Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Admitting Non‑Contact Sexualized Conduct Under Arkansas’s Pedophile Exception and Reaffirming Course‑of‑Conduct Nonhearsay: Commentary on Meacham v. State, 2025 Ark. 27 Introduction In Dean Leroy...
Corroborating an Accomplice with Forensic and Digital Evidence; “Any Person” in First‑Degree Battery Includes Unintended Victims Introduction In Justin Mays v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 25, the...
Affirmation of De Facto Judicial Authority: Establishing the Limits of Oath-of-Office Challenges in Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction The case of Rolandis Chatmon v. Dexter Payne, Director,...
Clarifying the Voluntariness Standard: Misrepresentations and Ambiguous Promises in Custodial Interrogations Introduction The Supreme Court of Arkansas’s decision in Billy Michael Nelson v. State of...
Electronic Signatures and Facial Validity: Affirming Judicial Efficiency in Habeas Proceedings Introduction In the case of Alvin Dejuan Aikens v. Dexter Payne (2025 Ark. 18), the Supreme Court of...
Clarifying Interrogation Techniques: Distinguishing Misrepresentations from Coercive Promises in Custodial Statements Introduction The case of Billy Michael Nelson Appellant v. State of Arkansas...
Reaffirming the Mandate Rule’s Binding Authority: Jurisdiction over Collateral Motions and Attorney’s Fee Awards Introduction The case of DONNELL BAUER AND MARILYN BAUER v. JESSE LEE BEAMON, JR. and...
Retention of Trial-Court Jurisdiction Over Collateral Postmandate Motions Introduction Donnell and Marilyn Bauer (“the Bauers”) sold real property to Jesse Lee Beamon Jr. and Mary A. Beamon (“the...
Clarifying Jurisdictional Limits on Juror Misconduct Appeals Under Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure–Criminal 2(b)(2) Introduction In Eathan Cypert v. State of Arkansas (2025 Ark. 11), the Supreme...
Affirming Substantial Evidence and the Pedophile Exception: A New Precedent in Child Sexual Abuse Trials Introduction The Supreme Court of Arkansas in Hunter de la Garza Ppellant v. State of Arkansas...
Substantial Evidence Standard in Child Sexual Exploitation Cases: Affirmation of Convictions in Woods v. State of Arkansas Introduction In the recent Supreme Court of Arkansas decision, James Woods...
New Insights into Felony-Murder and Aggravated Robbery: The Role of Digital Evidence in CHRIS ALLEN OLIGER v. STATE OF ARKANSAS Introduction The case of CHRIS ALLEN OLIGER v. STATE OF ARKANSAS...
Affirmation of Circumstantial Evidence Sufficiency in Child Pornography Convictions: James Woods v. Arkansas Introduction In James Woods v. State of Arkansas (2025 Ark. 9), the Supreme Court of...
Felony-Murder Doctrine Reinforced: Social-Media Evidence and Transactional Unity in Capital Murder Introduction In Chris Allen Oliger v. State of Arkansas (2025 Ark. 8), the Arkansas Supreme Court...
Pedophile Exception Affirmed: Admissibility of Similar Acts and Evidence Sufficiency in Child Rape Cases Introduction In Hunter De La Garza v. State of Arkansas (2025 Ark. 10), the Supreme Court of...
Enhancing Judicial Flexibility: Analysis of the Amendment to Administrative Order No. 16 by the Arkansas Supreme Court Introduction On January 27, 2025, the Supreme Court of Arkansas issued an...
Exchange of Jurisdiction by Joint Order: New Section V in A.O. No. 16 Introduction In Re Amendment to Administrative Order No. 16 (2025 Ark. 6) represents a procedural refinement by the Supreme Court...
Chief Justice Karen R. Baker Upholds Exclusive Administrative Authority, Reinforcing 'Regnat Populus' Principle Introduction The recent Order issued by Chief Justice Karen R. Baker on January 8,...
Exclusive Administrative Authority of the Chief Justice Under Amendment 80: “Regnat Populus” Affirmed Introduction In In Re Order of Chief Justice Karen R. Baker (2025 Ark. 4), the Arkansas Supreme...
Arkansas Supreme Court Clarifies Retroactive Application of Act 683 in Parole Eligibility Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Perry Wright Appellant v. Arkansas Post-Prison Transfer Board et...