Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Clear-and-Unequivocal Reliance Disclaimers and “Alarm-Meeting” Accrual for Texas Fraud Claims in Private Placement Investments

Clear-and-Unequivocal Reliance Disclaimers and “Alarm-Meeting” Accrual for Texas Fraud Claims in Private Placement Investments

Date: Jan 12, 2026
Clear-and-Unequivocal Reliance Disclaimers and “Alarm-Meeting” Accrual for Texas Fraud Claims in Private Placement Investments I. Introduction In Pastrana v. Bestrenewedoil (arising from In the...
Texas Sexual Assault of a Child (Tex. Penal Code § 22.011(a)(2)) Is a SORNA Tier I Predicate Under the Categorical Approach

Texas Sexual Assault of a Child (Tex. Penal Code § 22.011(a)(2)) Is a SORNA Tier I Predicate Under the Categorical Approach

Date: Jan 11, 2026
Texas Sexual Assault of a Child (Tex. Penal Code § 22.011(a)(2)) Is a SORNA Tier I Predicate Under the Categorical Approach I. Introduction United States v. Quintanilla-Matamoros (5th Cir. Jan. 9,...
Harmless-Error Rule for Conclusory Paragraph C “Marginal Adjustment” Findings When Supported Elsewhere in the ALJ Decision

Harmless-Error Rule for Conclusory Paragraph C “Marginal Adjustment” Findings When Supported Elsewhere in the ALJ Decision

Date: Jan 11, 2026
Harmless-Error Rule for Conclusory Paragraph C “Marginal Adjustment” Findings When Supported Elsewhere in the ALJ Decision 1. Introduction Laird v. Bisignano (5th Cir. Jan. 8, 2026) is a Social...
§ 2S1.1(a)(1) Applies When Laundered Funds Derive from a Drug-Conspiracy and the Drug Offense Level Can Be Approximated by Converting Cash to Drug Quantity Using Reliable, Wholesale Pricing

§ 2S1.1(a)(1) Applies When Laundered Funds Derive from a Drug-Conspiracy and the Drug Offense Level Can Be Approximated by Converting Cash to Drug Quantity Using Reliable, Wholesale Pricing

Date: Jan 11, 2026
§ 2S1.1(a)(1) Applies When Laundered Funds Derive from a Drug-Conspiracy and the Drug Offense Level Can Be Approximated by Converting Cash to Drug Quantity Using Reliable, Wholesale Pricing Case:...
Specific Field Evidence and Reasoned Credibility Findings Sustain RMA “Good Farming Practices” Denials Under APA Review

Specific Field Evidence and Reasoned Credibility Findings Sustain RMA “Good Farming Practices” Denials Under APA Review

Date: Jan 11, 2026
Specific Field Evidence and Reasoned Credibility Findings Sustain RMA “Good Farming Practices” Denials Under APA Review 1. Introduction In Miller v. Federal Crop (5th Cir. Jan. 8, 2026) (per curiam,...
Berryman v. Huffman — AEDPA Deference Permits (at Least on Habeas Review) a Count-by-Count Speedy-Trial Remedy; Fifth Circuit Issues Rule 47.6 Summary Affirmance and Withdraws Prior Published Opinion

Berryman v. Huffman — AEDPA Deference Permits (at Least on Habeas Review) a Count-by-Count Speedy-Trial Remedy; Fifth Circuit Issues Rule 47.6 Summary Affirmance and Withdraws Prior Published Opinion

Date: Jan 10, 2026
AEDPA Deference Permits (at Least on Habeas Review) a Count-by-Count Speedy-Trial Remedy; Fifth Circuit Issues Rule 47.6 Summary Affirmance and Withdraws Prior Published Opinion Case: Berryman v....
United States v. Johnson: Romantic Partner Presence Alone Does Not Justify a Michigan v. Long Vehicle Protective Sweep

United States v. Johnson: Romantic Partner Presence Alone Does Not Justify a Michigan v. Long Vehicle Protective Sweep

Date: Jan 10, 2026
United States v. Johnson: Romantic Partner Presence Alone Does Not Justify a Michigan v. Long Vehicle Protective Sweep 1. Introduction In United States v. Johnson (5th Cir. Jan. 7, 2026), the Fifth...
Perdomo v. City of League City: Body-Camera Video May Defeat Pleadings and Support Qualified Immunity at Rule 12(b)(6) After a Split-Second Takedown

Perdomo v. City of League City: Body-Camera Video May Defeat Pleadings and Support Qualified Immunity at Rule 12(b)(6) After a Split-Second Takedown

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Perdomo v. City of League City: Body-Camera Video May Defeat Pleadings and Support Qualified Immunity at Rule 12(b)(6) After a Split-Second Takedown 1. Introduction Perdomo v. City of League City,...
Lewis v. Delgado: Brief Handcuffing in a High-Risk Stop Does Not Defeat Qualified Immunity Absent Closely Analogous Clearly Established Law—Even with Alleged Notice of Medical Vulnerability

Lewis v. Delgado: Brief Handcuffing in a High-Risk Stop Does Not Defeat Qualified Immunity Absent Closely Analogous Clearly Established Law—Even with Alleged Notice of Medical Vulnerability

Date: Jan 9, 2026
Lewis v. Delgado: Brief Handcuffing in a High-Risk Stop Does Not Defeat Qualified Immunity Absent Closely Analogous Clearly Established Law—Even with Alleged Notice of Medical Vulnerability 1....
Pre-Deprivation Notice Required for Rule 11 Sanctions; § 1927 Does Not Reach Initial Pleadings Absent “Multiplying Proceedings”

Pre-Deprivation Notice Required for Rule 11 Sanctions; § 1927 Does Not Reach Initial Pleadings Absent “Multiplying Proceedings”

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Pre-Deprivation Notice Required for Rule 11 Sanctions; § 1927 Does Not Reach Initial Pleadings Absent “Multiplying Proceedings” Introduction Fletcher v. Experian Info Solutions (5th Cir. Jan. 6,...
No Clearly Established Supervisory Duty to Oversee Officers on Private Paid Details; Pattern-or-No-Training Required to Defeat Qualified Immunity in § 1983 Supervision/Training/Discipline Claims (Hankins v. Martin)

No Clearly Established Supervisory Duty to Oversee Officers on Private Paid Details; Pattern-or-No-Training Required to Defeat Qualified Immunity in § 1983 Supervision/Training/Discipline Claims (Hankins v. Martin)

Date: Jan 8, 2026
No Clearly Established Supervisory Duty to Oversee Officers on Private Paid Details; Pattern-or-No-Training Required to Defeat Qualified Immunity in § 1983 Supervision/Training/Discipline Claims...
Vacatur-and-Replacement Judgments Reset the Appeal Clock (Not a Rule 60(a) Correction) — Frey v. Health Mgmt Systems

Vacatur-and-Replacement Judgments Reset the Appeal Clock (Not a Rule 60(a) Correction) — Frey v. Health Mgmt Systems

Date: Jan 8, 2026
Vacatur-and-Replacement Judgments Reset the Appeal Clock (Not a Rule 60(a) Correction) — Frey v. Health Mgmt Systems I. Introduction Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Date:...
Harmless-Error Affirmance Despite § 875(c) Indictment Omitting Subjective Mens Rea When the Record Establishes Recklessness/Knowledge and a “True Threat” in Context

Harmless-Error Affirmance Despite § 875(c) Indictment Omitting Subjective Mens Rea When the Record Establishes Recklessness/Knowledge and a “True Threat” in Context

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Harmless-Error Affirmance Despite § 875(c) Indictment Omitting Subjective Mens Rea When the Record Establishes Recklessness/Knowledge and a “True Threat” in Context I. Introduction Case: United...
Rule 60(b)(5) Vacatur of § 1988 Fees After Jurisdictional Vacatur of Merits Relief (No Separate Fee Appeal Required)

Rule 60(b)(5) Vacatur of § 1988 Fees After Jurisdictional Vacatur of Merits Relief (No Separate Fee Appeal Required)

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Rule 60(b)(5) Vacatur of § 1988 Fees After Jurisdictional Vacatur of Merits Relief (No Separate Fee Appeal Required) Case: Pool v. City of Houston, No. 24-20138 (5th Cir. Jan. 2, 2026) Court: United...
Trahant v. Official Committee: No Appellate Divestiture from a Non-Final Contempt Finding; No Implied Interlocutory Leave under Rule 8004(d); Prophylactic Committee Removal Is Not a Sanction

Trahant v. Official Committee: No Appellate Divestiture from a Non-Final Contempt Finding; No Implied Interlocutory Leave under Rule 8004(d); Prophylactic Committee Removal Is Not a Sanction

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Trahant v. Official Committee: No Appellate Divestiture from a Non-Final Contempt Finding; No Implied Interlocutory Leave under Rule 8004(d); Prophylactic Committee Removal Is Not a Sanction Court:...
Partial Sovereign-Immunity Denials Are Immediately Appealable; Ex parte Young “Enforcement” Turns on Concrete Statutory Duties (Not Referral, Guidance, or Texas AG Criminal-Prosecution Assertions)

Partial Sovereign-Immunity Denials Are Immediately Appealable; Ex parte Young “Enforcement” Turns on Concrete Statutory Duties (Not Referral, Guidance, or Texas AG Criminal-Prosecution Assertions)

Date: Jan 7, 2026
Partial Sovereign-Immunity Denials Are Immediately Appealable; Ex parte Young “Enforcement” Turns on Concrete Statutory Duties (Not Referral, Guidance, or Texas AG Criminal-Prosecution Assertions) I....
Quiroz v. Hernandez — Futility of Repleading, No Relation-Back for Newly Added Defendants, and Jurisdictional Bars to Victim Suits Challenging Prosecution Decisions

Quiroz v. Hernandez — Futility of Repleading, No Relation-Back for Newly Added Defendants, and Jurisdictional Bars to Victim Suits Challenging Prosecution Decisions

Date: Jan 5, 2026
Quiroz v. Hernandez — Futility of Repleading, No Relation-Back for Newly Added Defendants, and Jurisdictional Bars to Victim Suits Challenging Prosecution Decisions Court: United States Court of...
Partial Sovereign-Immunity Denials Are Immediately Appealable; Ex parte Young Turns on Specific Statutory Enforcement (Not Referrals or General Oversight)

Partial Sovereign-Immunity Denials Are Immediately Appealable; Ex parte Young Turns on Specific Statutory Enforcement (Not Referrals or General Oversight)

Date: Jan 5, 2026
Partial Sovereign-Immunity Denials Are Immediately Appealable; Ex parte Young Turns on Specific Statutory Enforcement (Not Referrals or General Oversight) Case: OCA-Greater Houston v. Nelson...
Interlocutory Review and Ex parte Young “Enforcement” in Texas Election-Law Challenges

Interlocutory Review and Ex parte Young “Enforcement” in Texas Election-Law Challenges

Date: Jan 5, 2026
Partial Sovereign-Immunity Denials Are Immediately Appealable; Ex parte Young Turns on Concrete “Enforcement” Functions (Not Mere Referrals or General Oversight) Case: La Union del Pueblo Entero; et...
Stay-and-Deferral Orders Pending Heck/Conviction Status Are Not Immediately Appealable Under § 1291 or the Collateral-Order Doctrine

Stay-and-Deferral Orders Pending Heck/Conviction Status Are Not Immediately Appealable Under § 1291 or the Collateral-Order Doctrine

Date: Jan 2, 2026
Stay-and-Deferral Orders Pending Heck/Conviction Status Are Not Immediately Appealable Under § 1291 or the Collateral-Order Doctrine I. Introduction In Jew v. Dobbins (5th Cir. Dec. 30, 2025) (per...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert