. 16 (2025 Ark. 6) represents a procedural refinement by the Supreme Court...
Chief Justice Karen R. Baker Upholds Exclusive Administrative Authority, Reinforcing 'Regnat Populus' Principle

Chief Justice Karen R. Baker Upholds Exclusive Administrative Authority, Reinforcing 'Regnat Populus' Principle

Date: Jan 15, 2025
Chief Justice Karen R. Baker Upholds Exclusive Administrative Authority, Reinforcing 'Regnat Populus' Principle Introduction The recent Order issued by Chief Justice Karen R. Baker on January 8,...
Exclusive Administrative Authority of the Chief Justice Under Amendment 80: “Regnat Populus” Affirmed

Exclusive Administrative Authority of the Chief Justice Under Amendment 80: “Regnat Populus” Affirmed

Date: Jan 9, 2025
Exclusive Administrative Authority of the Chief Justice Under Amendment 80: “Regnat Populus” Affirmed Introduction In In Re Order of Chief Justice Karen R. Baker (2025 Ark. 4), the Arkansas Supreme...
Arkansas Supreme Court Clarifies Retroactive Application of Act 683 in Parole Eligibility Cases

Arkansas Supreme Court Clarifies Retroactive Application of Act 683 in Parole Eligibility Cases

Date: Dec 18, 2024
Arkansas Supreme Court Clarifies Retroactive Application of Act 683 in Parole Eligibility Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Perry Wright Appellant v. Arkansas Post-Prison Transfer Board et...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert