Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

“Weekly Salary” Means a Week’s Work: Sixth Circuit Clarifies § 541.602’s Salary-Basis Test, Preserves § 541.604(b), and Upholds DOL Authority Post–Loper Bright

“Weekly Salary” Means a Week’s Work: Sixth Circuit Clarifies § 541.602’s Salary-Basis Test, Preserves § 541.604(b), and Upholds DOL Authority Post–Loper Bright

Date: Apr 2, 2025
“Weekly Salary” Means a Week’s Work: Sixth Circuit Clarifies § 541.602’s Salary-Basis Test, Preserves § 541.604(b), and Upholds DOL Authority Post–Loper Bright Introduction In Lynwood Pickens v....
Beyond “Regurgitation”: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Admissibility of Government-Informant Statements Under Rule 801(d)(2)(D) While Affirming Whitmer Kidnapping-Plot Convictions

Beyond “Regurgitation”: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Admissibility of Government-Informant Statements Under Rule 801(d)(2)(D) While Affirming Whitmer Kidnapping-Plot Convictions

Date: Apr 2, 2025
Beyond “Regurgitation”: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Admissibility of Government-Informant Statements Under Rule 801(d)(2)(D) While Affirming Whitmer Kidnapping-Plot Convictions Introduction In United...
No Token Weekly Guarantees: Sixth Circuit Holds “Weekly Basis” Requires Pay for a Full Week’s Work Under the FLSA Salary Test

No Token Weekly Guarantees: Sixth Circuit Holds “Weekly Basis” Requires Pay for a Full Week’s Work Under the FLSA Salary Test

Date: Apr 2, 2025
No Token Weekly Guarantees: Sixth Circuit Holds “Weekly Basis” Requires Pay for a Full Week’s Work Under the FLSA Salary Test Introduction In Lynwood Pickens v. Hamilton-Ryker IT Solutions, LLC, the...
Time-of-Offense Controls ACCA “Serious Drug Offense” Status: Sixth Circuit Applies Brown v. United States in United States v. Wilkes

Time-of-Offense Controls ACCA “Serious Drug Offense” Status: Sixth Circuit Applies Brown v. United States in United States v. Wilkes

Date: Apr 2, 2025
Time-of-Offense Controls ACCA “Serious Drug Offense” Status: Sixth Circuit Applies Brown v. United States in United States v. Wilkes Introduction In United States v. Idris Quintell Wilkes (No....
Clarifying Rule 801(d)(2)(D): Informant Statements Are Government Admissions When Made in Furtherance of Investigative Goals — United States v. Fox (6th Cir. 2025)

Clarifying Rule 801(d)(2)(D): Informant Statements Are Government Admissions When Made in Furtherance of Investigative Goals — United States v. Fox (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Apr 2, 2025
Clarifying Rule 801(d)(2)(D): Informant Statements Are Government Admissions When Made in Furtherance of Investigative Goals — United States v. Fox (6th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v....
Indirect Derivation and No-Loss Requirement Under USSG §2B1.1(b)(17)(A): Sixth Circuit Clarifies “Gross Receipts from a Financial Institution” in United States v. Ross

Indirect Derivation and No-Loss Requirement Under USSG §2B1.1(b)(17)(A): Sixth Circuit Clarifies “Gross Receipts from a Financial Institution” in United States v. Ross

Date: Apr 1, 2025
Indirect Derivation and No-Loss Requirement Under USSG §2B1.1(b)(17)(A): Sixth Circuit Clarifies “Gross Receipts from a Financial Institution” in United States v. Ross Court: U.S. Court of Appeals...
No SSR 96-8p Explanation Required When the RFC Reasonably Harmonizes a Treating Physician’s Cane-and-Balance Opinion (Wilds v. Commissioner of Social Security, 6th Cir. 2025)

No SSR 96-8p Explanation Required When the RFC Reasonably Harmonizes a Treating Physician’s Cane-and-Balance Opinion (Wilds v. Commissioner of Social Security, 6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Apr 1, 2025
No SSR 96-8p Explanation Required When the RFC Reasonably Harmonizes a Treating Physician’s Cane-and-Balance Opinion Arthur Wilds v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 24-5504 (6th Cir. Mar. 31,...
Sixth Circuit Confirms No Jurisdiction to Review BIA’s Discretionary Denial of Sua Sponte Reopening Absent Legal Error

Sixth Circuit Confirms No Jurisdiction to Review BIA’s Discretionary Denial of Sua Sponte Reopening Absent Legal Error

Date: Apr 1, 2025
Sixth Circuit Confirms No Jurisdiction to Review BIA’s Discretionary Denial of Sua Sponte Reopening Absent Legal Error Case: Mahesh Amrutbhai Patel v. Pamela Bondi Court: United States Court of...
Bright-Line 75% Safe Harbor Confirmed; Proof of Original Taxability Required: The Sixth Circuit’s Framework for § 4052(f) in Fitzgerald Truck Parts & Sales LLC v. United States

Bright-Line 75% Safe Harbor Confirmed; Proof of Original Taxability Required: The Sixth Circuit’s Framework for § 4052(f) in Fitzgerald Truck Parts & Sales LLC v. United States

Date: Apr 1, 2025
Bright-Line 75% Safe Harbor Confirmed; Proof of Original Taxability Required: The Sixth Circuit’s Framework for § 4052(f) Introduction In Fitzgerald Truck Parts & Sales, LLC v. United States (6th...
No Pre‑Enforcement Challenge to § 922(g)(1) on Direct Appeal of a Different Conviction; Plain‑Error Barrier to Bruen Attacks on § 5861(d)

No Pre‑Enforcement Challenge to § 922(g)(1) on Direct Appeal of a Different Conviction; Plain‑Error Barrier to Bruen Attacks on § 5861(d)

Date: Apr 1, 2025
No Pre‑Enforcement Challenge to § 922(g)(1) on Direct Appeal of a Different Conviction; Plain‑Error Barrier to Bruen Attacks on § 5861(d) Introduction In United States v. Drew Miller, No. 24-3254...
Post–Loper Bright and Wilkinson, the Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Monreal-Aguinaga and Treats “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” as a Deferential Mixed Question: Commentary on Ceniceros v. Bondi

Post–Loper Bright and Wilkinson, the Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Monreal-Aguinaga and Treats “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” as a Deferential Mixed Question: Commentary on Ceniceros v. Bondi

Date: Apr 1, 2025
Post–Loper Bright and Wilkinson, the Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Monreal-Aguinaga and Treats “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” as a Deferential Mixed Question: Commentary on Ceniceros v. Bondi...
Coded Language and Interlocking Contacts Suffice to Prove Knowing Participation Beyond a Buyer–Seller Relationship in Drug Conspiracies

Coded Language and Interlocking Contacts Suffice to Prove Knowing Participation Beyond a Buyer–Seller Relationship in Drug Conspiracies

Date: Apr 1, 2025
Coded Language and Interlocking Contacts Suffice to Prove Knowing Participation Beyond a Buyer–Seller Relationship in Drug Conspiracies Case: United States v. Damarquecio Tate, No. 24-5687 (6th Cir....
Proximity Is Not Enough: Sixth Circuit Requires Clear Predicate Felony and Nexus to Apply §2K2.1(b)(6)(B) Enhancement

Proximity Is Not Enough: Sixth Circuit Requires Clear Predicate Felony and Nexus to Apply §2K2.1(b)(6)(B) Enhancement

Date: Apr 1, 2025
Proximity Is Not Enough: Sixth Circuit Requires Clear Predicate Felony and Nexus to Apply §2K2.1(b)(6)(B) Enhancement Case: United States v. Guanterio Logan, No. 24-3264 (6th Cir. Mar. 31, 2025) (not...
Paper Hearings Suffice: Sixth Circuit Confirms FCA § 3730(c)(2)(A) “Hearing” May Be Satisfied by Written Submissions and Reaffirms Broad DOJ Discretion to Intervene and Dismiss

Paper Hearings Suffice: Sixth Circuit Confirms FCA § 3730(c)(2)(A) “Hearing” May Be Satisfied by Written Submissions and Reaffirms Broad DOJ Discretion to Intervene and Dismiss

Date: Apr 1, 2025
Paper Hearings Suffice: Sixth Circuit Confirms FCA § 3730(c)(2)(A) “Hearing” May Be Satisfied by Written Submissions and Reaffirms Broad DOJ Discretion to Intervene and Dismiss Introduction In U.S....
Statutory Surplus Claim Procedures Preclude Fifth Amendment Takings Claims in Tax Foreclosure

Statutory Surplus Claim Procedures Preclude Fifth Amendment Takings Claims in Tax Foreclosure

Date: Mar 29, 2025
Statutory Surplus Claim Procedures Preclude Fifth Amendment Takings Claims in Tax Foreclosure Introduction Faytima Howard v. Macomb County, Mich. arises from a dispute over the disposition of surplus...
No Individual-Capacity Damages Under RLUIPA After Tanzin: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Spending Clause Clear-Statement Rule and Clarifies Redressability for Prison Diet Claims

No Individual-Capacity Damages Under RLUIPA After Tanzin: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Spending Clause Clear-Statement Rule and Clarifies Redressability for Prison Diet Claims

Date: Mar 29, 2025
No Individual-Capacity Damages Under RLUIPA After Tanzin: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Spending Clause Clear-Statement Rule and Clarifies Redressability for Prison Diet Claims Introduction This published...
Timeliness Alone Does Not Compel Substitution: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Adequate Inquiry and “Total Breakdown” Standard for Denying New Counsel at Sentencing

Timeliness Alone Does Not Compel Substitution: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Adequate Inquiry and “Total Breakdown” Standard for Denying New Counsel at Sentencing

Date: Mar 28, 2025
Timeliness Alone Does Not Compel Substitution: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Adequate Inquiry and “Total Breakdown” Standard for Denying New Counsel at Sentencing Introduction In United States v. Joshua...
Completion of a Short Revocation Sentence Without Ongoing Supervision Renders Sentencing Appeal Moot Absent Concrete Collateral Consequences

Completion of a Short Revocation Sentence Without Ongoing Supervision Renders Sentencing Appeal Moot Absent Concrete Collateral Consequences

Date: Mar 28, 2025
Completion of a Short Revocation Sentence Without Ongoing Supervision Renders Sentencing Appeal Moot Absent Concrete Collateral Consequences Case: United States v. Michael Avant, No. 24-4007 (6th...
No Inference from Fifth Amendment Invocation: Sixth Circuit Narrows Proffer-Waiver “Inconsistency” and Reverses Conviction in United States v. Grogan

No Inference from Fifth Amendment Invocation: Sixth Circuit Narrows Proffer-Waiver “Inconsistency” and Reverses Conviction in United States v. Grogan

Date: Mar 28, 2025
No Inference from Fifth Amendment Invocation: Sixth Circuit Narrows Proffer-Waiver “Inconsistency” and Reverses Conviction in United States v. Grogan Introduction In United States v. Grogan, No....
Clarifying ADA Coverage: Temporary, Minor Illnesses and Reasonable Accommodation Obligations (Paul Cook v. Warren Screw Products)

Clarifying ADA Coverage: Temporary, Minor Illnesses and Reasonable Accommodation Obligations (Paul Cook v. Warren Screw Products)

Date: Mar 28, 2025
Clarifying ADA Coverage: Temporary, Minor Illnesses and Reasonable Accommodation Obligations Introduction Paul Cook v. Warren Screw Products, Inc. is a Sixth Circuit decision issued on March 27,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert