Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Fixing “Child” Status at the Immigration Judge’s Decision: The Sixth Circuit’s Post‑Loper Bright Approach to INA § 1229b(b)(1)(D) in Perez‑Perez v. Bondi

Fixing “Child” Status at the Immigration Judge’s Decision: The Sixth Circuit’s Post‑Loper Bright Approach to INA § 1229b(b)(1)(D) in Perez‑Perez v. Bondi

Date: Nov 23, 2025
Fixing “Child” Status at the Immigration Judge’s Decision: The Sixth Circuit’s Post‑Loper Bright Approach to INA § 1229b(b)(1)(D) in Perez‑Perez v. Bondi I. Introduction In Roderico Filadelfo...
Affirmative Disclosure, Not Mere Plea: The Sixth Circuit Reaffirms the “Tell-All” Requirement for Safety‑Valve Relief Under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(5)

Affirmative Disclosure, Not Mere Plea: The Sixth Circuit Reaffirms the “Tell-All” Requirement for Safety‑Valve Relief Under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(5)

Date: Nov 23, 2025
Affirmative Disclosure, Not Mere Plea: The Sixth Circuit Reaffirms the “Tell-All” Requirement for Safety‑Valve Relief Under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(5) I. Introduction In United States v. William Hartson,...
True‑but‑Selective Reports, Honest Belief, and Cat’s Paw Liability: Commentary on Gray v. State Farm

True‑but‑Selective Reports, Honest Belief, and Cat’s Paw Liability: Commentary on Gray v. State Farm

Date: Nov 22, 2025
True‑but‑Selective Reports, Honest Belief, and Cat’s Paw Liability in ADA Retaliation: Commentary on Monica Gray v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. I. Introduction This published Sixth...
Emotional Distress, Irreparable Harm, and Asset Freezes: Commentary on Shangrila Partnership v. Lemos

Emotional Distress, Irreparable Harm, and Asset Freezes: Commentary on Shangrila Partnership v. Lemos

Date: Nov 22, 2025
Emotional Distress Alone Is Not Irreparable Harm, and Asset Freezes Are Limited: A Commentary on Shangrila Partnership v. Lemos I. Introduction A. The Dispute in Context This case arises from a...

        Snitch-Shaming on Social Media as Obstruction of Justice:
        A Commentary on United States v. Bradley Scott Heard (6th Cir. 2025)

Snitch-Shaming on Social Media as Obstruction of Justice: A Commentary on United States v. Bradley Scott Heard (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 22, 2025
Snitch-Shaming on Social Media as Obstruction of Justice: United States v. Heard and the Reach of U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 I. Introduction In United States v. Bradley Scott Heard, No. 24‑1778 (6th Cir. Nov....
United States v. Barnett: Intertwined § 3553(a) Analysis as Adequate Explanation for Consecutive Sentences

United States v. Barnett: Intertwined § 3553(a) Analysis as Adequate Explanation for Consecutive Sentences

Date: Nov 22, 2025
United States v. Barnett: Intertwined § 3553(a) Analysis as Adequate Explanation for Consecutive Federal Sentences I. Introduction In United States v. Chase Allen Barnett, the United States Court of...
Seriousness of the Offense and Guideline Disparities as a “Sound Reason” to Reject Rule 11(c)(1)(C) Plea Agreements: Commentary on United States v. Lanier (6th Cir. 2025)

Seriousness of the Offense and Guideline Disparities as a “Sound Reason” to Reject Rule 11(c)(1)(C) Plea Agreements: Commentary on United States v. Lanier (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 22, 2025
Seriousness of the Offense and Guideline Disparities as a “Sound Reason” to Reject Rule 11(c)(1)(C) Plea Agreements: Commentary on United States v. Lanier (6th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction In United...
Good-Faith Reliance and the “Minimal Nexus” Standard for Cell Phone Warrants in the Sixth Circuit: Commentary on United States v. Tanzil

Good-Faith Reliance and the “Minimal Nexus” Standard for Cell Phone Warrants in the Sixth Circuit: Commentary on United States v. Tanzil

Date: Nov 22, 2025
Good-Faith Reliance and the “Minimal Nexus” Standard for Cell Phone Warrants in the Sixth Circuit: Commentary on United States v. Jameel Anthony Dion Tanzil I. Introduction United States v. Tanzil,...
United States v. Black: Oral AVAA Restitution, Mislabelled Written Judgments, and Plain-Error Review of Child-Pornography Restitution

United States v. Black: Oral AVAA Restitution, Mislabelled Written Judgments, and Plain-Error Review of Child-Pornography Restitution

Date: Nov 22, 2025
United States v. Black: Oral AVAA Restitution, Mislabelled Written Judgments, and Plain-Error Review of Child-Pornography Restitution I. Introduction In United States v. Richard Roy Black, No....
No Property Interest in Zoning‑Violative Uses and No Seizure from Stop‑Work Orders: Commentary on Lamb v. Crofoot

No Property Interest in Zoning‑Violative Uses and No Seizure from Stop‑Work Orders: Commentary on Lamb v. Crofoot

Date: Nov 21, 2025
No Property Interest in Zoning‑Violative Uses and No Fourth Amendment Seizure from Stop‑Work Orders: A Comprehensive Commentary on Lamb v. Crofoot I. Introduction This commentary analyzes the Sixth...
Observed Trash Pulls, Digital Evidence, and the Nexus Requirement: A Commentary on United States v. Hawkins (6th Cir. 2025)

Observed Trash Pulls, Digital Evidence, and the Nexus Requirement: A Commentary on United States v. Hawkins (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 21, 2025
Observed Trash Pulls, Digital Evidence, and the Nexus Requirement: A Commentary on United States v. Hawkins (6th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction United States v. Shedrick Hawkins, No. 24-3839 (6th Cir....
Totality of Circumstances and Second Volleys of Deadly Force: Commentary on Romero v. City of Lansing (6th Cir. 2025)

Totality of Circumstances and Second Volleys of Deadly Force: Commentary on Romero v. City of Lansing (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Totality of Circumstances and Second Volleys of Deadly Force: Romero v. City of Lansing and the Limits of Qualified Immunity at the Pleading Stage I. Introduction In Ashly Romero v. City of Lansing,...
Deliberate Indifference, SACWIS Records, and State‑Created Danger: The Sixth Circuit’s Refinement of Social Worker Liability in R.S. v. Lucas County Children Services

Deliberate Indifference, SACWIS Records, and State‑Created Danger: The Sixth Circuit’s Refinement of Social Worker Liability in R.S. v. Lucas County Children Services

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Deliberate Indifference, SACWIS Records, and State‑Created Danger: The Sixth Circuit’s Refinement of Social Worker Liability in R.S. v. Lucas County Children Services I. Introduction This commentary...
United States v. Karasarides & DiPietro: Sixth Circuit Clarifies “Affirmative Acts” for Tax Evasion and Sentencing Duties in Complex Cash-Based Schemes

United States v. Karasarides & DiPietro: Sixth Circuit Clarifies “Affirmative Acts” for Tax Evasion and Sentencing Duties in Complex Cash-Based Schemes

Date: Nov 20, 2025
United States v. Karasarides & DiPietro: Sixth Circuit Clarifies “Affirmative Acts” for Tax Evasion and Sentencing Duties in Complex Cash-Based Schemes I. Introduction In United States v. Christos...
Affirmative Acts, Joint Trials, and Tax-Loss Estimation: The Sixth Circuit Refines Federal Tax Evasion and Sentencing Doctrine in United States v. Karasarides & DiPietro

Affirmative Acts, Joint Trials, and Tax-Loss Estimation: The Sixth Circuit Refines Federal Tax Evasion and Sentencing Doctrine in United States v. Karasarides & DiPietro

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Affirmative Acts, Joint Trials, and Tax-Loss Estimation: The Sixth Circuit Refines Federal Tax Evasion and Sentencing Doctrine in United States v. Karasarides & DiPietro I. Introduction This...
Deferential Review of “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” and No Consolidation of Pending Motions to Reopen: Cruz‑Lopez v. Bondi (6th Cir. 2025)

Deferential Review of “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” and No Consolidation of Pending Motions to Reopen: Cruz‑Lopez v. Bondi (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Deferential Review of “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” and No Consolidation of Pending Motions to Reopen: Cruz‑Lopez v. Bondi (6th Cir. 2025) Introduction In Jovita Cruz‑Lopez v. Pamela...
Reaffirming the “Zone of Choice” in Social Security Cases: ALJ’s Global Record Statement Suffices for Combined-Impacts Review and Omission of Nonfunctional Lab Results Is Not Error

Reaffirming the “Zone of Choice” in Social Security Cases: ALJ’s Global Record Statement Suffices for Combined-Impacts Review and Omission of Nonfunctional Lab Results Is Not Error

Date: Nov 16, 2025
Reaffirming the “Zone of Choice” in Social Security Cases: ALJ’s Global Record Statement Suffices for Combined-Impacts Review and Omission of Nonfunctional Lab Results Is Not Error Introduction This...
No Final Decision, No Federal Case: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Finality for Land‑Use and RLUIPA Claims; Code‑Enforcement Threats Are Not “Threats of Force” Under the FACE Act

No Final Decision, No Federal Case: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Finality for Land‑Use and RLUIPA Claims; Code‑Enforcement Threats Are Not “Threats of Force” Under the FACE Act

Date: Nov 16, 2025
No Final Decision, No Federal Case: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Finality for Land‑Use and RLUIPA Claims; Code‑Enforcement Threats Are Not “Threats of Force” Under the FACE Act Introduction In Daniel...
No Presumption of Vindictiveness from Speedy Trial Act Dismissal; Modus Operandi Joinder Upheld; Flight After Superseding Indictment Admissible — United States v. Conley (6th Cir. 2025)

No Presumption of Vindictiveness from Speedy Trial Act Dismissal; Modus Operandi Joinder Upheld; Flight After Superseding Indictment Admissible — United States v. Conley (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 16, 2025
No Presumption of Vindictiveness from Speedy Trial Act Dismissal; Modus Operandi Joinder Upheld; Flight After Superseding Indictment Admissible Case: United States v. Bryan Douglas Conley, No....
“Involves Possession” Does Not Require Personal Possession: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Grade A Violations Under USSG §7B1.1 in United States v. Keno Lane

“Involves Possession” Does Not Require Personal Possession: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Grade A Violations Under USSG §7B1.1 in United States v. Keno Lane

Date: Nov 16, 2025
“Involves Possession” Does Not Require Personal Possession: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Grade A Violations Under USSG §7B1.1 in United States v. Keno Lane Introduction This commentary examines the Sixth...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert